Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

I think is better move that changes to a branch and release. thanks El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Harbs, > > Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ? > > Thanks, > Piotr > > pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54

Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Hi Guys, I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it yourself). Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale-asjs - Build # 1073 - Still Failing

Hi, some latest change is breaking maven in *DesktopMap*, please take a look. In the other hand, I'm seeing locally the following fail in Blog Example about list royale-asjs/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml(53): col:

Re: [royale-typedefs] branch develop updated: don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get from royale-extras is valid

Sorry, this seems a problem in my end. sorry for the noise. El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 8:16, Carlos Rovira () escribió: > Hi this change, make Maven build break. I'll remove it localy while is > fixed > thanks > > El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:32, escribió: > >> This is an automated email

Re: [royale-typedefs] branch develop updated: don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get from royale-extras is valid

Hi this change, make Maven build break. I'll remove it localy while is fixed thanks El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:32, escribió: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > aharui pushed a commit to branch develop > in repository

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1505

See Changes: [noreply] Update DateField.as [noreply] Update MXRoyaleClasses.as -- [...truncated 187.58 KB...] check-dependency:

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Hi Piotr, 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven? 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS? El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Hi Guys, > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I > have

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration. I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build (build.xml or pom.xml). Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go to other config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right? El mar., 11 sept.

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #429

See -- [...truncated 247.81 KB...] [java] Adding @SuppressWarnings("all") to class:

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Hi Carlos, 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project which is using that swc ? 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is consumer of that swc you have it in link [1] Thanks, Piotr wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > 1.- Are

build SDK with ANT fails

Hi, another problem I get now is building SDK with ANT (a part from the problem of getting FlexUnit 4.2 and have to remove "_flex" swc commented in other thread). build fails here: get-flat-fonts: [get] Getting: https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/archive/2.2.2.zip [get] To:

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Piotr a project is used to be built. a lib to be compiled, and used in a project app... if you're not trying to do that, better I left to others since I don't understand the problem El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:38, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Again to build what

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Piotr, I must say that today I have various errors, as I reported: 1.- error in CI as we saw reported in email 2.- error building with maven in a blog example that before wasn't reporting error 3.- ANT failing creating SDK. Now yours: 4.- this one Maybe some changes yesterday in compiler or in

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Again to build what ? Project which is consuming SWC or SWCs itself ? Which one you are referring to. Link [2] is library, link [3] is consumer of that library ? wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:35 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration. > I see that

Re: build SDK with ANT fails

Hi, finaly this is not an issue, it seems that building sometimes with ANT and others with MAVEN sometimes can left the folders with unwanted artifacts and must be cleaned again, sorry for the noise. El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:54, Carlos Rovira () escribió: > Hi, > > another problem I get

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Ok I understand now what you are trying to say. Just to be clear the problem is following. If I prepare SWC which is SWF only - I'm able to consuming it and project which using it building without the problem to SWF. If I prepare SWC which is JS only - Classes are not visible, project is failing

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Hi, we cna remove from the list point 3, since it was something on my side as I just reported a minute ago. El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 13:30, Carlos Rovira () escribió: > Piotr, I must say that today I have various errors, as I reported: > 1.- error in CI as we saw reported in email > 2.-

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1305

See Changes: [carlosrovira] - fix dropdownlist arrow to reposition correctly on size changes - make [carlosrovira] update all jewel themes [carlosrovira] remove default select arrow on

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #1509

See

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1307

See -- [...truncated 1.04 MB...] clean: check-for-tests: clean-tests: clean: check-for-tests: clean-tests: clean: check-for-tests: clean-tests: clean:

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs #1308

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs #1306

See

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-typedefs #690

See -- Started by timer Building on master in workspace > git.exe rev-parse

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Speaking of upgrading, I think you will need to use the latest maven or somehow get Maven to use version 1.10.0 of the Maven SCM Plugin. I have most recently tweaked the Ant scripts to generate the required file extension on the SHA hashes. Assuming those changes work, we should be good to

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

Carlos, This is it -> https://ace.c9.io/. I think more information about that can provide you Yishay and Olaf. :) Thanks, Piotr wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:40 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor? > > thanks > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui ( >) >

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Hi Alex, The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is inside both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version. Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files. I

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale-asjs - Build # 1073 - Still Failing

Amazing. That means that the Maven builds have been failing to build the SWF version of these examples for quite a while now and we had not noticed. I just fixed having the SWF compiler return the right process exit code. I will patch up these examples. -Alex On 9/11/18, 1:30 AM, "Carlos

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF only. Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml? It is easier to see what it thinks is in the SWC. It could be that the manifest or other list of classes is not specified in the JS compile. HTH,

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

Interesting, I 'd love to know for what they use it? :) Thanks Piotr! El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:44, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Carlos, > > This is it -> https://ace.c9.io/. I think more information about that can > provide you Yishay and Olaf. :) > > Thanks,

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

I'm surprised that you don't remember :) It suppose to be part of Try It Out [1], but they probably didn't have enough time to finish it. [1] https://royale.apache.org/try-it-now/ wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:01 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Interesting, I 'd love to know for what they use it? :) >

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor? thanks El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui () escribió: > I am thinking the answer is no. Now that errors in SWF compile correctly > fail builds, we are seeing problems. I am going to remove SWF building for > ACE.SWC. Let me know if you

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same. JS -> https://paste.apache.org/XhLi SWF -> https://paste.apache.org/MwKB I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump. Thanks, Piotr wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex Harui napisał(a): > Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

If you are having a problem with a SWC, it is best to dump the SWC and examine it. A SWC is a ZIP file and contains at least a catalog.xml and library.swf and for Royale, usually it also contains JS files. The catalog.xml file should list all classes found in the SWC. If it lists a class but

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Alex, It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required information and files. I have in this library two files. 1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes 2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and COMPILE::JS JS library dump: https://paste.apache.org/dLA2 SWF

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Thanks Alex, very useful, I think I'll must have this in sight when I'll try to fix maven build distribution, since I think some of the problems are in config xml and library paths declarations. El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 18:49, Alex Harui () escribió: > It sounds like I have still not clearly

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Hey Piotr, There's something a little strange in your compiler options that you should probably fix: You're specifying JSRoyale and js-config.xml together, but these two aren't necessarily compatible. Here's what you have in your compiler options: -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

It sounds like I have still not clearly explained how library-path/swf-library-path/js-library-path work. Library-path is for SWCs that "might" work for both SWF and JS. When we compile most Royale SWCs, we build the library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true and then compile JS files with

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

Right!, I remember Olaf's effort, but I though Yishay wasn't involved. And I don't remember ACE editor was involved. thanks! El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 18:02, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > I'm surprised that you don't remember :) It suppose to be part of Try It >

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Alex, In the other words I don't have any other option than put my JS only library to js-library-path if I ever wanted to build my application to JS only. Unless there is really a bug, because why following things are not working. -targets=JSRoyale -source-path+=src

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to have trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next release. I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

I just looked in my working copy and the default royale-config.xml looks like it uses -js-library-path. I don’t remember if the build scripts tweak that or not for a js-only package, so look in the royale-config you have and verify if that's true. I guess we must have made that change to make

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #1506

See

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

I just checked and here is the results. JS version of library: If I'm using js-external-library-path or js-library-path - SWC is being recognized and I'm able to build using it my project to JS (JSRoyale) If I'm using -library-path or external-library-path - It's failing with errors described in

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

Carlos, Yishay was working on separate branch as far as I remember. [1] [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/ace-editor Thanks, Piotr wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:50 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Right!, I remember Olaf's effort, but I though Yishay wasn't involved. And > I don't remember

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this simply. If not, I’ll revert. Harbs > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes again > after release and discuss whatever needed.

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

I figured out a solution which should make Alex happy. (i.e. with correct annotations) I’ll be committing shortly. > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be > tomorrow morning or evening my time. > > Piotr >

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Interestingly, it looks like royale-compiler is downloading v20170626, but royale-asjs is downloading v20170910… Should we fix this? > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > I think we are using following version from 20170626.

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

If you have time, feel free. I think royale-compiler is just grabbing some simple externs for some simple tests, so not sure how much it matters. -Alex On 9/11/18, 11:27 AM, "Harbs" wrote: Interestingly, it looks like royale-compiler is downloading v20170626, but royale-asjs is

Re: GOOG::DEBUG

OK. I reverted the rest param. I’m now outputting rest = rest;if(!goog.DEBUG)return; instead of if(!goog.DEBUG)return; if there’s a rest argument. It’s a bit ugly, but it seems to make the closure compiler happy and gets the desired result. Thanks, Harbs > On Sep 10, 2018, at 6:52 AM, Alex

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: jewel textinput examples

Hi, in this example I make a text input text binds to other, and this later to other one. When I change the first, only the second changes, and when change the second the third one changes. I expect that changes in first make changes in second and third happens, and changes in second changes

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

It should be good to go now unless Alex or someone else has objections… > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be > tomorrow morning or evening my time. > > Piotr > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

I was about to do this, but I don’t know where to find the checksum for the new file… If it’s not important, I’ll find other things to do… ;-) > On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > If you have time, feel free. I think royale-compiler is just grabbing some > simple externs for

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: resize example button

Hi I make an example where a slider changes size of a button. Then the label of the button is binding a the width and height of the button. The label in the button doesn't change In the other hand, I put as well a label and make the same binding to the text, and as usual this is changing. Do you

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Hi Harbs, It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes again after release and discuss whatever needed. I think we are using following version from 20170626. Thanks, Piotr wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs napisał(a): > I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want.

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be tomorrow morning or evening my time. Piotr wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs napisał(a): > I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this simply. > If not, I’ll revert. > > Harbs > > > On Sep 11, 2018, at

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

+1 for releasing sooner than later :-) I plan to make some time to test things out. Thanks, Om On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:55 AM Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be > tomorrow morning or evening my time. > > Piotr > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

I am still trying to fix the Maven build of the examples. Harb's change seems satisfactory for at least now. -Alex On 9/11/18, 11:47 AM, "Harbs" wrote: It should be good to go now unless Alex or someone else has objections… > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-compiler #430

See

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

> I 'd love to know for what they use it Thanks to Yishay the ACE editor was "captured" by Royale. We want to use the ACE editor within the TryItNow app. Unfortunately still no free cycles... However, I've no idea about the current issue here. @Yishay Do you have some free cycles in order to

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: fix maven examples

Ok I undertand now. It seems it will be right to change it, but maybe other things has priority thanks El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:23, Alex Harui () escribió: > I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before. In SWF, MouseEvent does > not subclass org.apache.royale.events.Event since

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

That's oool Josh!, I'll try to try "JS" instead of "JSRoyale", that seems more correct. thanks! :) El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 19:21, Josh Tynjala () escribió: > Hey Piotr, > > There's something a little strange in your compiler options that you > should probably fix: > > You're specifying

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Jewel will probably need JSRoyale On 9/11/18, 1:31 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: That's oool Josh!, I'll try to try "JS" instead of "JSRoyale", that seems more correct. thanks! :) El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 19:21, Josh Tynjala () escribió: > Hey Piotr,

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

In case of upgrading anything I really suggest to leave it for the next release. If you upgrade something you have to take care of upgrading maven's pom as well. Piotr On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 8:54 PM Alex Harui wrote: > I am still trying to fix the Maven build of the examples. Harb's change >

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: fix maven examples

Hi Alex, so this was incorrect? we can't use Event instead of MouseEvent, or is just to improve the actual code? thanks! El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:05, escribió: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > aharui pushed a commit to branch develop > in

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: fix maven examples

I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before. In SWF, MouseEvent does not subclass org.apache.royale.events.Event since MouseEvent subclasses flash.events.MouseEvent. Nobody is really happy about it, but that's the way it is right now. Volunteers are welcome to try to change it. -Alex

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: fix maven examples

I once spent time on this and things started unraveling pretty quickly. This was a very long time ago, so it might be easier now… > On Sep 11, 2018, at 11:29 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Ok I undertand now. > > It seems it will be right to change it, but maybe other things has priority > >

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1508

/ws/frameworks/localfonts.ser> [delete] Deleting: <http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/mxml-manifest.xml> [delete] Deleting: <http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/spark-m

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1304

See Changes: [carlosrovira] jewel textinput examples [carlosrovira] resize example button [aharui] fix maven examples -- [...truncated 513.75

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

Yeah, it makes sense to use JSRoyale with js-config.xml to exclude parts of the framework referenced in royale-config.xml. Unexpected changes to js-config.xml in the future could possibly cause some surprises, but if that's probably not a huge risk. This would be a decent exception to the rule.