This is the Jira ticket I opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18644 a long time ago :)
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> @Robert what's the state here?
>
> On 24/06/2019 16:16, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
>
is also eliminates need for any special
> editor
> > /
> > >> checkstyle configs as the code formatting is part of the build itself.
> > >>
> > >> The one Beam uses is https://github.com/diffplug/spotless with
> > >> GoogleJavaFormat, it may be wort
Thanks for your summary Becket.
Your list of items makes sense to me.
I wonder if we should start working on some project Bylaws to write down
how we want to work together. I really like your thoughts around "sticking
to the process" to make us more efficient and approachable for new
contributors.
+1 to create a repo.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:10 AM Konstantin Knauf
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> in the course of implementing FLIP-42 we are currently reworking the
> Getting Started section of our documentation. As part of this, we are
> adding docker-compose-based playgrounds to get started w
Thank you Becket for kicking off this discussion and creating a draft in
the Wiki.
I left some comments in the wiki.
In my understanding this means, that a committer always needs a review and
> +1 from another committer. As far as I know this is currently not always
> the case (often committer au
> > > > "docs" but under "flink-quickstart" or so?
> > > > > > Would that be equally cumbersome for users?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Stephan
> > > > > >
> >
The repo creation was faster than expected:
https://github.com/apache/flink-playgrounds (it's not even listed here yet:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf)
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:55 AM Robert Metzger wrote:
> I will request the repo now, so that you can continue workin
hesnay Schepler
wrote:
> Wouldn't this qualify for releasing snapshot artifacts to users? (Which,
> you know, shouldn't be done?)
>
> On 12/07/2019 11:55, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > I will request the repo now, so that you can continue working on the
> > document
I have received one review for the PR so far.
I'll merge it in the next 24 hours unless there's further feedback.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:04 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> I've converted the google document into a markdown-based pull request
> here: https://github.com/apac
As always, thank you for putting these nice summaries together!
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:34 PM Konstantin Knauf
wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> happy to share this weeks community update with Apache Flink 1.9, bylaws
> for Apache Flink, Savepoints vs Checkpoints, Flink on ARM, and more.
>
> As alw
ebsite, we can ask Apache
> infra team to prepare the VM for us, as that may also take some time.
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:57 PM Robert Metzger
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> quick update on this project: The frontend and backend code have been put
>> toge
Hi all,
I'm excited to announce that Jiangjie (Becket) Qin just became a Flink
committer!
Congratulations Becket!
Best,
Robert (on behalf of the Flink PMC)
Hi all,
The permissions for the FLINK Jira project have been changed [1], to *only
allow committers and PMC members to assign somebody to a Jira ticket.*
Anybody with a Jira account can be assigned to a ticket. There is no need
for "Contributor" permissions.
This has been discussed in this maili
them
to my announcement.
What do you think?
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed570c7110b7b55b5c3bd52bb61ff35d5bda88f47939d8e7f1844c4@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:21 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> This is the Jira ticket I opened
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
d the email to the user@ list.
It is okay for me if you do that :)
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:47 PM Bowen Li wrote:
> shall we announce in user ML too? Users who are used to assign tickets to
> themselves should also be aware of this change
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 3:06 AM Robert
t; > > may have to bite the bullet and click 600 times in a row :)
>>> > >
>>> > > On 18/07/2019 12:32, Zili Chen wrote:
>>> > > > Robert,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks for your effort. Rejecting contributor permission request
>>> > >
rd -> pull request
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -
> > >>>>>> Re: Chesnay
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The emeritus stuff seems like unnecessary noise.
> &
Hey all,
We've added another committer to the Flink project: Zhijiang Wang.
Congratulations Zhijiang!
Best,
Robert
(on behalf of the Flink PMC)
+1
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:27 AM Biao Liu wrote:
> +1, make sense to me.
> Mailing list seems to be a more "community" way.
>
> Timo Walther 于2019年7月22日周一 下午4:06写道：
>
> > +1 sounds good to inform people about instabilities or other issues
> >
> > Regards,
> > Timo
> >
> >
> > Am 22.07.19 um
off to you and Daryl — this turned out amazing!
>>>
>>> Marta
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:57 AM Congxian Qiu
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Robert and Daryl, thanks for the great work, I tried the website and
>>> filed
>&
Hi all,
On behalf of the Flink PMC, I'm happy to announce that Kete Young is now
part of the Apache Flink Project Management Committee (PMC).
Kete has been a committer since February 2017, working a lot on Table API /
SQL. He's currently co-managing the 1.9 release! Thanks a lot for your work
for
> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:59 PM Hequn Cheng
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jark,
> >>
> >> Good idea. +1!
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:23 PM Jark Wu wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thank you all for your positiv
I've requested the creation of the list, and made Jark, Chesnay and me
moderators of it.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:12 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> @Jark: Yes, I will request the creation of a mailing list!
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:48 PM Hugo Louro wrote:
>
>> +1
>
The mailing list has been created, you can now subscribe to it.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jark Wu wrote:
> Thanks Robert for helping out that.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 19:16, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> > I've requested the creation of
The bot now warns if a pull request has been linked to an unassigned Jira
ticket. (It also puts a warning if no docs, no zh-docs have been touched,
or if a pom.xml file has been touched)
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 3:11 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> I will add such a feature to the bot!
>
&g
> > > >>
> > > > >> It is super easy to use for contributors as they don't need to
> keep
> > > any
> > > > >> particular coding style in mind and they can only focus on
> > > functionality
> > > > >> they want t
Congratulations!
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:09 PM highfei2...@126.com
wrote:
> Congrats Hequn!
>
> Best,
> Jeff Yang
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hequn becomes a Flink committer
> From: Piotr Nowojski
> To: JingsongLee
> CC: Biao Liu ,Zhu Zhu ,Zili Chen ,Jeff
Thanks for starting the vote.
How about putting a specific version in the wiki up for voting, or
restricting edit access to the page to the PMC?
There were already two changes (very minor) to the page since the vote has
started:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?
Thanks a lot for starting the discussion Chesnay!
I would like to throw in another aspect into the discussion: What if we
consider this repo split as a first step towards making connectors, machine
learning, gelly, table/SQL? independent projects within the ASF, with their
own mailing lists, comm
gt; > That's a good suggestion. Will you help to change the permission on that
> > page?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:41 PM Robert Metzger
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for startin
1:00am?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Do we need a process do decide about removal of features
> >>>>>>> (like
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> DataSet API
gt;
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:22 PM Maximilian Michels >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1 It's good that we formalize this.
> > >>>
Hi all,
I've opened a pull request for the release announcement. I'm looking
forward to your review & feedback:
https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/244
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:27 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Update: voting on RC2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 has started:
>
> http://a
It seems that this FLIP doesn't have a Wiki page yet [1], even though it is
already partially implemented [2]
We should try to stick more to the FLIP process to manage the project more
efficiently.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals
[2] https://issue
Congratulations! Very happy to have you onboard :)
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:06 PM Kostas Kloudas wrote:
> Congratulations Andrey!
> Well deserved!
>
> Kostas
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:04 PM Yun Tang wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations Andrey.
> >
> > Best
> > Yun Tang
> > __
Has anybody verified the inclusion of all bundled dependencies into the
NOTICE files?
I'm asking because we had some issues with that in the last release(s).
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:31 PM Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> +1
>
> I did some testing on a Google Cloud Dataproc cluster (it gives you a
>
Flink 1.9 is feature freezed and almost released.
I guess it makes sense to update the roadmap on the website again.
Who feels like having a good overview of what's coming up?
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:33 PM Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Yes, that's a very good proposal Jark.
> +1
>
> Best, Fabian
>
>
Hi all,
I wanted to understand the impact of the hardware we are using for running
our tests. Each travis worker has 2 virtual cores, and 7.5 gb memory [1].
They are using Google Cloud Compute Engine *n1-standard-2* instances.
Running a full "mvn clean verify" takes *03:32 h* on such a machine typ
provide support, if needed.
>
> Marta
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 4:46 PM Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> > I could help with that.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 2:36 PM Robert Metzger
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Flink 1.9 is feature freezed and almost r
ackaged and most of
> the end-to-end tests use the shade plugin to package the jars for testing.
>
> Aljoscha
>
> > On 18. Aug 2019, at 19:52, Robert Metzger wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wanted to understand the impact of the hardware we are using for
>
et) Qin
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:29 PM Robert Metzger
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Becket,
> > I've applied the proposed change to the document:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=120731026&selectedPageVersi
Jan, will you be able to test this issue on the now-released Flink 1.9 with
the new UI?
What parallelism is needed to reproduce the issue?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:59 PM Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> I remember an issue regarding the watermark fetch request from the WebUI
> exceeding some HTTP si
t; Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:11 PM Robert Metzger
> wrote:
>
> > I have started a Wiki page (editable by all) for collecting ideas for
> > Bylaws changes, so that we can batch changes together and then vote on
> > them:
> >
> https:/
Thanks a lot for your summary Chesnay.
I agree with you that we have no consensus in the community for splitting
up the repository immediately, and I agree with you that we should have a
separate discussion about reducing the build time (which is already making
good progress).
Also, I will keep th
s etc.), nice docker support, plenty of free build resources for
open source projects, ...)
Best,
Robert
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 5:12 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have summarized all arguments mentioned so far + some additional
> research into a Wiki page here:
> http
ensure that contributor builds are still running in a reasonable time?
>
> As an example of this happening on Travis, contributors currently cannot
> run all e2e tests since they timeout, but on apache we have a larger
> timeout.
>
> On 03/09/2019 18:57, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
ng experiments here;
> I would prefer if we only activate it once things are confirmed to be
> working.
>
> For observation purposes, we could also add it to flink-ci with
> notifications to people who are interested in this experiment.
> This wouldn't impact CiBot.
>
ldown timeout is to avoid rescaling the job very frequently,
> >> because TaskManagers are not all connecting at the same time.
> >>
> >> So, is it possible that every taskmanager connecting will produce a
> >> scalling event and it'll be stacked with many scale
I did a shallow pass over the release for it to get the +3 votes. Please
verify other aspects of the release when voting ;)
+1 (binding)
- maven clean install on the source tgz (not on an M1 macbook because of
protoc, but on x86 linux) (not on Java 17 either ;) )
- staging repo seem fine
- statef
There's now a PR (https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/676) and a
preview available for this FLIP (
https://website-refresh.d193kg429zpv7e.amplifyapp.com/).
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 8:45 AM Mohan, Deepthi
wrote:
> Matthias, Markos, Martijn, thank you for your feedback.
>
> Markos, I've addres
I left a comment in FLINK-5.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:18 AM Alexander Fedulov <
alexander.fedu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FLINK-17375 [1] removed [2] run-pre-commit-tests.sh in Flink 1.12. Since
> then the following tests are not executed anymore:
> test_state_migration.sh
> test_state_evolution
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Guowei Ma wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Best,
> Guowei
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:49 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Rui
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:41 PM Hang Ruan wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding
Thanks for starting this discussion!
+1 to drop both
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:45 PM Dawid Wysakowicz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As described in this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11720
> ticket our elasticsearch 5.x connector does not work out of the box on
> some systems and requires
+1 (binding)
- Checked some artifacts in the staging repo
- checked license documentation
- source release is binary free
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:01 AM Dian Fu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Verified the signature and checksum
> - Checked the release note that all the tickets included in th
I agree that we need to fix this.
We could either misuse the "build artifact" feature of azure pipelines to
publish the logs, or we set up something simple for Flink (like running an
instance of https://github.com/lachs0r/0x0 or
https://github.com/dutchcoders/transfer.sh :) )
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020
gt; >> Thanks for bring up this topic. The 2 ARM machines(16cores) which I
> >> donated is just for POC test. We(Huawei) can donate more once moving to
> >> official Azure pipeline. :)
> >>
> >> Robert Metzger 于2019年12月6日周五 上午3:25写道：
> >>
> >
documentation addition to what is provided in the commit
> > message?
> >
> > Counting hotfixes by contributor, the top of the list looks as I would
> > expect.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > Note: this summary is rather naive and includes non-squashed hotfix
&
Tracking this here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16122
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 8:12 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> I agree that we need to fix this.
>
> We could either misuse the "build artifact" feature of azure pipelines to
> publish the logs, or we set u
The ES5 connector is causing some problems on the CI system. It would be
nice if we could make a decision here soon. I don't want to invest time
into fixing it, if we are going to remove it.
I'm still in favor of removing it. If we see that there's demand for the
5.x connector after the 1.11 relea
he commits are not unrelated and the feature commits use
> parts of the hotfix commits, then it makes the cherry-picking more tricky
> and the commits should have the JIRA issue tag. But I would be fine with
> trying it out.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:56
.
> >
> > On 18/02/2020 13:03, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> > > Wouldn't removing the ES 2.x connector be enough because we can then
> > > update the ES 5.x connector? It seems there are some users that still
> > > want to use that one.
> > >
> >
AND+component+%3D+%22Build+System+%2F+Azure+Pipelines%22>
" component.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:23 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> @Leonard: On Azure, I'm not splitting the execution of the end to end
> tests anymore. We won't have the overhead of compiling the same prof
I would be excited to read such a blog (can I request topics? :) )
We could start very low key by using our wiki's blog feature:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewrecentblogposts.action?key=FLINK
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:26 PM Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Great idea, but I also second Seth
;
> > > >>>> I like the idea. +1 from my side.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Potential topics:
> > > >>>> - Scheduling
> > > >>>> - Cluster partitions
> > > >>>> - Memory configura
gt; >>>> some more advanced features, like a deep tech dive for
> > power
> > > > > > users.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> I’m not opposing the deep tech di
+1 for disabling this feature for now.
Thanks a lot for spotting this!
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:54 PM Zhijiang
wrote:
> +1 for disabling "Squash and merge" if feasible to do that.
>
> The possible benefit to use this button is for saving some efforts to
> squash some intermediate "[fixup]" comm
gt; > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 23:04, Zhijiang > > .invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for this proposal Arvid!
> > > > > +1 and looking forward to the wiki structure and more following
> > blogs.
> &g
I'm wondering whether we should file a ticket to remove the *.bat files in
bin/ ?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:46 PM Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> Since there was no-one that said we should keep the windows scripts and
> no-one responded on the user ML thread I'll close the Jira issues/PRs
> about ext
Hi all,
I'm currently investigating a failing end to end test for the bucketing
sink [1].
The bucketing sink has been deprecated in the 1.9 release [2], because we
have the new StreamingFileSink [3] for quite a while.
Before putting any effort into fixing the end to end test for the sink, I
wanted
gt; >
> > > >> > This e2e test really fails frequently. +1 to drop bucketing sink,
> > it
> > > is
> > > >> > not worth paying more efforts since deprecated.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best,
> > > >
sion
> > > today. Maybe we should remove them? Like what we do for other legacy
> > codes.
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:01 PM Aljoscha Krettek >
> >
Hi all,
I have just published the first post to the dev blog:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2020/03/22/Migrating+Flink%27s+CI+Infrastructure+from+Travis+CI+to+Azure+Pipelines
.
I'm looking forward to your feedback and questions on the article :)
Best,
Robert
Hey devs,
I would like to discuss whether it makes sense to fully switch to Azure
Pipelines and phase out our Travis integration.
More information on our Azure integration can be found here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2020/03/22/Migrating+Flink%27s+CI+Infrastructure+from+Tra
25T05:31:52.7412964Z [INFO] <
> org.apache.flink:flink-end-to-end-tests-common-kafka >
> >>>> 2020-03-25T05:31:52.7413854Z [INFO] Building
> flink-end-to-end-tests-common-kafka 1.11-SNAPSHOT [39/46]
> >>>> 2020-03-25T05:31:52.7414689Z [INFO]
from the .travis.yml with a push/pr condition.
>
> On 25/03/2020 15:03, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > Thank you for the feedback so far.
> >
> > Responses to the items Chesnay raised:
> >
> > - by virtue of maintaining the past 2 releases we will have to maintain
> any
ce it has been removed.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:35 AM Kostas Kloudas wrote:
> Thanks Robert for all this,
>
> I think that we should also post a thread in the user ML so that users
> can also comment on the topic.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Kostas
>
> On Mon, Mar
While checking the release, I found a 77
MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in docs/ from je
actually, only the pom file since that's the parent
> module
> > which only has pom packaging.
> > I'm looking into it.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger
> > wrote:
> >
> >> While checking the release, I found a
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which will have
> the
> > problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you for loo
Welcome & congratulations to all of you!
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:58 AM Jingsong Li wrote:
> Congratulations! Konstantin, Dawid, Zhijiang. Well deserved.
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:52 PM Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Happy to announce that over the last
Thanks a lot for preparing another RC!
+1 (binding)
- source archive looks fine (no binaries, copied sources are properly
reported)
- staging repository looks fine (bundled binaries seem documented, versions
are correct)
- *mvn clean install *(mvn clean verify fails, "install" is required) w/
e2e
a lot of
> optimizations in master[2], Cython can further greatly improve the
> performance of Python UDF.
>
> Robert Metzger, Jincheng Sun and I have discussed offline and have drafted
> the FLIP-121[3]. It includes the following items:
>
> - Introduces Cython implementation of
I also like the idea of getting rid of all those copies of the same file
across our codebase.
How about setting the log level in the log4j config file in
flink-test-utils-junit/src/main/resources to INFO, and using a separate
log4j config for local maven runs? (we pass a different log4j file in th
+1 on creating the repo.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 5:54 PM Till Rohrmann wrote:
> I think it is a good idea to make the benchmarks available to the community
> via a repo under the Apache project and to make updating it part of the
> release process. Hence +1 for the proposal.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
Thanks a lot for volunteering to drive an application for the Flink project!
Last year, we discussed finishing the chinese translation as a potential
project. I believe there's still a need for this.
Since the work on the project starts pretty far in the future (September),
the translation project
numbers.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pulls?q=is%3Apr+created%3A%3E%3D2020-01-01
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://dev.azure.com/rmetzger/Flink/_pipeline/analytics/stageawareoutcome?definitionId=4
>
@David: I'm happy to create a component in JIRA.
How about calling the component "Documentation / Training"?
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:14 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
wrote:
> I can help create the flink-training repository.
>
> Before I do that though, I'd like to wait a bit on [1] over the next fe
ut calling the component "Documentation / Training"?
>>
>>
>> Sounds good. Thanks!
>>
>> *David Anderson* | Training Coordinator
>>
>> Follow us @VervericaData
>> --
>> Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference
>> Stream
Congratulations!
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:05 PM Canbin Zheng wrote:
> Congratulations Hequn!
>
> Regards,
> Canbin Zheng
>
> wenlong.lwl 于2020年4月20日周一 下午8:02写道：
>
> > Congratulations Hequn!
> >
> > Bests,
> > Wenlong
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 17:56, Yuan Mei wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats!
>
Hi all,
for the upcoming 1.11 release, I started looking into adding support for
Hadoop 3[1] for Flink. I have explored a little bit already into adding a
shaded hadoop 3 into “flink-shaded”, and some mechanisms for switching
between Hadoop 2 and 3 dependencies in the Flink build.
However, Chesna
FYI: I have moved the Flink PR and master builds from my personal Azure
account to a PMC controlled account:
https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:28 PM Robert Metzger wrote:
> Thanks a lot for bringing up this topic again.
> The reason why
>
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 17:51, tison wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your reply Robert. That sounds great.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Robert Metzger 于2020年3月9日周一 下午5:46写道：
> >
> > > Hey Tison,
> > >
> > > only
+1 (binding)
- for license documentation, I checked the diff between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3:
https://github.com/apache/flink/compare/release-1.9.2...release-1.9.3-rc1
- Kafka dependency changed from 0.10.2.1 to 0.10.2.2 --> License doc was
updated in PR https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/11617/files
Thanks for starting the thread!
I would consider the docker images of Flink convenience binary releases
that can happen any time. I believe a simplified, but formal release
process would be appropriate (preview / staging images for the community to
validate & vote, then release to docker hub).
On
Thanks for starting this discussion.
I believe the different options are a lot about personal taste, there are
no objective arguments why one option is better than the other.
I agree with your proposal to simply go with the "max-xyz" pattern, as this
is the style of the majority of the current con
+1 for separate repositories.
This is also good for the community to collect some experience for a
potential repository split effort at some later point.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:01 PM vino yang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fast release cycles seems a good viewpoint to support keeping it in a
> separate r
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen wrote:
> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
> contribution to Apache Flink.
>
> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
> found here:
> https://statefun.io/
> https://gi
Hey Xiyuan,
thanks a lot for checking out Travis ARM-based offering.
As part of the "Reducing build times" discussion, we have considered moving
away from Travis to Azure Pipelines. What I want to say is that Travis
might not be important for the Flink community in the long run.
I think running th
ty can have the full
> access to the ARM resources as well.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1 ]
>
> https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/azure/devops/pipelines/agents/v2-linux?view=azure-devops
>
> Robert Metzger 于2019年9月5日周四 下午8:54写道：
>
> > I do have a working Azure setup, yes
Hi all,
I would like to announce that Ververica, with the permission of the Flink
PMC, is launching a website called flink-packages.org. This goes back to an
effort proposed earlier in 2019 [1]
The idea of the site is to help developers building extensions / connectors
/ API etc. for Flink to get
1 - 100 of 1902 matches
Mail list logo
