Re: New ContainerPool

flag for functions. Happy to discuss some of the challenges and issues I found getting this to work if people are interested. On 4 April 2017 at 22:54, Michael M Behrendt <michaelbehre...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Dragos, > > James Thomas has done some work around zipkin & open

Re: Propose BI-WEEKLY "Technical Exchange" Zoom meeting for OpenWhisk staring next Wed. 19th

ecting: Greet new people and hear their interest and help them > connect with others. > - Volunteers: identify key code work areas where we need help and seek > volunteers. > > > Before we event start we would need to… > > - Have an initial pool of volunteer moderators (of course I would > volunteer to be one and help jump start the processes) > - Develop a list of agenda topics here on mailing lists and CWIKI that is > large enough to start the first meeting and have enough topics to keep it > going > > > Please provide feedback on this proposal as I would welcome any support > and ideas that could make this better if we agree this is a good idea. > > > Cheers! > Matt > > > > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Minutes & Video posted for "OW Tech Interchange" kickoff call

2017-07-19+OW+Tech+ > Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes > > Video on our YouTube (Apache Meetings playlist): > https://youtu.be/bqh3ynIF8mM > > Feel free to comment/fill in anything I may have missed. > > Kind regards, > Matt > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Improving support for UI driven use cases

valid at all. I think it was also already noted, that this > imposes some of the "old-fashioned" problems on the user, like: How many > concurrent requests will my action be able to handle? That kinda defeats > the seemless-scalability point of serverless. > > Cheers, > Markus > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Updating Package and Language versions for a kind

> >> >[2]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2120 > >> >[3]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/319 > >> > > >> > > >> >> On 14 Jul 2017, at 16:27, Michael Marth <mma...@adobe.com.INVALID> &g

Re: Requested new "low hanging fruit" (i.e., "lhf") label for Issues

ssues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14318 > > > > The actual label would be "lhf" once it gets created and hope we can make > > good use of it once it is active. Will add that to our CWIKI > > documentation once enabled as well. > > > > Kind regards, > > Matt > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Action Container Packages Versions

refresh process every X weeks or months to ensure they are current? I've opened a PR to update the Swift runtime but thought it might be useful to discuss this broader issue. https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2374 -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: PassportJS with OpenWhisk

at listen to events from a variety of 3rd > party providers on behalf of the users, and then be able to do something > useful on user’s behalf; user authentication plays an important role in > this. To some extent I’ve also been thinking what it would be like for > developers if this feature would come with the OW catalog. > > > Looking forward to hearing your feedback, > > Dragos > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Next Tech Interchange meeting

meeting of delaying it a >>> week as it's Thanksgiving in the US this week. >>>> >>>> I think it'd be better to just skip this week's meeting and have the >>> next meeting on 6th December. I'm pretty sure I can make that day, so am >>> willing to host (at some level of competence). >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>> Rob... >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: OpenWhisk NodeJS 8 support

new promisify >> here is some good read on this: >> http://2ality.com/2017/05/util-promisify.html >> >> I have a WIP PR with the support here >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/5 >> >> There are few things I want to see if we can improve and take the chance >> to it since this will be a new kind. I added a list in the PR >> >> I have no issue opened because the repo is not enable with Issues, that's >> why I put the details in the PR >> >> -- Carlos >> >> -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk "Tech Interchange" Meeting - November 8th 2017.

) -> Updating Runtimes (Carlos Santana & James Thomas 15 minutes) -> Swift 4 Runtime & Codable support -> Node.js 8 & async/await support 4. Find and confirm moderator for next meeting (2 min) * - "If Docker has captains, OpenWhisk can have pirates" On

Re: list etiquette: job postings?

+1 On 7 Dec 2017 11:51 a.m., "Carlos Santana" wrote: > +1 > > Also add to the policy that posting should make it clear that is not the > ASF hiring :-) > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:49 AM Michael Marth > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > as you might (or

Re: Please review our project's draft Apache Incubator June board report

rter (June); I plan to > post it tomorrow to the board's Wiki; please review and comment here or on > our CWiki: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=85475755 > > Thanks, > Matt > > PS message me if you need CWiki access > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: About Ruby2.5 runtime support proposal(in relation to #3725)

ut > wsk action invoke myAction --result -p message hello > > # 4. Test it > cd ../openwhisk && ./gradlew install && cd ../openwhisk-runtime-ruby > ./gradlew :tests:test --tests *actionContainers. > Ruby25ActionContainerTests* > ``` > > Best, > Kei > -- Regards, James Thomas

Supporting user-configurable warm action containers?

] https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets=default=%20%23AWSWishlist%20warm=typd [3] https://theburningmonk.com/2018/01/im-afraid-youre-thinking-about-aws-lambda-cold-starts-all-wrong/ [4] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2795 -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Supporting user-configurable warm action containers?

t; nick > > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:22 AM, James Thomas > wrote: > > > One of most frequent complaints[1][2][3] I hear from developers using > > serverless platforms is coping with cold-start latency when dealing with > > sudden bursts of traffic. > >

Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk

abarra.com > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Rob Allen wrote: > > > On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt Rutkowski wrote: > > > > > > > > Can we go with 0.9.0? > > > > > > > > > > 0.9.0 is fine with me. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rob > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Feed Provider API v2?

ges can be reviewed for updating where relevant. Hopefully this message can spark some discussion, feeds are a really important part of the openwhisk platform. I'm happy to also introduce this on the video call next week? -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Feed Provider API v2?

pi key is revoke, to tell the feed provider > to update replace all the trigger with the old key, and use the new key > > [1]: https://github.com/abaruni > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:39 AM James Thomas <ja...@jamesthom.as> wrote: > > > Users are running into l

Re: Welcome new Committer James Thomas

com> wrote: > OpenWhiskers, > > Based on his ongoing and valuable contributions to the project, the > OpenWhisk PPMC has elected James Thomas as a Committer as well as PPMC > member and he has > accepted the invitation. > > Please join me in welcoming him! > > James,

Re: A proposal for a more efficient implementation of Go actions

sabled this explicitly at one point, >> but I don't foresee a show stopper yet. >> >> -r >> -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: A proposal for a more efficient implementation of Go actions

implement. It'd be great to run some performance tests once you have created this new runtime to validate the expected performance improvement. -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: A proposal for a more efficient implementation of Go actions

ly. > > Can I use your code? You know, you should have signed the contributor > agreement (as I did) and place the code under the Apache license... > > -- > Michele Sciabarra > mich...@sciabarra.com > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 12:56 PM, James Thomas wrote: >

Re: First Implementation of the self-replacing Go support for OpenWhisk

quot;:{"name":"Mike"}}' > {"greetings":"Hello, Mike"} > ``` > > As you can see, the function changed and now it implements the "hello" > handler. > > But the replaced server is still able to run init so let's do it again

Re: Generalising the proposed approach for Go actions to support Generic Binary Actions.

d to address some weaknesses that emerged in the discussion (again, thank > to James Thomas for pointing them out). > > First, the most relevant, my approach requires you implement a supporting > library able to run an http server in each language you want to support. So > one fo

Re: Getting Started for those in a hurry.

available. > > > Alexander Hitchins > > E: a...@alexhitchins.com > W: alexhitchins.com > M: 07788 423 969 > T: 01892 523 587 > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Benchmarking the Go server: results of performance comparison against the Dockerskeleton

6758b2014 > months ago289MB | > > (the `openwhisk-image` is the image with the proxy and the action, while > the `openwhisk-exec` contains just the proxy) > > --- > > All the instructions how to run the benchmark by yourself are in the repo > here: > > https://github.com/sciabarracom/openwhisk-runtime-go > > -- > Michele Sciabarra > openwh...@sciabarra.com > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

t; > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk

ources.tar.gz > > under the folder of apache-openwhisk-incubator-0.9.0-rc1. > > > > Shall we include the name "incubator" as part of the version name? Or it > > does not sound attractive. > > > > > > Best wishes. > > Vincent Hou (侯胜博) > > > &

Re: MiniWhisk: what you think?

it is a tool to develop an action in go locally simulating what > would happen when run in the real OpenWhisk. > > > How does sound the idea? Is it worth the effort? > > > > > > > > -- > Michele Sciabarra > openwh...@sciabarra.com > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: AI Actions as a first-class citizen in OpenWhisk

With OpenWhisk I think we're very close to make AI Actions a first-class > citizen for developers, and I've created a wiki to explore what it would > take to get there [1]. Coincidently James Thomas also published today his > experience with Tensorflow and OpenWhisk [2] > > > I'm i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk python, php and and swift runtimes[RC1]

o compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > Thank you very much. > > > Best wishes. > Vincent Hou (侯胜博) > > Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM > Cloud > > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United > States > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

t; [ X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. > [ X ] All files have license headers if necessary. > [ X ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > Cheers, > Justin Halsall -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: any updates to include in OW quarterly board report draft?

nt me to miss (as I will use primarily the "dev" list discussions, as > > well as scan the merged PRs over last 3 months across most repos. > > > > Any help appreciated. > > > > Kind regards, > > Matt > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Today's Tech Interchange meeting video and notes posted

ps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/ > 2018-04-11+OW+Tech+Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes > > Will verify James when back in health can host on the 25th > > cheers, > -mr > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

| xargs -n10 file | grep -v ASCII > > -Bertrand > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: dotnet 2.1 Runtime for OpenWhisk

; > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:55 PM Shawn Black > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Howdy, all! > > >> I would like to contribute the code for the .NET 2.1 runtime that I > had > > >> demoed earlier today during the 2018-10-10 Apache OpenWhisk Tech > > >> Interchange meeting. > > >> The current GitHub repo is: > > >> https://github.com/shawnallen85/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet > > >> Thanks!!Shawn > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Invoking actions via websockets

a client > > that could invoke a whisk action `onMessage`. > > > > I'd like to get feedback from the community at large as to this > > proposal. Interested in your thoughts, ideas, etc. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-apigateway/issues/325 > > > > -Matt > > matthew.ham...@gmail.com > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: OpenWhisk officially first-time released all the 12 modules under Apache as incubator project.

tor, Open Technology, IBM > Cloud > > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United > States > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Welcome new Committer Michele Sciabarra

cepted the invitation. > > Please join me in welcoming him! > > Regards, > -- Carlos > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Welcome new Committer Rob Allen

r new Committer! > > > > Based on his ongoing and valuable contributions to the project, the > > OpenWhisk PPMC has elected Rob Allen as a Committer and he has > > accepted the invitation. > > > > Please join me in welcoming him! > > > > Regards, > > -- Carlos > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk python, php and and swift runtimes[RC1]

es are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > Thank you very much. > > > Best wishes. > Vincent Hou (侯胜博) > > Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM > Cloud > > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United > States > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 1.12.0-incubating: OpenWhisk nodejs, java and and docker runtimes[RC1]

t release. > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > Thank you very much. > > Best wishes. > Vincent Hou (侯胜博) > > Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM > Cloud > > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United > States > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: release verification help

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 17:21, James Thomas wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 17:40, Carlos Santana wrote: > > > > Using the website I would think it doesn’t count as verifying the artifacts. > > > > Just playing devils advocate here. > > > > Going

Re: Bi-weekly meeting tomorrow

your agenda items! > > Call details: > Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/5043933185 > > Wednesday April 3rd > - 11AM EST(Eastern US) > - 5PM CET (Central Europe), > - 4PM UTC, 12AM CST (Beijing) > > > Thanks > Tyson -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 12:07, James Thomas wrote: > > Non-binding +1: > > Matt Sicker > > I think this might be wrong now that I'm a mentor? Or does it only > apply to the IPMC vote? > > -- > Matt Sicker -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: release verification help

bout using an external service, you can host the tool yourself. -- Regards, James Thomas

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0

Matt Sicker There were no -1 or 0 votes. The vote has passed in the dev list of OpenWhisk, based on Apache voting policy. I am closing the vote mail thread, and will send out another email for IPMC to vote. -- Forwarded message - From: James Thomas Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 18:14

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0

Mar 2019 at 12:57, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > +1 > > Best regards > > Krzysztof > > > On 18.03.2019 19:14, James Thomas wrote: > > This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk Client JS > > (incubating) 3.19.0 > > > > List of J

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)

ISCLAIMER is included. > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > regards, > > --dave > -- Regards, James Thomas

LICENSE format?

experience in this provide guidance on which is correct? -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: release verification help

f the steps using a shell script similar to > > > > > https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh > > " > > in one of the recent release vote threads. > > > > Thanks to James Thomas, we have a web-based verificat

Re: [DISCUSS] release openwhisk-client-js

js/pull/151 > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/pull/152 > > > > > > I've opened a new PR to add the missing files necessary for a release. > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/pull/154 > >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0.

the release and help us. Minor issues raised during the vote from members have been captured and will be fixed in the next release. -- Forwarded message - From: James Thomas Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 17:14 Subject: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0

Re: change the default action context to omit api key

ation is added by the controller when an action is created or > > updated unless already present. The default value for the annotation is > > "false", meaning no key is injected to the action context. > > > > Furthermore comments and feedback is appreciated. > > > > -r > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: switch docker compose to "lean"?

compose use it by default? > > > > I'm trying to reproduce failures reported in the slack channel for > > docker-compose/make quick-start and it occurred to me we can startup even > > faster with the lean configuration. > > > > -r > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Bi-Weekly Tech Interchange tomorrow - add agenda topics here

That should be "Wednesday (February 20th)." On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 11:55, James Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > Please add to this thread any agenda items you'd like to discuss at the > Tech Interchange call tomorrow - Wednesday (February 19th). > > Call details: > >

[DISCUSS] release openwhisk-client-js

the release? Speak now or forever hold your peace (until the next release...) -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [DISCUSS] Release event providers

rom others. Assuming there are no technical blockers, I would > > like to initiate a formal release process for these three components > early > > next week. > > > > thanks, > > > > --dave > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [DISCUSS] graduation from the incubator

t > considering graduation in parallel. > > Please share your thoughts, > > --dave > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2217c61caad5c7a0369699d06d44e5cf688d3cba982e354a45b8c78@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103091999 > -- Regards, James Thomas

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0

. -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [Bi-Weekly Tech Interchange] Call for agenda topics

U3h2nElV5sk_WI= > > - Wednesday March 20th > 11AM EST(Eastern US) > 5PM CET (Central Europe), > 4PM UTC, 12AM CST (Beijing) > > Thanks, > dragos > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWhisk CLI 0.10.0-incubating

wskdeploy > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release and the reason > > Checklist for reference: > [ ] Download links are valid. > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included. > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current releas

Re: OpenWhisk Apps on Knative

eveloper tooling. For example, IBM Cloud Functions switched from a > > "classic" ansible-driven VM-based deployment to a Kubernetes-based > > deployment of OpenWhisk in the middle of 2018. None of our customers > > noticed or cared (from their perspective nothing changed and all their > > existing programs still run just fine). > > > > Finally, the focus of this project is where the community takes it. We > can > > even go multiple directions simultaneously. That's how open source works > :) > > > > > > --dave > -- Regards, James Thomas

Pluggable Trigger Feed Event Provider

All feedback welcome! -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: nodejs runtime packages in base images

t; their own. But I'm finding that our nodejs6 runtime more convenient for > >> some development because of its built-in packages. > >> > >> So I opened a draft PR (new on GitHub!) to add some packages to our > images > >> here: > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/111 > >> > >> Feedback welcome and especially appreciated if you aren't a provider > that > >> runs their own images. > >> > >> -r > >> > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: good first issue tweets

go-github > repo. > > > > Thoughts on adding the app it to our openwhisk repos? > > > > -r > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: outstanding PRs on openwhisk repo

is appreciated by > contributors > > and project maintainers alike. > > > > I thank you for your patience if you've been waiting on me specifically > for > > a review. I am hoping that this round of housekeeping will help us all > > regain some velocity on accepting contributions. > > > > -r > -- Regards, James Thomas

Bi-Weekly Tech Interchange tomorrow - add agenda topics here

) - Zoom: https://zoom.us/my/asfopenwhisk -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Bi-Weekly Tech Interchange tomorrow - add agenda topics here

nimal impacts with the hopes it will get our comm. > thinking about what are the essential differentiators of OW to carry > forward on a Kube/Knative stack. > > Kind regards, > Matt > > > > From: James Thomas > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Date: 02/19/2019 06:01 AM &g

Re: Bi-Weekly Tech Interchange next Wednesday - add agenda topics here

; > Call details: > > Web Meeting: Tech Interchange (bi-weekly): > - Day-Time: Wednesdays, 11AM EST(Eastern US), 5PM CET (Central Europe), > 4PM UTC, 12AM CST (Beijing) > - Zoom: https://zoom.us/my/asfopenwhisk > > Cheers, > > Justin Halsall > > Ps. Carlos I noted

Remove SDK commands from CLI?

using these SDKs "in the wild" and can't see a valid use-case for continuing to provide them given all the changes in the platform since they were introduced. Does anyone have any comments? If not, I'll open a PR in the CLI to start removing them. -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: override main on activation?

> I'm thinking primarily to restrict this to web actions initially, although > there are some extensions that are also reasonable to consider > subsequently: > >1. we could also make it work for POST invoke, namely wsk action invoke >--main. >2. we can extend it to sequences so that you can create a sequence from >fn@main1, fn@main2 >3. we can further extend it to conductor continuations > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/4349 > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Pluggable Trigger Feed Event Provider

wrote: > This is awesome. Thanks James for sharing it. > > -r > > > On Feb 8, 2019, at 12:11 PM, James Thomas wrote: > > > > Hello Whiskers. > > > > On Wednesday's Community Call, I presented my work on building a > "pluggable > > trigger

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js (v0.14.0, rc1)

lease. [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWhisk graduation to Top Level Project

u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D115526932=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=LUNmCHjmrhrkjp9ZF9fhwg=LFSSfkEdvRwfS3FkELMfDq_7zw2s2_TKfw_AXT9Dw2o=YGyPOxDTHT-HjpQZb1_UMuX4dySHKqv0FH0AkPlJjpg= > > [4] > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__incubator.apache.org_guides_graduation.html-23community-5Fgraduation-5Fvote=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=LUNmCHjmrhrkjp9ZF9fhwg=LFSSfkEdvRwfS3FkELMfDq_7zw2s2_TKfw_AXT9Dw2o=oYAfkquuRCiMbdk0S-TF9_IG9jFe1OYc-qtxFDjBf2Q= > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js (v0.14.0, rc2) apache-openwhisk x

The voting is now closed. The vote has PASSED with 4 +1 binding votes from Rodric Rabbah, Ying Chun Guo, Matt Rutkowski and Dave Grove and no +0 or -1 votes. I'll send the notice to the incubator mailing list to get the vote started there. On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 17:42, James Thomas wrote

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js (v0.14.0, rc2) apache-openwhisk x

lease. [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk API Gateway (v0.10.0-incubating, rc2)

t; > > > > > Usage: > > > > curl -s " > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=HEAD > > > > " -o rcverify.sh > > > > chmod +x rcverify.sh > > > > rcverify.sh openwhisk-apigateway 'OpenWhisk API Gateway' > > > 0.10.0-incubating > > > > rc2 > > > > > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > > > > > > > Release verification checklist for reference: > > > > [ ] Download links are valid. > > > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > > > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included. > > > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > > > > release. > > > > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk > > repository. > > > > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project > > > > policy [1]. > > > > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > > > > > > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3a33c365fb755f364385bff06ac681912fd1af7a43a9b58a881d6b85@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Tech Interchange Call on Wednesday: Topics?

Does anyone have anything for the meeting on Wednesday? I can add you to the agenda as I'm running the call. I know there's lots of exciting stuff going on from the mailing list so if anyone wants to share on the call - let me know! -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Openwhisk in a standalone runnable jar (#4516)

> >> > > > > > >> Chetan Mehrotra > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:57 PM Nick Mitchell < > > moose...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] - prepare to release OpenWhisk catalog

d this release be numbered 0.10.0 or 1.0.0? > > > > --dave > > > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddf47c05e72426a47f0a414e1dd68cc6075fa4a60be1753318ebfe58@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: openwhisk distributions via dockerhub

the NPM guidelines from ASF, we comply with all of them apart from the name. I've opened an issue to track this and will wait on the legal discussion. https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/169 -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Openwhisk in a standalone runnable jar (#4516)

12:30 PM, David P Grove wrote: > > > > WhiskerControl -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Nominations for PMC Chair for TLP graduation resolution

on planning for rotation. > > > I’d like to nominate Dave Grove for consideration. > > Thanks Rodric. I'm happy to take a turn at some point. Whether that's > soon or a couple years down the road doesn't matter to me. > > -dave -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk API Gateway (v0.10.0-incubating, rc1)

t; Please vote to approve this release: > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > > > Release verification checklist for reference: > > [ ] Download links are valid. > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included. > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > > release. > > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. > > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project > > policy [1]. > > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md > > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/281 > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js (v0.14.0, rc1)

; http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval lists > what's required for releases. > > -Bertrand > -- Regards, James Thomas

[DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js (v0.14.0, rc1)

://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/commit/386b13d5642e7e8d9dee00913fc97d529c9637ef -- Regards, James Thomas

Apache OpenWhisk Web Action HTTP Proxy

re's lots more details about the project in the project README and I've now written a blog post in more details about the project here: http://jamesthom.as/blog/2019/04/29/apache-openwhisk-web-action-http-proxy/ -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Move default Node.js runtime to v10?

nd should be OK > > this time... but the catalog actions that are pinned to node6 will need > to > > be updated in a second phase. > > > > -r > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:52 PM James Thomas > wrote: > >> > >> On Wednesday

Re: Change the way the java runtime handles envirorment variable

ot change it - openwhisk has a uniform model across all the > >> runtimes and this would start to diverge... i can be convinced but > >instinct > >> is to leave it alone. > >> > > > >I think the change could be justified if it was part of a broader > redesign > >to enable concurrent activations in a runtime. > >1. pass in a context object instead of stashing > activation-specific > >params in the environment > >2. require proper structured logging > > > >--dave > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Move default Node.js runtime to v10?

on to fix the failures (https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4450) -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Fine-grained permission

t; write/execute". > "51" would mean the owner can do "read/not write/execute". > > There might be more cases, but I believe we can deal with them in the same > way. > Any feedback or idea on this would be appreciated. > > Thanks > Best regards, > Dominic > -- Regards, James Thomas

OpenWhisk JS SDK Updates

on the PRs. * -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: devtools and make-quickstart

ow > nightly), I think we should pin all the dependent images etc and make a > release available. > > An existential question is whether we should use the standalone controller > which is faster to startup and adapt our docs accordingly. > > Thoughts? > > -r > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Catalog (v0.10.0-incubating, rc1)

the release > > > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > > > > > > > Release verification checklist for reference: > > > > [ ] Download links are valid. > > > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > > > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included. > > > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > > > > release. > > > > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk > > repository. > > > > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk > project > > > > policy [1]. > > > > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > > > > > > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Santana > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Adding Github app (Depend-a-bot) to Client JS SDK repo?

-openwhisk-client-js/pull/180 -- Regards, James Thomas

OpenWhisk Client JS: Reducing Package Install Size?

one have any feedback on those proposals? -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Go (v1.13.0-incubating, rc2)

gt; [ ] DISCLAIMER is included. > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Updating our contributions guide

rom non-committers. We just need a clear intent by the author to contribute under our normal terms." There are other links in the blog post to ASF projects discussing this in the past and coming to the same conclusion. -- Regards, James Thomas

  1   2   >