jvsd

Hi, Is there a plan to merge jvsd to the develop branch in the near future ? Thanks, Gal This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp

Re: Review Request 52076: GEODE-1511: Remove test dependencies from pom file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52076/#review149653 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jens Deppe On Sept. 20, 2016, 3:49 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 52019: GEODE-1513: Remove duplicate jars from war files

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52019/#review149661 --- geode-pulse.war contains geode-web.jar - I don't think it needs th

Re: Review Request 52019: GEODE-1513: Remove duplicate jars from war files

> On Sept. 20, 2016, 2:17 p.m., Jens Deppe wrote: > > geode-pulse.war contains geode-web.jar - I don't think it needs that. > > > > Both geode-pulse.war and geode-web-api.war contain the relevant exploded > > classes. However, geode-web.war contains a geode-web.jar file with the > > actual cla

Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #598

See Changes: [hkhamesra] GEODE-1908 DS.connect call not configuring p2p server with SSL. [hkhamesra] GEODE-37 re-merge commit 6a109a7f57a5402af458d593d93c2e328bd3281b [klund] GEODE-1905: Address UnknownPropertyException when running test

Re: M3 is out - New release manager for 1.0 ?

I think we should do these security features incrementally after 1.0.0. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > On Sep 17, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > > So, my proposal for

Re: M3 is out - New release manager for 1.0 ?

> > So, my proposal for issues to be targeted for 1.0 is: > GEODE-136 Fix possible NullPointerException in Gfsh's 'list regions' > command's GetRegionsFunction > GEODE-1466 Branding: rename gemfire.properties file to geode.properties file > GEODE-17 Provide Integrated Security > GEODE-37 (package

Re: jvsd

Hi Gal, This page talks about the goals and status for jvsd: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61309918 Here’s another thread which discussed options for moving forward: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geode-dev/201605.mbox/%3c14840688a62caa4197a28aaccda9d2

Re: Review Request 52076: GEODE-1511: Remove test dependencies from pom file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52076/#review149677 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Mark Bretl On Sept. 19, 2016, 8:49 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 52076: GEODE-1511: Remove test dependencies from pom file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52076/#review149687 --- I don't think having this special logic for slf4j-impl is necessar

Re: jvsd

I don't think we should try to include jVSD in 1.0.0 at this point, because it introduces dependencies that might make the 1.0.0 release more complicated such as the MultiAxisChartFX dependency. But I think the should try to get it to develop sooner rather than later to make it easier for people to

Re: [VIRTUAL] Geode Clubhouse TOMORROW Weds, 9/21 10AM Pacific - Domain Driven Design & Reactive Programming w/ Apache Geode - Discussion Panel

Dear Geode Community, This is a reminder that tomorrow we have Vaughn Vernon and Wes Williams joining us for a further discussion of Domain Driven Design and reactive programming. This is a follow on of the Webinar recently run by Pivotal: Why Domain-Driven Design and Reactive Programming?

Re: jvsd

To what degree should jVSD be mentioned in the docs? The current writeup is essentially "go get it if you want it, but be warned that it's not fully baked and we don't support it". Would that still be the appropriate jVSD policy for 1.0.0? On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > I d

Error loading cluster config serialized prior to repackage

If current develop attempts to read a cluster config that was persisted prior to the repackage, our code now throws ClassNotFoundException. Turns out Cluster Config is implemented by the class org.apache.geode.management.internal.configuration.domain.Configuration which is a DataSerializable. Unfor

Re: Error loading cluster config serialized prior to repackage

The repackage broke those two methods. The oldPackage needs to replace "org.apache" with "com.gemstone". It allows interaction with a locator from WAN sites and clients running GemFire. I'll fix that problem. Le 9/20/2016 à 11:53 AM, Kirk Lund a écrit : If current develop attempts to read a

Re: Error loading cluster config serialized prior to repackage

I like your idea of having registered DataSwizzlers. Would registering a DataSerializer for these classes work? It would be nice to just use the extension mechanism that's already there. -Dan On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > The repackage broke those two methods. The

Speed up your Gradle tasks!

I wanted to share a tip with everyone that may speed up your build and test execution times if you don’t already use it. Before we can speed up these tasks, it would be helpful to measure their baseline. This can be done by adding the --profile flag, e.g. executing “gradle test --profile”. Th

Review Request 52101: GEODE-1791: Update LICENSE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52101/ --- Review request for geode, Jens Deppe and Joey McAllister. Repository: geode D

Re: Review Request 52101: GEODE-1791: Update LICENSE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52101/#review149750 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jinmei Liao On Sept. 20, 2016, 10:44 p.m

Re: Review Request 52101: GEODE-1791: Update LICENSE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52101/#review149751 --- LICENSE (line 330)

Re: Review Request 52076: GEODE-1511: Remove test dependencies from pom file

> On Sept. 20, 2016, 5:33 p.m., Dan Smith wrote: > > I don't think having this special logic for slf4j-impl is necessary because > > slf4j-impl already marked optional. It was *not* optional in M3, because of > > GEODE-1811. So I think this bug was already fixed by GEODE-1811. > > > > As far a

[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request #243: Marked test guaranteed to take at least 1...

GitHub user jaredjstewart opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/243 Marked test guaranteed to take at least 1 minute as an integration test This test is guaranteed to take at least 65 seconds to run. Our [wiki](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis

Re: Review Request 52052: GEODE-1128: Enhance missing-disk-stores command with missing regions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52052/#review149759 --- geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/Colocati

Re: Review Request 52052: GEODE-1128: Enhance missing-disk-stores command with missing regions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52052/#review149762 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Darrel Schneider On Sept. 19, 2016, 12:1

[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request #243: Marked test guaranteed to take at least 1...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/243 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featur