Congrats Erik !
Cheers
Prasad
On Nov 20, 2007 11:45 AM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please extend a welcome to Erik Craig who is the latest committer to
> be added to the Geronimo fold. Erik has had a sustained and continued
> track record in working on the J2G conversion tool as
Congrats Jay !
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 4, 2007 11:26 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> Please join us in congratulating Jay McHugh as the newest member of
> the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jay working with us as a
> committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us
I have noticed this irksome behavior too. AFAIK, there isn't a better
way. For now, this is a gaping hole in our plugin design.
Seems like when a plugin is uninstalled, we'll have to uninstall all
the child components recursively.
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 6, 2007 10:04 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL
I agree. We should make GShell flexible like our Geronimo server.
I don't know if this makes sense but I'll just think aloud. At it's
core should be the most basic features like start/stop and
deploy/undeploy. Since Groovy is the culprit, can Groovy sit this one
out ? I believe we use goals from g
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 6, 2007 9:43 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment, and
> those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I think
> it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt Hogstrom
I'm with Matt on this. Since it is not perfect to everybody's
satisfaction, let us move it to the /plugins tree (at least for now).
Sandbox is definitely not the place for it.
Erik, contrary to your belief, the /plugins tree does not contain only
those plugins that work independent of G. It *most
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 11, 2007 4:58 AM, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks, a small change to Genesis was made to support a custom legal
> resource bundle for the GShell release. I'd like to get this out so
> we can get GShell out too.
>
> +1 -Release it
> +0 -Eh, whatever
I don't think we have a way of knowing what svn revision a final
Geronimo binary came from. Is there ?
Maybe we should include a revision.txt file in ${geronimo_home} which
contains the svn revision number of the build from which the binary
was built.
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 19, 2007 10:03 AM, Anit
ed......
> .
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
>
> --- Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think we have a way of knowing what svn revision a final
> > Geronimo binary came from. Is there
> in the log file.
> The right svn revision numbers are also included in the email
> notifications, so that's another way to figure this out.
>
> Jarek
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:29 AM, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't think we have
Most of the tests in the webservices-testsuite have a client piece in
it. You will find simple examples of the plan there.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 20, 2007 6:33 AM, ivanrc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> He
My first guess is that the deploy tool could be broken. The client
jars in the webservices-testsuite are deployed with the help of
geronimo-maven-plugin:deploy-module.
Just for kicks, can you please try using the deploy.bat ?
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 20, 2007 11:24 AM, ivanrc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Correction: Haven't had the time to *look* into it. Dunno what it will
take to fix it.
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 21, 2007 11:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The daily automated builds have been failing for the same reason for a
> few days now. Haven't
The daily automated builds have been failing for the same reason for a
few days now. Haven't had the time to fix it.
Cheers
Prasad
On Dec 20, 2007 2:57 PM, Erik B. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> Has anyone else been experiencing problems building since yesterday?
> Attempting to buil
On Dec 31, 2007 4:41 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all I appear to have broken the build last night with some
> changes to get the roller plugin building again. I think I've
> managed to fix all the problems -- the it tests all pass for me. Let
> me know if there are stil
Root cause:
11:19:20,898 INFO [Log4jService] --
11:19:33,423 ERROR [[TomcatWebContainer]] "Restricted listeners
property file not found
11:19:36,093 INFO [startup] Creating TransactionManager(id=Default
Transaction Manager)
11:19:36,096 ERROR [GBeanIns
The work on integrating Jetspeed with Geronimo is currently in the sandbox.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration/
This is what the following modules do.
jetspeed-base:
-
This module installs 5 common jetspeed jars into the G repository.
jetspeed-a
Failed to retrieve
> Portlet Definition for demo::BookmarkPortlet
> 00:16:10,485 WARN [JetspeedPortletContainerWrapper] Could not render
> PortletWindowdp-18 as it has no PortletDefintion defined.
> 00:16:10,487 WARN [PersistenceBrokerPortletEntityAccess] Failed to retrieve
> Portlet Def
My thinking on this was to leave it as is for 2.1. We fix this right
for 2.2, when we split the trunk into different svn trees.
Moving the c-m-p configuration settings from configs parent pom to the
root pom is not a problem. It is the boatload of property settings
that will cause Jason good grief
Thanx Matt.
Congrats Kevan ! (the band is now playing *Hail to the Chief* )
Cheers
Prasad
On Jan 16, 2008 3:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently I have had several things change personally and I have found
> it increasingly difficult to keep up with the Geronimo mailing li
Most definitely. Thank you Joe for shouldering such a big
responsibility for the project.
Cheers
Prasad
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>
> > I've been referred to as a puppy before :)
> >
> > But I'd b
>
> prasad:
> sandbox/restructure
This has served its purpose and is obsolete now. Feel free to delete it.
Cheers
Prasad
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:07 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few years ago I read about an information based perpetual motion
> machine someone came up with.
That is sooo cool.
I also noticed that there were version specific user and developer
guides in the first column too. They can be merged into a single row
as "User Guide" with appropriate links in the remaining columns.
Cheers
Prasad
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:22 PM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTEC
I did a sniff test of the installed product and I think we are good to go.
+1 from me.
I shall grill it some more tomorrow.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/19/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
> Some notes in relation to documentation:
>
> * Clicking on the the "Geronimo Do
David,
Thanks for that excellent recap.
+1 from me.
+1 to Alan's comment that all patches to branches should also be
applied to the trunk. Any future x.(y+1) branch should come from the
trunk and not from the recently frozen x.y.z branch.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/21/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROT
Cool Jason. I like it. Can we please have to/fro links from the
http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo site to the KB.
Thanx
Prasad
On 6/22/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Autoexport is up:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxKB/index.html
--jason
On Jun 22, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Jason Dill
api would take care of
that. Right now, I don't know why it fails. The build is successful
the second time.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/12/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please see comments inline -
On 6/11/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm finding
Ah. So I wasn't the only one missing the deps. Jacek, you may find the
patch here.
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg25267.html
Can you please patch it using
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2149 ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/25/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes modules should first be built
The execeptions are caused by missing deps in the modules. Nothing to
do with the deployment plugin.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/25/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25, 2006, at 4:06 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 6/13/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROT
Here's the status of the assembly plugin.
The geronimo-assembly-plugin is ready and is undergoing tests. It has
only 1 goal, i.e., the "installConfig" goal. This goal runs thro' the
dependency list in the pom.xml and installs all dependencies of type
"car". I have attached a patch of this plugin
I was unable to attach the zip file of the plugin. Here's the patch.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 6/26/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the status of the assembly plugin.
The geronimo-assembly-plugin is ready and is undergoing tests. It has
only 1 goal, i.e., the &quo
The trunk
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/26/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What branch is this on?
IMO, the sooner we get to m2 the better.
--jason
On Jun 26, 2006, at 10:09 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Although there are still some problems (such as not running all the
> tests) I think we h
I'm whiskers away from finishing the assembly plugin. I am down to the
nitty grittties of ensuring the correct file mode on the various
files and directories. I also have to set and ensure the correct line
endings.
What else ? We have to get maven to apply the patch for the assembly
plugin and d
Alan,
You'd have to build the geronimo-packaging-plugin manually first. It's
under geronimo/m2-plugins
cd geronimo/m2-plugins
mvn clean
mvn -N
mvn
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/25/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get this error:
Try downloading the file manually from the project website
hat is not very friendly either.
* * *
Also, start adding ../pom.xml to the
parent element, so that you can skip the mvn -N install bits.
--jason
On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Alan,
>
> You'd have to build the geronimo-packaging-plugin manually first. It&
et really clean builds. Often m2 problems will only start
to show up when a clean repo is used... :-(
--jason
On Jun 26, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> I'm sorry but I'm confused about this main build and the plugins
> build. I thought they are all one single
t gonna happen any time soonish for us
to benefit from.
IMO, we need to adapt to how m2 works now and then grow with it as we
get features/bugs fixed and implemented.
--jason
On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Yes, that's the ideal situation and we very much desir
-level
will continue. Something is horked... not sure why though...
Where did this jsr plugin come from?
--jason
On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Alan,
>
> You'd have to build the geronimo-packaging-plugin manually first. It's
> under geronimo/m
configuration gbean
org.apache.geronimo.configs/openejb-deployer/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/26/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg25378.html
On 6/26/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What the heck is up with the
Maybe 'coz we built it with "new2" before ? Not sure.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/26/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why is openejb included in "our" build at all?
--jason
On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> These are the pr
Alright, alright. Stop whining already :-) :-)
Now somebody please apply the patch in
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2157. We can then build
trunk from top down with 1 single command.
I still can't find anything in the modules that depends on the
geronimo-plugins. I cleaned out t
On 6/27/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I mentioned before in previous m2 related mails, most of the
properties defined in the top-level pom are unneeded and can be
removed to simplify the pom and reduce the fragility of the
configuration.
At the same time, all modules, that have
The link tries to authenticate me :-(
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/30/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Built and published the latest jars from my mac.
For reference it's simply: Finder -> Go -> Connect to Server
Use "https://dav.codehaus.org/dist/openejb/"; for the Server Address.
Good ide
ned patch with (I hope) only one copy of each missing
> file.
>
> david jencks
>
>
> On Jun 30, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry. The earlier maven-assembly-plugin.patch had a whole
>> directory that had gone missing.
>>
>> Here is the patch again.
>>
>> Thanks djencks for catching it.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Prasad
>>
>>
Inline -
On 6/30/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
inline..
--- Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. Our pom.xml first lists all and only geronimo modules, configs and
> apps as dependencies. The transitive deps are taken care of by m-a-p.
The m-a-p is invoked twice for the following reasons:
When we copy some modules into a m2 repo structure format, it also
copies the META-INF/maven/.. directories. This unneccesary directory
introduces a very long path too. So in the first execution, we use the
to skip the archive process. In the
m.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 1, 2006, at 1:39 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>>
>>> We can exclude META-INF/maven/ from the jars by configuring
>>
>>> the
>>> jar plugin to use false. I have not used
>> it,
>>
--jason
Cheers
Prasad
On Jul 1, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> The m-a-p is invoked twice for the following reasons:
>
> When we copy some modules into a m2 repo structure format, it also
> copies the META-INF/maven/.. directories. This unneccesary directory
> i
Inline -
On 7/1/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why can't the dependency plugin be used to install the car files?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by the dependency plugin.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/dependency-maven-plugin/
It basically handles copying (or unpacking) artifacts and
ugin, but to use the
dependency plugin instead of a custom car installer plugin.
--jason
On Jul 2, 2006, at 8:25 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Inline -
>
> On 7/1/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Why can't the dependency plugin be used to install the
Hi Anita,
Sorry, couldn't get back to your earlier. I was checking my mail while
on a vacation but didn't have access to my code.
Anyways, I built all the applications successfully today. To figure
out why you are seeing that build break, could you please turn on the
config option of the jspc-m
Oh cool. Yes !!
First we needed the geronimo-deployment-plugin to be in m2. So in
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1738, I got the
deployment-plugin migarted to m2. The RTC for this is pending 2 more
votes. Now, if you and Jason can review and approve it, we can get it
in the build.
SHOT\tranql-1.4-SNAPSHOT.pom
Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/4/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ooops. Sorry Jason. I was trying to keep up with the emails on my
vacation and ended up misreading your question. You do clearly ask why
the d-m-p not be used to install car
Cool ! Congrats guys !
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/6/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulations! Matt and Jeff
Cheers
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > Last week the PMC voted to invite Jeff Gen
Hi Bill,
Inline-
On 7/6/06, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Prasad,
>
> First we needed the geronimo-deployment-plugin to be in m2. So in
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1738, I got the
> deployment-plugin migarted to m2. The RTC for this is pending 2 more
> votes. No
[INFO]
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Inline-
>
> On 7/6/06, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Prasad,
>>
>> >
>> > First we needed th
UILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 14 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Thu Jul 06 14:40:10 MDT 2006
[INFO] Final Memory: 8M/14M
[INFO]
On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Yep.
4:40:10 MDT 2006
[INFO] Final Memory: 8M/14M
[INFO]
On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Yep. This is it.
So what you could do is take a m1 binary and run the mvn
install:install-file command to install it i
Alex, Enrique,
The assembly of G in m2 is failing because we can't find valid poms
for Apache directory artifacts. Our module geronimo-directory depends
on apache directory artifacts. The Apache directory artifacts now have
moved under the groupId "org.apache.directory"
http://www.ibiblio.org/mav
.1
I guess eventually we'll have to move to the latest version of Apache
directory in our 1.2.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/6/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex, Enrique,
The assembly of G in m2 is failing because we can't find valid poms
for Apache directory artifacts
udney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Oh I forgot to mention.
Check the *.log files in the top level module and individual modules.
If I remember right, you can run the mvn site:site command to generat
ally we will have to contend this issue and then we'll have to
map those 4 artifacts to their latest equivalents.
Thanx
Prasad
On 7/7/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's another idea. We could just fix the pom for
directory-protocols:ldap-protocol:0.9.2 and publish
Seeing this error on Windows XP only. Unable to recreate it on Linux.
I am trying to build the trunk using m2. I began with a clean repo and
did a fresh checkout.
I executed build.bat and it ran the bootstrap stage. Then I executed
build.bat -Dstage=assembly -Dmaven.test.skip=true.
It failed w
Bill,
Here's the latest patch:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12336616/geronimo-deployment-plugin-RTC-VOTE.3.patch
Now let's see how itests are doing.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 7/7/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bill,
No. I applied the patch aga
That's cool, dude. Now can we please have some intro to Genesis. I
saw a fleeting mention of it in another mail thread.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/11/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... will now all build from Continuum when adding their pom URL's as
m2 projects :-)
But, due to Continuum
.properties
>> uddi-db/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml
>> uddi-server/src
>> uddi-server/src/webapp
>> uddi-server/src/webapp/happyjuddi.jsp
>> uddi-server/src/webapp/WEB-INF
>> uddi-server/src/webapp/WEB-INF/juddi.properties
>> uddi-server/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web
There u go..
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/11/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you send the output of the build plz.
--jason
On Jul 11, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Nope. No such luck. I deleted the entire applications dir. I also
> deleted the o.a.g.applic
that I fixed ;-)
Please use this SVN URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/svkmerge/
m2migration/
--jason
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> There u go..
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> On 7/11/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-jason
On Jul 11, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Shucks.. I gotta get used to this m2migration branch.
>
> Thanx Jason. BTW, since this is a bug fix, this can go into trunk too,
> rt ? No RTC needed.
>
> Are you going to put it there ? Or will it be Jacek who h
son Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, it will make it easier for us all to keep in sync and to
rapidly accept patches if we use this code-line.
And then... RTC with a functional build and be done with it.
--jason
On Jul 11, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Ah.. makes sense.
ason
On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> I began using the m2migration branch. The configs build stalled while
> building the jsp-examples-* configs on Windoze due to the now familiar
> long path problem.
>
> C:\Apache\geronimo\sandbox\m2migration\configs\jsp-examp
is specified in
genesis/config/project-config/pom.xml
If you want to use something else, then you need to explicitly define
the plugin's version in the pom you use it from.
--jason
On Jul 11, 2006, at 9:56 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Earlier, my jetty assembly build always used the 2.2
On 7/12/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is the assemblies patch to build jetty and tomcat full
assemblies. Joe will have to bribe me to build the minimal assemblies
;-)
We should merge the properties in configs/pom.xml and
m2-assemblies/pom.xml. They are common
Cheers
Pra
might make it into an official release
of the plugin?
--jason
On Jul 12, 2006, at 9:46 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Let ma again remind everyone trying the assembly that they will have
> to build the maven-assembly-plugin.
>
> 1. Check out maven-assembly-plugin src from
> http://svn
Used by var/config/config.xml of the assemblies.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 7/12/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should merge the properties in configs/pom.xml and
> m2-assemblies/pom.xml. They are common
Where are they used?
--jason
l 12, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Used by var/config/config.xml of the assemblies.
>
> Cheers
> Prasad.
>
> On 7/12/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > We should merge the properties in configs/pom.xml and
>> > m2-ass
sted in little-G besides myself ...
so hopefully you will be able include the minimal assemblies too in the
not too distant future. I can't think of any reason why the minimal
assemblies would require any special treatment beyond that necessary for
big-G. Did you encounter some problems there?
t spits out ##... ?
I did not see that in the plugin... maybe I missed it... or maybe its
hiding from me.
--jason
On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Comes from the installation of the "car" with the geronimo-assembly-
> plugin
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
>
Shucks ! My bad. Sorry.
I deliberately omitted those changes from the m2migration patch
because I though DJ was fixing configs before getting assembly to
build. And since our configs were successfully building, I left it
out.
I was thinking of comparing the 2 patches this morning. But I'm glad
i
The geronimo-deployment-plugin build fails on windoze with the following error.
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
C:\Apac
Hi Anita,
I applied the pending patch (geronimo-remote-deploy/pom.xml). That
was when I got that error. Are there are more patches to be applied
along with that ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/14/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it not be simpler to use the patched version of
I tried the latest changes on Windows and it builds the assembly fine.
I even ran the jetty binary successfully.
Jason, I also tried commenting out a few builders from the
dependencies list and it still worked fine. So I guess we can prune
the deps list to remove the redudant ones.
A full extrac
rasad
On 7/14/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried the latest changes on Windows and it builds the assembly fine.
I even ran the jetty binary successfully.
Jason, I also tried commenting out a few builders from the
dependencies list and it still worked fine. So I guess we ca
The timer tests failed. Jason, I thought you pulled them out late last
night after our discussion.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/14/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The bootstrap on linux first failed a test in the security module. I
ran the build inside the security module. It
I am trying to get remote-deploy-jetty and remote-deploy-tomcat
configs into the m2 build and it is failing due to packaging/deploy
error. (Anita, Jason, I did get some info off the patches in G-2067
but that didn't help me too much).
It fails in 1.2 because the deployer in 1.2 has only the
Servi
This issue has now been resolved.. well almost.. (except for
remote-deploy-tomcat).
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2201
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/17/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to get remote-deploy-jetty and remote-deploy-tomcat
configs into the m2
The remote-deploy-tomcat issue too has been resolved.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 7/17/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This issue has now been resolved.. well almost.. (except for
remote-deploy-tomcat).
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2201
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/17/06,
The DayTrader project needs a consistent groupId for all it's
artifacts. Currently, some of it's artifacts are under the "geronimo"
groupid while others are under the "org.apache.geronimo" groupid.
I discussed this with Matt and we decided to pose this Q to the
community. One option is to have a
I'd like to see the itests framework with atleast a basic suite of
tests go into v1.2.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/15/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Its time to start defining the content of what everyone is planning on doing
for 1.2. The biggest
change so far that I'm aware of are
; Jeff
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Why not give it is own:
>>
>> org.apache.geronimo.daytrader
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>>
>>> The DayTrader project needs a consistent groupId for
Inline -
On 7/19/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
inline..
--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is my opinion that we should probably start the RTC process now
> for merging the svkmerge/m2migration branch to trunk and to deprecate
>
> the Maven 1 build... and nu
Anita,
Here http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067#action_12416236,
you said that you have uploaded a patch for uddi configs. I couldn't
find it in any of the patches in this JIRA.
Do you think you have the patch on your machine ? Or shall I go ahead
and work on it ?
Cheers
Prasad
;t/shouldn't go looking for it in the trunk.
I'd like to learn something new everyday. So I don't mind being
corrected and advised on how we can better manage this. Any other
suggestions ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/20/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7
I'd like Anita who implemented the plugin confirm my answers. Please
see inline -
On 7/24/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I have a few more questions, now that I think about it:
* Must you put the plan at src/plan/plan.xml or is there some way to
point it to a different fil
I am having trouble building the uddi-jetty
uddi-jetty.
--
ERROR [PackageBuilder] org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Cannot de
ploy the requested application module because no deployer is able to handle it.
This can happen if you have omitted the J2EE deployment descript
I am having trouble building the following config
servlets-examples-jetty.
--
[INFO] Could not load servlet class
compressionFilters.CompressionFilterTestServlet
compressionFilters.CompressionFilterTestServlet in classloader
org.apache.geronimo.configs/servlet-ex
I'm having trouble running the hot-deployer car in an m2 built server.
The errror is as follows :
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin/ConfigIDEx
tractor
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass0(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Class
/geronimo/sandbox/svkmerge/m2migration/m2-plugins/car-maven-plugin/
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/25/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/24/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a planFile config option in the mojos. So I suspect you may
> specify a different loc
I'll read and reply in detail in a while. But for now, here's a quick
answer to your last question -
In the PlanProcessorMojo.java, introduce the variable (foo) you desire
as a field. Annotate that field as follows
/**
* @parameter
*/
private String foo;
Use the variable directly in your code i
No. I guess that's about right. I have seen this comment in the
project.xml in the maven 1 builds too. We need this to force the
reactor to build the jar first. But all other deps should be in the
jar's pom.xml.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/25/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/25/06, anita
1 - 100 of 1266 matches
Mail list logo
