Hi everyone,
time runs fast and like the last two years we'll have adaptTo() in Berlin.
For those who do not know it yet: this is a non-profit conference arround
Apache Sling and the connected Frameworks like Apache Felix and Apache
Jackrabbit.
The conference is hosted by pro!vision GmbH and spon
In a discussion [0] within the Oak mailinglist it became clear that the way
Sling listens zu JCR Repository Changes and transforms all of them to
events will not scale well in some big scale scenarios that oak is aiming
to enable. Therefore the question was posted if it would be feasible and/or
eve
whole repository and require access to
> properties.
>
> Carsten
>
>
> 2013/10/22 Dominik Süß
>
> > In a discussion [0] within the Oak mailinglist it became clear that the
> way
> > Sling listens zu JCR Repository Changes and transforms all of them to
> > events wi
The analysis looks pretty good to me but does not provide answers of how to
solve this. The first two topics "Cached Content" and "Content Export,
Replication to Remote Systems" are the ones where I don't see an option to
get rid of the content change triggers. This might not apply to the whole
tre
4:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > ...This might not apply to the whole
> > tree, but does this really matter when the tree that needs to be watched
> > contains over 90% of the data?...
>
+1 non-binding.
I just did a rough codecheck to understand how this should work - looks
good and extensible which I think is important when people with other
resourceResolvers want to utilize it. There are some typos here and there
(pacakge instead of package, even in the api) but it would be easie
Hi Bertrand,
as far as I can see the API is just covering the java aspect of this. When
looking at typical Apache Sling-based Applications you might want to toggle
specific resources from being renderes (this could be on page or on a lower
resource level). Since this is a lot about "permission" to
nik
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > ...as far as I can see the API is just covering the java aspect of
> this...
>
> Nothing prevent
st&target or other products?)
>
> Ruben
>
>
> On 11/13/2013 6:32 AM, Dominik Süß wrote:
>
>> Hi Bertrand,
>>
>> the UI of an application based on Sling are often composed of existing
>> resourceTypes so you cannot just decide in the code to display or not to
is checked for a feature flag property
> (e.g. sling:feature ?) and this being checked against the Feature service.
> If not enabled, that resource is „hidden“ and not returned.
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Felix
> >
> > —
> > Felix Meschberge
Hi Bertrand,
I disagree on that one - maybe we should put it in contrib or so, but is is
essential to disable most features to disable some parts of the
resourcetree. This is just applying your api in a conventient api to
resource resolving. There is no additional magic since developers would
have
s to resources based on feature flag. Just implement a
> > FeatureFlagResourceGate (or whatever name would make sense)..
> >
> > best regards
> > Mike
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Dominik Süß [mailto:dominik.su...@gmail.com]
> >> S
rendering
Code where you could just filter the ResourceTree beforehand.
Best regards,
Dominik
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Alexander Klimetschek
wrote:
> On 14.11.2013, at 05:11, Dominik Süß wrote:
>
> > As mentioned earlier the majority of features I have implemented yet d
Am 14.11.2013 23:11 schrieb "Alexander Klimetschek" :
>
> On 14.11.2013, at 13:55, Dominik Süß wrote:
>
> > this is one way but just solves this partially since you completely
rely on
> > inclusions to happen, but sometimes you just walk the tree and collect
the
&
Nov 15, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > Am 14.11.2013 23:11 schrieb "Alexander Klimetschek" >:
> >> ...And the ResourceDecorator can't filter out things?
> >
> > No, r
Hi Amit,
maybe I haven't understood the idea of FeatureFlags right, but isn't this
exactly what this is about. The system should behave if it wouldn't be
there at all. The basic idea is that you don't have to branch it away
during development so you can ship it in a non-productionready or non QEed
elopment/installers are using the resourceResolver api and never see the
> resource.
> Like exporting some content package to be deployed to another sling
> instance, but package exporter use resouceResolver api and never see the
> resource.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
> -
Hi Henry,
the way understand Feature Flags as well as the comment from Roy is quite
different:
- Features can be content, java code, configuration or anything else that
you would touch to introduce a new feature
- Therefore the when a feature is turned off ist must be granted that (as
far as techn
+0.5
I'm aware of this contract but just did check when the NonExistingResource
would be valid to be used.
Looking at [0] you could read this to be a correct behavior as well. There
is currently a gap between the behavior of .resolve() and .getResource()
where getResource would return null and .re
.12.2013, at 04:38, Dominik Süß wrote:
>
> > There is currently a gap between the behavior of .resolve() and
> .getResource()
> > where getResource would return null and .resolve() should return a
> > NonExistingResource. I'm pretty sure there is a reason for that, but
First of all - Happy new year to all of you from my side :)
The last days I had the chance to think a bit abou what happend in the last
year and what I expect and/or wish for the next year. Since I feel
pretty connected to Apache Sling this also did involve thinking about the
project from my perso
I'm not sure what I think of that change due to the following points:
- Filters might override getAttribute and therefore could (at least
theoretically) break currently working functionality (code which would not
be harmful atm)
- All usecases I can imagine here are about introspection of what scri
Hi Bertrand,
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
>
> > ...DevOps optimization: this includes setup, patching, monitoring and
> > scalling of installations...
>
> I also think
+1
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after long discussions we have to the compromise to tag a resource provider
> if a (optionally) available resource access security is used for this
> provider.
>
> I think this was a wrong compromise with no real value - and w
I just checked the RFC for statuscodes and 403 seems appropriate while 409
seems to be wrong.
Although you could argue the user can resolve the conflict by changing the
URI the new URI has a new target (since the URI does not know about
concepts like selectors or suffixes) and therefore is a differ
+1
Regards,
Dominik
2009/6/30 Juan José Vázquez Delgado
> +1
>
> BR,
>
> Juanjo.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Felix Meschberger
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 3 issues in this release:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12313945
> >
> > This parent pom is
Hi :)
I think the refactoring and updating of the documentation should be
mentioned in the community section since this was a major problem for
Slingrookies.
Best regards,
Dominik
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our first board report is due within the nex
I think this might be an excelent example project and could come along with
a detailed documentation to show several aspects of sling/JCR programming as
the mentioned use of selectors and versioning.
Best regards,
Dominik
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Ian Boston wrote:
> We had the same use
Hi Vidar,
did you give the Javaannotations a try (@SlingServlet [1]), we currently
only work with those instead of QDox and if I remember right I've seen a
testcomponent with the selectors which worked. The SlingServlet annotation
can be found in the felix scr annotations.
Best regards,
Dominik
Ok, I ran into that just some minutes ago, so
+1 for fix ;)
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Vidar Ramdal wrote:
> 2009/8/4 Carsten Ziegeler :
> > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> >>> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> ...if a servlet is
Hi Bertrand,
are you sure this works? I thought registering with methods and seletors
would not work at the moment (does not respect selectors afaik). I can't
test it here right now so could someone else please check the code in the
FAQ with the trunk?
Best regards,
Dominik
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009
Hi Branden,
it might help you to have a look at:
http://dev.day.com/microsling/content/blogs/main/cheatsheet.html
There you can see how URLs are composed/decomposed. For your case
/content/portal/users/admin/pages/home/widgets/hello_world*.html*
/widget.html
might do the trick ;)
HTH
Best regard
Hi Markus,
Day added the Portal Director to their (Sling-based) CQ5 portfolio this
march so I bet this code is the rudimentary base of this integration.
The integration in portlets should not be the hardest task since the
RESTfull URIs of Sling allow strikt forward webclipping with a bit of url
re
I'd strongly vote +1 since this could be a nice way of participation without
the overhead of
- checkout
- fixing
- creating patch
- waiting till someone downloads the patch and checks the diff
- asking for some changes in the patch
...
especially for minor bugs this can be usefull and speed up the
lthough
> they could certainly be tied to a Crucible code review.
>
> Justin
>
> 2009/12/16 Dominik Süß
>
> > I'd strongly vote +1 since this could be a nice way of participation
> > without
> > the overhead of
> > - checkout
> > - fixing
> >
Seams like Felix got the wrong list ;)
Without having a closer look at the details +1 from my side :)
Best regards,
Dominik
-- Forwarded message --
From: Felix Meschberger
Date: Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:44 PM
Subject: Engine and Commons Auth Releases
To: Felix Dev
Hi all,
After
Why would this require two runs.
The data of depth could be collected while iterating through the levels. It
would require some adjustments like prefetching for the current level to
check if the result would get too big but appending this list to the other
list should be a cheap operation.
Best re
I.
>
> Ian
>
> On 14 Jan 2010, at 09:19, Dominik Süß wrote:
>
> > Why would this require two runs.
> > The data of depth could be collected while iterating through the levels.
> It
> > would require some adjustments like prefetching for the current level to
>
Hi everybody,
I just realized that this year we seem to have missed to get the
information out on all avaliable channels, and this includes this
mailinglist.
For those not aware what adaptTo() is beside the beloved Method:
In 2011 we decided to setup a yearly meetup for the community around Apach
Here my 2 cents about Sling Tooling & vault,
IMHO vault is pure JCR Tooling. And even if some people do not like the
fact, but the resourcetree is different from the jcr tree. So in
consequence this additional abstraction of the Resource API is there (even
without additional resource resolvers, si
One comment about content.xml - in our CQ solutions we do use the
Sling-Initialcontent (with the much nicer json files placed parallel to
the folders with the same name instead of .content.xml underneath) instead
of packing it directly in the vault based packages. This leads to a clean
and much be
One problematic part about serialisation is structuredepth. In development
you might not want to handle complex structures by shifting folders around,
so it would be nice to have a format that allows to define a substructure,
so in the Sling Initialcontent you might even define one big JSON that
de
I'm trying to summarize my thoughts including the several opinions
scenarios stated:
a) The main usecase seems to be development from IDE (persisted to FS and
therefore to be integreated with any FS based versioning tool of choice)
b) a (on save) sync the application from FS to Sling via IDE seems
; For c) java code and bundles, I would suggest to leave this out for now and
> see if we can integrate other tooling for that work. I'm currently
> exploring options and maybe we can leverage other peoples work for that
>
> Carsten
>
>
> 2013/6/2 Dominik Süß
>
> &
Hi Robert,
regarding your sample - this kind of annotation does work for sure, what I
was talking about is the finegrained control over serialisation and
breakpoints (when to build a complete serialized file and where to split up
in subfolder and subsequent metafiles) - I'm sure someone can come u
ure then a fresh checkout would create) and have all the
tooling required to transform the structure and/or the
serializationdefinition.
Dominik
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 14:25 +0200, Dominik Süß wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> &g
to provide tools for that; I would rather love to
> reuse others work.
>
> Carsten
>
>
> 2013/6/3 Robert Munteanu
>
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 14:21 +0200, Dominik Süß wrote:
> > > When skipping Javacode and Bundles (which I'm not so happy with) one
> >
Just for the record:
- Filters registered via @SlingFilter will set the order as Serviceranking
Best regards
Dominik
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, I am basically in that camp, too, but ...
>
> In our commercial product (Adobe Experience Manager aka CQ5)
Hi everyone,
within the last weeks I spent some time on a project that is heavily
relying on data being submitted by users of the system and setting up
complex structures, users, groups and ACLs based on the operations
performed by a user. I reallized that a lot of those things could be done
by ut
As far as I got it right most agree that it would be great to have an
optimized way to utilize the SlingPostServlet.
I also +1 the idea of having a pipeline with different stages of
processing where a dev can hook in based on some criteria (like
resourcetype, path, extension and so on) to be able
Facing some questions about how to prevent the SlingPostServlet to be able
to perform a change I had a closer look at the current implementation and
it looks like there is currently no "secure" way of doing that beside
locking the target on persistancelevel (alias setting ACLs). There is some
hack
Jul 2, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > Facing some questions about how to prevent the SlingPostServlet to be
> able
> > to perform a change I had a closer look at the current implementation and
> > it looks like there is currently no "secure" way of doing
;s the old
> "action=create" topic again, which should be covered very well with the
> default features of the Sling post servlet already, which only requires you
> to add custom code (actions) for very specific things.
>
> This is even less once we have a validation fram
d act as
restricting criteria.
WDYT?
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > ...why do you think registering logic by path is bad. Especially if I
> look at
> > potential for multite
> resource is of type app/foo and is under /content/bar, decorate the
> resource to app/bar ?
>
> The fact that you can register servlets by path should *not* in my opinion
> be a reason to extend behavior-by-path to other parts of Sling.
>
> Regards,
> Justin
>
>
into the URL. But then it's the old
> > "action=create" topic again, which should be covered very well with the
> > default features of the Sling post servlet already, which only requires
> you
> > to add custom code (actions) for very specific things.
>
>
Rereading my post:
you always trigger exactly one :operation, so this is not an
aspect, this is wat actualy is done to perform the post.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Dominik Süß wrote:
> If I got the implementation right you always trigger exactly one, so this
> is not an aspect, t
+1 - validation can also be necessary on dataimport through services, to
have a default integration of this service in the default Post Handler is
IMHO a mandatory but not stricktly bound extension to this service.
Dominik
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Even if there
t we actually validate changed resources (credits
> > to Carsten for this idea)
> >
> > Devs, which solution sounds better to you and why?
> >
>
> What would be the minimum requirements for adding some validation bundles
> (api + impl) in contrib?
>
> Thanks,
> Ra
Hi Felix,
I just did wonder if this really can replace loginAdministrative().
Although I'd really like to get rid of the adminSession due to various
(mostly securitybased) reasons, I don't see all usecases covered by this
solution. The one I have explicitly in mind is the impersonation to users.
J
Hey everyone,
altough we already got some really great submissions in the last days we
want to encourage you to send in your submissions as soon as possible. That
way we can finalize the schedule early, give proper feedback about the
proposals and grant the verified speakers their slot early so yo
eakers get free entrance and a fancy speaker shirt ;)
Best regards
Dominik
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Dominik Süß wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> altough we already got some really great submissions in the last days we
> want to encourage you to send in your submissions as soon as
Hi everyone,
although I know this touches an area with a lot of emotions involved I
wanted to reopen the discussion around Featureflags support for the
resourceresolver.
The last thing that happend was removing it for a release due to potential
confusion and subtle issues. See http://markmail.org
mechanism could lead to bad design. So the solution could really
> > be to wrap the ResourceAccessGates for the functionality of featureflags.
> >
> > Best regards
> > mike
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Dominik Süß [mailto:dom
elacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > -... Currently writing frontend that needs to adapt to featureflags
> requires
> > adding custom code to check and filter the ui to be rendered. This leads
> to
> > a lot
b in a ui.
Best regards
Dominik
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > ...I fear it is not as easy since this mandates rendering engines to be
> able
> > to perform t
Hi everyone,
last week I wanted to check about the state of the various webframeworks of
Apache. To get an idea which frameworks are available I visited
www.apache.org and opened the "Index by Category" and couldn't find Sling
with all the other webframworks - even worse, I couldn't find it at all
Hi everyone,
I'm currently doing some research to implement a feature where I need to
integrate 3rd party systems that act as client and need to perform some
local changes that I can trigger from the sling instance.
The issue I do have is that there seems to be no proper way to transport
the info
ate solutions on
> the JCR repo layer, Oak has some options with commit hooks.
>
> Just my 2 cents,
> Alex
>
> On 24.06.2014, at 04:22, Dominik Süß wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm currently doing some research to implement a feature where I need to
>
nding changes aka the
events).
Best regards
Dominik
[0]
https://github.com/apache/sling/blob/trunk/bundles/servlets/post/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/servlets/post/AbstractPostOperation.java#L129
Am 25.06.2014 21:50 schrieb "Alexander Klimetschek" :
> On 25.06.2014, at 00:27,
beer together (community). We try not just to be a conference but a
meetup - so make sure you don't miss it!
I'm looking forward to seeing you in Berlin this september.
Best regards in the name of the adaptTo() organisation team,
Dominik Süß
P.S. do not hesitate to contact us in case yo
Hey Stefan,
just to add my 2 cents on constraints for a tenant:
* In both cases the tenant could be identfied by one or more branches in
the repo that can be linked to exactly one tenant.
* In cases of Tenant Inheritance (as described in the Massive Multi Site
Scenario) the returned Tenant would b
Hey everybody,
just with the same pace Sling is currently evolving with all contributions
and new features comming in time runs by and we're close to the "1 month
left" mark for adaptTo() 2014 in Berlin.
We would be really glad to see a lot of you join us in Berlin, share
experiences, exchange kn
Hi Felix,
you probably remember our discussion - I checked and found out that
resourceresolution is done with adminsession anyways and superTypeHierarchy
being cached (at least from what I remember) therefore this shouldn't add
much overhead.
IMHO an important point is that it needs to be possibl
Hi Carsten,
I've played around with filters a lot and the problem with them really is
that they often have way to much impact and are not constrainted as they
would need to be. Even those filters skipping often create a lot of
overhead because they do not skip fast and with cheap evaluations but
i
, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > Hi Felix,
> >
> > you probably remember our discussion - I checked and found out that
> > resourceresolution is done with adminsession anyways and
> superTypeHierarchy
> > being cached (at least from what I rememb
ay to intrusive because in the current state of
applications the filters do no harm.
Dominik
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Carsten Ziegeler
wrote:
> Well, so the main argument is badly written code?
>
>
> 2014-08-18 19:35 GMT+02:00 Dominik Süß :
>
> > Hi Carsten,
> >
>
Gratulations!
Glad to see all the new Commiters and hope too see more of those great
contributions :)
Best regards
Dominik
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Mike Müller wrote:
> Welcome on board Stefan!
>
> Best regards
> mike
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Seifert [mailto:s
Hi community,
adaptTo is about to start in less then two weeks. If you yet haven't
registered this might be your chance to get one of the remaining tickets
and join us for this great opportunity to learn from each other, share
experiences and drive the evolution of Apache Sling itself as part of t
Perfidious autocompletion I guess ;)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Felix Meschberger
Date: Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:51 AM
Subject: Launchpad versions
To: sling-...@incubator.apache.org
Hi all,
We used to have three main Launchpad modules:
Launchpad Bundles
Launchpad App
L
Hi everyone,
since 2009 there was no ApacheCon in Europe and as far as I could
investigate there is no current plan for a new ApacheCon Europe.
Due to the there was no public event for "users" and "developers" of
Apache Sling, Felix and JCR (and therefore CQ5 developers as well) in
Europe to get
h
>> audience) would be nice.
>>
>> -- Jürg
>>
>> On 10.04.2011 13:41, Dominik Süß wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> since 2009 there was no ApacheCon in Europe and as far as I could
>>> investigate there is no current plan for a
at people who are busy on projects can
>>> sneak away and attend?
>>>
>>> - One Day: Adobe sponsor a day of CQ technical overview including Day
>>> roadmap showing Live-cycle/Day direction,
>>> - One Day: Sling "best practices", tips and trick
t; - One Day: Adobe sponsor a day of CQ technical overview including Day
>> >> roadmap showing Live-cycle/Day direction,
>> >> - One Day: Sling "best practices", tips and tricks, perhaps some case
>> >> studies by our more esteemed members,
>> &g
ys: firm days
>> >> on Sunday / Monday or Friday / Saturday, so that people who are busy on
>> >> projects can sneak away and attend?
>> >>
>> >> - One Day: Adobe sponsor a day of CQ technical overview including Day
>> >> roadmap showing
After weeks of organising sponsorship, location and other details of
this event, I'm glad to finally announce the .adaptTo(Berlin) meetup
for the 15th and 16th of september 2011. The event will be located at
Betahaus Berlin (Kreuzberg) and will be open for a maximum of 100
participants.
.adaptTo(B
Hi everyone,
since I did receive some requests for registration here an additional
information:
The registrationdate announced in the first news could be postponed
since the location and depending details are fixed. So registration
will be open till september the 10th.
Some further notes on the
Dear Apache Sling users and developers,
as Carsten allready announced we'll organise a 2nd Edition of
.adapto(Berlin) this september.
Based on the feedback of the attendees from last years .adaptto()
we're trying to change some things.
Here are some things we'll have to / want to change:
- Locat
couple of days till I can announce all essential information.
Best regards,
Dominik
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike Müller wrote:
> Hi Dominik
>
> Is the .adaptTo() 2012 gonna be happen or is it at this time just an
> idea?
>
> best regards
> mike
>
>> -----Or
For me one of the most interesting filters for "native" filtering would be
based on ResourceType (& RT changes). Optimally we would even have the
option to filter by ResourceType and its SubTypes - but detecting the
subtypes is something that would go beyond a hint (basically preprocessing
a hint t
Hi Dan,
can you crosscheck if the same happens for a previous version of Sling
Installer to be deployed (e.g. installing 3.8.2 when an older version was
deployed before). I can't see any chance that this fix introduces new
issues into restart behavior of bundle and therefore would opt to move on
a
FYI - I could reproduce the issue only by deploying the jar via webconsole
and not performing a package refresh. If I either deploy the bundle via the
installer itself or manually trigger refresh packages the installer works
quite fine.
Cheers
Dominik
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Dominik Süß
Reverting to -1. Subsequential integration testing on product on top of
this did show that SLING-6392 does fail with content-packages that
partially end up uninstalled instead of installed.
Reverting SLING-6392 only including SLING-5457 succeeds.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Stefan Seifert
w
staller/core/impl/PersistentResourceList.java?
> r1=1765129&r2=1783196&pathrev=1783196). So I am wondering which package
> is actually detected as stale?
> The according log entry should start with "Removing stale resource ..."
> Thanks,
> Konrad
>
original issue, and
> cut a new release candidate without this change for now.
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Dominik Süß
> wrote:
> > @kwin - sorry I cannot add logs as this is confidential information -
> yet I
> > could trace bac
I don't mind - yet just to clarify: This feature doesn't add scenarios that
couldn't arise before as clarified in the docs.
Apache Felix supports (and since quite a long time supported) having
multiple versions of bundles installed - we just didn't provide install
options (beyond feature launcher o
Hi Karl,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 3:15 PM Karl Pauls wrote:
> Yeah, fwiw, that was the underlying idea - there are no restarts
> anymore. I guess we might want to consider emphasising this by making
> it the default to clear the cache on restarts so that you always start
> from a clean state.
>
I
+1 non binding :)
Cheers
Dominik
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:19 AM wrote:
> Here's my +1
>
> David
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 15:27, wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to call the 1.0.0 release of the following components:
> >
> > org.apache.sling.feature 1.0.0
> > fixed issues:
> > https
Hi Andreas,
Sling Feature Model "Launcher" is built primarily for building immutable
instances from scratch. The feature model definition itself doesn't mandate
any runtime behavior in particular but is supposed to describe a target
state, so it is up to any implementation to take care of establis
Hi Andreas,
if looks like you found a bug in there due to the embedded jars:
[INFO] Processing bundle core-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar...
[INFO] Reading 'core-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar' bundle GAV from
META-INF/maven/com.madplanet.sling.cp2sf/core/pom.properties...
[INFO] Reading 'core-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar' bundle
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
