Hi,
in reply to the migration guide, thanks a lot for the information.
I have a jetspeed-1 based turbine webapp and tried to do an update. I am
already using turbine 2.3.3.
With this release I experience with the handling of the velocity
templates a similar problem as discussed in
http://wik
Hello,
another (two) remarks:
If I include JSPs into a velocity based template system, I get (nothing
else changed) the exception java.lang.IllegalStateException:
getOutputStream() has already been called for this response.
This may be because data.getResponse().getOutputStream() is already
call
Guide
On 30.08.11 09:47, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> With this releas
On 30.08.11 09:47, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/turbine/Turbine2/VelocityOnlyLayout getting the
> error java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already
> been called for this response.
[...]
>
.
}
}
}
and this should solve the concurrency issue.
Best regards, Georg
Von:"Georg Kal
Hello Turbine developers,
as I recently was asked by Thomas Vandahl to become a committer to the
Turbine project I accepted.
The case for me is, that I´m developing a OS project (ODC
http://opendc.distributed-campus.org/), which is still based on Jetspeed
1.6, http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-1
I am there, too. What do you think? Have we a space for our own?
Integration ogf some new API e.g. JSON-API from Jackson ;-)
Best, Georg
Von:Thomas Vanda
On 09.10.12 17:29, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> I am there, too. What do you think? Have we a space for our own?
> Integration ogf some new API e.g. JSON-API from Jackson ;-)
There used t
[x] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
N.B. I could create a running turbine version from archetype
turbine-webapp-4.0-1.0.0 with dependency to turbine 4.0-M2-SNAPSHOP,
which has this parent...
[x] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
Von:Thomas Vandahl
I have problems to get the tests running for the Turbine trunk
4.0-M2-SNAPSHOT.
I need to update to surefire plugin version to 2.12.2 at least (2.12.4
ok too), the current version is 2.12 in the new parent.
Otherwise I get the error:
[INFO]
seems like it have to be done. May be the maven-scm-publish-plugin would
be the (easiest) way to go?
This discussion may be helpful:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201205.mbox/%3C668763170.AiMcQ0VOS3@bigmax%3E
I am not completely clear with that, though..
Best regards, Georg
Hi there,
I have a working example of a Jersey (Version 1.16)
RolesAllowedResourceFilter integration with Jetspeed-1, which could work
in Turbine similar. It allows having role restricted access to JAXB or
Jackson annotated classes in Turbine/Jetspeed to get JSON (or XML)
content - outside the Tur
Hi,
my suggestions and remarks:
- Fulcrum is referenced multiple times and points sometimes to nowhere.
Which version applies is not entirely transparent.
Fulcrum->Building seems to be for maven 1 and not maven 2/3.
- New maven archetypes should be in a more prominent place, may be in a
(new)
Ge
Hello,
I am a little bit at a loss concerning the following case and hopefully
not missed the whole point, but:
If I would like to integrate another templating mechanism (e.g. Jade)
instead of or parallel to e.g. Velocity, where would I start? (not that
I actually would do this right now, but jus
My vote is [x] +1 release it, although non-binding. And I would
recommend lazy consensus as voting mechansim at least for the parents,
as it was already asked for sometimes earlier here.
BTW I would "vote" for releasing fulcrum-parser (version 1.0.3-snapshot)
too, containing a bugfix. The Turbine
[x] +1 release it. -Georg
|>
| Von: |
|>
>--|
|Thomas Vandahl
Hi,
I have prepared a fulcrum-based component which generates (serializes)
JSON and vice versa. It is divided up to now into an API-component, a
GSON, Jackson 1.9 and Jackson 2.1 component.
I am currently using the Jackson 2 component (serialization method using
filters) within a velocity templat
Hi,
how is the fulcrum site be prepared to get it up to date again (
http://turbine.apache.org/fulcrum/ ) ?
This has be done probably the last time from the trunk. I think, if we
update now the site the released components get the Javadocs from the
current trunk. Is this ok? A tagged version shou
ulcrum site + parent
Hi Georg,
On 04.12.13 12:46, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> how is the fulcrum site be prepared to get it up to date again (
> http://turbine.apache.org/fulcrum/ ) ?
I gu
Hi Thomas,
after examining more closely the new Fulcrum Security component, the
method checkPassword seems to be missing.
It has been removed from the Turbine class SecurityService
(org.apache.turbine.services.security.SecurityService), but I could not
find it anywhere in the new Fulcrum Security
Hi,
I have a little bit concerns about the current state of the Torque OR
-Mapping in the Fulcrum Security Torque Component, and how to integrate
it into the Turbine Framework. Current state is:
In Fulcrum Security Torque rev 1524160 from 17. September 2013 "Switch
security model to Fulcrum Secur
urity torque and turbine v4-m2
Hi Georg,
On 11.02.14 09:13, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Only the bases classes could be apparently generated with the Torq
bine v4-m2
Hi Georg,
On 11.02.14 09:13, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Only the bases classes could
Hi Turbine Developers,
a release candidate for the Fulcrum Component "fulcrum-json" version
1.0.0 was prepared,
find the Documentation (SNAPSHOT) here:
http://turbine.apache.org/fulcrum/fulcrum-json/
.. the tagged release candidate in SVN here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/turbine/fulcrum
,
On 17.03.14 13:03, Georg Kallidis wrote:
>
> Hi Turbine Developers,
>
> a release candidate for the Fulcrum Component "fulcrum-json" version
> 1.0.0 was prepared,
>
> find the Documentation (SNAPSHOT) here:
> http://turbine.apache.org/fulcrum/fulcrum-json/
[VOTE]
Hi Georg,
On 17.03.14 13:03, Georg Kallidis wrote:
>
> Hi Turbine Developers,
>
> a release candidate for the Fulcrum C
]
Hi Georg,
On 17.03.14 13:03, Georg Kallidis wrote:
>
> Hi Turbine Developers,
>
> a release candidate for the Fulcrum Component "fulcrum-json" version
> 1.0.0 was prepared,
>
> find the Documentation (SNAPSHOT) here:
> http://turbine.apache.org/fulcrum/fulc
]
On 23.03.14 12:49, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Hi Georg,
>
> On 21.03.14 12:01, Georg Kallidis wrote:
>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheturbine-1001/org/apache/fulcrum/fulcrum-json-parent/1.0.0/
Hi Thomas, hi Turbine Developers
another release candidate is prepared for the Json Fulcrum component:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheturbine-1002/
The parent package contains the compressed project:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheturbi
- Version
1.0.0 [VOTE]
+1
Buddy
> On 28.03.2014, at 13:09, "Georg Kallidis"
wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas, hi Turbine Developers
Hoffmann
+1 Thomas Vandahl
+1 Georg Kallidis
and the -1 vote (TV) was superseded later by +1, I´ll promote the latest
release candidate and add the source and binary files to the new
distribution directory.
Thanks!
Best, Georg
Hi Turbine Devs and Users,
we are pleases to announce the release of the new Fulcrum JSON
component!
The intent of this component is to provide a configurable and customized
integration of JSON De-/Serializers into Avalon/Turbine applications.
The used libraries are GSON, Jackson 1 and Jackson 2
Hi,
I just read in a previous thread of this mail conversation:
> (BTW In Turbine trunk Torque 3.3 is still present in the
> pom.xml).
Yes. This is necessary as long as the old scheduler is still there.
Checking the dependencies with
org.apache.maven.plugins
Dear Turbine enthusiasts,
As you may be aware, ApacheCon will be held this year in Budapest, on
November 17-23. (See http://apachecon.eu for more info.)
The Call For Papers for that conference is still open, but will be
closing soon. We need you talk proposals, to represent Turbine at
ApacheCon.
Hi Youngho,
no, it seemed that a class was missing in the trunk (PeerManagable).
Could you please update fulcrum-security torque trunk and test once
more?
Thanks, Georg
Von:Youngho Cho
An: Turbine Developers List
Datum: 24.09.2014 11:50
Betreff:trunk fulcrum-security build f
Hi Youngho,
you are right, there should be an update in Turbine documentation (
https://turbine.apache.org/turbine/development/turbine-4.0/services/torque-security-service.html
), which correspondents actually to version 4.0-M1: For Version M2
(trunk) Torque Security Service has moved to Fulcrum T
Hi Youngho,
(1) are you sure, that class
org.apache.fulcrum.security.torque.om.TorqueTurbineUser is not an old
class generated previously? Especilly setting basePeer might be the
problem..
(2) What about using this header:
instead of
This generates valid mapper files, where the TurbineU
va:208)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
2014-09-29 22:01 GMT+09:00 Youngho Cho :
> Hello Georg,
>
> Thanks!, compile sucessfully finished !.
>
> Tomorrow moring, I will make some test code.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Youngho
>
>
> 2014-09-29 21
packages).
Any ideas, how to get this done? Reflection would be one solution, of
course.. Or better change to another JSON-RPC framework completely?
Thanks, and best regards, Georg
Georg Kallidis
---
Freie Universität Berlin
Center für Digitale
If no other opinion is around, I´ll include the jar in a external folder
and install it locally before compiling (no require to have it already
installed into a maven repo). BTW: Jabsorb requires SLF4J.
Best regards, Georg
Von:"Georg Kallidis"
An: "Turbine Develope
Hi Thomas,
sorry, I had the not yet released Torque 4.1-SNAPSHOT in my tests. Fixing
the schema and the test class should do it. I checked in and FS-Torque now
builds again, could you confirm?
-Georg
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List
Datum: 22.02.2015 18:42
Betreff:
13:13, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> sorry, I had the not yet released Torque 4.1-SNAPSHOT in my tests.
Fixing
> the schema and the test class should do it. I checked in and FS-Torque
now
> builds again, could you confirm?
Unfortunately not. I still get compile errors
-torque does not build
Hi Georg,
On 09.03.15 08:50, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Of course the method getCustomPeer is in class AbstractEntityManager in
> module api.
Ok, I see. I didn't check for this. However, I consider fulcrum-api the
wrong place for such an implementation-specific
Hi Siegfried,
I updated fulcrum-configuration to version 1.6 and could now build all
fulcrum components.
(With the sole exception, that security/nt always fails on my windows
systems. This is the error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
com.tagish.auth.win32.NTSystem
Hi list,
concerning upcoming releases of Turbine:
- Turbine parent release should be either done without voting or not - we still
have not concluded IMO or have we? I think, it should be released this year to
enable up-to-date releases (including current reference to Apache parent pom,
..).
: Siegfried Goeschl
Datum: 19.03.2015 21:41
Betreff: Re: Concerning Releases / Settings
Hi Georg,
please see my comments below
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
> On 19 Mar 2015, at 20:09, Georg Kallidis
> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> concerning upcoming releases of Turbine:
>
>
should be done may be in a fulcrum-log component?
Best regards, Georg
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List
Datum: 22.03.2015 12:41
Betreff:Re: Concerning Releases / Settings
Hi Georg,
On 19.03.15 20:09, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> concerning
about
supporting SSL & TLS and using the latest version of commons-email
Any other components which need some care?
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
> On 22 Mar 2015, at 12:41, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>
> Hi Georg,
>
> On 19.03.15 20:09, Georg Kallidis wrote:
>> H
Hi Jithu,
the easiest way at the moment would be to install from archetype:
mvn archetype:generate -Dfilter=:turbine
Then change into generated folder and type mvn install (be aware that
groupId and artifactId contain only alphanumeric).
Currently there are only two archetypes, the most rece
My vote:
[x] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
- Georg
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 18.04.2015 21:47
Betreff:[VOTE] Release fulcrum-intake 1.2.0 based on staged
repository
[x] +1 release it
best regards, Georg
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 02.05.2015 11:37
Betreff:[VOTE] Release fulcrum-intake 1.2.0 based on staged
repository RC2
Hi folks,
A second release candidate for the Fulcrum Intak
Hi Turbine Developers,
a release candidate for the Fulcrum JSON Component, version 1.1.0 has
been prepared. The higher version number was chosen to reflect major
upgrades in GSON and Jackson 2 sub-modules and major fixes in in Jackson 2
Component.
Please verify this release candidate carefully
On 16.06.15 16:09, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [X] -1 no, do not release it because
Sorry to be a pain. The RAT reports show several files not containing
license headers. I'd rather fix these before release. I don't know w
ke to release fulcrum-yaafi-10.7 as well
We could team up in preparing the release - more fun and I have completely
forgotten all the ASF release procedures :-)
Sigi
> On 16 Jun 2015, at 16:09, Georg Kallidis
wrote:
>
> Hi Turbine Developers,
>
> a release candidate for th
Hi Siegfried,
I agree entirely - while M1 does not mean Milestone 1, but Maven 1 ;-)
If Fulcrum Script could be updated, this would give another RC ? Could
Fulcrum Script then replace Fulcrum Groovy?
Osworkflow could be deprecated in my view. Maybe Fulcrum Dvsl could be
integrated in Fulcru
Hi Turbine Developers,
another release candidate (RC2) for the Fulcrum JSON Component Version
1.1.0 has
been prepared. The higher version number was chosen to reflect major
upgrades in GSON and Jackson 2 sub-modules and major changes/fixes in in
Jackson 2 Component.
Please verify this release
Hi all,
I count four binding +1 votes for the release candidate (five days after
the beginning of the last voting process):
- Jürgen Hoffmann
- Georg Kallidis
- Thomas Vandahl
- Siegfried Goeschl
and no 0 or -1 votes. The vote has passed.
I will be publishing the artifacts on Nexus shortly
Hi Thomas,
[x] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
Best regards, Georg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@turbine.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@turbine.ap
Hi,
I have updated the Turbine archetpye trunk (based on Turbine 4 M2), which
now fetches the (almost) released Fulcrum security components. I am sure
the release will be done in the next days ;-) What remains is the Turbine
4 Snapshot itself.
I added before a jetty to quick start. After inst
4.0 M2 Archetype Trunk Release
On 22.07.15 09:22, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated the Turbine archetpye trunk (based on Turbine 4 M2),
which
> now fetches the (almost) released Fulcrum security components. I am sure
> the release will be done in the next days ;
Developers List
Datum: 27.07.2015 19:43
Betreff:Re: Antwort: Re: Turbine 4.0 M2 Archetype Trunk Release
Hi Georg,
On 27.07.15 17:19, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> wow, it seems you updated the scheduler already! Tests are running
> successfully here (Windows, Java 1.7).
Good to know. I
Hi Thomas,
in my view PipelineData is more kind of internal data handler i.e. Turbine
framework related stuff, while Rundata is handling with external issues
(servlets, session, parameters, request ..) isn´t it?
It may be considered to move certain methods (screen/layout getter/setter)
to Pip
Hi,
a release candidate for
Fulcrum Testcontainer Component, version 1.0.7
has been prepared (release date August 6th).
This does mainly cover support for JUnit4 tests.
Please verify the RC carefully and vote, if possible, within next week ;-)
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
my vote: +1
- Georg
Von:"Georg Kallidis"
An: "Turbine Developers List"
Kopie: priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 04.09.2015 15:52
Betreff:[VOTE] RC Fulcrum Testcontainer Version 1.0.7
Hi,
a release candidate for
Fulcrum Testcontainer Comp
Hi,
I announce (by courtesy of Siegfried) another release candidate for
Fulcrum Yaafi Component, version 1.0.7, which
has been prepared with release date of Sept 10th.
Please verify the RC carefully and vote, if possible within one week ;-)
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tu
Hi all!
to restart an older discussion (What happens after M1?) I have some more
(naive) questions about this.
Should Turbine support/be runnable in a OSGI container?
Should this become a main focus of the next release?
-> Create a new JIRA issue (feature request)!
Some more questions, which cam
depicts my personal opinion and should by no means stop
discussion! And by my prejudice I guess you already figured that my
knowledge about OSGi is pretty slim :)
Buddy
> On 24.09.2015, at 10:03, Georg Kallidis
wrote:
>
> Hi all!
> to restart an older discussion (What happens after
Betreff:Re: [DISCUSS] OSGI in Turbine 4 Final
Hi Georg,
On 24.09.15 10:03, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Hi all!
> to restart an older discussion (What happens after M1?) I have some more
> (naive) questions about this.
> Should Turbine support/be runnable in a OSGI container?
I wrot
Hi,
RC Fulcrum Yaafi Version 1.0.7 voting results is:
In favor (chronological):
- Georg Kallidis
- Thomas Vandahl
- Siegfried Goeschl
No other votes appear (but see below!) and I count three binding votes.
I´ll publish the RC and update the distribution directory.
Best regards, Georg
N.B. I
see another result below (reposted with extended subject line)..
Best regards, Georg
- Weitergeleitet von Georg Kallidis/CeDiS/FU-Berlin/DE am 09.10.2015
08:36 -
Von:Georg Kallidis/CeDiS/FU-Berlin/DE
An: "Turbine Developers List"
Kopie: priv...@turbine.apache
Hi Thomas,
I´ll review it of course, ...
. Georg
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 02.01.2016 19:45
Betreff:PING Re: [VOTE] Release turbine-4.0-M2 based on RC1
On 21.12.15 21:55, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I th
> [X] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because
.Georg
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 21.12.2015 21:55
Betreff:[VOTE] Release turbine-4.0-M2 based on RC1
Hi folks,
I thought is
Hi,
Jackson is a very popular JSON mapping library (cft.
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson). Turbine currently has the Jabsorb
library (cft. https://code.google.com/archive/p/jabsorb/) integrated in
the JSON-RPC module, which has its own ser/deser mechanism.
To take advantage of Jackson map
st regards, Georg
Von: "Georg Kallidis"
An: dev@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 05.04.2016 09:48
Betreff:JSONRPC /Jackson: Jabsorb Integration to Fulcrum?
Hi,
Jackson is a very popular JSON mapping library (cft.
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson). Turbine currently has
Hi,
(1) as far as I can see, the archetype trunk (turbine-webapp-4.0) points
to Version 4.0-M2.
Should we release it now or wait for Turbine 4.0 Final Release? It seems
quite ready to be used. Nonetheless some testing and validating should be
done.
If we proceed to 4.0-SNAPSHOT changing e.g
Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List
Datum: 11.05.2016 20:08
Betreff:Re: Turbine 4.0 Archetype + Fulcrum in Turbine / Security
Services / Torque Persistence
Hi Georg,
On 11.05.16 09:30, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> (2) When looking a little deeper into how actually things are to
Hi,
comparing Turbine4-M1, Turbine4-M2 and current trunk 4.0-SNAPSHOT I took
some notes, which may now get their (right) place in this list to have
some more reviewing and discussion. Sorry for this lengthy mail!
I started with a user model as an example and sketching the situations
with some
as I have added a test with defined peer classes
TurbineDefaultModelManagerTest), which is not yet automatically support in
torque, the tests failed of course with e.g.
java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.fulcrum.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeerImpl cannot be cast
to org.apache.fulcrum
well ..
Best regards, Georg
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List
Datum: 05.08.2016 17:03
Betreff:Re: Turbine 4 Entity User Data Model, Facts and
Discussion, Fulcrum Security
On 08.07.16 13:11, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> comparing Turbine4-M1, Turbin
Hi,
in the case, you need to save some more attributes as defined in
TurbineUser interface into turbine_user table - e.g. confirm_value,
last_login, created, password_changed (which were removed in Turbine M2),
I could find no other (easy)? way to get it to work but to
- extend
org.apache.ful
reviewed before releasing the final version.
Best, Georg
Von:"Georg Kallidis"
An: "Turbine Developers List"
Datum: 11.08.2016 15:16
Betreff:Turbine 4 Final: How to save additional attributes into
turbine_user, removed in M2
Hi,
in the case, you ne
code was like
"permData.containsKey(TurbineUserPeer.columnNames[i])", which has the
requirement, that you have the same permStorage keys as in the database
(actually Torque 4 has global var fieldNames, which are lowercase..).
Did I miss something?
Best, Georg
Von: "Geor
which will be
possible in new Turbine 4.0.
Best regards, Georg
Von: "Georg Kallidis"
An: "Turbine Developers List"
Datum: 19.08.2016 12:22
Betreff:Antwort: Re: Turbine 4 Final: How to save additional
attributes into turbine_user, removed in M2
Hi,
sorr
Hi all,
a release candidate for the
Turbine Webapp Maven-Archetype, version 1.0.1
has been prepared.
It contains the Archetype for Turbine 4-M2 Version. After that final
Turbine 4 Archetype could be prepared.
Please verify this release candidate carefully and vote!
Thanks!
Tag:
[x] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
- Weitergeleitet von Georg Kallidis/CeDiS/FU-Berlin/DE am 14.10.2016
08:43 -
Von:"Georg Kallidis"
An: "Turbine Developers List" ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum:
Hi Thomas,
@my approach
I started with updating the deps, and upgrade to JUnit4.
JAXB before calling afterUnMarshal did not visit the code in Group.setFields. I
researched a little bit (Stackoverflow..) and thought the best hook would be
the Adapter, which already exists.
As it hooks the inst
Hi Jeffery, hi Thomas,
I updated the archetype
- removing most of the memory classes and replaced them by Torque managers
in role-configuration xml (reason: we are now in mysql)
- using lower case groups/roles (because Fulcrum Security 1.1.0 seems to
have a bug - now fixed in 1.1.1)
- includ
trying to use the new Turbine4-M2
Archetype
Hi Georg,
On 02.11.16 16:30, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> If you think it´s ok, we have really to prepare release. Then I would
> suggest to first release Fulcrum Intake and Security, test it in Turbine
> 4.0, and only after this release t
Hi Jeffery, hi Thomas,
I think it´s worth discussing that and I support the annotation approach.
Having annotated security constraints in actions may be indeed a neat and
flexible way to go. I think the role annotation pretty useful and with non
dynamic groups the groups annonation as well, but
I tested it with Java 7/8 without errors!
UnMarshalling is neat done this way (in the beans), let the adapter
(unMarshal) keep focused on its own issues ..
+1 (expect)
Best regards, Georg
-Thomas Vandahl schrieb: -
An: dev@turbine.apache.org
Von: Thomas Vandahl
Datum: 17.11.2016 16:
this might be quite useful -
having the archetype ready at hand as a test environment for Turbine 4.
Have we not found this way some bugs now?
Best regards, Georg
Von:"Georg Kallidis"
An: "Turbine Developers List"
Datum: 07.11.2016 15:53
Betreff:Re: Re: Er
: Turbine Developers List
Von: Thomas Vandahl
Datum: 18.11.2016 16:34
Betreff: Re: Errors found trying to use the new Turbine4-M2 Archetype
Hi Georg,
On 18.11.16 13:38, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> the archetype seems to be now pretty ready and I would prepare a release.
>
> What do you thin
Hi Thomas,
YES and Turbine 4.x !
1) In SNAPSHOTS
Fulcrum Jackson2 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT dependency
- com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype
jackson-datatype-json-org
Fulcrum Gson 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT dependency
- com.jayway.jsonpath
json-path
Turbine 4 class
org.apache.turbine.services.jsonrpc.JSONPro
[x] +1 release it
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 27.11.2016 14:51
Betreff:[VOTE] Release fulcrum-factory 1.1.0 based on staged
repository RC1
Hi folks,
A release candidate for the Fulcrum Factory Component, version
1.1.0
[ x ] +1 release it
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 27.11.2016 11:59
Betreff:[VOTE] Release fulcrum-intake 1.2.2 based on staged
repository RC1
Hi folks,
A release candidate for the Fulcrum Intake Component, version
1.2.2
License and Apache Projects
Hi Georg,
On 25.11.16 12:52, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Fulcrum Jackson2 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT dependency
> - com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype
>jackson-datatype-json-org
>
> Fulcrum Gson 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT dependency
> - com.jayway.jsonpath
> json-pat
Hi Thomas,
if I think again about it, isn´t then Jabsorb another wrapper around the
offending lib? If so, we are clean, as Jabsorb is Apache 2.0 licensed.
This might be of interest for others as its a quite lightweighted bundle..
Best regards, Georg
-"Georg Kallidis" schrieb
[x] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
Best regards, Georg
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 07.12.2016 12:29
Betreff:[VOTE] Release fulcrum-intake 1.2.2 based on staged
repository
[x] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
- G
Von:Thomas Vandahl
An: Turbine Developers List ,
priv...@turbine.apache.org
Datum: 12.12.2016 19:36
Betreff:[VOTE][LAZY] Release turbine-parent 4 based on staged
repository RC1
Hi folk
1 - 100 of 393 matches
Mail list logo
