Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-16 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Reading backwards... +1 - deferring the announcement would be fine. We simply can't make 2.4.32 "disappear" as unreleased. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We > can easily release a quick

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018-03-16 08:03, Jim Jagielski wrote: Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is just an un-announced release. Personally, I prefer this approach. I've been holding off on sending the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is just an un-announced release. > On Mar 15, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Christophe Jaillet > wrote: > > Le 15/03/2018 à 17:34, Yann

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-16 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:17:45 -0500): >That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on >these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between >candidate and release if both exist!) But great pointer, TY! The

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between candidate and release if both exist!) But great pointer, TY! On Mar 15, 2018 21:46, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote: > William A Rowe Jr in

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:11:10 -0500): >https://github.com/appsuite/oss-httpd-build is where this all lives, and is >where the localized PERL5LIB schema for all the components will land. >This can be further streamlined, and the really big caveat is that

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: This looks sensible, or do we say that users of

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer >>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? >>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer >> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? > > +1 Should we also mention the regression against mod_security on Windows? (Nobody

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 4:28 PM > To: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Rugge

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Eric Covener
> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer > on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? +1

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > *** Changes here >We consider this release to be the best version of Apache available for >non-Windows platforms, and encourage users of all prior versions to > upgrade. > >Please note, a bug after

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:09 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic: > > On Thu, Mar 15

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:48 > -0500): >>The largest headache is provisioning the entire suite of non-default perl >>modules required. Running the framework is trivial. I've been

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:48 -0500): >The largest headache is provisioning the entire suite of non-default perl >modules required. Running the framework is trivial. I've been working on >some workaround to this for unix and windows for "stock" test boxes.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Rainer Jung in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:15:13 +0100): >The artefacts are on the mirrors and out in the wild, so we can not get >them back. Best is to soon proceed with the release and document the >mod_proxy_balancer on Windows regression in the announcement. +1 >About "not

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener: >> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >>> >>> Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 >>> -0400):

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Christophe Jaillet
Le 15/03/2018 à 17:34, Yann Ylavic a écrit : On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via ANNOUNCE. Thoughts? I

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 -0400): +1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't quickly/casually picking up source

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via ANNOUNCE. Thoughts? I

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 > -0400): >>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >>quickly/casually picking up source releases. > > Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 > -0400): >>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >>quickly/casually picking up source releases. > > Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 -0400): >+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >quickly/casually picking up source releases. Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Update and with a curl release. I upgraded everything yesterday... --

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> >> Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will >> see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will > see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via > ANNOUNCE. > Thoughts? I think we should complete this release,

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:00 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > Hi, all; > > On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri"

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Exonetric
Hi > On 13 Mar 2018, at 16:59, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > >> On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: >> Hi, all; >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-13 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this