First draft of netbeans quick outline plugin

2018-02-26 Thread Peter Cheung
First draft of netbeans quick outline plugin http://peter.quantr.hk/2018/02/first-draft-of-netbeans-quick-outline-plugin/

Re: Netbeans quick outline plugin

2018-02-26 Thread Peter Cheung
Dear Chris That would be great. I thought on such a plugin too, please Keep in mind, that we Need it for C/C++, Java, JavaScript, PHP and what NetBeans also Support. Maybe HTML XML too but could be optional. Easy, Antlr already support those grammars If this is not possible, with a 3rd Party

Re: ActionReference has bug ?

2018-02-26 Thread Peter Cheung
OK, thanks Thanks >From Peter From: Geertjan Wielenga Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 1:13 AM To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Cc: d...@platform.netbeans.org Subject: Re: ActionReference has bug ? Programmatic name is

Re: Netbeans quick outline plugin

2018-02-26 Thread Peter Cheung
1. Let me try out the javascript grammar in the coming few days https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4/tree/master/javascript 2. Why netbeans just let everyone to access every api/class/functions ? Thanks >From Peter From: Christian Lenz

AW: Netbeans quick outline plugin

2018-02-26 Thread Christian Lenz
The Thing is, that you can extends the Java Editor to add new Hints for example, this is not possible for JS, HTML, CSS or PHP, because it is not open to extend those stuff. As you can see a plugin from NetBeans to adding KendoUI, this was only possible to add the plugin as a friend which is

incubator-netbeans-website, lightbox and issues

2018-02-26 Thread Antonio
Hi all, I was wondering if anybody is working on the "lightbox" support for the website features page, I may have some spare time during the week and may tackle if, if nobody is already working on that. Also I thought we could open JIRA tickets for the web as well, and was wondering if we

Re: Platform API: Context-sensitive keyboard accelerators

2018-02-26 Thread Tim Boudreau
It's been a long time since I worked on the code involved, so my recollection may be a little fuzzy, but this may help point you in a direction or two: There is a general problem that NetBeans supports, or at least used to support, both single window pseudo-SDI mode and a multiple windows mode.

Re: incubator-netbeans-website, lightbox and issues

2018-02-26 Thread Antonio
Hi Neil, D'oh! I'm afraid I'm in the mood or something, I hate having things hanging on me. We have now https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-website/pull/9 with this colorbox stuff. Seems to we working fine https://netbeans.vieiro.net/download/nb90/ (requires reload). Anyway feel

AW: incubator-netbeans-website, lightbox and issues

2018-02-26 Thread Christian Lenz
What exactly do you mean with lightbox for the Features page? Please keep in mind, that all pages, should work mobile friendly too BUT only that they should looking good to navigate and not to zoom etc. Please be Aware of this. Cheers Chris Von: Antonio Gesendet: Montag, 26. Februar 2018

Re: incubator-netbeans-website, lightbox and issues

2018-02-26 Thread Wade Chandler
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 1:55 PM, Antonio wrote: > > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anybody is working on the "lightbox" support for the > website features page, I may have some spare time during the week and may > tackle if, if nobody is already working on that. Not I. >

AW: Platform API: Context-sensitive keyboard accelerators

2018-02-26 Thread Christian Lenz
I figured out that problem too, but I don’t know whether this is window specific or not. Sure I think you can add a shortcut to your Code, which is already taken. You got a warning after NetBeans started that says: „there is a duplicate“. Maybe it overrides it or not, I don’t know atm. But if

Re: incubator-netbeans-website, lightbox and issues

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
Hi, On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 20:54 Antonio wrote: > > http://www.jacklmoore.com/colorbox/ > > Which is MIT licensed. That could be a good choice. I'll try to > integrate it as transparently as possible, so as not to have to write > any HTML-specifics in the pages. > > I was

AW: incubator-netbeans-website, lightbox and issues

2018-02-26 Thread Christian Lenz
I would like to reamove jQuery as good as possible, because it is not needed in my eyes and my opinion anymore. The Colorbox is a plugin as I understand it right for jQuery. Cheers Chris Von: Antonio Gesendet: Montag, 26. Februar 2018 21:54 An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re:

Re: AW: incubator-netbeans-website, lightbox and issues

2018-02-26 Thread Antonio
Hi, So do I: I love removing unrequired dependencies everywhere! But Foundation 6 requires jQuery, I'm afraid. Cheers, Antonio On 26/02/18 21:57, Christian Lenz wrote: I would like to reamove jQuery as good as possible, because it is not needed in my eyes and my opinion anymore. The

Re: incubator-netbeans-website, lightbox and issues

2018-02-26 Thread Antonio
On 26/02/18 23:18, Neil C Smith wrote: There is support for modals in general though which might work for this - https://foundation.zurb.com/sites/docs/reveal.html Ahh, that's the piece I was missing! Maybe that path is worth exploring, Neil, instead of using this ColorBox plugin. If you

Re: launcher for windows and building c file

2018-02-26 Thread Scott Palmer
That is of course the “correct” way to do this. But I still wonder, why doesn’t NetBeans use the standard java launcher that is produced by javapackager? (If it isn’t good enough, it should be. We should file an issue with the JDK if it is inadequate.) Scott > On Feb 25, 2018, at 10:00 PM,

Re: Netbeans quick outline plugin

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 09:50 Christian Lenz wrote: > ... this was only possible to add the plugin as a friend which is only a > Workaround. > There was a discussion on a PR recently about stopping using friend relationships for "unstable" API's in favour of another

Re: The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Antonio
Hi again, So, to keep things moving, shall we announce closing the contest by, say, until March the 1st? And start the voting during March 2nd, 3rd and 4th? Or is that too fast? ;-) Cheers, Antonio On 26/02/18 12:09, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: That sounds good. Thanks for persevering with

Re: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal)

2018-02-26 Thread Peter Steele
It could be that because you have cleaned them outside of gradle, gradle still thinks they are there and they haven't changed. The .gradle/caches contains the cached data, you can tell gradle to refresh the dependencies using ./gradle build --refresh-dependencies. Although the easiest way is to

Re: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal)

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 07:54 Antonio wrote: > This has now been merged to master, we think we comply with ASF's > podling website requirements. Woot! :-) Some other enhancements & to-dos as seen in the thread & elsewhere: > ... > - The README at > >

Re: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal)

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 10:57 Peter Steele wrote: > Gradle clean basically cleans the build directory used in java compilation. > In the task compileContentSass for instance you source from $contentDir and > write to $generatedAssetDir and these are not part of the java eco

Re: The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 11:06 Antonio wrote: > To end up the logo discussion once and for all I propose: > > - Announcing closing the contest within a few days. > - Announce a voting in the mailing list, as per the Apache way. > Sounds good! Can we also clarify what we mean

AW: The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: ANetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Christian Lenz
I know all of that, the page in the wiki was from me, because I didn’t know the real voting process for that. Now we have a ticket, someone created it in Q4 last year I think. But there was no Progress until now. So no real announcement that someone should create logos and adding stuff. Junichi

[ANN] Closing the NetBeans Logo Contest

2018-02-26 Thread Antonio
Hi all, We'll be closing the First Apache NetBeans Logo Contest [1] by March the 1st, to proceed with voting during March the 2nd, 3rd and 4th. If you would like to submit a proposal for the Apache NetBeans Logo please do so before March the 2nd. Note that we're focusing in the icon design

AW: First draft of netbeans quick outline plugin

2018-02-26 Thread Christian Lenz
Hey Peter, I wanted to comment, but smth with Twitter and/or fb is not working. Anyway, I do it here: ➢ The tree (AST) view is needed, because it shows the hierachical view and the association of the code. IntelliJ does the same, the navigator in NetBeans too. It represents the Abstract

The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Antonio
Hi Chris, all, The situation with the logo is that there was a voting at [1] somewhere in 2016, the most voted logo is not the one with colors, so using the one you suggest (with colors) instead of the most voted one does not seem to be very Apache compliant, as it would be against a voting

Re: The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Antonio
I'd say the icon without the typography. Cheers, Antonio On 26/02/18 12:16, Neil C Smith wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 11:06 Antonio wrote: To end up the logo discussion once and for all I propose: - Announcing closing the contest within a few days. - Announce a voting

Re: The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 11:24 Antonio wrote: > I'd say the icon without the typography. > Agreed, so +1 from me to that and your schedule. Given the necessarily short schedule, etc., and as we find our feet at Apache, it might be good to keep in mind that any decision could

AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal)

2018-02-26 Thread Christian Lenz
I would like to Change the logo to the SVG file, because it scales better and we don’t have any Problems with Retina and whatever, as you can see it here: http://netbeans.apache.org/. I added the SVG too. Cheers Chris Von: Antonio Gesendet: Montag, 26. Februar 2018 08:54 An:

Re: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal)

2018-02-26 Thread Peter Steele
Gradle clean basically cleans the build directory used in java compilation. In the task compileContentSass for instance you source from $contentDir and write to $generatedAssetDir and these are not part of the java eco system. What you should do is create a new task which deletes all the

Re: The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
That sounds good. Thanks for persevering with this, Antonio. Gj On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Antonio wrote: > Hi Chris, all, > > The situation with the logo is that there was a voting at [1] somewhere in > 2016, the most voted logo is not the one with colors, so using

Re: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal)

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 11:38 Peter Steele wrote: > Although the easiest way is to actually move the clean code from the > scripts to gradle because gradle will then have a complete view on things > Everything is already gradle though! Best wishes, Neil -- Neil C Smith

Re: launcher for windows and building c file

2018-02-26 Thread Wade Chandler
On Feb 26, 2018 17:54, "Scott Palmer" wrote: But I still wonder, why doesn’t NetBeans use the standard java launcher that is produced by javapackager? NetBeans launcher has been around well before that. NB is in itself an entire platform with a module management

Re: launcher for windows and building c file

2018-02-26 Thread Jan Lahoda
Hi Scott, On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: > That is of course the “correct” way to do this. But I still wonder, why > doesn’t NetBeans use the standard java launcher that is produced by > javapackager? > I am not sure what exactly is the proposal -

Re: launcher for windows and building c file

2018-02-26 Thread Jan Lahoda
Hi Eric, Not sure about the current status: should I try to look at how to update the launchers? Do you have a working commandline for build? Thanks, Jan On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Eric Barboni wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry I can answer all issue but make file is

Platform API: Context-sensitive keyboard accelerators

2018-02-26 Thread cowwoc
Hi, Netbeans has an extremely long (and getting longer) list of keyboard shortcuts. Part of the problem is that (for the most part) keyboard shortcuts are not context-sensitive nor are they able to be context-sensitive. I'll give you a simple example I raised a few years back: When the

Re: openide annotation processors and StandardLocation.SOURCE_PATH

2018-02-26 Thread Basin Ilya
Hi Neil. On 26.02.2018 16:27, Neil C Smith wrote: > :-) But, do you have to use the Eclipse compiler? There's no easy way to switch to another compiler in Eclipse. > I was looking at the bundle processor the other week when I needed to write > my own processor using SOURCE_PATH. In this

AW: [ANN] Closing the NetBeans Logo Contest

2018-02-26 Thread Christian Lenz
Thx for the announcement and work  Great to see it going the right way. Cheers Chris Von: Antonio Gesendet: Montag, 26. Februar 2018 12:57 An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Betreff: [ANN] Closing the NetBeans Logo Contest Hi all, We'll be closing the First Apache NetBeans Logo Contest

openide annotation processors and StandardLocation.SOURCE_PATH

2018-02-26 Thread Basin Ilya
Hi. This may sound like a heresy, but I tried to build some Netbeans components with Eclipse. Namely, openide.util.ui/test and its dependencies. Almost everything works except Eclipse can't generate Bundle.java because of the error thrown by an annotation processor used. The error is

Re: openide annotation processors and StandardLocation.SOURCE_PATH

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
Hi, On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 12:36 Basin Ilya wrote: > This may sound like a heresy, but I tried to build some Netbeans > components with Eclipse. :-) But, do you have to use the Eclipse compiler? > Eclipse can't generate Bundle.java because of the error thrown by an >

Re: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal)

2018-02-26 Thread Peter Steele
Apologies if i may have missed it, but where in the incubator-netbeans-website github repository is the delete/clean code in build.gradle? On 26 Feb 2018 11:52, "Neil C Smith" wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 11:38 Peter Steele wrote: > > > Although

Re: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal)

2018-02-26 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 at 13:27 Peter Steele wrote: > Apologies if i may have missed it, but where in the > incubator-netbeans-website github repository is the delete/clean code in > build.gradle? > I have no idea! Maybe one for Wade. What I do know is that clean deletes

Re: The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Eduard Karel de Jong
Indeed, the icon without typgraphy should be the item to vote upon this time. The next discussion and a subsequent vote should be on the elements that we want to present in the typography, for instance: -the word "apache" -the feather -a 'badge' with "IDE" (with a possible alternate badge for

RE: launcher for windows and building c file

2018-02-26 Thread Eric Barboni
Hi, Sorry I can answer all issue but make file is incomplete in this location[1] it need a mk file generated by c support in NetBeans. It the same for ide. It means we cannot build from 'scratch'. Kind of" chicken or egg" issue. And on the other hand, it is cool to have a c NetBeans project

Re: First draft of netbeans quick outline plugin

2018-02-26 Thread Peter Cheung
let me think and thanks Chris From: Christian Lenz Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 5:56 PM To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Subject: AW: First draft of netbeans quick outline plugin Hey Peter, I wanted to comment, but smth with

Re: The logo, once and for all? (was AW: Merged to master (was Re: A NetBeans website proposal))

2018-02-26 Thread Eduard
Indeed, the icon without typgraphy should be the item to vote upon this time. The next discussion and a subsequent vote should be on the elements that we want to present in the typography, for instance: -the word "apache" -the feather -a 'badge' with "IDE" (with a possible alternate badge for