I just committed a big change to deployment... I have changed
deployment to no longer build into a packed Jar file, instead it builds
into a temp directory and once complete moves the temp directory into
the config store. If a packed car file is needed, the deployer simply
jars up the temp
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Ralf Barkow (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 4:04 PM
Comment:
Patched project.xml file (modules/tomcat/project.xml)
Changes:
Attachment changed to geronimoTomcat-project_xml.patch
Well looks like this doesn't work on windows. I don't think windows is
letting me move the temp directory to the config store because the
URLClassLoader on windows holds locks open on the jar files inside of
the config store.
I'll add some code that copies the files from the temp dir into the
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Can someone on linux check if the build works?
At first glance, no:
BUILD FAILED
File..
/home/ammulder/.maven/cache/maven-multiproject-plugin-1.3.1/plugin.jelly
Element... maven:reactor
Line.. 217
Column 9
Unable to obtain goal
All that stuff worked for me on a fresh checkout on the windows pc I
have hiding in the corner :) It looks like you didn't update openejb.
I get an exception moving the temp dir into the config store.
-dain
On Oct 4, 2004, at 5:22 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Okay, when I tried a maven
There is still a bug with resolving URIs on Windows. It looks like you
can't resolve an absolute file location (e.g., c:\a\b\c) against a file
uri unless you specify the file protocol on the uri. Anyway, I'm about
to commit it... just verifying the change.
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief
Part of the deployment system rewrite was an effort to clean up our
handling of temp files. I carefully went though our entire active code
base (1) searching for places where we create temp a file or directory,
and added code that explicitly deletes the file or directory. Since we
are
Hi,
I am trying to get a feel for how EJB/JNDI clustering will be implemented
in Geronimo and when it might be implemented.
I remember reading somewhere in the mail archives that the clustering
module in Geronimo has been abandoned and that ActiveCluster will be used.
Is it envisaged that
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-359
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
It would appear to me that openejb is a bit buggy and readily throws
exceptions rather than diagnostics when it is unhappy with or confused
by a configuration. So, I present the following to see if anyone else
thinks openejb is messing up in this particular case.
I was trying to get Kevin
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-360
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: David Jencks
Created: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:04 AM
Body:
This is fixed, but an additional refactoring and simplification is possible,
namely to create a new ImportedTransactionContext class that includes the info
in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+reference name=serverInfogeronimo.system:role=ServerInfo/reference
attribute name=Url
type=java.lang.Stringtcp://localhost:61616/attribute
reference
name=ActiveMQContainergeronimo.server:type=JMSServer,container=ActiveMQ/reference
That's just struck me
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dain
Date: Thu Sep 30 22:13:01 2004
New Revision: 47628
Added: geronimo/trunk/modules/j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment/EJBRefInfo.java
+ * @version $Revision$ $Date$
Let's try it again, Dain, could you update the templates to use $Rev$
instead
David Blevins wrote:
Seems we're getting classloading issues from our RMIClassLoaderSpi.
After a clean build, this no workie.
$ cd modules/assembly/target/geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT
$ java
-Djava.rmi.server.RMIClassLoaderSpi=org.apache.geronimo.rmi.RMIClassLoaderSpiImpl
-jar bin/server.jar
It fails
I feel your pain:-)
I get these errors whenever I include that in a geronimo deploy plugin
startRemoteServer command. As you say, it doesn't seem to be a problem
with openejb.
david jencks
On Oct 5, 2004, at 1:47 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems we're getting classloading issues from our
On Oct 5, 2004, at 3:04 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+reference
name=serverInfogeronimo.system:role=ServerInfo/reference
attribute name=Url
type=java.lang.Stringtcp://localhost:61616/attribute
reference
name=ActiveMQContainergeronimo.server:
On Oct 5, 2004, at 4:19 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dain
Date: Thu Sep 30 22:13:01 2004
New Revision: 47628
Added:
geronimo/trunk/modules/j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/
deployment/EJBRefInfo.java
+ * @version $Revision$ $Date$
Let's try it again, Dain,
That's exactly what I'm trying to do. Need this for the Geronimo itests to run.
-David
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:02:39AM -0700, David Jencks wrote:
I feel your pain:-)
I get these errors whenever I include that in a geronimo deploy plugin
startRemoteServer command. As you say, it
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The current convention is for attributes to follow Java variable
naming
conventions (i.e., lower case first character camel cased after) and
for references to follow Java class naming conventions (i.e., capital
On Oct 5, 2004, at 9:24 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The current convention is for attributes to follow Java variable
naming
conventions (i.e., lower case first character camel cased after) and
for references to follow Java
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
First you spend an hour trying to get a login to MoinMoin... then you
spend another hour trying to figure out how to make MoinMoin line up
the text on the page correctly.
That's okay, you would have just spent those two hours reading
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-249
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
My theory is that this is a client side problem and that the list of
dependencies in project.xml is different in the openejb itests and
geronimo and activemq itests. I haven't investigated yet though.
david jencks
On Oct 5, 2004, at 9:33 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-361
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Dain Sundstrom (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:00 AM
Changes:
Version changed from 1.0-M3
-
For a full history of the issue, see:
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Dain Sundstrom
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:00 AM
I added a bunch more checks for missing files and such
-
View the issue:
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-284
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:33:14AM -0500, David Blevins wrote:
Looks like a conflict with something in JMXRemoting. But I am
concerned
that something needs special commmand line properties to start and
would
assume due to that the RMIClassLoaderSPIImpl has not been used in
quite
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-362
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Jeremy Boynes
Created: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:00 PM
Body:
A workaround for now is simply to return the original object rather than
proxying it.
-
View this
David Blevins wrote:
To answer part of my own question, the RMIClassLoaderSpi provider must
be in the system classloader. Worse yet, the provider is instaniated
and assigned to a private static final in RMIClassLoader.
It works in OpenEJB because it has geronimo-core in the manifest
class-path of
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:14:37PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
To answer part of my own question, the RMIClassLoaderSpi provider must
be in the system classloader. Worse yet, the provider is instaniated
and assigned to a private static final in RMIClassLoader.
It works
I'm thinking about using the maven multiproject plugin as replacement
for our current reactor build. Before I do this, I'd like to know
which options of our current build people are using...
Are you using any of the following command line options
module.types Comma seperated list of
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: David Jencks
Created: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 1:02 PM
Body:
I've modified the admin object deployment to return the actual admin object
rather than a proxy. I'm reluctant to apply the same change to connection
factories because
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-363
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:50:40PM -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm thinking about using the maven multiproject plugin as replacement
for our current reactor build. Before I do this, I'd like to know
which options of our current build people are using...
Are you using any of the following
This is a little off topic, but it would be nice to have a target
that does nothing but update any third-party libraries that have changed,
so you could run that once and then do maven -o instead of having to run
maven online and have it attempt to download the same libraries dozens of
On Oct 5, 2004, at 1:00 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Oct 4, 2004, at 11:17 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I know the main developer of MC4J, a cool (Swing-based) JMX
management console -- check out the screen shots and stuff. (His
name is
Greg Hinkle)
I was using mc4j. I liked it.
I hope to get
On Oct 5, 2004, at 1:39 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:50:40PM -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm thinking about using the maven multiproject plugin as replacement
for our current reactor build. Before I do this, I'd like to know
which options of our current build people are
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
last time I looked at it, it required the netbeans runtime environment
which was H_U_G_E... does anyone know if he has a standalone swing (or
swt) version yet?
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:13:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:
41 matches
Mail list logo
