Hello,
I would like to generate the JARs to try out the examples.
*./mvnw install -P build-executable-jars -DskipTests*
shows
*WARNING: The requested profile "build-executable-jars" could not be
activated because it does not exist.*
The reason is probably that this profile is not defined in th
telefon gesendet
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Generate JARs to try out the examples
> Von: Kai Wähner
> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> Cc:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to generate the JARs to try out the examples.
>
> *./mvnw install -P buil
Nachricht ----
> Betreff: Re: Generate JARs to try out the examples
> Von: Kai Wähner
> An: Julian Feinauer
> Cc: dev@plc4x.apache.org
>
> Thanks. I wasn't aware you can use more than one profile. I can confirm
> that the built now works and generates the JARs.
>
If you could / would elaborate a bit about your use cases or your ideas
> you can of course ask Chris for an access to the codecentric IoT Lab and
> test against real PLCs via remote.
>
>
>
> Julian
>
>
>
> *Von: *Kai Wähner
> *Antworten an: *"megachu...@gmail.com&
t
>
> GERMANY
>
>
>
> Tel: +49 711 685-84530
>
> Fax: +49 711 685-74530
>
>
>
> E-Mail: matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de
>
> Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai Wähner
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 1:13 PM
Hi Chris,
great that you will work on the connector.
I am not deep technical, but if you need guidance from Kafka Connect
experts, I can connect you to a Confluent colleague to can help with best
practices for building the connector.
For example, we have implemented a wildcard option into our MQ
I also blocked my calendar and will join...
As mentioned before, am not really a good coder, but will create some nice
content in the next few months about *PLC4X + Kafka* and start "promoting"
this combination (blog, slides, meetup talks). Happy to chat about use
cases, ideas, challenges for comb
orking on is updating the current plugin to
> not schedule and handle the connection stuff manually, but use the scraper
> component of PLC4X.
> Also is the current configuration not production ready and I'll be
> working on to make it more easily usable.
>
>
Good morning,
so we „officially“ begin at 2pm, right?
I arrive ~12:30pm in Frankfurt.
Looking forward to meet you today...
Kai
On Sun 18. Aug 2019 at 19:22, Bjoern Hoeper wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I sadly cannot participate because I am still on holiday on Thursday.
> I wish all of you a produc
em Mobiltelefon gesendet
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Betreff: Re: Next PLC4X Meetup on 22.08.2019 in the codecentric Office in
> Frankfurt
> Von: Kai Wähner
> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> Cc:
>
> Good morning,
>
> so we „officially“ begin
*"So in the mid- or longterm I agree that it would be nice to rename PLC4X
to something like "Industrial IoT and Industrie 4.0 we kick your ass" or
something with subprojects like - CRUNCH as processing pipeline - PLC4X as
connection - hopefully some more to come"*
>From an external perspective, I
I would vote for something like Niclas proposed. Much clearer than having
yet another product / component name...
For instance, PLC4X DSP, PLC4X Signal Processor, or something what clearly
describes in one or two words / shortcuts what the component does.
See Kafka and its ecosystem: Kafka Connec
ame CRUNCH to something different
>
> Hey,
>
> As i'm electrical engineer i like the name oscilloscope.
> But full ack to Kai, name should be clearer.
> Furthermore i like Kai's suggestion PLC4X DSP as it is
&g
and OT. And in
> fact, as the lib is quite a bit specialiced and think its reasonable to
> have people look at the docs first : )
>
> But, I mean we are (as Chris pointed out) still in the process of consent
> building, so its good to get so many opinions here.
>
> Julian
&
I was just smiling a little bit while reading this because I remembered my
presentations almost 10 years ago about such discussions...
Just for reference (you don't need to agree with my categorization), and
today you think much more about "Vue/Angular/React/JS-Framework of the
week". I discussed
15 matches
Mail list logo