cool, thanks all!
to sum up the discussion:
HBase 2.0 will have 2.6.1+ and 2.7.1+ has supported hadoop version.
(hadoop 3.x support will be decided later, since work is still going on)
HBASE-16884 - updates the supported version map in the docs, with the
2.6.1+ and 2.7.1+ support for 2.0
HBASE-1
See HBASE-16887
2016-10-20 22:50 GMT+08:00 Sean Busbey :
> Unfortunately, I think this means we'll need to update the hadoopcheck
> versions to vary by branch.
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:21 PM, 张铎 wrote:
> > OK, seems no objection. I will file a issue to modify the hadoop version
> > support
Unfortunately, I think this means we'll need to update the hadoopcheck
versions to vary by branch.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:21 PM, 张铎 wrote:
> OK, seems no objection. I will file a issue to modify the hadoop version
> support matrix.
>
> And I think we also need to change the hadoopcheck version
+1, we are running 2.6.x online and it's also stable.
Best Regards,
Yu
On 20 October 2016 at 13:30, Jerry He wrote:
> Concur here. Our distribution has on 2.7.x lines for a while.
>
> Jerry
>
> On Oct 19, 2016 6:26 PM, "张铎" wrote:
>
> > OK, seems no objection. I will file a issue to modify th
Concur here. Our distribution has on 2.7.x lines for a while.
Jerry
On Oct 19, 2016 6:26 PM, "张铎" wrote:
> OK, seems no objection. I will file a issue to modify the hadoop version
> support matrix.
>
> And I think we also need to change the hadoopcheck versions for our
> precommit check?
>
> T
OK, seems no objection. I will file a issue to modify the hadoop version
support matrix.
And I think we also need to change the hadoopcheck versions for our
precommit check?
Thanks all.
2016-10-20 1:14 GMT+08:00 Andrew Purtell :
> FWIW, we are running 2.7.x in production and it's stable.
>
>
>
FWIW, we are running 2.7.x in production and it's stable.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> we had not decided yet AFAIK. a big concern was the lack of
> maintenance releases on more recent Hadoop versions and the perception
> that 2.4 and 2.5 were the last big stable relea
we had not decided yet AFAIK. a big concern was the lack of
maintenance releases on more recent Hadoop versions and the perception
that 2.4 and 2.5 were the last big stable release lines.
2.6 and 2.7 have both gotten a few maintenance releases now, so maybe
this isn't a concern any more?
On Tue,
I thought we already decided to do that, no?
Enis
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Looking at http://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html , 2.5.x hasn't got new
> release for almost two years.
>
> Seems fine to drop support for 2.4 and 2.5
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Duo Zha
Looking at http://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html , 2.5.x hasn't got new
release for almost two years.
Seems fine to drop support for 2.4 and 2.5
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Duo Zhang wrote:
> This is the current hadoop version support matrix
>
> https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
>
This is the current hadoop version support matrix
https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
2016-10-19 9:40 GMT+08:00 Duo Zhang :
> To be specific, hadoop-2.4.x and hadoop-2.5.x.
>
> The latest releases for these two lines are about two years ago, so I
> think it is the time to drop the support
11 matches
Mail list logo
