-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
the OOo4Kids has been depreciated, and points to
On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess
is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
I think, that both products are derived works from OpenOffice.org.
Maybe the people, who developed both projects, have not
who are the developers of these products and
how we can contact them.
See Eric Bachard
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Ericb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
My recollection is that OOo4Kids was intended to remain downstream and under
LGPL in any case.
The OOo4Kids developer participated on the AOO Podling. There was a
complicated disagreement (not about licensing and more about AOO's
unwillingness to arbitrate a conflict between third parties)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/15 08:05, jan i wrote:
so my best guess is that they were forgotten,
That would be forgotten by developers.
The current Trinidad and Tobago DVD contains OOo4Kids.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
jan i wrote:
On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
the OOo4Kids
Пятница, 13 февраля 2015, 7:58 UTC от jonathon t:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
the
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new
people) by lowering the barrier.
For more documentation on Git at Apache see
I don’t understand the response. I said GitHub Mirror, which anyone can make a
push request to from another GitHub repo (a GitHub fork) and from a clone of
the Mirror not on GitHub. If I push a change to the OpenOffice Mirror on
GitHub, won’t the pull of those changes show up in the AOO SVN
Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be
removed shortly.
roberto
2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr:
Hello list,
New ad to have a fake AOO.
See: http://hpics.li/73a635e
This ad jump to a para-site:
h**p://www.maribiz.net
Hello list,
New ad to have a fake AOO.
See: http://hpics.li/73a635e
This ad jump to a para-site:
h**p://www.maribiz.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Just confirming it has been blocked 5 mins ago.
Thanks again,
Roberto
2015-02-13 17:29 GMT+01:00 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com:
Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be
removed shortly.
roberto
2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum
On Friday, February 13, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I don’t understand the response. I said GitHub Mirror, which anyone can
make a push request to from another GitHub repo (a GitHub fork) and from a
clone of the Mirror not on GitHub. If I push a change to the
Greeting!
This is Jackey and am a first year undergraduate who currently studies
Computer Science. I am from Toronto and studies at University of Waterloo.
With the interest in Open Sources Community and Computer Science, I believe
that I can make contributions to the Open Office projects, as
Am 02/13/2015 06:13 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
participate (although it is in no way a
OK, I finally cloned Apache/OpenOffice from GitHub.
I learned two things:
1. The git repo takes just under 3GB on my hard drive. That's considerably
less than the 4.35GB SVN working copy for the AOO SVN trunk.
2. Although I have paired my apache.org ID and my GitHub ID and it was
confirmed
On 13 February 2015 at 18:13, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
Hi Jan,
jan i schrieb:
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new
people) by lowering the barrier.
For more
Hello;
I don't currently use git but what I use is not really important:
if a move to git were to be considered, it would only make sense
if we can rescue the pre-apache history and in particular the
Hg CWSs.
Just my $0.02,
Pedro.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to
participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new
people)
贾麒 wrote:
Greeting!
This is Jackey and am a first year undergraduate who currently studies
Computer Science. I am from Toronto and studies at University of Waterloo.
With the interest in Open Sources Community and Computer Science, I believe
that I can make contributions to the Open
On 13/02/2015 jonathon wrote:
Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an
Apache project?
No. But as several people pointed out, they have always been independent
projects. Eric's messages to this list cover pretty much all discussions
we had about them:
I think is a good idea to use Git as a full fledge repo.
+1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
Should we move to a
Isn't having the mirror on GitHub an effective way to push changes to the SVN,
especially for Apache committers who have project rights to the GitHub repo?
Non-committer pull requests are as complicated either way, it seems to me, and
the GitHub mirror might be superior for that.
I assume the
On 13 February 2015 at 13:13, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
Isn't having the mirror on GitHub an effective way to push changes to the
SVN, especially for Apache committers who have project rights to the GitHub
repo? Non-committer pull requests are as complicated either
26 matches
Mail list logo
