Okay, good luck. Let me know if you change your mind and need improvements to
gossip.
Cheers,
—jason
On October 22, 2016 at 10:20:08 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY (herve.bout...@free.fr) wrote:
thanks for sharing what you had, this really helped me work on the topic,
testing and learning misc approach
thanks for sharing what you had, this really helped me work on the topic,
testing and learning misc approaches.
Now, the first feedback we've got on slf4j-simple to Gossip provider change
is:
- mailing list: some missing features
- MNG-6044: missing documentation and integration improvements re
FTR I choose Gossip because it was an slf4j impl I created which had more
features than slf4j-simple but was also very small, and I had already
previously implemented a ANSI color rendering scheme for it, as it was used by
Maven Shell.
Its true that Gossip doesn’t have the same features as sl
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2016 13:35:52 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> On 19 October 2016 at 12:37, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 20:58:16 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> > > Could you at least raise the issues that you see as blocking Gossip
> >
> > against
> >
> > > it. I presume y
On 19 October 2016 at 12:37, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 20:58:16 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> > Could you at least raise the issues that you see as blocking Gossip
> against
> > it. I presume you have them currently in your context and it would be
> good
> > to capture them n
Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 20:58:16 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> Could you at least raise the issues that you see as blocking Gossip against
> it. I presume you have them currently in your context and it would be good
> to capture them now so that if somebody can add those features to Gossip
> (assum
Could you at least raise the issues that you see as blocking Gossip against
it. I presume you have them currently in your context and it would be good
to capture them now so that if somebody can add those features to Gossip
(assuming they are aligned with the direction Gossip wants to go) then we
c
adding some rendering code like supported by Gossip, and eventually adding the
rendering feature to slf4j-simple seemed sufficiently easy to give it a try:
done and was as easy as expected
Now, adding every slf4j-simple feature to Gossip require more work (it's not
simply about rendering: need
Hello Jason,
I do not know about Hervé, I checked out the gossip source to maybe add the
needed documentation for configuring gossip, but found the Maven module
structure, the code structure and the configuration format very confusing
and after spending two hours to figure out how to easily handle
So your approach was to fork some code, instead of trying to fix Gossip? I
haven’t been paying much attention just trying to understand why you would fork
instead of working with Jason Dillon to get that added? Did he not respond or
you couldn’t make a PR?
Jason
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:11 AM,
Hi Mirko,
short answer: yes
more precise answer:
Gossip slf4j provider does not have color feature but has extensible Renderer
interface which permits to inject Maven colorized renderer [1] with one
configuration line [2]
In maven-slf4j-simple, I copied the same Maven colorized renderer code [
Hello Hervé,
I would like a simple approach here. If I understand it correctly, gossip
was chosen because of its color capability. If we could have this without
switching the log provider it would be a good thing IMO. Gossip seems to be
unconfigurable by means of system properties, which is a pity
12 matches
Mail list logo
