OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All: My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects. https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that the OOo4Kids has been depreciated, and points to

Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread jan i
On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All: My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.

Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread RA Stehmann
On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote: I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess is that they were forgotten, but others might know more. I think, that both products are derived works from OpenOffice.org. Maybe the people, who developed both projects, have not

Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread FR web forum
who are the developers of these products and how we can contact them. See Eric Bachard https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Ericb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
My recollection is that OOo4Kids was intended to remain downstream and under LGPL in any case. The OOo4Kids developer participated on the AOO Podling. There was a complicated disagreement (not about licensing and more about AOO's unwillingness to arbitrate a conflict between third parties)

Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/02/15 08:05, jan i wrote: so my best guess is that they were forgotten, That would be forgotten by developers. The current Trinidad and Tobago DVD contains OOo4Kids. jonathon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread Dave Barton
jan i wrote: On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote: All: My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects. https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that the OOo4Kids

Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread Yakov Reztsov
Пятница, 13 февраля 2015, 7:58 UTC от jonathon t: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All: My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects. https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that the

[PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread jan i
Hi. We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo. Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new people) by lowering the barrier. For more documentation on Git at Apache see

RE: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
I don’t understand the response. I said GitHub Mirror, which anyone can make a push request to from another GitHub repo (a GitHub fork) and from a clone of the Mirror not on GitHub. If I push a change to the OpenOffice Mirror on GitHub, won’t the pull of those changes show up in the AOO SVN

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-02-13 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be removed shortly. roberto 2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr: Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO. See: http://hpics.li/73a635e This ad jump to a para-site: h**p://www.maribiz.net

Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-02-13 Thread FR web forum
Hello list, New ad to have a fake AOO. See: http://hpics.li/73a635e This ad jump to a para-site: h**p://www.maribiz.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads

2015-02-13 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Just confirming it has been blocked 5 mins ago. Thanks again, Roberto 2015-02-13 17:29 GMT+01:00 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com: Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be removed shortly. roberto 2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread jan i
On Friday, February 13, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: I don’t understand the response. I said GitHub Mirror, which anyone can make a push request to from another GitHub repo (a GitHub fork) and from a clone of the Mirror not on GitHub. If I push a change to the

APACHE OPENOFFICE Project Volunteering

2015-02-13 Thread 贾麒
Greeting! This is Jackey and am a first year undergraduate who currently studies Computer Science. I am from Toronto and studies at University of Waterloo. With the interest in Open Sources Community and Computer Science, I believe that I can make contributions to the Open Office projects, as

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread Marcus
Am 02/13/2015 06:13 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote: Hi. We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo. Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to participate (although it is in no way a

RE: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
OK, I finally cloned Apache/OpenOffice from GitHub. I learned two things: 1. The git repo takes just under 3GB on my hard drive. That's considerably less than the 4.35GB SVN working copy for the AOO SVN trunk. 2. Although I have paired my apache.org ID and my GitHub ID and it was confirmed

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread jan i
On 13 February 2015 at 18:13, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo. Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Jan, jan i schrieb: Hi. We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo. Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new people) by lowering the barrier. For more

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; I don't currently use git but what I use is not really important: if a move to git were to be considered, it would only make sense if we can rescue the pre-apache history and in particular the Hg CWSs. Just my $0.02, Pedro.

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo. Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract new people)

Re: APACHE OPENOFFICE Project Volunteering

2015-02-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
贾麒 wrote: Greeting! This is Jackey and am a first year undergraduate who currently studies Computer Science. I am from Toronto and studies at University of Waterloo. With the interest in Open Sources Community and Computer Science, I believe that I can make contributions to the Open

Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status

2015-02-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 13/02/2015 jonathon wrote: Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an Apache project? No. But as several people pointed out, they have always been independent projects. Eric's messages to this list cover pretty much all discussions we had about them:

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread Alexandro Colorado
I think is a good idea to use Git as a full fledge repo. +1 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo. Should we move to a

RE: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Isn't having the mirror on GitHub an effective way to push changes to the SVN, especially for Apache committers who have project rights to the GitHub repo? Non-committer pull requests are as complicated either way, it seems to me, and the GitHub mirror might be superior for that. I assume the

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-02-13 Thread jan i
On 13 February 2015 at 13:13, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: Isn't having the mirror on GitHub an effective way to push changes to the SVN, especially for Apache committers who have project rights to the GitHub repo? Non-committer pull requests are as complicated either