Hi Mathias,
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:41:04 +0100, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:44:23 -0500, James Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am curious if anyone has an ant script to build an add
Hi Bruce,
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:50:03 -0800, Bruce Byfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I am also looking for
someone to discuss the use of Java in OOo, explaining why the decision
to use it was made in specific cases, and its pros and/or cons.
One use of Java over, say, C++ from a component
On 4/25/05, Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On a related topic, if I wanted to play around with a SCM, which would
you recommend? (open source svp). Some times I wish I had one. Right
now, when I work on a program, I keep doing a 'cp -r'.
This is not my personal opinion, but Linus
On 4/26/05, Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Subversion is certainly not a bad choice. It's a bit difficult to
compile/install, but it's possible to find precompiled binaries for
almost all platforms.
I use Subversion for all my personal projects. It's very nice.
Kohei
will be asked a 'passphrase', not a 'password'.
HTH,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to my function as a
java.util.Date?
Try the com.sun.star.util.Date struct.
http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/util/Date.html
HTH,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us
On 5/27/05, Ary Junior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kohei Yoshida, if I try to declare the date argument date as a
com.sun.star.util.Date like this:
(In my .idl file)
string test(...[in] com::sun::start::util::Date date, ...);
This should probably be string test(...[in] double date
implementation in a few months time...).
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and sell it as
StarOffice.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
years since my last French
class in college, and we only covered basic (I mean *real* basic)
daily conversation in that class, not reading technical documents...
But other than that, it sounds great. :-)
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo
Hi Sophie,
On 8/19/05, Sophie Gautier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
[...]
Is there a plan to translate the documentation into English? My
French is pretty bad as it's been almost 10 years since my last French
class in college, and we only covered basic (I
on
this matter would be appreciated.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/XCellRangeData.html
Because the actual speed up is pretty considerable by switching to
using this method, I use it in all situations where
setFormula/setValue calls inside a loop would otherwise be needed.
HTH,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo
the
discussion to.
Regards,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on a Linux 2.6.12 kernel.
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, somehow Gmail thought I was ready to send it when I wasn't... Hmm.. :(
On 9/11/05, Kohei Yoshida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
In a nutshell, you need to compile your component into a dll for
Windows, and .so's for unixes, and put them as follows:
my_package.zip:
windows.plt/
Here
++ binding is left behind the
other language bindings in terms of popularity, which is a shame. :(
Kohei
P.S. Yes, I love C++.
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
the warning within hdl headers. Because of the
severity of overlooking this warning, turning it off globally would be
IMO a very bad move.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e
On 11/3/05, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
1) Put the values into some type of a XML structure, and inject it
into the zipped file structure (if that's even possible).
You can add a subfolder to the documents' package and (important!) add a
MediaType
Hi Mathias,
On 11/3/05, Kohei Yoshida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/05, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can add a subfolder to the documents' package and (important!) add a
MediaType to it (details can follow if you like this way). Then you can
put any content you like
with the code. Trying to fix a bug that bothers you a lot is a
great way to get you motivated. That's how I got started too.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On 11/8/05, Kohei Yoshida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/05, John Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why
has such a basic problem remained unfixed since April?.
Because no one has bothered to file an issue for it? Seriously, if
Ok. I pull the trigger too soon. I didn't read
hope).
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida
OpenOffice.org Calc contributor
http://kohei.us/ooo/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Kohei Yoshida, OpenOffice.org Calc Hacker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/25/06, Nikolai Pretzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Ziehm schrieb:
Hi Michael,
them: We need this burdensome process for Higher Quality !
us: But lets face it quality is still not good
them: Then we need -even-more- burdensome process !
Hi Cor,
On 10/25/06, Cor Nouws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David, *,
David Fraser wrote:
[...]
3) The spec process is apparently working well for those inside Sun,
less well for those outside. If there were an easier route for those
less involved in development to produce specs it could be
On 10/27/06, Nikolai Pretzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
In a not-so-ideal world, things don't always go as planned.
Requirements grow organically over the development life cycle of that
feature, but the spec document may not always get updated.
There is a clear rule
On 10/29/06, Mikaël De Bie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for you quick answer.
I got all the source files from :
$SRC_ROOT cvs /
-d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs /
co -r SRC680 OpenOffice2
my SRC_ROOT is the directory /docs
that's the version that is recommended on the wiki
Hi Nikolai,
On 10/30/06, Nikolai Pretzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
On 10/27/06, Nikolai Pretzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
In a not-so-ideal world, things don't always go as planned.
Requirements grow organically over
Hi Mikaël,
On 10/31/06, Mikaël De Bie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The add-in I want to compile is the scsolver created by Kohei Yoshida
(http://kohei.us/ooo/solver/)
I've downloaded the scsolver sources from
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/ooo-build/scratch/scsolver/
As I mentioned in my reply
On 10/31/06, Mikaël De Bie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida a écrit :
Hi Mikaël,
On 10/31/06, Mikaël De Bie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The add-in I want to compile is the scsolver created by Kohei Yoshida
(http://kohei.us/ooo/solver/)
I've downloaded the scsolver sources
On 11/1/06, Cor Nouws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote:
But we didn't write down a spec. We conceived of the idea, then
implemented it, now we have it. The original conception of course was
prolly inaccurate, no-one gets things right 1st time, we most likely
have a
Hi Cor,
On 11/1/06, Cor Nouws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kohei,
I think it is party right what you write. Because I've some more
experience is writing words than code, I don't have that 'problem' and
maybe under estimate it.
I have no doubt that expressing and formulating ideas into
Hi Mathias,
On 10/31/06, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
2) The target audience is not very clear. Thanks to this thread,
though, now I'm beginning to see who the specification documents are
intended for (mostly for QA, right?).
Not exclusively. Also developers
Hi Cor,
On 11/2/06, Cor Nouws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this whole discussion is influenced by the fact, that many in
FLOSS love freedom so much, that they become a little bit offended, when
they see some kind of format ;-) (of course no offence meant).
Nah. This thread has little to
So, the language used in the spec should be oriented toward QA
personnel (i.e. less advertising or selling tone, but more
technicality and correctness).
A spec is a strictly technical document. Advertisement and selling has
nothing to do with it.
Yes, that was my understanding as well. But
On 11/2/06, Michael Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems there has been a wide-ranging debate on the spec. topic wrt.
reducing potentially discouraging barriers to entry for community
contributors. I tried to summarise where I -think- we're at, and then
present some principles some
On 11/3/06, Niklas Nebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Another point I want to mention is that, perhaps the UI design
requirement at CWS integration time should be relaxed a bit. Instead
of requiring UE approveal of the UI change at cws integration time,
either QA or peer
On 11/3/06, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's put it that way: it should be possible to integrate something even
if the original goal laid out in the spec wasn't reached but the result
is good enough. Good enough means that we could live with it even if
nothing was changed until the
On 11/6/06, Niklas Nebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On 11/3/06, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's put it that way: it should be possible to integrate something even
if the original goal laid out in the spec wasn't reached but the result
is good enough. Good
On 11/14/06, Kai Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/14/06, Michael Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe Kai volunteered to write some of this up in the Wiki
somewhere as a conclusion, so we actually move to the decision making
phase after the lengthy discussion ;-)
Yep, as
Hi Thorsten,
On 12 Dec 2006 16:13:22 +0100, Thorsten Behrens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
...
Thanks for listening, and eagerly waiting for your feedback!
The first thing that caught my eye is that, you guys are switching
from using tab characters for indentation to using spaces. I'm
On 12/12/06, Eike Rathke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2006-12-12 10:26:41 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
The first thing that caught my eye is that, you guys are switching
from using tab characters for indentation to using spaces.
Actually that's nothing new, but a guideline
On 12/15/06, Christian Lohmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a rule wrt parenthesis? At the same line or on a seperate one?
Or is there no preference?
I don't think it's that important to specify parenthesis style as a
rule. It's a little too excessive, and a little too difficult to
On 18 Dec 2006 11:46:35 +0100, Thorsten Behrens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say let's add the rule then. I'm relatively indifferent about
this, though - if people think it's ok to start removing external
header guards right now (because it will take years to clean them up
anyway), I'd be fine
On 12/21/06, Nikolai Pretzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is: From today on, we use internal include guards only.
...
What do you think?
Sounds good to me. :-)
Kohei
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 12/20/06, Gurpreet Malhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I am facing an error when I am trying to run shell script from CUI mode.
It is displaying the error that Cannot connect to X server.
OO.o requires X server to be running at run time. To run OO.o without
X server, you need to use
Hi Mikael,
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 14:33 +0200, Mikael De Bie wrote:
I've used your code of scsolver as base for my extension, have you a
makefile that generate the dll files for your scsolver ? If so, can you
please send it to me ?
Sorry. I don't have a good makefile for building dll files
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 13:15 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Hi all,
Is the Jam stuff in the OOo source tree (thought as a replacement for
dmake) still relevant or is it dead code (that should go)?
More importantly, what happened to our grand --enable-jam project? I
loved that concept have
Hi Oliver,
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 10:07 +0200, Oliver Craemer - Sun Germany - ham02
- Hamburg wrote:
Hi,
good work, but I miss the point where it is mentioned that there must be
a link to the installsets for the QA. This should not be a nice to
have but a must, otherwise the QA
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 17:28 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Wednesday, 2007-07-04 17:04:39 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
modified version of the child workspace policies on
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/CWS_Policies
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 22:22 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Mathias Bauer already pointed out that a operational build bot system is
essential and solves the problems you mention here, we need to make this
a priority
That sounds fantastic, thank you. :-)
Kohei
Hi Thorsten,
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 22:25 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kohei Yoshida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) The use of product and non-product terms seems unclear to me.
What do they mean exactly?
Hi Kohei,
a product version is one that has .pro suffix at the output trees
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 23:21 +0200, Johan Rudholm wrote:
Does anyone have any good advice? I would very much like to type the
equivalent of make install. :)
/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/bin/userscripts/install
is your friend. :-)
Have fun!
Kohei
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 12:14 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
This process will break if developers do not use the correct templates
which is a defined process for creating new specifications.
A defined process !? By who? I thought we (Sun and non-Sun) agreed
when we had that big spec process
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 08:54 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Count for 2.3.0 is only (...) about 70.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/New_Features_2.3#Full_list
Though some structured data/lists were available, it took more that a
day to only discover all features. Some simply had to be dug
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 13:25 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
So well as long as the spec is not finished and not using the template
it doesn´t appear correctly in the release notes interim document. But
this currently only affects the release notes for the first developer
milestone the
aSameOrSuperType ) const
used all over the place. But is this macro still actively used or is it
deprecated?
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Stephan,
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 09:09 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
It was introduced and heavily used at a time when compiler-based RTTI
was still unavailable or too expensive. It would not be necessary today
that we have compiler-based RTTI available everywhere, but I guess that
, I don't think it's feasible to remove them all at once. We
should do it gradually in steps.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
but because Calc is not Excel. So, when in doubt,
defaulting to Excel's behavior makes sense to me.
Anyway, that's the way I see it. Agree or disagree, is up to you.
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
roadblock, as long as
someone else's doing the work. ;-)
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
what are your opinions on making java 1.5 a requirement for OOo 3.0?
Heck no way!
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
: No such file or directory.
Can't open draw_list.txt: No such file or directory.
Can't open draw_list.txt: No such file or directory.
cat: galleries.txt: No such file or directory
make: ** [install] Error 1
Seams that are files that werent create and that are needed to build.
--
Kohei Yoshida
that.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Let me
know if there is more that I've removed but you want to restore.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
FUTURE around it, or else I can add such things to the
whitelist if that's undesirable.
For now, I'll put '#define MAYBE_REMOVE_THIS 0' in global.hxx and use it
for the codes I'm not sure about.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
. ;-)
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 15:16 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Having said that, I would like to still reserve the right to just
outright remove code if I think with strong certainty that the code
shouldn't be there at all. ;-)
And again, if I removed something by mistake that you want to leave
the default and copy ctors
in the private section of the class declaration, and leave their
definitions out. That should prevent the compiler from automatically
generating those ctors, and if any code constructs that class via
default or copy constructor, then the link should fail.
--
Kohei Yoshida
Hi Niklas,
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 19:17 +0200, Niklas Nebel wrote:
example: CHINA001
In the interest of removing the unused code, I'd like know what those
CHINA001 labels are for. Is it okay to perhaps review those commented
out lines and see if we can remove them permanently?
Kohei
--
Kohei
on the callcatcher page.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an indication that the class as a whole is not used at all.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've never installed OOo this way on locale other
than en-US.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:52 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I'm now checking out the cws once again to do a fresh rebase, to see
if
that works.
And this worked! Still not sure what the problem was that prevented the
rebase in the first place.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer
this problem.
Any known workaround on this? As Caolan already said, running 'svn up'
does not seem to fix it.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
kyosh...@novell.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
empty files. You cannot
really make something wrong when updating them.
Unfortunately not. I've also tried Heiner's suggestion but that didn't
solve the problem either.
I'm now checking out the cws once again to do a fresh rebase, to see if
that works.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org
issues with the core implementation which need to be fixed in
order to make this feature more stable.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
kyosh...@novell.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 18:21 +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi Kohei,
the pilot is just to make certain that there aren't any unexpected
glitches in hg with respect to scalability or features. If everything is
OK we will go with hg.
Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.
Kohei
are also affected, quite possibly others too.
The good news is that this does not break anything thanks to those
header guards, but I guess we should still fix this...
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
kyosh...@novell.com
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:13 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
The form in EIS to enter a featuremail
BTW, I can't add feature mail in the EIS. I don't have any button to
enter or edit feature mails anywhere. Is this a permission issue,
or ... ?
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 13:25 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi Bernd,
Hi Kohei,
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:13 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
The form in EIS to enter a featuremail
BTW, I can't add feature mail in the EIS. I don't have any button to
enter or edit
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 07:50 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 13:25 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi Bernd,
Hi Kohei,
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:13 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
The form in EIS to enter a featuremail
BTW, I can't add
the answer for it is killing me.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc.
kyosh...@novell.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:21 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote:
Hi Kohei,
if you open Styles and Formatting, eg with the toolbar icon left to
the Font selection box in the OpenOffice toolbars you will see a
watering can icon in the dialog. The SID_STYLE_WATERCAN slot ID is
most likely associated
85 matches
Mail list logo
