On 10/4/2012 4:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
Oh dear, I have to go against the bandwagon.
I like pb2 best, by a clear margin. The contrast to pb3 is that
it separates the slogan visually from the name, which I find
more comfortable. Pb3 jars when the text powered by ...
turns out not to trip off
On 10/05/2012 04:25 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 10/4/2012 4:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
Oh dear, I have to go against the bandwagon.
I like pb2 best, by a clear margin. The contrast to pb3 is that
it separates the slogan visually from the name, which I find
more comfortable. Pb3 jars when the
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:25:55 -0500
Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
On 10/4/2012 4:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
Oh dear, I have to go against the bandwagon.
I like pb2 best, by a clear margin. The contrast to pb3 is that
it separates the slogan visually from the name, which I find
On 10/5/2012 11:53 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
No. Apache is the brand and the logo. HTTPD is just a name.
I can agree that Apache is the brand... but isn't the focus of a
'powered by' logo the product rather than the brand?
Meaning... These clothes cleaned by Procter Gamble makes less sense
to me
On 04.10.2012 05:15, Eric Covener wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
pb3 has my vote
Same here and thanks for the effort.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2012 05:16
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:15:57PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
pb3 has my vote
On 4 Oct 2012, at 03:51, Daniel Gruno wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
Pick a card, any card ;)
Oh dear, I have to
Am 04.10.2012 05:15, schrieb Eric Covener:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
pb3 has my vote
yep, mine too, and is exactly what I
Can I assume that all the logos being proposed are donated
to the ASF?
I'm sure they are, but we need some sort of paper-trail
to ensure. If someone is a committer with an iCLA then
it's not really needed, but any from non-committers need
verification.
On Oct 4, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Guenter Knauf
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 23:15 -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
pb3 has my vote
+1
On 10/04/2012 02:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can I assume that all the logos being proposed are donated
to the ASF?
I'm sure they are, but we need some sort of paper-trail
to ensure. If someone is a committer with an iCLA then
it's not really needed, but any from non-committers need
Hi Daniel,
Am 04.10.2012 15:05, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
Do we need to call a vote on this, or will all the pluses, that have
been flying around in the thread, suffice? There seems to be an
overwhelming majority supporting the use of
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
I dont think that
On 10/02/2012 03:58 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 10/02/2012 03:42 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 10/2/2012 5:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Righto, ASL getting in the way ;)
I have updated my suggestion for a powered-by logo using only ASL stuff:
Powered by and 2.4 is done with Droid Sans, which is using
On 10/03/2012 08:20 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Really thank for that. I see the images are already in trunk, would it
be possible to have them also in 2.4 branch?
Thanks,
Jan Kaluza
Even though this is under the jurisdiction of the docs project, it is
still commit-then-review, which is why I
Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :)
If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and
commit them to trunk later today.
go ahead - thats overdue!
Gün.
Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :)
If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and
commit them to trunk later today.
go ahead - thats overdue!
oh, I should read all
On 10/3/2012 1:31 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :)
If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions
and
commit them to trunk later today.
go
Hi Daniel,
Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :)
If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and
commit them to trunk later today.
go ahead - thats overdue!
may I ask
On 10/04/2012 03:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :)
If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and
commit them to trunk later
What about Apache HTTPD?
* Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 03:35:56 +0200
From: Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.28
On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote:
What about Apache HTTPD?
+1
httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked.
Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified right.
Like so maybe? HTTPD is syncopate too
Am 04.10.2012 04:26, schrieb Gregg Smith:
On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote:
What about Apache HTTPD?
+1
httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked.
Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified right.
Like so maybe? HTTPD is syncopate too
On 10/04/2012 04:45 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 04.10.2012 04:26, schrieb Gregg Smith:
On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote:
What about Apache HTTPD?
+1
httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked.
Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
pb3 has my vote
On 10/04/2012 05:15 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
pb3 has my vote
I like pb3 too.
On 10/02/2012 01:01 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure who has done original ./docs/icons/apache_pb2.* icons, but
I think they should be updated to show 2.4 version for httpd-2.4. We are
using that icon in default index.html in Fedora and it would be really
nice to see version 2.4 there
On 10/02/2012 01:41 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 10/02/2012 01:01 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure who has done original ./docs/icons/apache_pb2.* icons, but
I think they should be updated to show 2.4 version for httpd-2.4. We are
using that icon in default index.html in Fedora and it
On 10/2/2012 4:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Yes, this does seem to be something that needs fixing.
If people are content with this suggestion, I can turn it into png/gif
images and put them in the docs folder in trunk as well as the svg
version. Or if the original author still has the original
On 10/02/2012 01:56 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 10/2/2012 4:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Yes, this does seem to be something that needs fixing.
If people are content with this suggestion, I can turn it into png/gif
images and put them in the docs folder in trunk as well as the svg
version. Or if
On 10/2/2012 5:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Righto, ASL getting in the way ;)
I have updated my suggestion for a powered-by logo using only ASL stuff:
Powered by and 2.4 is done with Droid Sans, which is using ASL
Apache is done with Syncopate, which is also using ASL.
Take a look and see if the
On 10/02/2012 03:42 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 10/2/2012 5:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Righto, ASL getting in the way ;)
I have updated my suggestion for a powered-by logo using only ASL stuff:
Powered by and 2.4 is done with Droid Sans, which is using ASL
Apache is done with Syncopate, which
32 matches
Mail list logo