-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
the OOo4Kids has been depreciated, and points to
http://educ
On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All:
>
> My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
> accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
>
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says th
Пятница, 13 февраля 2015, 7:58 UTC от jonathon :
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>All:
>
>My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
>accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
>
>https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
jan i wrote:
> On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon wrote:
>
> All:
>
> My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
> accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
>
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
> the OOo4Kids has been deprec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/15 08:05, jan i wrote:
>so my best guess is that they were forgotten,
That would be "forgotten by developers".
The current Trinidad and Tobago DVD contains OOo4Kids.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQ
On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
>
>
>> I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess
>> is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
>
I think, that both products are derived works from OpenOffice.org.
Maybe the people, who developed both projects, ha
>who are the developers of these products and
>how we can contact them.
See Eric Bachard
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Ericb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
My recollection is that OOo4Kids was intended to remain downstream and under
LGPL in any case.
The OOo4Kids developer participated on the AOO Podling. There was a
complicated disagreement (not about licensing and more about AOO's
unwillingness to arbitrate a conflict between third parties) t
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new
people) by lowering the barrier.
For more documentation on Git at Apache see
Isn't having the mirror on GitHub an effective way to push changes to the SVN,
especially for Apache committers who have project rights to the GitHub repo?
Non-committer pull requests are as complicated either way, it seems to me, and
the GitHub mirror might be superior for that.
I assume the
On 13 February 2015 at 13:13, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Isn't having the mirror on GitHub an effective way to push changes to the
> SVN, especially for Apache committers who have project rights to the GitHub
> repo? Non-committer pull requests are as complicated either way, it seems
> to me, a
Hello list,
New ad to have a fake AOO.
See: http://hpics.li/73a635e
This ad jump to a para-site:
h**p://www.maribiz.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@
Greeting!
This is Jackey and am a first year undergraduate who currently studies
Computer Science. I am from Toronto and studies at University of Waterloo.
With the interest in Open Sources Community and Computer Science, I believe
that I can make contributions to the Open Office projects, as w
Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be
removed shortly.
roberto
2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
> Hello list,
>
> New ad to have a fake AOO.
> See: http://hpics.li/73a635e
>
> This ad jump to a para-site:
> h**p://www.maribiz.net
>
>
>
>
Just confirming it has been blocked 5 mins ago.
Thanks again,
Roberto
2015-02-13 17:29 GMT+01:00 Roberto Galoppini :
> Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be
> removed shortly.
>
> roberto
>
> 2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> N
I don’t understand the response. I said GitHub Mirror, which anyone can make a
push request to from another GitHub repo (a GitHub fork) and from a clone of
the Mirror not on GitHub. If I push a change to the OpenOffice Mirror on
GitHub, won’t the pull of those changes show up in the AOO SVN an
On Friday, February 13, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I don’t understand the response. I said GitHub Mirror, which anyone can
> make a push request to from another GitHub repo (a GitHub fork) and from a
> clone of the Mirror not on GitHub. If I push a change to the OpenOffice
> Mirror on Gi
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
>
> Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
> participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new
> people) by lowerin
贾麒 wrote:
> Greeting!
> This is Jackey and am a first year undergraduate who currently studies
> Computer Science. I am from Toronto and studies at University of Waterloo.
> With the interest in Open Sources Community and Computer Science, I believe
> that I can make contributions to the Open O
On 13 February 2015 at 18:13, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
> >
> > Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
> > participate (although it is in
Am 02/13/2015 06:13 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i wrote:
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it
OK, I finally cloned Apache/OpenOffice from GitHub.
I learned two things:
1. The git repo takes just under 3GB on my hard drive. That's considerably
less than the 4.35GB SVN working copy for the AOO SVN trunk.
2. Although I have paired my apache.org ID and my GitHub ID and it was
confirmed
Hello;
I don't currently use git but what I use is not really important:
if a move to git were to be considered, it would only make sense
if we can rescue the pre-apache history and in particular the
Hg CWSs.
Just my $0.02,
Pedro.
---
Hi Jan,
jan i schrieb:
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new
people) by lowering the barrier.
For more documenta
I think is a good idea to use Git as a full fledge repo.
+1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
> >
> > Should we move to a full git repo, making i
On 13/02/2015 jonathon wrote:
Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an
Apache project?
No. But as several people pointed out, they have always been independent
projects. Eric's messages to this list cover pretty much all discussions
we had about them:
http://mark
26 matches
Mail list logo
