> Am 27.11.2021 um 14:21 schrieb Greg Stein :
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:49 AM ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> >...
> Additionally, we need to clarify with ASF and ISRG if this needs some sort of
> paperwork. Since the ISRG repository uses the Apache license, in my naive
> world
> view, this
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:49 AM ste...@eissing.org
wrote:
>...
> Additionally, we need to clarify with ASF and ISRG if this needs some sort
> of
> paperwork. Since the ISRG repository uses the Apache license, in my naive
> world
> view, this should be quite an informal process. But I do not
Thanks everyone for giving feedback. I summarise this as an overall positive
response.
I will start next week on bringing this over as an experimental module. Also
make
the test cases run on one of our travis instances.
Additionally, we need to clarify with ASF and ISRG if this needs some
For me it is a +1,
I didn´t say anything because I am not knowledgeable enough.
Stefan, if noone answers it is not because of lack of interest but
probably because you are several steps ahead :)
El jue, 25 nov 2021 a las 11:26, Greg Stein () escribió:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:42 AM
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:42 AM ste...@eissing.org
wrote:
>...
> In its development, the arrival of mod_tls has caused changes in our
> server core. Not in any way related to Rust itself. But we added the
> capability to have more than one SSL/TLS provider in our server. So people
> can use
> Am 24.11.2021 um 12:42 schrieb Graham Leggett :
>
> On 18 Nov 2021, at 19:48, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
>> How would you feel about adding mod_tls
>> (https://github.com/abetterinternet/mod_tls) as an experimental module to
>> Apache httpd?
>
> Having more choice is excellent.
>
>>
Add it in :-)
> On Nov 24, 2021, at 4:46 AM, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> Coming back to this. Since there was no feedback on my post: are people
> just too occupied/opposed/not interested?
>
> Curious,
> Stefan
>
>> Am 18.11.2021 um 18:48 schrieb ste...@eissing.org:
>>
>> How would you feel
On 18 Nov 2021, at 19:48, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> How would you feel about adding mod_tls
> (https://github.com/abetterinternet/mod_tls) as an experimental module to
> Apache httpd?
Having more choice is excellent.
> For people who have not followed that development:
> - it is a TLS
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:19:17AM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> However what would be a discussion without a naming dispute, mod_rustls? :p
Agreed. At least as long as it's an experimental module. If it ever
moves beyond experimental, then a rename back to mod_tls might make
sense.
vh
Mads
Hi Stefan,
sorry for the lateness..
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:46 AM ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> Coming back to this. Since there was no feedback on my post: are people
> just too occupied/opposed/not interested?
I looked at the code diagonally and it looks good to me (I like it and
the
> Am 24.11.2021 um 10:57 schrieb Joe Orton :
>
> Possibly no strong opinions? +1 from me anyway.
>
> How hard is it going to be to test in Travis?
I have a test suite that can be added to our test/modules. Then
we need to bring the rust tool chain into the test image and
checkout/create the
Possibly no strong opinions? +1 from me anyway.
How hard is it going to be to test in Travis?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:46:03AM +0100, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> Coming back to this. Since there was no feedback on my post: are people
> just too occupied/opposed/not interested?
>
> Curious,
>
Coming back to this. Since there was no feedback on my post: are people
just too occupied/opposed/not interested?
Curious,
Stefan
> Am 18.11.2021 um 18:48 schrieb ste...@eissing.org:
>
> How would you feel about adding mod_tls
> (https://github.com/abetterinternet/mod_tls) as an experimental
13 matches
Mail list logo
