[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.3.6

The vote has passed with 3 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes. Thanks, Konrad > On 14. Nov 2023, at 15:01, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault >> Packa

Re: VOTE: Migrate from Subversion to Git

; > Regards > Julian > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:57 AM Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> On 12.10.2023 06:55, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> On 11.10.2023 19:58, Konrad Windszus wrote: >>>> ... >>> >>> [X] +1, migrate Jackrabbit to Git >>

Jackrabbit Site: Migrate to Git

Hi, Currently the source for the Jackrabbit website is maintained at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/trunk/. The Maven site build generates the target site out of that and the maven-scm-publish-plugin pushes the generated site to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.22

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.22 with [INFO] [INFO] Apache Maven 3.9.5 (57804ffe001d7215b5e7bcb531cf83df38f93546) [INFO] OS name: "mac os x", version: "14.2", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac" [INFO] Jav

Re: Jackrabbit 2.20.14 Release Plan

Can you review https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit/pull/147? I would like to back-port it to 2.20 as well. Thanks, Konrad > On 4. Jan 2024, at 12:12, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit 2.20.14 on Monday. > > The list of open issues scheduled for 2.20.14 is empty

Re: Jackrabbit 2.20.14 Release Plan

I take this as approval and created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-5011 and squashed and merged the PR. > On 4. Jan 2024, at 21:54, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 04.01.2024 19:48, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Can you review https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit/pull/147?

Re: Jackrabbit Site: Migrate to Git

pository writes to publish the site. Konrad > On 12. Dec 2023, at 12:33, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > Currently the source for the Jackrabbit website is maintained at > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/trunk/. > The Maven site build generates the targe

Re: Jackrabbit Site: Migrate to Git

I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-55 to track this. Konrad > On 14. Jan 2024, at 14:12, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 11.01.2024 16:56, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Ping, any feedback? Otherwise I would start an official VOTE soon. >> ... > > +1 in

Re: [VOTE] Switch Jackrabbit trunk to require Java 11

+1 Konrad > On 16. Jan 2024, at 16:05, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 12.01.2024 16:15, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 08.01.2024 09:25, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> Hi there. >>> >>> In the upcoming weeks, I'd like to discuss the roadmap for Jackrabbit. >>> >>> Things that come to mind are: >>> >>>

JIRA project admin rights for https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRSITE/

Hi, Who is JIRA project admin for https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRSITE/? I cannot assign issue to myself. Can we use the same permission scheme there as for https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/JCR/permissions (i.e. grant all PMC automatically the project admi

Re: Jackrabbit Site: Migrate to Git

another mail, once that is done. Konrad > On 14. Jan 2024, at 15:25, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-55 to track this. > > Konrad > >> On 14. Jan 2024, at 14:12, Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> On 11.01.2024 16

Re: JIRA project admin rights for https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRSITE/

Ping, can anyone help me here? Thanks, Konrad > On 24. Jan 2024, at 13:17, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > Who is JIRA project admin for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRSITE/? > I cannot assign issue to myself. > Can we use the same permission scheme

Re: Jackrabbit Site: Migrate to Git

24. Jan 2024, at 20:45, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > Due to the size of the generated site (almost 2GB without history) I decided > for now to leave the https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/live/ > in place. > > The source for the JR2 part of the site wa

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.8.0

Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.8.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.8.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/jackrabbit-filevault-3.8.0/ The release no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.8.0

+1 Built successfully with [INFO] [INFO] Apache Maven 3.9.8 (36645f6c9b5079805ea5009217e36f2cffd34256) [INFO] OS name: "mac os x", version: "14.6", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac" [INFO] Java version: 11.0.24, vendor: Eclipse

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.8.0

Hi, The vote passes with 4 binding votes from Julian, Manfred, Jörg and myself. Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Konrad > On 1. Aug 2024, at 09:38, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.8.0 release is availab

JCR 2.0 System View -> sv:name: expanded or qualified form?

Hi, in the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-407 I am currently looking into details how node names can be given in the System View format (https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/7_Export.html#7.2%20System%20View) Although not explicitly stated in the JSR, it seems t

Re: JCR 2.0 System View -> sv:name: expanded or qualified form?

Reschke wrote: > > On 11.02.2020 10:01, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Thanks for the quick response. >> Indeed there seems to be an issue in Oak: >> After creating a node with its expanded form with system view format import >> below the root node I try to call >>

Re: JCR 2.0 System View -> sv:name: expanded or qualified form?

Also according to https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit/blob/b23d6734381e49f236c3705820126803555608b5/jackrabbit-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/spi/Name.java#L39 the default namespace URI is the empty one! > On 11. Feb 2020, at 11:43, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > But I am g

Re: JCR 2.0 System View -> sv:name: expanded or qualified form?

20, at 11:50, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 11.02.2020 11:45, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Also according to >> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit/blob/b23d6734381e49f236c3705820126803555608b5/jackrabbit-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/spi/Name.java#L39 >> the defau

Re: JCR 2.0 System View -> sv:name: expanded or qualified form?

What should be the expanded name for the qualified name "foo" (without URI prefix) then? What namespace URI should be used then? I am now totally lost to be honest. Konrad > On 11. Feb 2020, at 12:01, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 11.02.2020 11:52, Konrad Windszus wro

Re: JCR 2.0 System View -> sv:name: expanded or qualified form?

with jackrabbit-spi-commons 2.20.0. "wrongtype" is IMHO a totally valid qualified name, therefore it shouldn't throw! Is this a bug? Konrad > On 11. Feb 2020, at 15:40, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 11.02.2020 12:17, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> What should be the

Re: JCR 2.0 System View -> sv:name: expanded or qualified form?

ckrabbit/blob/b23d6734381e49f236c3705820126803555608b5/jackrabbit-spi-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/spi/commons/namespace/NamespaceResolver.java#L38>. Will open a PR for that. > On 13. Feb 2020, at 11:46, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > So what you are saying is basically

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.4 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.2

A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.4 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.4/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/commons/filevault/tags/jackrabbit-filevault-3.4.4/ The S

Git migration of FileVault and FileVault Package Maven Plugin

Hi, I would like to tackle the git migration of FileVault [1] soon. I would propose to create two new repositories named - jackrabbit-filevault and - jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin Since this is already the names of the github svn mirror repos [2][3] currently in place, those would n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.4 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.2

Here is my +1 Konrad > On 16. Mar 2020, at 15:14, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.4 release is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.4/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the s

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.4 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.2

Hi, the vote passes as follows: +1 Tobias Bocanegra, Robert Munteanu, Konrad Windszus No other votes have been cast Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Konrad > On 16. Mar 2020, at 15:14, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.4 releas

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.4 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.2

.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-421 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-422 > > stefan > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Konrad Windszus >> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:16 PM >> To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org >> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Ap

Re: Git migration of FileVault and FileVault Package Maven Plugin

advance. Konrad On 2020/03/16 21:02:13, Konrad Windszus wrote: > Hi, > I would like to tackle the git migration of FileVault [1] soon. > > I would propose to create two new repositories named > > - jackrabbit-filevault and > - jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin > >

Re: Git migration of FileVault and FileVault Package Maven Plugin

I little bit more formal: Vote is open for 72 hours. [ ] +1, migrate FileVault to Git [ ] 0 [ ] -1, because... Thanks, Konrad > On 21. May 2020, at 10:45, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > For the actual migration we need a more formal vote than just > https://lists.apache.org

Re: Git migration of FileVault and FileVault Package Maven Plugin

Here is my +1. Can we have at least two other PMC votes? Thanks, Konrad > On 21. May 2020, at 14:14, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > I little bit more formal: > Vote is open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1, migrate FileVault to Git > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1, because... > > Thanks, > Ko

Re: Git migration of FileVault and FileVault Package Maven Plugin

Ping again, I need at least one more PMC vote. Konrad > On 21. May 2020, at 14:14, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > I little bit more formal: > Vote is open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1, migrate FileVault to Git > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1, because... > > Thanks, > Konrad > >

Re: June 2020 report: draft for review

Hi Marcel, Maybe we should add that FileVault has been migrated from SVN to Git. Thanks, Konrad > On 5. Jun 2020, at 14:56, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > > Hi, > > The draft for the June 2020 board report is available here: > https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2020-06.html > > Plea

Re: June 2020 report: draft for review

would like to point out in particular in addition > to moving to Git? > > Regards > Marcel > > On 05.06.20, 18:59, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > > Hi Marcel, > Maybe we should add that FileVault has been migrated from SVN to Git. > Thanks, > Konrad

Rights to assign reviewer in GH PRs

Hi, it seems that for https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit I don't have enough Karma to select reviewers for PRs. Who could help me with that, or should I raise a ticket with INFRA? Thanks, Konrad

Re: Rights to assign reviewer in GH PRs

Ping, anyone? > On 8. Jul 2020, at 12:52, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > it seems that for https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit > <https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit> I don't have enough Karma to select > reviewers for PRs. > Who could help me with that,

Re: PMC list in jackrabbit-parent/pom.xml vs team member list in jackrabbit/site

Did you really mean that link? I rather see this info in https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/jackrabbit-team.html (don't have the according MD SVN file URL at hand) At Apache Sling we never put developer info into our modules and I am +1 on

Re: PMC list in jackrabbit-parent/pom.xml vs team member list in jackrabbit/site

n 16.07.2020 15:08, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Did you really mean that link? >> I rather see this info in >> https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/jackrabbit-team.html (don't have the >> according MD SVN file URL at hand) > > Yes, the link was to the markdown file

Re: Rights to assign reviewer in GH PRs

I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20531 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20531> for that and also asked how we can manage those rights ourselves. Konrad > On 10. Jul 2020, at 13:43, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Ping, anyone? > >> On 8. Ju

Re: Rights to assign reviewer in GH PRs

Jul 2020, at 10:26, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20531 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20531> for that and also asked > how we can manage those rights ourselves. > Konrad > >> On 10. Jul 2020, at 13:

FileVault Release

Just to give some advance notice: I plan to spin a release of Jackrabbit FileVault Maven Plugin 1.1.2 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRVLT/versions/12346689 ) and FileVault 3.4.6 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.3

+1 [INFO] [INFO] Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f) [INFO] OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.15.6", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac" [INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_222, vendor: AdoptOpenJDK, runtime: /Lib

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.6/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

+1 Konrad > On 28. Jul 2020, at 11:48, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 release is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.6/ > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ja

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

ote: > > Am 28.07.2020 um 11:48 schrieb Konrad Windszus: >> ... > > The check for the filevault plugin fails here: > >> [INFO] Scanning for projects... >> Downloading from central: >> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/parent/3.4.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

eason for that additional effort. WDYT? Konrad > On 30. Jul 2020, at 15:45, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Am 30.07.2020 um 13:20 schrieb Konrad Windszus: >> Hi Julian, >> can you give a bit more context? >> I released both 3.4.6 and the Maven plugin 1.1.4 together becau

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

> On 30. Jul 2020, at 16:35, Julian Reschke wrote: > > So, when taking the vote instructions literally, I should veto > the release... The vote instructions in my email do not say anything about failed execution of check-release.sh, but vote however you want to. I already gave updated instru

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

ignatures >> [INFO] >> [INFO]Verifying >> filevault-package-maven-plugin-1.1.4-source-release.zip... >> gpg: die unterzeichneten Daten sind wohl in >> './filevault-package-maven-plugin/1.1.4/filevault-package-maven-plugin-1.1.4-source-release.zip' &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

Regarding "Can you please check whether you see the same gpg/openssl issues in your log?" Yes, that message is totally expected. As I said already: My key is not signed yet! Therefore GPG emits a message related to that. IMHO that should not make the check fail though (and in fact it doesn't) b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

> On 31. Jul 2020, at 07:46, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Am 30.07.2020 um 20:22 schrieb Julian Reschke: >> Am 30.07.2020 um 20:07 schrieb Konrad Windszus: >>> Hi Julian, >>> >>>> On 30. Jul 2020, at 19:52, Julian Reschke >>> <mailto:juli

Adjustments of check-release.sh for multi module releases

Hi, currently the check-release.sh (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/check-release.sh) executes the Maven build in step 6. with "mvn clean verify". That means if one releases couples multiple dependent modules one has to install the dependent module in the local Maven repositor

Re: Adjustments of check-release.sh for multi module releases

gt; On 31. Jul 2020, at 10:56, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > currently the check-release.sh > (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/check-release.sh) executes > the Maven build in step 6. with "mvn clean verify". > > That means if one releases coupl

Re: Adjustments of check-release.sh for multi module releases

> On 31. Jul 2020, at 15:29, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Q: so why does this work when we do multi-module releases in Jackrabbit > Classic or Oak? This is not about one Maven reactor build (which might obviously contain as many modules as you would like) but about two or more modules which are n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

We need one more vote. Anyone? > On 28. Jul 2020, at 11:48, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 release is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.6/ > <https://dist.apache.org/r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

%3Cdev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1bc7a7cda0dc76d504fb85fe05864c987ecdf7465c1fcfb92553640f@%3Cdev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E> Thanks, Konrad > On 3. Aug 2020, at 11:55, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 11:48 +0200, Konrad Windszus w

Re: Adjustments of check-release.sh for multi module releases

ld need to redownload all necessary plugins/dependencies WDYT? Konrad > On 3. Aug 2020, at 12:12, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 10:56 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Hi, >> currently the check-release.sh ( >> https://dist.apache.org/repos

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.6 & Apache Jackrabbit FileVault - Package Maven Plugin 1.1.4

Hi, the vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Toby, Robert and myself I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. Thanks, Konrad

FileVault: Where to place OSGi configurations, bundles and packages in container packages?

Hi, according to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-170 "container" packages are not supposed to contain any content themselves except for (sub) packages, bundles and OSGi configuration. Now the question is how to place them properly inside the container package: They must be located s

FileVault: Usage of namespace prefixes in deserialisation of simple file aggregates

Hi, according to [1] a simple file is sufficient to generate a node with several properties out of that (during deserialization/package installation) The problem is that this filename does not have any local namespace declarations. Still the filename might look like _jcr_myfile.png which is mapp

Javadocs for 2.18

Hi, I just noticed that version 2.18 is missing from https://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/ . It used to be there in the past. Was that deliberate or does anything speaks against restoring the Javadoc of 2.18 in that location? Thanks, Konrad

Re: Javadocs for 2.18

d IMHO... Thanks, Konrad > On 1. Dec 2020, at 13:43, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Am 01.12.2020 um 13:26 schrieb Konrad Windszus: >> Hi, >> I just noticed that version 2.18 is missing from >> https://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/ <https://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/>. >&

Re: new filevault and filevault-package-maven-plugin release?

Hi Stefan, IIUC all of the issues are only related to the node type validator which has been introduced in 3.4.8 and indeed suffered from several flaws. However that validator can be easily disabled (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/validation.html#Settings

Re: new filevault and filevault-package-maven-plugin release?

but it is > an improvement and should not block the release? > > stefan > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Konrad Windszus mailto:konra...@gmx.de>> >> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 11:59 AM >> To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org <mailto:dev@j

Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.8 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.8/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/jackrabbit-filevault-3.4.8/ The release no

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

, at 10:09, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 20:44 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> The command for running automated checks against this release >> candidate is: >> $ sh check-release.sh filevault 3.4.8 >> 669663e26d9fe7364a2735bcf237

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

-01-12 at 10:53 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> That is a shame, we had that with other artifacts in the past. I will >> try to get a fix for that in Maven Central. >> The file listing the wrong versions is >> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/javax/jcr/jc

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

Hi Julian > On 14. Jan 2021, at 16:00, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Am 11.01.2021 um 20:44 schrieb Konrad Windszus: >> Hi, >> ... > > Hi Konrad! > > The subject line of this mail should be prefixed with "[VOTE]"... Noted, I unfortunately missed it this

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

21, at 10:53, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi Robert, > That is a shame, we had that with other artifacts in the past. I will try to > get a fix for that in Maven Central. > The file listing the wrong versions is > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/javax/jcr/jcr/maven-metadata.xml

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

Hi Julian, > > check-release for FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6 fails, as it > assumes that FV 3.4.8 is already released. (same problem as for the last > release) > I explicitly mentioned that in my release vote email: > *** As FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6 depends on the FileVault

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

Here is my +1 Konrad > On 11. Jan 2021, at 20:44, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.8 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.8/ > > The release candidate is a zi

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

I need one more vote. Thanks, Konrad > On 11. Jan 2021, at 20:44, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.8 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.8/ > > The release ca

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

Gentle nudge Still one more vote missing... Konrad > On 18. Jan 2021, at 08:58, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > I need one more vote. > Thanks, > Konrad > > >> On 11. Jan 2021, at 20:44, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> A cand

Re: Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

> I can +1 FileVault 3.4.8; the other one doesn't validate for me on > Cygwin (due to scm problem I currently can't investigate -- same as last > time). > > Best regards, Julian Once you find some time please raise an issue with further details, then I can look into that and hopefully fix it.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Jackrabbit FileVault 3.4.8 and FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.6

Hi, The vote has passed with +1 (binding) from Marcel, Robert and myself +1 (non-binding) from Stefan Thanks for voting. I will copy this release to the Jackrabbit dist directory and promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. Konrad > On 11. Jan 2021, at 20:44, Konrad Winds

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 released

Hi Andrei, would it be possible to update the javadoc at https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/apidocs/? This is pretty outdated (1.27-SNAPSHOT). Thanks in advance, Konrad > On 28. Jan 2021, at 14:41, Andrei Dulceanu wrote: > > The Apache Jac

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10

Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.10/ The release notes can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRVLT/versions/12349480 The release candidate is a zip archive of the sourc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10

. Konrad > On 26. Feb 2021, at 11:51, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > > Hi, > > On 26.02.21, 09:56, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault >> 3.4.10. The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours during busines

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10

> > The simplest fix would be to remove the file from the ZIP, and then let > people retry... Not that easy, as then the checksums and the signature would no longer match... If you consider this a blocker I guess I have to respin the release... > > Best regards, Julian

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10

This is deliberate, as this is supposed to be backwards compatible : https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/f91c3d73ab33e4155837768d70b7c3e8c7da9e2d/RELEASE-NOTES.txt#L17 Jackrabbit 2.14 and Oak 1.6 were the versions shipped with AEM 6.3 with which this release is supposed to be com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10

> Am 26.02.2021 um 13:21 schrieb Konrad Windszus: >> This is deliberate, as this is supposed to be backwards compatible : >> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/f91c3d73ab33e4155837768d70b7c3e8c7da9e2d/RELEASE-NOTES.txt#L17 >> >> Jackrabbit 2.14 and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10

Here is my +1 Konrad > On 26. Feb 2021, at 09:56, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.4.10/ > > The release notes

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10

Hi, The vote passes as follows: +1 Marcel, Robert and myself. Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Konrad > On 26. Feb 2021, at 09:56, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.4.10 release is available at: > > https://dis

Evolution of Jackrabbit API vs Oak API

Hi everyone, I am wondering if it makes sense to still extend the Jackrabbit API given that Jackrabbit 2 is mostly in maintenance mode. In the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-515 I would need some API to get all(!) bound principals for one session (https://issues.apache.

Re: Evolution of Jackrabbit API vs Oak API

Thanks, that makes it even more blurry for me what is supposed to be exposed by Jackrabbit API vs by Oak API if Oak is now the only implementation of more recent Jackrabbit API versions... > On 21. Apr 2021, at 10:16, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Am 21.04.2021 um 09:59 schrieb Konrad

Re: Evolution of Jackrabbit API vs Oak API

session is backed by Oak, otherwise throws an ISE? IMHO it doesn't make sense to duplicate methods exposed by Oak API already in Jackrabbit API... Konrad > On 21. Apr 2021, at 10:43, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Am 21.04.2021 um 10:18 schrieb Konrad Windszus: >> Thanks

Re: Evolution of Jackrabbit API vs Oak API

> On 21. Apr 2021, at 11:19, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Am 21.04.2021 um 10:47 schrieb Konrad Windszus: >> What about providing a bridge from JCR to Oak API by adding the following >> method to org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.JCR: >> &

Re: Evolution of Jackrabbit API vs Oak API

I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9416 to track this improvement and attached a PR. Please have a look. > On 21. Apr 2021, at 11:29, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > > >> On 21. Apr 2021, at 11:19, Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> Am 21.04.2021 um

Re: Evolution of Jackrabbit API vs Oak API

t; On 21. Apr 2021, at 12:15, Angela Schreiber wrote: > > hi konrad > > i commented on the issue. in general i agree with julian that this looks bad > and i am not in favor or that proposal. > > kind regards > angela > > > From: Konrad Windszus > Sent: Wedne

Linking ASF and Github Accounts

Hi, to be able to select someone as a reviewer in Github PRs or to just get write access to Jackrabbit Git Repositories (which are no SVN mirrors) it is necessary for committers to explicitly link their accounts via https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/. Currently only very few committers (17) have d

Re: New release of Jackrabbit Filevault?

Hi Carsten, I plan to do that as soon as https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/pull/137#issuecomment-842073806 and https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/pull/139#pullrequestreview-658495207

Re: New filevault-package-maven-plugin release including FileVault 3.4.10

Hi Daniel, for Maven Plugins you can override dependencies locally like this: org.apache.jackrabbit filevault-package-maven-plugin 1.1.6 org.apache.jackrabbit.vault org.apache.jackrabbit.vault 3.4.10 Unfortunately JCRVLT-496 is not sufficient, but probably

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.0

A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault ${project.version} release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.5.0/ The release notes can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRVLT/versions/12349947 The release candidate is a zip archive of t

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.0

Time to call the vote on the Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.0 release. * +1 votes from Robert Munteanu, Marcel Reutegger and Dominik Süß. * No other votes. The vote is successful. I will make the artifacts available as soon as possible. > On 20. May 2021, at 13:47, Konrad Windszus wr

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8

Hello, A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault-package-maven-plugin/1.1.8/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-pac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8

Here is my +1 I need more binding votes. Thanks, Konrad > On 2. Jun 2021, at 11:44, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hello, > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8 release > is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/fi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8

Hi, I need at least one more binding vote. Konrad > On 2. Jun 2021, at 11:44, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hello, > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8 release > is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8

> On 2. Jun 2021, at 11:44, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hello, > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8 release > is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault-package-maven-plugin/1.1.8/ > > The release ca

[VOTE} Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2

Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.5.2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/jackrabbit-filevault-3.5.2/ The release no

[CANCEL] [VOTE} Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2

I hereby cancel the vote for FileVault 3.5.2 due to the regression found by Stefan. Konrad > On 1. Sep 2021, at 19:32, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabb

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.4

Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.4 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.5.4/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/jackrabbit-filevault-3.5.4/ The release no

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >