Embedding ZooKeeper without using network

Hi, I often use ZookKeeper in embedded mode, that is to launch both a Server and a Client inside the same JVM. I would like to run the whole setup without the need of network connections. One use case is to run unit tests which need ZookKeeper, in order to run a full server-client pair at least a

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0

the 3.5.2 release >> (correct me if I missed something). Certainly we should fix it, but not a >> blocker imo. >> >> Patrick >> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0

+1 (non binding) Tested Majordodo (http://majordodo.org) and BlazingCache (http://blazingcache.org) against 3.5.2-alpha. My tests also include running Apache BookKeeper 4.4.0 using the 3.5.2-alpha java client. All is fine but dependencies changed a lot, many legacy deps like jline, jms and sun

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0

gt; Arshad > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:ph...@apache.org] > > > Sent: 29 June 2016 20:47 > > > To: DevZooKeeper > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0 > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1

+1 (non binding) Tested Apache BookKeeper trunk (4.5.0-SNAPSHOT) Tested Majordodo (http://majordodo.org). These tests also include running Apache BookKeeper 4.4.0 Client using the 3.5.2-alpha java client. Tested BlazingCache (http://blazingcache.org) . These tests also include running Apache

Graceful close of ZooKeeper client

Hi ZooKeepers, I have just created this and issue to improve client-side "close" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2697 Handle graceful stop of ZookKeeper client If the idea is acceptable for you I can write a patch and file a PR. Thanks -- Enrico

Re: Anyone interested in learning about our QA build? (ZK-2665)

pying stuff from master, but you'd need to understand to copy > the > >> right stuff. I'm willing to guide anyone interested in doing this. > >> > >> I can definitely do it myself if no one else is interested in picking it > >> up. > >> > >> -Flavio > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Feature Proposal: Embedded (non network stack) connection option for embedded Zookeeper

h > geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der beabsichtigte Empfänger sind, > informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und löschen Sie diese E-Mail. Das > unbefugte Kopieren oder die unbefugte Weitergabe der enthaltenen > Informationen ist nicht gestattet. > > On 27 September 20

Re: Feature Proposal: Embedded (non network stack) connection option for embedded Zookeeper

n this > and whether this is a welcome feature, in which case I would create a Jira > Issue for further discussion and patch submission. > > Best regards, > > Matthias Amberg > Developer > Office: ++41 511 11 64 > > unblu inc. - Kernserstrasse 17 - 6060 Sarnen - Switzerland > > unblu makes websites personal http://www.unblu.com > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Graceful close of ZooKeeper client

2017-04-11 15:13 GMT+02:00 Jordan Zimmerman : > > The new method will not introduce any compatibility issue, even with > > Curator; maybe @Jordan can you confirm that ? > > If it's a new method then there's no Curator compatibility issues. Though, > we'd appreciate a

Re: Graceful close of ZooKeeper client

that ? I can update the JIRA and submit a PR to share my patch, I really would like to have this small feature in 3.5.x branch Does it sound good to you ? > Cheers, > Eddie > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Z

Re: Feature Proposal: Embedded (non network stack) connection option for embedded Zookeeper

;easy" using Netty, look at this test case: https://github.com/eolivelli/zookeeper/blob/ZOOKEEPER-2755-localaddress/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/NetworklessTest.java I hope that helps -- Enrico 2017-01-09 15:33 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > H

Re: Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.3-beta Release Plan

Hi Michael, is there any chance to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2460 included in 3.5.3 ? I can convert the patch to a PR if needed Thanks -- Enrico 2017-03-13 18:30 GMT+01:00 Michael Han : > Hi all, > > Here is an update of the release progress

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.4.11 release

t wrote: > > Hi folks, any objection to cutting a 3.4.11 release? It's been awhile > > since > > 3.4.10 and we have over 50 JIRA that have gone into the 3.4 branch. > > > > If there are no objections I'll start the process sometime next week. > > > > Regards, > > > > Patrick > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.4-beta candidate 0

) at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.auth.KerberosSecurityTestcase.setUpSasl(KerberosSecurityTestcase.java:56) Il giorno lun 14 mag 2018 alle ore 05:39 Michael Han <h...@apache.org> ha scritto: > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > downl

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

> > > -QuorumPeer - > > > > /** > > * A 'view' is a node's current opinion of the membership of the entire > > * ensemble. > > */ > > public Map<Long,QuorumPeer.QuorumServer> getView() { > > return Collections.unmodifiableMap(getQuorum

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

t; wrote: > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > You can determine the state of a server it via 4-letter commands. Would > that work for you? > > > > -Flavio > > > >> On 8 May 2018, at 09:09, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> &g

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

llower - We are a cluster of three - Every of the three is a PARTECIPANT (no observers) in order to guess which is the leader I have to ask to all of the three nodes in the cluster Am I missing something ? I am running 3.5.3-BETA Enrico > > Patrick > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.4-beta candidate 0

+1 (non binding) downloaded, built from source, checked signatures run Apache BookKeeper unit tests using staged Maven Staged artifacts and run basic manual tests using this ZK candidate run ZK tests on my Fedora Box got a failure on

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.4-beta

> > We would like to thank the contributors that made the release possible. > > Regards, > > The ZooKeeper Team > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Andor Molnar

Congrats Andor ! Enrico Il giorno ven 8 giu 2018 alle ore 15:48 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Andor and he > has accepted. Andor has made some great contributions and we are looking > forward to even more :) > > Congratulations and

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

FYI the patch has been merged to master e to 3.5 branch thank you ! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3066 Enrico Il giorno gio 21 giu 2018 alle ore 17:38 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Il gio 21 giu 2018, 17:13 Andor Molnar ha >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.13 candidate 0

Il giorno sab 23 giu 2018 alle ore 00:31 Michael Han ha scritto: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.13. It fixes 17 issues, > including issues such as ZOOKEEPER-2959 > that could cause > data loss when observer is used, and

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

20 giu 2018 alle ore 13:45 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > This is my JIRA > I am going to work on a patch > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3066 > > Enrico > > Il gio 10 mag 2018, 19:47 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > >> &

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.13 candidate 1

+1 (non binding) Checked signatures/md5/sha1 Built from source and run Java tests on Fedora 26 I am not able to run CPPUNIT tests on Fedora 26, I think this is not a real blocker, I never run those tests on other releases, So I can't tell this is a regression. This is my case

Re: [SUGGESTION] Target branches 3.5 and master (3.6) to Java 8

2018-02-16 14:20 GMT+01:00 Andor Molnar : > +1 for setting the Java8 requirement on server side. > > *Client side.* > I'd like the idea of the setting the requirement on client side too without > introducing anything Java8 specific. I'm not planning to use Java8 features >

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

;shutdown" it you cannot 'start' it anymore. This is why I am asking for help. -- Enrico > > Regards, > Norbert > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:51 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > This is my patch > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/546 > &g

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Norbert, > > thank you for taking a look > > > > Il giorno gio 21 giu 2018 alle ore 11:58 Norbert Kalmar > > ha scritto: > > > > > Good question. Wouldn't just kill

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

think the existing JMX test corpus should be refactored but given the little impact of this patch is it not worth to spend much time. Enrico > Hope that helps. > > Regards, > Andor > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: >

Re: A new Pluggable Metrics System for ZooKeeper

ping Il giorno mar 24 lug 2018 alle ore 13:03 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > I have started drafting an API for the new Metrics system. > > The idea is to design a common API to be implemented by a "Metrics > Provider". > > This

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

r jira: > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2689 > > > > "ZooKeeper runs in Java, release 1.6 or greater (JDK 6 or greater)." > > https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.13/zookeeperAdmin.html > > > > > > Rakesh > > > > On S

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

Il giorno mer 1 ago 2018 alle ore 21:58 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > > Il mer 1 ago 2018, 21:08 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > >> We had discussed dropping java6 as a supported platform recently. Perhaps >> yet another reason to move forward with that? >> > >

Re: ZooKeeper @ Facebook Meetup - 30 Second Survey

ou. The link does not work (on mobile)...is it possible? Enrico > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [SUGGESTION] Jute's place in the new directory structure

> What do you think? > > As this is a change that was not in the initial doc about maven > migration, > > I thought it's best to ask. > > > > Regards, > > Norbert > > > > p.s.: The best thing would be to use a more standardized library for > > serialization like protobuf or Avro. But that's just a distant dream > right > > now, maybe ZooKeeper v5.0 ;) > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 12:02 AM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Thanks Enrico. Possible. However afaict Jenkins is running build 19 > (build > > 11-ea+19) and I didn't notice anything obvious in the notes for 19+ > related > > to sasl/kerb. > > > >

A new Pluggable Metrics System for ZooKeeper

Hi, I have started drafting an API for the new Metrics system. The idea is to design a common API to be implemented by a "Metrics Provider". This way we will instrument ZooKeeper code only once and the user will be able to publish metrics to his preferred system. This is the umbrella issue:

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

Il sab 21 lug 2018, 17:17 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:21 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il sab 21 lug 2018, 09:22 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > > > Interestingly I don't see the auth tests that are failing in 3.4 > failing > &

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

found in the subject > 2018-07-20 14:39:27,127 [myid:0] - ERROR > [QuorumConnectionThread-[myid=0]-2:SaslQuorumAuthServer@133] - Failed > to authenticate using SASL > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_java11/2/#showFailuresLink > > Patrick > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

MetricsProvider Plan

Hi, I would like to share the plan for the new "Pluggable metrics system for ZooKeeper" [1] Currently on master we have the MetricsProvider API and the management for the lifecycle of the MetricsProvider (start/stop/configuration). Next immediate steps, which can run concurrently: -

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

2018-03-14 12:26 GMT+01:00 Flavio Junqueira : > I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut > a 3.5.4 release? > It will be great ! ZK 3.5.4 has Quorum Peer Mutual Auth which is very important in order to move from 3.4 branch to 3.5 Enrico > >

Re: [SUGGESTION] Migrate project structure to Maven build

Hi Norbert, thank you for your suggestiion there is a long standing patch for migration to Maven https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1078 personally I am using that pom.xml in order to speed up work I really would like this change, but we need support from some committer. It is an

Re: [VOTE] Migrate ZK to Maven build

+1 thank you (non binding) Enrico 2018-04-20 16:36 GMT+02:00 Rakesh Radhakrishnan : > I really appreciate your initiative! > > +1 > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > > Definitely +1 > > > > > On 20 Apr 2018, at 16:06, Norbert

Re: Discover LEADER from JMX

s correct. > > Regards, > Andor > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il giorno mer 9 mag 2018 alle ore 20:24 Patrick Hunt > ha > > scritto: > > > > > iiuc what you are interested in the information is already ava

Re: Maven migration - main src dir moved

ase your PRs > and resolve conflicts to get them merged. > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > Regards, > Andor > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Decrease number of threads in Jenkins builds to reduce flakyness

I have to open PR for that. > > >> > > >> Andor > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Norbert Kalmar < > > >> nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +

Re: Decrease number of threads in Jenkins builds to reduce flakyness

ilds much more stable. That would be probably too slow, but maybe running > at least less threads would improve the situation. > > It's getting very annoying that I cannot get a green build on GitHub with > only a few retests. > > Regards, > Andor > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Decrease number of threads in Jenkins builds to reduce flakyness

gt; flaky > >>>>> unrelated to my patch”. Which is bad, but the shame is it’s true 90% > >>>>> percent of cases. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I’m just trying to find some ways - besides fixing c) and d) > >> flakies > >>&

Re: [VOTE] Maven migration - separation of java files to server and client project?

Yes, I think it is NOT a good idea to go ahead with this separation. so -1 (non binding) from my side for now And your patch is very good at demonstrating this. We can't break compatibility in clients. We can move to Maven first and then re-think about separating client and server Enrico Il

Zookeeper at Twitter by Micheal

Hi Michael, I just stepped into this very interesting post ! https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/infrastructure/2018/zookeeper-at-twitter.html Thank you Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Re: asfgit commenting on PRs

Now it seems okay. Let me know if there are problems. The docs about the plugin are not very clear. Cheers Enrico Il mar 6 nov 2018, 21:10 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > I am not sure what is adding that comment. > I will dig > > Enrico > > > Il mar 6 nov 2018, 21:04 Mi

Re: asfgit commenting on PRs

ng 0 > or > > 1 comments). Or to see quickly if something is getting a lot of attention > > lately, or getting updates etc. > > > > This was a convenient thing for me, of course not a feature I can't live > > without. I just wanted to ask other devs view on this. > > > > So, what's your view? :) > > > > Regards, > > Norbert > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Fangmin Lv

d. Fangmin has made some great contributions and we > > are looking forward to even more :) > > > > > > Congratulations and welcome aboard, Fangmin! > > > > Michael > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Java11 test failures with 3.5/master

without particular issues, hopefully I will in production soon, now I have many cases of ZK clients/servers on jdk10 in production and they will move soon to jdk11. I will take a closer look as soon as I have cycles this week. Enrico Enrico > Thanks, > > Patrick > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: question about approach to take

Il giorno mar 13 nov 2018 alle ore 16:47 Alexander Shraer ha scritto: > > I also wanted to get other's views on this. > > My opinion is that the current server configuration format > (server.x=ip:port:port:role;ip:port) has run its course. There are multiple > proposals for additions/changes to

Re: Re: asfgit commenting on PRs

g the change. > An example just a second ago: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/679 > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 4:02 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > I have unchecked the "Add test result one liner" flag in the PR builder > Job > > https://build

Re: Re: asfgit commenting on PRs

l build comments. > > > > Best regards > maoling > Beijing,China > > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人：Enrico Olivelli > 收件人：dev@zookeeper.apache.org > 主题：Re: asfgit commenting on PRs > 日期：2018年11月06日 04点57分 > > Il lun 5 nov 2018,

Re: ZooKeeper website design change

gt; > If the feedbacks are positive I'd like to apply the same design for the > documentation. > > Thanks, Tamaas > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Prometheus Metrics Provider

Hi, I am going to work on Prometheus Metrics Provider, I see these ways: 1) add Prometheus metrics to current code base using ANT (add depedencies and change build scripts) 3) implement the provider using Maven in a metrics/prometheus folder, assuming that one day we will have Maven and it

Re: DISCUSSION: Drop PDF support in documentation

Il giorno mer 3 ott 2018 alle ore 09:34 Tamas Penzes ha scritto: > > Hi All, > > As part of "ZOOKEEPER-925 Consider maven site generation to replace our > forrest site and documentation generation" I have implemented > "ZOOKEEPER-3153 Create MarkDown files and build process for them". > > The

Roadmap to MetricsProvider

Hi guys, as I am going to work on Prometheus implementation I should at least add some minimal metric to expose to MetricsProvider. In order to introduce a MetricsProvided based instrumentation we should eventually drop existing instrumentation and replace with the new system. The challenge would

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

Il giorno ven 21 set 2018 alle ore 03:44 Michael Han ha scritto: > Thanks Enrico for volunteering, it'll be cool if we can fix this. > Ok, working now on https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/ Stay tuned Enrico > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Enr

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

I apologize if there will be some spam on the list When you enable this trigger asfgit starts to add comments like this: Can one of the admins verify this patch? I am looking for a solution. We had the same on BookKeeper jobs Enrico Il giorno ven 21 set 2018 alle ore 09:31 Enrico Olivelli

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

Jenkins jobs on git, using Jenkins DSL language. I can also take a look and see how to port to ZK Enrico > Michael. > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

Il giorno ven 21 set 2018 alle ore 11:27 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I have set up the 'retest this please' trigger. > But now we have two jobs running for each pull request. > > I can't find the flag which makes the validation named 'Jenk

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

Too early... It seems that the first line with 'Jenkins' never goes away. Patrick, do you have some hint ? Otherwise I can ask to infra or bui...@apache.org Enrico Il giorno ven 21 set 2018 alle ore 14:45 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > Okay > on github you see two lines, but there is

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

iki to update and if there is a common place for storing CI Jobs configurations Enrico Il giorno ven 21 set 2018 alle ore 11:56 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Il giorno ven 21 set 2018 alle ore 11:27 Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

', and it maps to the same Job is there any other trigger ? I will continue to search Enrico Il giorno ven 21 set 2018 alle ore 09:33 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I apologize if there will be some spam on the list > > When you enable this trigger asfgit starts to ad

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

ut it seems to me that the 'Jenkins' line never goes green nor red, it stays yellow forever Enrico > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:51 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> Too early... >> It seems that the first line with 'Jenkins' never goes away. >> >> Patrick, do you hav

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

es anyone has an explanation? Maybe it is an asf infra configuration Enrico > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> Il ven 21 set 2018, 19:11 Michael Han ha scritto: >> >> > Thanks for the work, Enrico! Looks like it's working? >>

Re: About Jenkins pre-commit job

All done, will send a new email with a clean recap Enrico Il giorno sab 22 set 2018 alle ore 09:54 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > > > Il ven 21 set 2018, 22:53 Michael Han ha scritto: >> >> >> It is the default config, I can drop. In BK sometimes it is useful in

Re: New precommit job 'retest this please' trick

nt on the PR Much simpler IMO Enrico > Andor > > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi ZooKeepers, > > we have enhanced the "precommit" automated QA testing. > > Before merging any patch the committer should wait fo

Grant edit permission on Wiki

Hi, can I have 'edit' permissions on ZooKeeper space on confluence ? I have to update this page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute my confluence username is 'eolivelli' Thanks Enrico

New precommit job 'retest this please' trick

Hi ZooKeepers, we have enhanced the "precommit" automated QA testing. Before merging any patch the committer should wait for a "green light" on CI, but unfortunately we have a few flaky tests which are very annoying. Now any Apache Committer, member of the 'apache' organization on github, is able

Committers can't close github prs

the configuration. My 2 cents Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

MetricsProvider..time to start?

designed and are running in production at Facebook I think that such work should be driven by one of our 'Facebook friends', anyway I am available to do whatever is best in order to move this work forward. Cheers Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: What about using Travis-CI ?

ed 'fsyncs' and set forkcount = 1. I don't know how many tests are missing in the job logs, maybe we are close to the end of the suite. Enrico Il giorno lun 14 gen 2019 alle ore 14:16 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > First Travis build: > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/751

Re: What about using Travis-CI ?

Last update:with fork count = 4 we have the build finishing wihin 20 minutes but we have a lot of test failures ! https://travis-ci.org/apache/zookeeper/builds/479607886 Enrico Il giorno lun 14 gen 2019 alle ore 22:24 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > I am sorry, we have two problem

Maven pom - scm connection is not good

Hi, in the new Maven pom we have a wrong scm XML tag: It looks like: scm:git:git://git.apache.org/zookeeper.git scm:git:https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git It should be:

Re: Removing BETA suffix

https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/785 cheers Enrico Il giorno mer 23 gen 2019 alle ore 15:06 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > Il giorno mer 23 gen 2019 alle ore 14:34 Andor Molnar > ha scritto: > > > > Makes perfect sense. > > 3.5.5 release is going to be the

Re: Maven assembly

t; in the tarball, so not 100% backward compatible). > > > > I know I said in the initial docs we will keep the tarball, but now that > we > > are in the finish line of the migration, I also lean towards doing the > > release tha "maven way" and just package up the buildable resource. > > > > What's your take on the topic? > > > > Thanks, > > Norbert > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Maven pom - scm connection is not good

probably merged today or > tomorrow) I can do a seperate PR for it (or if you wish publish the PR > yourself). > Okay for committing on assembly PR Thanks Enrico > > Regards, > Norbert > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:43 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi,

Re: Removing BETA suffix

Il giorno mer 23 gen 2019 alle ore 14:34 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > > Makes perfect sense. > 3.5.5 release is going to be the first stable release of 3.5 branch. Let me have the honor to send the patch :-) Enrico > > Andor > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:3

Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox

p-us.apache.org/> will have > CNAMEs > > > to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the read-only > > > git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure about > the > > > timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins bui

Re: owasp job just started flagging slf4j

ail/CVE-2018-8088 > > We don't use EventData but should consider upgrading. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3217 > > Patrick > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Maven migration and C client

I forgot about it... it should definitely > be changed. And ant already does something like this (if you don't have the > required infrastructure, c build will not run.) > > But just creating a profile for building and testing C client is a good > idea, so +1 from my side. > >

Maven migration and C client

Hi, can't we create a "profile" in order to build and test the C Client ? I think that very few developers are working on it, it is only a burden for Java developers. CI will build and run tests Thoughts ? Enrico

Re: Maven migration and C client

Spotbugs: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/742 Enrico Il giorno gio 20 dic 2018 alle ore 15:09 Norbert Kalmar ha scritto: > > Here's the PR, open for feedback! :) > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/741 > > Regards, > Norbert > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at

Re: Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

ernals Enrico ----- 原始邮件 - > 发件人：Enrico Olivelli > 收件人：DevZooKeeper > 主题：Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues > 日期：2018年12月20日 17点10分 > > > Great > Il giorno gio 20 dic 2018 alle ore 10:07 Norbert Kalmar > ha scritto: > > > > Subtasks: > > Findbugs,

What about using Travis-CI ?

Hi, Now that we are Mavenizing ZookKeeper it will be super easy to add Travis-CI to the story. It will enable non Apache Committers to have more access to logs of their patches. I am thinking about Travis only for Pull Requests. It is super easy and ZooKeeper build is not super heavy. I would

Re: owasp job just started flagging slf4j

Patch updated with a better approach Enrico Il ven 21 dic 2018, 00:29 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > Thanks Enrico, I commented on the PR, lmk if that doesn't make sense. > > Patrick > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:34 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Here it is &g

Paper about Zookeeper and consistency guarantees

Hey, I found this interesting paper, it talks about zookeeper https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse551/15sp/papers/alice-osdi14.pdf Cheers Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: owasp job just started flagging slf4j

ng that > issue. > > Patrick > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 2:39 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Can we whitelist that jar in the meantime? > > > > Enrico > > > > Il sab 15 dic 2018, 01:28 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > > > > >

Re: owasp job just started flagging slf4j

Here it is https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/736 I have disable all jars for slf4j, I can narrow the patch down to the single file. I don't know how it is worth Enrico Il giorno lun 17 dic 2018 alle ore 07:02 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > Sure > > Enrico > > Il lun

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

; Thanks Enrico! > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:10 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > >> Great > >> > >> Il giorno gio 20 dic 2018 alle ore 10:07 Norbert Kalmar > >> ha scritto: > >> > > >> > Subtasks: >

Re: Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

pache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3029 > > This are the tasks left I can think of. If anything is missing, feel free > > to create a jira, or let me know. > > The ones I'm already working on - 3225, 3171 - I made a comment, Those > > should be ready this week. > >

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

ease here: > >> https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/master/dev-support/make_rc.sh > >> We could probably use the well known "copy+paste technology" to have it > >> within ZooKeeper the same way. ;-) > >> > >> Regards, Tamaas > >> > &g

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

an think of. If anything is missing, feel free > to create a jira, or let me know. > The ones I'm already working on - 3225, 3171 - I made a comment, Those > should be ready this week. > > Thanks, > Norbert > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:07 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: >

Re: Glide path to getting 3.5.x out of beta

ed AND fixVersion = > > > >>> 3.5.5 AND priority in (blocker, critical) ORDER BY priority DESC, key > > > >>> ASC > > > >>> > > > >>> ZOOKEEPER-1818 - Fangmin is working on it and patch is available on > > > >

Re: Leader election

Michael, Leader election is not enough. You must have some mechanism to fence off the partitioned leader. If you are building a replicated state machine Apache Zookeeper + Apache Bookkeeper can be a good choice See this just an example: https://github.com/ivankelly/bookkeeper-tutorial This is

Re: Glide path to getting 3.5.x out of beta

Thank you very much Michael I am following and reviewing your patches Enrico Il giorno gio 22 nov 2018 alle ore 10:14 Michael K. Edwards ha scritto: > > Hmm. Jira's a bit of a boneyard, isn't it? And timeouts in flaky > tests are a problem. > > I scrubbed through the open bugs and picked the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >