Re: A hang with mod_md renew

Thinking. Because an issue can be a configuration fault and not a bug. I think best is post it to the user list first or dev can reply in the AL forum. Bugzilla is not so suited for discussions. Experience learns that AL users not always willing to be directed to bugzilla or to lists.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 -0400): +1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't quickly/casually picking up source

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will > see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via > ANNOUNCE. > Thoughts? I think we should complete this release,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 > -0400): >>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >>quickly/casually picking up source releases. > > Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the

Re: svn commit: r1826279 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Hi Yann, 2018-03-08 23:05 GMT+01:00 Yann Ylavic : > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:00 PM, wrote: > > > >*) mod_access_compat, mod_authz_host: Prevent access control > misconfiguration > > due to interpretation of #comments in Require host or

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> >> Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will >> see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Steffen sent me the patched module and it works! -- Sent from: http://apache-http-server.18135.x6.nabble.com/Apache-HTTP-Server-Dev-f4771363.html

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > For the sake of completeness, here are the full trace8 (failed) startup logs > for this reproduction scenario: Thanks Rainer! Could you (or Steffen, or Lucas) try the attached patch? It's based on 2.4.x, but should

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 18:25 schrieb lucas29252: Steffen sent me the patched module and it works! Same here. Regards, Rainer

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:25 PM, lucas29252 wrote: > Steffen sent me the patched module and it works! Thanks Steffen and Lucas! (and Yann)

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

*bringo*! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MpyHBoiTwk > On Mar 15, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>> On Thu,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 -0400): >+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >quickly/casually picking up source releases. Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Update and with a curl release. I upgraded everything yesterday... --

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Index: modules/slotmem/mod_slotmem_shm.c === --- modules/slotmem/mod_slotmem_shm.c (revision 1826753) +++

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 15.03.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rainer Jung >> wrote: >> Index: modules/slotmem/mod_slotmem_shm.c >>

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Steffen wrote: > Ok, my fault. I shall stop reporting here. > > Btw.. official is 32 not announced and in the vote thread I said: When there > some pop's up from the AL community, I let it know. Bug reports are always very welcome, at

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Steffen wrote: > Thinking. > > Because an issue can be a configuration fault and not a bug. I think > best is post it to the user list first or dev can reply in the AL > forum. Bugzilla is not so suited for discussions. Yes, technical

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: For the sake of completeness, here are the full trace8 (failed) startup logs for this reproduction scenario: Thanks Rainer! Could you (or Steffen, or Lucas) try the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via ANNOUNCE. Thoughts? I

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 > -0400): >>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >>quickly/casually picking up source releases. > > Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:48 > -0500): >>The largest headache is provisioning the entire suite of non-default perl >>modules required. Running the framework is trivial. I've been

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:48 -0500): >The largest headache is provisioning the entire suite of non-default perl >modules required. Running the framework is trivial. I've been working on >some workaround to this for unix and windows for "stock" test boxes.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener: >> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >>> >>> Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 >>> -0400):

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Le 15/03/2018 à 17:34, Yann Ylavic a écrit : On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via ANNOUNCE. Thoughts? I

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Rainer Jung in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:15:13 +0100): >The artefacts are on the mirrors and out in the wild, so we can not get >them back. Best is to soon proceed with the release and document the >mod_proxy_balancer on Windows regression in the announcement. +1 >About "not

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

> -Original Message- > From: William A Rowe Jr > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 4:28 PM > To: httpd > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri > wrote: > > > >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: This looks sensible, or do we say that users of

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

> -Original Message- > From: Rainer Jung > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:09 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer > on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? +1

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer >>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? >>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > *** Changes here >We consider this release to be the best version of Apache available for >non-Windows platforms, and encourage users of all prior versions to > upgrade. > >Please note, a bug after

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer >> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? > > +1 Should we also mention the regression against mod_security on Windows? (Nobody

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:11:10 -0500): >https://github.com/appsuite/oss-httpd-build is where this all lives, and is >where the localized PERL5LIB schema for all the components will land. >This can be further streamlined, and the really big caveat is that

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between candidate and release if both exist!) But great pointer, TY! On Mar 15, 2018 21:46, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote: > William A Rowe Jr in

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Ruggeri > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:00 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > Hi, all; > > On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: > > Hi, all; > >

mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Looks a serious regression. Reported: www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36597

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

No doubt something in Yann's slotmem changes that affect Windows. > On Mar 15, 2018, at 6:56 AM, Steffen wrote: > > > > Looks a serious regression. > > Reported: www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36597 > >

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

My bet would be on mod_md.c, line 701 that could place the job->next_run in the past. That would cause then the watchdog to run immediately again. Since the log shows the expiry date to be ok, the md->renew_window seems to be wrong. It would also be interesting to see the content of

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Hi > On 13 Mar 2018, at 16:59, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > >> On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: >> Hi, all; >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >>

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Steffen wrote: > > > Looks a serious regression. > > Reported: www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36597 It does not look like mod_slotmem_shm is used (missing some error logging from there), mod_slotmem_plain maybe? Also, more context

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Can anyone reproduce outside of Windows? Regards Rüdiger On 03/15/2018 01:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > No doubt something in Yann's slotmem changes that affect Windows. > >> On Mar 15, 2018, at 6:56 AM, Steffen wrote: >> >> >> >> Looks a serious regression. >> >>

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Besides, isn't this specifically tested in the Perl test framework? > On Mar 15, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I can't... > >> On Mar 15, 2018, at 9:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> Can anyone reproduce outside of Windows? >> >> Regards >>

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Steffen wrote: >> >> >> Looks a serious regression. >> >> Reported: www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36597 > > It does not look like mod_slotmem_shm is used

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

I am just passing the issue to list. I hope the reporter follows this list, the link I posted in the forum. > Op 15 mrt. 2018 om 14:34 heeft Yann Ylavic het > volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Steffen wrote: >>> >>> >>> Looks a serious regression. >>> >>> Reported:

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Steffen wrote: > > I am just passing the issues to list. I hope the reporter follows this list, > the link I posted in the forum. The best thing for everyone would be to direct users to bugzilla to report bugs, when they're not in the

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> (IIRC, Windows MPM is threaded only, no "forking" right?). > > the parent and child both run postconfig though on Windows. Argh, that's it!

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

Ok, my fault. I shall stop reporting here. Btw.. official is 32 not announced and in the vote thread I said: When there some pop's up from the AL community, I let it know. >>> Op 15 mrt. 2018 om 15:07 heeft Yann Ylavic het >>> volgende geschreven: >>> >>> On Thu,

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:59 PM, lucas29252 wrote: Hi, I'm the original reporter. I've just make a fresh install of httpd-2.4.32-Win64-VC15.zip

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Steffen wrote: >> >> >> Looks a serious regression. >> >> Reported: www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36597 > > It does not look like mod_slotmem_shm is used

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Hi, I'm the original reporter. I've just make a fresh install of httpd-2.4.32-Win64-VC15.zip And then uncommented the following modules: lbmethod_byrequests_module proxy_module slotmem_shm_module And in the

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

I am just passing the issues to list. I hope the reporter follows this list, the link I posted in the forum. > Op 15 mrt. 2018 om 09:58 heeft Stefan Eissing > het volgende geschreven: > > My bet would be on mod_md.c, line 701 that could place the job->next_run

Re: A hang with mod_md renew

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Steffen wrote: >> >> I am just passing the issues to list. I hope the reporter follows this list, >> the link I posted in the forum. > > The best thing for everyone

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

I can't... > On Mar 15, 2018, at 9:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > Can anyone reproduce outside of Windows? > > Regards > > Rüdiger > > On 03/15/2018 01:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> No doubt something in Yann's slotmem changes that affect Windows. >> >>> On Mar 15,

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:59 PM, lucas29252 wrote: > Hi, I'm the original reporter. > > I've just make a fresh install of httpd-2.4.32-Win64-VC15.zip > > > And then uncommented the following

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>> >>> (IIRC, Windows MPM is threaded only, no "forking" right?). >>

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

IIRC they use a combo of AP_PARENT_PID and postconfig userdata to tell between parent/child an first/second pass. But i also vaguely recall there is a helper for it now? On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Yann Ylavic