: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe
Speaking of STLPort: It seems that these incredible number of
ANACHRONISM warnings regarding missing typenames on unxsols4 and
unxsoli4 can be fixed with a single line of change in STLPort. I'll
suggest that we fix this one in another CWS which has a chance to get in
OOo 2.0, if Martin
operations should be much slower in debug mode than
in product mode. In practice I didn't notice a real slowdown of OOo.
Thanks,
Heiner
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Technical Lead Release Engineering, StarOffice
OpenOffice Release Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED
/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/vcl/source/src
dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'
This is not my first problem but it is the first I can't find a fix for the
other is discribed here with a fix
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44027
--
Jens-Heiner
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
OpenOffice.org release engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED
is a set of prebuild binaries, so the stuff is not
committed to CVS. They are not regularly provided, due to their size. If
there is a solver you can find it here:
http://oootranslation.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Johannes Walther wrote:
--- Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Well to me it looks like your checkout is broken
because you definitely missing at least two required
modules. You can check them out by name, for example
cvs -d ... co epm. It's no wonder your build broke
...
Ok
.
Solaris compiler support #pragma pack(n) which works similar to the gcc
#pragma. The documentation is here:
http://docs.sun.com/source/817-5070/Pragmas_App.html, B.2.12
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the
mainstream.
Heiner
Function call overhead for a
simple increment appears somewhat disproportionate to me...
Apart from that, with the integration of the UNO threading framework,
there's opportunity to bin thread-safe implementations at tons of
places, isn't there?
Cheers,
--
Jens-Heiner
Ross Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 18:32 +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Ross Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:09 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Hi all,
Someone recently mentioned that osl_increment/decrementInterlockedCount
would show up as top scorers with certain
Ross Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 18:22 +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
I can't see what we could do about the costs of the lock instruction
on x86. I mean, if we need an atomic increment/decrement for our
reference counter we can't work with non-atomic instructions here
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, on newer processors (P4, Xeon etc) the lock prefix shouldn't be
that expensive, because if the target memory of the instruction is
cacheable the CPU will not assert the Lock# signal (which locks the
bus) but only lock
wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 16:19 +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Ross Johnson wrote:
The timings for the Interlocked routine calling and for the inlined non-
locked asm using MSVC 6 were almost identical, whereas the inlined
locked asm was much slower. The same tests using GCC showed
on vacation...)
-Stephan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
'how-to' if the one I've been using is
not right?
Some additional notes are here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Windows
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
OpenOffice.org Release Engineer
Technical Lead Release Enginering, StarOffice
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, they are
of course no substitute for doing some real profiling with the office code.
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CFLAGS= -I. -fPIC -O2 -Wall -DINLINE -DCHECKSMP
#CFLAGS= -I. -fPIC -O2 -Wall -DINLINE
#CFLAGS= -I. -fPIC -O2 -Wall -DCHECKSMP
#CFLAGS= -I. -fPIC -O2 -Wall
intrlock: intrlock.o
10%
per call to the reference counter. The overall influence of inlining on
the performance is thus probably not measurable on this platform.
Heiner
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
I did some measurements with a copy of SRC680 m164 and one of the more
pathological calc documents, and found
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
disappeared in the meanwhile :-(
C.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
regarding position _B) below: one should point out that the milestone
will be delayed for more than 2-3 days in case something is wrong with
the milestone. Creating a CWS, fixing the bug, rebuilding, repackaging,
doing again the automated tests can possibly delay the milestone by a
week
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Michael,
With UTF2 you mean Uno Threading Framework 2? I can see how it helps
the performance if we reduce mutex locking (especially Solar-Mutex, of
course) but naively I would assume that reference counter as programming
concept are mostly independent from that effort? Does UTF2
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With UTF2 you mean Uno Threading Framework 2? I can see how it helps
the performance if we reduce mutex locking (especially Solar-Mutex, of
course) but naively I would assume that reference counter
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
On Monday 18 December 2006 11:46, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Aah. Let me rephrase. Are -you- really sure the external include guard
optimization provides enough benefit on all the compilers we are using
7.1
Go ahead with the script (I'd take that anyway, once we switch to 8.0)
- I can do the timings.
Please remember to do the timings against remote volumes.
Thanks
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
no problem with SunStudio 8/Solaris 8. A quick workaround would be
to modify Python.h to include limits.h unconditionally.
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 14:18 +0100, Pavel Janík wrote:
What about making binfilter SO only module? ;-)
-1
Unfortunately .sdw etc documents exist and are a fact of life, we do
still need to import them. e.g. my performance
Gregoire Gentil wrote:
Hello,
When I big import a Microsoft Word .doc document with the Sun binaries
ooo 2.1, the document opens in 20s.
When I import it with my own compilation of ooo (Gentoo, gcc 4.1, a set
of coherent/optimized flags), it takes more then two minutes.
Can anyone tell
if there are, well, unexpected dependencies
in the code base and than it will take a source code janitor to removed
it from the code.
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Jörg Jahnke wrote:
Hi,
the reason why the Wiki page speaks of mandatory tests I have mentioned
in a previous mail:
Jörg Jahnke schrieb:
The problem with such tests not being mandatory is that, sooner or
later, some tests would break. That again would lead to a state where
the user of
/DevelopersGuide/GUI): it answers some
questions I had for a long time! Thanks hr (I don't know your real
name!)!
Hehe. hr (Jens-Heiner Rechtien) is a release engineer, who integrated
the child workspace where this was introduced. While he, as all our
release engineers, surely deserves thanks
]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
looks like the top level makefile is broken for Solaris (looks like it
wants a gmake).
Please place gmake in PATH before /usr/ccs/bin/make (can be found in
/usr/sfw/bin nowadays)
Heiner
Gérard Henry wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi Gérard,
I'm wondering which version
Hi,
this exact problem is not exactly new and got already forgotten twice
because we (well I) were to lazy to write an issue. Please write me (hr)
an issue, and I'll include a fix in my next CWS.
Here is a possible way to fix the problem.
--- _stdio_file.hFri Sep 7 13:33:27 2007
+++
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e
/Compiler_versions_used_by_port_maintainers_and_release_engineers
Heiner, yes. This is the current status quo. And sb wants to change
it... I do not agree with the change.
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Ulf,
Ulf Wendel wrote:
Moin Heiner!
Jens-Heiner Rechtien schrieb:
- we had a former version of OOo on Solaris Sparc which was buildable
with gcc but this port hasn't been maintained for a long time.
Currently you'll need SunStudio (8, 10-12 or Sun Studio Express) to
build OOo on Solaris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi Martin,
since almost all OOO300 CWSs (for the RC) will be integrated into
DEV300 as well it makes sense to have most of them already integrated
into DEV300 before starting the migration. Also there are some quite
huge CWSs currently
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 08/27/08 16:00, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Please note that we have a soft dependency on the RC. Since CWSs which
are meant for OOO300 can only be opened in CVS, we'll need to manually
merge then into SVN for DEV300. The simple double integration trick we
usually
Jahnke wrote:
Hi,
Jens-Heiner Rechtien schrieb:
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi Martin,
since almost all OOO300 CWSs (for the RC) will be integrated into
DEV300 as well it makes sense to have most of them already
integrated into DEV300 before starting the migration. Also
Hi,
last weekend I managed to hurt myself with the kick starter of a bike
and as a result I'm out of office for probably a week. This means that
the Subversion migration will probably be delayed for a few days. Sorry
for that. I keep you posted about when exactly we will do the migration.
Heiner
with CVS (at least
for now), thus the Openoffice.org 3.0 release is not affected at all.
The migration will take about a week.
Please find the details here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOo_and_Subversion
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOo_and_Subversion#Create_a_OOo_repository_mirror
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
just a little status update:
We plan to write enable the subversion based OOo repository on Tuesday
if nothing to serious shows up until then. There will be a separate
announcement on the developer mailing list when this happens.
Actually the repository is already write enabled for those
Hi
+1 for the proposal
Heiner
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
After the switch to Subversion, the license headers in all the OOo
source files (taken from the templates
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/templates/code and
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/templates/makefile) still
ANNOUNCEMENT: OpenOffice.org migrates to Subversion
===
The OOo subversion source code repository is now write enabled for all
domain developers, thus we are officially migrated to Subversion.
The details of the migration can be found here:
probably not m33, but at some time in the near future.
Another huge change which could be done in the same milestone is to
convert tabs to 4 spaces, something I know Kendy and some others are
advocating.
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-x -b' is your friend ...
Could be done, and the earlier the better I guess.
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stuff to a SVN based branch @m32 and
then rebase with svn merge to something newer ... = problem solved.
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
On 10/16/08 11:00, Malte Timmermann wrote:
In short: Can we please add the platform-dependent output tree names
as svn:ignore property to all modules?
+1
+1
-1
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
anyway.
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
reference and in case somebody wants to file an
issue against an old version of jut?
Good question. I makes sense to keep it there for a while, but it's hard
to determine when this while should end :)
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wouldn't know).
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Tuesday, 2008-10-28 10:57:39 +0100, Frank Schönheit wrote:
modifying a .cxx file on Windows, and committing it to SVN, followed by
a svn diff -r PREV file, shows me that *the complete* file changed
with the commit. Doing a svn diff -r PREV -x
Hi,
on Friday evening (19:00) I plan to update the SVN server on
svn.services.openoffice.org to version 1.5.4.
Please avoid having open svn connections then.
Thank you,
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
To be more precise: Friday, Nov 28th, 19:00 CET (GMT+1)
Thanks,
heiner
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
on Friday evening (19:00) I plan to update the SVN server on
svn.services.openoffice.org to version 1.5.4.
Please avoid having open svn connections then.
Thank you,
Heiner
Hi,
the server upgrade to SVN 1.5.4 is completed.
Have a nice weekend
Heiner
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
To be more precise: Friday, Nov 28th, 19:00 CET (GMT+1)
Thanks,
heiner
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
on Friday evening (19:00) I plan to update the SVN server
you
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as well.
Thank you
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Which is a pity, as this is *the* feature of SVN which made it worth
suffering the additional complexity introduced with it.
Ciao
Frank
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
I wouldn't call for a complete ban but it looks like one has to be extra
careful. Restructuring should be done in CWS which lives only a very
short time. Best, say, opened on one milestone
?
kind regards
Regina
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
that too. Maybe better wait ..
Regards,
Eric
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Jürgen,
thanks for pointing this out. The problem is caused by SVN fooling up on
resurrected items. I found this in the change log for SVN 1.5.5
* fixed: broken merge if target's history includes resurrections
(r34385, -93)
Heiner
PS: svn 1.5.5 fixes a number of svn:mergeinfo related
...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
this :-) We can setup a mercurial classroom as well,
after I'm back from vacation (July, 6th). Let's say at sometime in mid July?
Tschues,
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
Hi Malte,
Malte Timmermann wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote, On 06/12/09 15:33:
Gi Eric,
eric.bachard wrote:
Hi,
FYI, we had a nice ClassRoom, about git introduction, made by Jérémie
Laval (from UTBM).
As usual the log is available at :
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki
, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail
hastily add that I don't blame the author of the CWS for doing this,
he hadn't much choice due to the (required) format change. But often we
do have a choice, please keep this in mind.
Thanks for your consideration
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
with your SVN distribution.
Does this sequence of events match your experience?
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
recht...@sun.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
of the pilot we move over to next
phase: the implementation of a full scale migration to Mercurial. I'll
keep you posted about the details.
Thanks:
===
I would like to thank all the pilot participants for their work and
their valuable discussions and insights.
Regards,
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Rene,
please see my comments inline,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Scalability:
- overall perceived good performance, some were even quite enthusiastic
about it (SVN users are easy to please ...).
- there were three mentions of sub-par performance
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
[Cc to tinderbox removed]
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
As an additional note, it has been suggested to not commit the
boost*.tar.gz to boost/download, but make it a pre-requisite which needs
to be downloaded before building. This would
Hi Rene,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Or invent a nice solution that does auto-downloads, and switch a few
other huge external libs to that (like icu). ;)
That would be a problem for some builders unless you don't download
Hi Jan,
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Heiner,
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Everyone using a mercurial based CWS MUST enter the new milestone in EIS
manually after rebasing the CWS to a new milestone using mercurial
commandline or gui tools.
Cannot this be automated
Hi OOo Mercurial users,
Automatic creation of outgoing repositories
=
The mechanism for the server side creation of the outgoing CWS
repositories on hg.services.openoffice.org is in now place.
An outgoing repository is automatically created for every
Hi OOo Mercurial users,
OOo domain developers public keys
=
The SVN public keys of all OOo domain developers can now be used to r/w
access the outgoing mercurial repositories on
hg.services.openoffice.org via SSH
(ssh://h...@hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/*).
Hi,
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
it seems to me that lately a huge amount of lineend-changes did occur.
Maybe it is just a bad impression because many of the cws I had a look
at lately did cause so many unrelated changes, but still:
*Please* take care of lineendings before you commit.
Hi Takashi,
the OpenOffice.org build guide in the Wiki is licensed under PDL, you
can do with it pretty much what you want as long as the resulting
document stays under PDL and it's clear where it did come from and what
your modification are. Of course, IANAL. The exact terms can be found
Hi,
there is not yet a need to drop gcc-3.4 support I think, the usual
compile problems happen with gcc-3.3 or older versions. GCC made a major
(and very necessary) parser update from 3.3 to 3.4 and should have
bumped up the major version at that time.
We have discussed dropping gcc-3.3
Hi Yuri,
thanks for the update!
Bye
Heiner
Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed dropping gcc-3.3 support for quite some time now, but
we refrained from officially obsoleting it because OS/2 and MACOSX 10.3
support still depend on gcc-3.3, at least according to this list:
Hi Christian,
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jens-Heiner Rechtien
jens-heiner.recht...@sun.com wrote:
there is not yet a need to drop gcc-3.4 support I think, the usual compile
problems happen with gcc-3.3 or older versions. GCC made a major (and very
to Mercurial:
- where to find documentation
- which will be the last svn based milestone
- conversion of child workspaces to hg
- conventions which we will use
Regards
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
OpenOffice.org release engineer
h...@openoffice.org
jens-heiner.recht...@sun.com
technical errors but
also embarrassing spelling and grammar mistakes, please feel free to
correct them. It's a Wiki after all.
Regards,
Heiner
--
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
OpenOffice.org release engineer
h...@openoffice.org
jens-heiner.recht...@sun.com
Hi Eric,
looks fine and I'm looking forward to that ClassRoom.
Regards,
Heiner
eric.bachard wrote:
Hello Heiner,
Jens-Heiner Rechtien a écrit :
Migration to Mercurial
==
OpenOffice.org developers,
here - as promised - some information about the migration
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
[...]
As shown, theres a way to do that. However, this local repository now
contains multiple heads. Do NOT DARE to hg push --force these
multiple heads to an outgoing repository or the wrath of RelEng will
be upon you. You have
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
