[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938269#comment-14938269 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6594: - Commit 1706128 from

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938239#comment-14938239 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-6594 at 9/30/15 6:34 PM:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-6594: -- Fix Version/s: 5.4 > Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8109) Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14937734#comment-14937734 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-8109: Isn't this situation already pretty sell resolved more robustly by

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938239#comment-14938239 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-6594: --- Forbidden-Apis 2.0 was released a minute ago. I will

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-6594: -- Summary: Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0) (was: Add

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-6594: -- Attachment: LUCENE-6594.patch Patch. > Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8109) Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938168#comment-14938168 ] Gus Heck commented on SOLR-8109: Does FirstFieldValueUpdateProcessorFactory accept wildcards? The case that

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938274#comment-14938274 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6594: - Commit 1706130 from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8109) Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938312#comment-14938312 ] Gus Heck commented on SOLR-8109: So what I think you are saying is that copyField will soon be deprecated?

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-8101) Installation script permission issues and other scripts fixes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timothy Potter reassigned SOLR-8101: Assignee: Timothy Potter > Installation script permission issues and other scripts fixes >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8101) Installation script permission issues and other scripts fixes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14937964#comment-14937964 ] Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-8101: -- Thanks for the updated patch [~urusha]. I'll try this out soon

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-6594. --- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Robert for review. > Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-7839) SolrJ support for BasicAuth

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya closed SOLR-7839. -- Resolution: Duplicate > SolrJ support for BasicAuth > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938279#comment-14938279 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6594: - Commit 1706132 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938276#comment-14938276 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6594: - Commit 1706131 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6594) Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis 2.0)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938260#comment-14938260 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6594: - +1 > Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to

Re: Sanity checking in Solr

On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 13:30 +0100, Upayavira wrote: > Could it be added to the debug component? That seems like a natural > place for it. It could, as you say, look for standard things that > might make a query perform badly, and report them in a new > element, or such. Agreed. I'll take a

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7 - Build # 3565 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/3565/ 3 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.SaslZkACLProviderTest.testSaslZkACLProvider Error Message: java.net.BindException: Address already in use Stack Trace: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936541#comment-14936541 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821: -- See (also?) LUCENE-4483. > TermQuery's constructors should

Re: Cross-node joins

So I went down the route of creating a new QParser named "fulljoin", and I have it essentially working. https://github.com/fullstorydev/lucene-solr/commits/scottb/fulljoin Basically, I copied JoinQParserPlugin, ripped out the local index "from" processing, and replaced it with a SolrCloud facet

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3931) Turn off coord() factor for scoring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938785#comment-14938785 ] Ivan Provalov commented on SOLR-3931: - Ideally, I would like to plug in a similarity class at search

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2834) AnalysisResponseBase.java doesn't handle org.apache.solr.analysis.HTMLStripCharFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938830#comment-14938830 ] Sergio commented on SOLR-2834: -- The same problem happens if the filter is used in the schema. >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3759) Support joining in a distributed environment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938802#comment-14938802 ] Scott Blum commented on LUCENE-3759: Request for feedback / comments:

Re: Cross-node joins

Hi Scott, I've replied to your comment on SOLR-7090. I just had a look at the your fulljoin implementation, but I wasn't sure if I follow this properly. Maybe a unit test would help? Also, do you plan to open a JIRA (or, maybe, use SOLR-7090 JIRA itself, so as to keep all related efforts together

Re: Cross-node joins

I think LUCENE-3759 is not a good place, since this is a Solr specific implementation. Please feel free to use SOLR-7090. Based on my idea of your implementation, it wasn't clear to me whether or not the intention of the patch is the same as what SOLR-7090 (at a high level), as per the description

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7090) Cross collection join

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938789#comment-14938789 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-7090: bq. I couldn't figure out how to use the

Re: Cross-node joins

Hi Ishan, I definitely should write a test. It's supposed to be a drop-in replacement for the existing Join query. I wasn't sure if I should hijack SOLR-7090, or maybe LUCENE-3759, or just open a new JIRA. Please advise! Or I'm happy to continue discussing high level on this thread. Best,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6650) Remove dependency of lucene/spatial on oal.search.Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936669#comment-14936669 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6650: -- bq. I substituted BooleanClause.Occur.FILTER instead of MUST

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6650) Remove dependency of lucene/spatial on oal.search.Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936739#comment-14936739 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-6650: -- Thanks for the review Adrien. I'll change the

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java8 - Build # 429 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java8/429/ 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.sql.JdbcTest.doTest Error Message: Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([6E84BD2F6D27DC55:C9C0058B009CCFEC]:0)

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8095) Allow disabling HDFS Locality Metrics

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936856#comment-14936856 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-8095: --- The problem is that getting metrics like this is per file and so

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6650) Remove dependency of lucene/spatial on oal.search.Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936794#comment-14936794 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6650: -- Fair enough. > Remove dependency of lucene/spatial on

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6650) Remove dependency of lucene/spatial on oal.search.Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936810#comment-14936810 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-6650: -- I was just thinking -- maybe a Java 8

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_60) - Build # 14355 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/14355/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_60 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 3 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestSolrConfigHandlerCloud Error Message: ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher opens=305 closes=304

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6688) There should be no error about a non-required file admin-extra.html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938964#comment-14938964 ] Upayavira commented on SOLR-6688: - [~hossman_luc...@fucit.org] I haven't yet implemented admin-extra in the

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-6688) There should be no error about a non-required file admin-extra.html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Upayavira updated SOLR-6688: Comment: was deleted (was: [~hossman_luc...@fucit.org] I haven't yet implemented admin-extra in the new UI.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6688) There should be no error about a non-required file admin-extra.html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938963#comment-14938963 ] Upayavira commented on SOLR-6688: - [~hossman_luc...@fucit.org] I haven't yet implemented admin-extra in the

Re: Solr search

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote: > Dear Team, > > I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search  server  without the > following jar files, > > commonsfileupload: 1.2.1 xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1 org.apache.ant : > ant : 1.8.2 > > > If yes , how can I do it. I am

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8110) Start enforcing field naming recomendations in next X.0 release?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938973#comment-14938973 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-8110: As far as the "how" to implement this, i think it would be pretty straight

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6688) There should be no error about a non-required file admin-extra.html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938945#comment-14938945 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6688: bq. I am still experiencing the errors with the block commented out.

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8110) Start enforcing field naming recomendations in next X.0 release?

Hoss Man created SOLR-8110: -- Summary: Start enforcing field naming recomendations in next X.0 release? Key: SOLR-8110 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8110 Project: Solr Issue Type:

Re: Cross-node joins

Alright, I'll put something on SOLR-7090 in a bit. Meanwhile, I'm trying to get a basic test running, and running into a stupid problem... I am trying to write a cloud and non-cloud code path for the facet query. What I want to do is create a solrj HttpSolrClient either way, but I can't figure

Solr search

Dear Team, I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following jar files, commonsfileupload: 1.2.1 xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1 org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2 If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is valuable and appreciated. Thanks, Vetrik

Strangeness with MultiSpansWrapper duplication

In branch_5x, the MultiSpansWrapper.java file exists in two places. I only noticed this because of an error in eclipse. The two files look identical. This doesn't seem to cause any actual problems with the build, just the IDE error. One copyishere:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6688) There should be no error about a non-required file admin-extra.html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939004#comment-14939004 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6688: bq. Possible? Possible, but as I mentioned before -- really ugly ... for

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x - Build # 972 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x/972/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=11987, name=collection2, state=RUNNABLE,

Re: Solr search

Hi Upayavira, Thanks for your quick reply. Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and MIT. Regards, Vetrik 2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira : > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote: > > Dear Team, > > I am

Re: Solr search

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:11 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote: > Hi Upayavira, > > Thanks for your quick reply. > > Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and > MIT. There is no MIT or GPL to Xerces or ant, they are Apache products. Why makes

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6650) Remove dependency of lucene/spatial on oal.search.Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939305#comment-14939305 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6650: - Commit 1706184 from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5748) Introduce autoManageReplicas collection property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939199#comment-14939199 ] Steve Davids commented on SOLR-5748: Due to the continued comments about an impending "ZK as truth"

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6650) Remove dependency of lucene/spatial on oal.search.Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939218#comment-14939218 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6650: - Commit 1706181 from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8109) Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938196#comment-14938196 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-8109: bq. Does FirstFieldValueUpdateProcessorFactory accept wildcards? it does,

RE: Solr search

Hi, The licenses of those files are all explained and listed in the licenses/ subdirectory of the Solr distribution (same for Lucene). All those 3 files are Apache 2.0 license, see corresponding files: - ant-LICENSE-ASL.txt, but I think you are talking about

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7577) Add support for rules in CREATESHARD and ADDREPLICA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936869#comment-14936869 ] Steve Davids commented on SOLR-7577: After looking at the test for this issue, why would anyone need to

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_60) - Build # 14356 - Still Failing!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/14356/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_60 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.search.TestFiltering.testRandomFiltering Error Message: FAILURE: indexSize=2 iiter=4 qiter=474 request=[q, {! cost=172

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7577) Add support for rules in CREATESHARD and ADDREPLICA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936882#comment-14936882 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-7577: -- Replica placement is about identifying nodes for replicas. The user

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6815) Should DisjunctionScorer advance more lazily?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-6815: - Attachment: LUCENE-6815.patch Here is a patch I've been hacking on. Nothing changes in the case

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-5944) Support updates of numeric DocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya updated SOLR-5944: --- Attachment: SOLR-5944.patch WIP patch, updated to trunk. The logic to deal with

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8109) Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14937711#comment-14937711 ] Gus Heck commented on SOLR-8109: Sometimes when using dynamic fields, the majority of the dynamic fields

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8109) Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field

Gus Heck created SOLR-8109: -- Summary: Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field Key: SOLR-8109 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109 Project: Solr Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8109) Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gus Heck updated SOLR-8109: --- Attachment: SOLR-8109.patch patch vs 5x branch > Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field