Reading backwards... +1 - deferring the announcement would be fine.
We simply can't make 2.4.32 "disappear" as unreleased.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We
> can easily release a quick
On 2018-03-16 08:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We
can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is
just an un-announced release.
Personally, I prefer this approach. I've been holding off on sending the
Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We
can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is
just an un-announced release.
> On Mar 15, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Christophe Jaillet
> wrote:
>
> Le 15/03/2018 à 17:34, Yann
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:17:45
-0500):
>That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on
>these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between
>candidate and release if both exist!) But great pointer, TY!
The
That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on
these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between
candidate and release if both exist!) But great pointer, TY!
On Mar 15, 2018 21:46, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote:
> William A Rowe Jr in
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:11:10
-0500):
>https://github.com/appsuite/oss-httpd-build is where this all lives, and is
>where the localized PERL5LIB schema for all the components will land.
>This can be further streamlined, and the really big caveat is that
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
This looks sensible, or do we say that users of
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer
>>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience?
>>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer
>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience?
>
> +1
Should we also mention the regression against mod_security on Windows?
(Nobody
> -Original Message-
> From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 4:28 PM
> To: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Rugge
> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer
> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience?
+1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> *** Changes here
>We consider this release to be the best version of Apache available for
>non-Windows platforms, and encourage users of all prior versions to
> upgrade.
>
>Please note, a bug after
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:09 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32
>
> Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
> > On Thu, Mar 15
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:48
> -0500):
>>The largest headache is provisioning the entire suite of non-default perl
>>modules required. Running the framework is trivial. I've been
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:48
-0500):
>The largest headache is provisioning the entire suite of non-default perl
>modules required. Running the framework is trivial. I've been working on
>some workaround to this for unix and windows for "stock" test boxes.
Rainer Jung in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:15:13
+0100):
>The artefacts are on the mirrors and out in the wild, so we can not get
>them back. Best is to soon proceed with the release and document the
>mod_proxy_balancer on Windows regression in the announcement.
+1
>About "not
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>>>
>>> Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38
>>> -0400):
Le 15/03/2018 à 17:34, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will
see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via
ANNOUNCE.
Thoughts?
I
Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38
-0400):
+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't
quickly/casually picking up source
Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will
see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via
ANNOUNCE.
Thoughts?
I
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38
> -0400):
>>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't
>>quickly/casually picking up source releases.
>
> Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38
> -0400):
>>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't
>>quickly/casually picking up source releases.
>
> Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the
Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38
-0400):
>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't
>quickly/casually picking up source releases.
Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Update and with a curl
release. I upgraded everything yesterday...
--
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will
>> see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will
> see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via
> ANNOUNCE.
> Thoughts?
I think we should complete this release,
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:00 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32
>
> Hi, all;
>
> On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri"
Hi
> On 13 Mar 2018, at 16:59, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
>
>> On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>>
Hi, all;
On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote:
> Hi, all;
>
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
>
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
28 matches
Mail list logo