Remark those that follow bugzilla-admin, will have noticed that Infra has
identified a problem with BZ sending mail.
I assume it will be solved quickly.
Fixed for me
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams. I think a good interim maneuver
is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page ad lib. I
haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just yet. If that stays, it
needs to ripple through the translations too.
If I have to
Hello all,
I am a technical writer based in San Diego, CA and I'd be very interested in
participating in writing documentation for OpenOffice. I am, however, unsure on
how to get starter. Any pointers would be appreciated.
Could you please create a personal account for me (username:
I think we need to rewrite or remove the page.
We can talk about the permissive AL.
We can suggest that people do their own research and/or seek their own counsel.
We could even offer a google link.
If we have a vote then here is my +1 to make a change as we should not be
offering this type
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
The page in question is here:
http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
Voting choices are:
[ ] Leave the page as it is.
[X ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or
Thread for discussion
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use
as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry.
As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content is too
aggressive or just the
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:29 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use
as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry.
As it is still not clear if we
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use as
every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry.
As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content is too
aggressive or just the
Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus wrote:
Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
Please read up the documentation module on our site
http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-doc.html
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Olivier Bricaud obric...@mac.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am a technical writer based in San Diego, CA and I'd be very interested
in participating in
Am 02/19/2015 08:29 PM, schrieb jan i:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use
as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry.
As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content
I think you are not seeing anything about Unicode because ODF is fully Unicode
and so is Apache OpenOffice and it is taken for granted. It came with being
based on XML.
I think you are asking something not about use of Unicode but perhaps having
fonts the support the characters you are
PROPOSAL: Remove the page link from the sidebar, so that the controversial page
is no longer reachable from other pages on the site. Do this in all languages
having the page.
We can then continue this discussion about the page itself, whether it is to be
recast in some manner, whether the
Marcus wrote:
Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus wrote:
Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Marcus wrote:
I've changed all links for the grey box from HTTP to HTTPS. Let's see if
this will help to solve the problem.
The correct solution is to use src=/path/to/image, not forcing the
protocol on the url.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La
Am 02/19/2015 09:09 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus wrote:
Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus wrote:
Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org
Hi Erik,
Erik Engstrom schrieb:
Developers,
I'd like to start working on fixing a bug from Bugzilla, but I don't know
how to assign one to myself.
The issue has a line
Assigned To:
The default entry is
AOO issues mailing list (edit) (take)
Click on take to assign the issue to you.
Olivier Bricaud wrote:
Hello all,
I am a technical writer based in San Diego, CA and I'd be very
interested in participating in writing documentation for OpenOffice. I
am, however, unsure on how to get starter. Any pointers would be
appreciated.
Could you please create a personal
[X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
Marcus
Am 02/19/2015 08:57 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
The page in question is here:
http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
Voting choices are:
[ ] Leave the page as it
Rob Weir wrote:
The page in question is here:
http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
Voting choices are:
[ ] Leave the page as it is.
[ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
[ ] Delete the entire
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
you can simply comment on the bug, and provide patches. Once you do a few
times your role will be bumped and more features would be enhanced.
Actually it's enough to send a mail to the QA list
http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
and ask for QA Team
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
The connection to this web site is not fully secure
because it contains unencrypted elements (such as
images).
Perhaps
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
The connection to this web site is not fully secure
Hi.
We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which
seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people.
There are of course people who do not like the page because they would like
another license to have the headline, they are not my concern (as long as
the page we
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which
seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people.
There are of course people who do not like the page because they would like
another license to have
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Patrick Lynn plynn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, my name is Patrick Lynn and I am a student at College of Charleston who
is working on bug fixes for AOO this semester with my team. We have
familiarized ourselves with the bug system but I was wondering if their is
any
On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which
seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people.
There are of course people who
I saw no confusion in the article and I enjoyed it But it is odd that the
page exists there of it is an unrelated opinion piece. That said, of it is
indicating a reason the license fire AOO is desirable, that is different.
On Feb 19, 2015 10:10 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We
On 18.02.2015 20:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 08/02/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I will send a resolution for the next Board Meeting
(18 February) for replacing me with Jan Iversen.
The Board has just approved the resolution, so Jan Iversen is the new
OpenOffice PMC Chair (or, to
state it
Hi, my name is Patrick Lynn and I am a student at College of Charleston who
is working on bug fixes for AOO this semester with my team. We have
familiarized ourselves with the bug system but I was wondering if their is
any information on the folder layout of AOO. As it stands whenever we find
a
You can use our code browser that will let you identify code rather
quickly. Please take a look here:
http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/
Hope this helps, please provide more specific questions regarding the
specific problem.
On 2/19/15, Patrick Lynn plynn...@gmail.com wrote:
My team
Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
The connection to this web
+1 on change or removal
It is perhaps more useful to follow the thread view of the conversation that
resumed today on the legal-discuss mailing list,
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201502.mbox/thread.
Some suggestions have been voiced there too.
Anyone can also
I need to posting on the top because I don't know which one I should use
as every 3 minutes new postings are coming. Sorry.
As it is still not clear if we discuss about that the content is too
aggressive or just the disclaimer is too unclear, I've moved the
disclaimer to the top, made it
Am 02/19/2015 06:28 PM, schrieb Steve Henes:
As hard as it is to find a place on the website showing the improvements
in the newest version of Open Office,
at least this should be easy:
- go to the download webpage [1]
- click on the link Release Notes inside the green box
For older releases
Marcus wrote:
Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
The connection
1 Andrea
-Original Message-
From: Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) [mailto:r...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 06:15
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
On 18.02.2015 20:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 08/02/2015 Andrea
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 18:22, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM,
Rob Weir wrote:
Thread for discussion
Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this
conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje
[Andrea] The page provides relevant information in a bad way. It is by
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Thread for discussion
Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation
earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje
On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote:
OK, next try. Still an error message?
Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL
https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer
HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use broken extensions or
paranoid security settings
OK, it seems your offer good lost as the topic got more intensive today.
At least this applies to me. So, sorry from myside.
When the forecast of the vote still remains then you can still do the
rework of the webpage. At least this work should be not for nothing.
Marcus
Am 02/19/2015
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams. I think a good interim
maneuver is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page
ad lib. I haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote:
OK, next try. Still an error message?
Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL
https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer
HTTPS, we make it
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote:
OK, next try. Still an error message?
Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL
Andrea Pescetti wrote on 19/02/15 23:14:
On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote:
OK, next try. Still an error message?
Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL
https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer
HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use broken
I would like to update the wiki theme to the one that we use on the
homepage. ATM the wiki theme uses the very old OpenOffice.org, we are going
4-5 years in Apache and still have the same look and feel. I would like to
get a new theme on the wiki for current style.
First step should be to
Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote:
OK, next try. Still an error message?
Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL
https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer
HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use
+1
Nice idea and great attention to progressive staging.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro
Colorado
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 14:41
To: dev
Subject: Updating the wiki theme.
I would like to update the
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which
seems to be like a red
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
We have a page
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a more
agreeable content on it.
That sounds smart to me, +1.
I note that on legal-discuss Jim [called the page][1] misrepresentation -
maybe he has comments
On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org
wrote:
Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a more
agreeable
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org
wrote:
Why not just
Ok. Thanks for your quick response
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
you can simply comment on the bug, and provide patches. Once you do a few
times your role will be bumped and more features would be enhanced.
If you did this already then please
I tried it on 2 different computers and both got the error.
Brenda
From: jan i
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:26 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org ; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Cc: blissfulh...@live.com
Subject: Re: website security certificate
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E.
Developers,
I'd like to start working on fixing a bug from Bugzilla, but I don't know
how to assign one to myself. I have fixed a bug and submitted a patch file
as an attachment to that issue, but I haven't heard any response. I read
something in the documentation about clicking a button to
you can simply comment on the bug, and provide patches. Once you do a few
times your role will be bumped and more features would be enhanced.
If you did this already then please reffer to the patch and a
mantainer/tester might take a look at it.
Regards.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Erik
Please review our Dev documentation on the AOO wiki. For your specific
question take a look at this:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Source_code_directories
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Patrick Lynn plynn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, my name is Patrick Lynn and I am a student at College of
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a more
agreeable content on it.
That sounds smart to me, +1.
I note that on
On 19 February 2015 at 18:22, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at
jan i wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
The connection to this web site is not fully secure
As hard as it is to find a place on the website showing the improvements
in the newest version of Open Office,
It is even harder to find a place to let you know that it appears like
an attempt to avoid making useful information easy to find
I know this is the wrong place to send this to -
My team and I are students at the College of Charleston are working on bug
fixes for AOO. We have identified these three bugs as things that may be
within our skill set:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=58604
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=54923
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 18:22, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM,
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net
wrote:
jan i wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
javascript:; wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org javascript:;
wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015,
This technica information is usually on our wiki, however what you are
asking is a bit too specific. I think you should provide a sample
document with large set of unicode to be able to test it.
AOO uses the IBM developed ICU4C (International Component for
Unicode), more information here:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna
keith.mcke...@comcast.net
wrote:
jan i wrote:
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
javascript:; wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/02/15 22:26, jan i wrote:
Do we (AOO) have to solve that, or is it the project (being downstream to
AOO) ?
To me it sounds like a downstream adaptation.
If the point is to remove _existing_ functionality, then it is a
downstream adaption.
On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:28 PM, jan i wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams. I think a good interim
maneuver is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page
ad lib. I haven't
On 02/19/2015 11:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
The page in question is here:
http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
Voting choices are:
[ ] Leave the page as it is.
[ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
Hi -
We had a reason that we enabled https in the first place. I don't recall it
now, but there was a reason. It may have had to do with update servers.
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote:
OK,
Forgive my slipping a discussion on the vote thread with my +101.
I have thought about things and I am going to cast the following vote:
[X] delete the page.
Why?
It does not help the overall OpenOffice community to be making a strong
argument over this issue at this point in time.
it
On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Thread for discussion
Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation
earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like
On 19/02/2015 Patrick Lynn wrote:
My team and I are students at the College of Charleston are working on bug
fixes for AOO. We have identified these three bugs as things that may be
within our skill set:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=58604
77 matches
Mail list logo
