Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2020-11-06 Thread John D'Orazio
oh sorry I just realized this discussion was from 4 years ago! it seemed more recent at first. I see there is a wiki page for Groovy https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Groovy_UNO_Extension , and I saw now a reference to Carl's github repo https://github.com/cbmarcum/guno-extension . -- John On Fri,

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2020-11-06 Thread John D'Orazio
I've touched up the wiki page in the past week or so, as I've been using the Netbeans plugin on more recent versions of Netbeans. I believe Patricia was asking about the wiki for the Groovy / Gradle tests? Is there any information on how to proceed in testing the Groovy / Gradle implementation?

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-28 Thread Carl Marcum
On 03/27/2016 10:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 3:53 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 03/27/2016 05:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin, this

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 3/27/2016 3:53 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 03/27/2016 05:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin, this discussion will make sense. Otherwise we are wasting

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Carl Marcum
On 03/27/2016 05:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin, this discussion will make sense. Otherwise we are wasting our time. I generally have at least one

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin, this discussion will make sense. Otherwise we are wasting our time. I generally have at least one Windows box with Netbeans installed, so I should

RE: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 on the three PMC members > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:26 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans > > Dennis E. Hami

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: From: Andrea Pescetti On 27/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. Then all of us are violating the policy every time we update the website. [orcmid] That is not the case for *any* Apache Project web site or the web site for Apache

RE: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 09:46 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans > > On 27/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: >

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 27/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/26/2016 10:37 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: 3) We recognize that http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ has different areas, and that not all of them should be subject to the same policy. Just like I don't call a release vote when I change a web page

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Carl Marcum
On 03/26/2016 05:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:38 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans On 20/03/2016 Patricia

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 3/26/2016 2:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:38 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans On 20/03/2016 Patricia

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 3/26/2016 10:37 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 20/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: The issue is whether it is ASF distributed software, for which ASF trademarks can appropriately be used. I think it is and should continue to be ASF distributed software. ... 3) We recognize that

RE: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-26 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:38 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans > > On 20/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: >

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-26 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 20/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: The issue is whether it is ASF distributed software, for which ASF trademarks can appropriately be used. I think it is and should continue to be ASF distributed software. So far we've adopted another approach: it is a development tool meant to ease

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Patricia Shanahan
be elsewhere is a good idea. -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 09:49 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans [ ... ] I do prefer this is from the project and if it needs

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Marcus
of Apache OpenOffice, it can be taken to Apache legal and elsewhere where review and approval at the Foundation level is required. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 04:31 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing

RE: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 I think exploring that source being at ASF and the artifact be elsewhere is a good idea. > -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 09:49 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOf

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Carl Marcum
of Apache OpenOffice, it can be taken to Apache legal and elsewhere where review and approval at the Foundation level is required. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 04:31 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Kay Schenk
ndicator of the >> project's viability. >> >> If the Apache OpenOffice Project Management Committee >> words and procedurally-approves a narrow, specific request >> for an exception with regard to the UNO Tools of Apache >> OpenOffice, it can be taken to

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Carl Marcum
e review and approval at the Foundation level is required. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 04:31 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans Am 03/20/2016 11:29 AM, sc

RE: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
required. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 04:31 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans > > Am 03/20/2016 11:29 AM, schrieb Andre

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Marcus
Am 03/20/2016 11:29 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 20/03/2016 Marcus wrote: Am 03/18/2016 12:19 AM, schrieb Carl Marcum: Do we need to treat the submission of plugin artifacts for availability at NetBeans.org and through their update mechanism as official project releases requiring a vote?

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 20/03/2016 Marcus wrote: Am 03/18/2016 12:19 AM, schrieb Carl Marcum: Do we need to treat the submission of plugin artifacts for availability at NetBeans.org and through their update mechanism as official project releases requiring a vote? ... @all: Is there anything that would speak

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:04:43 +0100 Marcus wrote: > Am 03/18/2016 12:19 AM, schrieb Carl Marcum: > > Do we need to treat the submission of plugin artifacts for availability > > at NetBeans.org and through their update mechanism as official project > > releases requiring a

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-20 Thread Marcus
Am 03/18/2016 12:19 AM, schrieb Carl Marcum: Do we need to treat the submission of plugin artifacts for availability at NetBeans.org and through their update mechanism as official project releases requiring a vote? If so, what would the verification procedure look like? We had the first