https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303926
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||GNOME Desktop 754990
From 55605c61ada5bb063b1d66258b11e7d983d5d7c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:15:51 +0100
Subject: Modernize spec file
---
perl-AnyEvent-DBus.spec | 35 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19
Folks,
we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox recently
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1239962) which comes from
Gtk3 system library.
If you's like to help here, please install latest FF updates from koji:
F23: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8344bd0b61
F22:
Don't know it it will help, but I see Firefox almost always crash when I
open new window and try to close it on F23. Sometimes earlier after
opening the windows, sometimes later after closing.
Jakub
On 02/03/2016 10:43 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folks,
we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:13:13PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >This approach really scales badly and creates busywork.
> And breaking rawhide however often due to unnoticed soname bumps
> does scale well and does not cause busywork?
Right. Tooling should stop that too. And I'm not just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303926
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Regression
Also please remove Firefox from ABRT blacklist at:
/etc/abrt/abrt-action-save-package-data.conf
ma.
On 02/03/2016 10:43 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folks,
we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox recently
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1239962) which comes from
Gtk3 system library.
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:13:13PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >Ideally, every line in a package definition (specfile or what have you)
> >is only there because of some exception from the typical case. For
> >well-behaved
> >upstreams, the perfect packaging description would be _empty_.
> I
I'd need the ABRT backtrace for that - don't see it on my F23 box.
On 02/03/2016 11:58 AM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
Don't know it it will help, but I see Firefox almost always crash when I
open new window and try to close it on F23. Sometimes earlier after
opening the windows, sometimes later after
From ce4d8837a8e486a17219db98a7ffa2c4d4a406e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:17:48 +0100
Subject: Package cleanup
---
perl-Class-Exporter.spec | 39 ---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-Config-Record to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Christian Stadelmann <
genodeft...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel?
> See https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the
> related .spec files in git repos?
They used to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304359
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-Class-Data-Accessor to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 02/03/2016 10:53 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Also please remove Firefox from ABRT blacklist at:
/etc/abrt/abrt-action-save-package-data.conf
ma.
On 02/03/2016 10:43 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folks,
we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox recently
From 74c7eb810371ebad0291ab962f3d95f58d81ea9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:33:30 +0100
Subject: Package cleanup
---
perl-Class-Data-Accessor.spec | 76 +++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+),
On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 13:01:04 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Even if the spec file uses wildcards to include any shared library
> > version, the automatic dependency checks for Rawhide will notice the
> > SONAME change and inform the packager about it.
> > [...]
>
> This is too late, though. We
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304362
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1120735
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1120735=edit
[patch] Update to 3.418 (#1304362)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304362
Bug ID: 1304362
Summary: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.418 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Verilog-Perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 04:11:46PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >I was notified by a user that a newer version of trustedqsl was
> available
> >so I looked into why I wasn't notified.
> >For some reason
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:34:06 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:45:04PM -, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> > Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel? See
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the related
>
From 1bab6d2659efcb25f0856115a588bc49cd9f3656 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:59:31 +0100
Subject: Package cleanup
---
perl-Config-Record.spec | 45 -
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-Class-Exporter to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303830
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
So it's not enabled. That's what I'd like to see.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 05:26:23 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:13:13PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > >This approach really scales badly and creates busywork.
> > And breaking rawhide however often due to unnoticed soname bumps
> > does scale well and does not cause
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304362
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12801629
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
From e6ca396067139ae3b4d2db6966c6e74e1e3e85d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:26:45 +0100
Subject: Package cleanup
---
perl-Convert-UU.spec | 35 +--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
On 02/03/2016 02:45 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
On 02/03/2016 10:53 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Also please remove Firefox from ABRT blacklist at:
/etc/abrt/abrt-action-save-package-data.conf
ma.
On 02/03/2016 10:43 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folks,
we see many Gtk3 crashes in Firefox recently
8b1c19725c56123e14d1d38e3eacf505 Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.02.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru/Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.02.tar.gz/md5/8b1c19725c56123e14d1d38e3eacf505/Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 94d12dc694acc5aecf0d0d7ea7c2bc9a557b5e02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Colin B. Macdonald"
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:26:25 -0800
Subject: Version bump, spec file clean up
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Tie-Cycle.spec | 16 ++--
sources | 2 +-
From e18f63c086aaa2e09deb306047cda2614acc0b08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:01:45 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
dropbox-api-command.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+),
From bab895d5f61411b6b770a773a8a0a0d08b5fca31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:21:19 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
dspam.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
837 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
601 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
451
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:04:19 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> When a provenpackager is rebuilding *hundreds* of packages at once,
>> and trying to deal with maybe dozens of build failures, sending emails
>> to all the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302696
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.95-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
From 9feec646ec8b5ed99ba5d56b3587ab2435746aed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:09:28 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
cpanspec.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> This is the hazard of using %{_libdir}/*.so.* in %files. Is there any
> reason why such a syntax should NOT be formally discouraged in the
> packaging guidelines?
There is: I do not want to have to pointlessly edit my specfile each time
some soname changes, and waste a
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
> > Sometimes a provenpackager will make a bad change, and that's
> > unfortunate, but it happens. Sometimes package owners make bad changes
> > too! :-)
>
> You're taking it too lightly. Somebody who performs version upgrades really
> needs to take
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296734
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296734
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296734
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.fc
From bc416b8eb38d71456f617ce24159707cffacc16b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:18:38 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
ctstream.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1
773b14e02cb5815d40160cf7255897e0 Tie-Cycle-1.221.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Tie-Cycle/Tie-Cycle-1.221.tar.gz/md5/773b14e02cb5815d40160cf7255897e0/Tie-Cycle-1.221.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296734
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290619
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290619
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.18-1.fc
I have lots of test installations using identical partition sizes for EXT3 or
EXT4 / filesystems. the filesystem space these provided is adequate on all if
running Mageia or openSUSE, but quite often not for Fedora. Working around
the inadequacy on Fedora presents problems #2 & #3.
Problem #1:
From 3c4b5a4f9c9d571a11fe831a307018f284bd365c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:16:06 +0100
Subject: Package cleanup
---
perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes.spec | 39
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+),
Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2016, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Jan Kurik:
> First supported version is going to
> be Fedora 23->24 upgrades.
Does this mean the changes will be backported to GNOME Software 3.18?
--
Regards,
Heiko Adams
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On 02/03/2016 03:16 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2016, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Jan Kurik:
>> First supported version is going to
>> be Fedora 23->24 upgrades.
> Does this mean the changes will be backported to GNOME Software 3.18?
No. The plan is to put GNOME Software 3.20 in F23,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:21:26PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> >> We'll implement a graphical user interface for system upgrades. The
> >> implementation will use PackageKit and the libhif stack as a backend
> >> and GNOME Software as a frontend. First supported version is going to
> >> be Fedora
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:44:21AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/03/2016 09:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2016-02-02, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> May packages assume that /usr/sbin is on PATH when they are built?
From 1c7f1459fb21f0e2d176030094982b01db8d505f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:30:55 +0100
Subject: 3.418 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Verilog-Perl.spec | 13 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files
From dbe9314ff454b573fa59ef16f45b00e5dfe08720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:01:08 +0100
Subject: 0.02 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru.spec | 32 ++--
sources
From dbe9314ff454b573fa59ef16f45b00e5dfe08720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:01:08 +0100
Subject: 0.02 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru.spec | 32 ++--
sources
From a07cb4958fa2dcfb89f08c35a308bed2dcce94d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:01:08 +0100
Subject: 0.02 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru.spec | 32 ++--
sources
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Graphical System Upgrades =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GraphicalSystemUpgrades
Change owner(s):
* Kalev Lember < klember AT redhat DOT com >
Add support for performing system upgrades to a newer Fedora release
through GNOME Software.
== Detailed
= Proposed System Wide Change: GNOME 3.20 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNOME3.20
Change owner(s):
* Kalev Lember
Update GNOME to the latest upstream release, 3.20
== Detailed Description ==
The new features for 3.20 include:
* Graphical System Upgrades
* Cantarell font improvements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304359
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.02-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-89fd8382bc
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304359
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.02-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2b8f743260
--
You are receiving this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/2016 09:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-02-02, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> May packages assume that /usr/sbin is on PATH when they are built?
>>
>> If you need a program which is currently only in /usr/sbin, should a
>>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Graphical System Upgrades =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GraphicalSystemUpgrades
This change is really light on details (or progress?). How is this going
to be different (and why) from the
On 02/03/2016 03:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> We'll implement a graphical user interface for system upgrades. The
>> implementation will use PackageKit and the libhif stack as a backend
>> and GNOME Software as a frontend. First
= Proposed System Wide Change: The GNU C Library version 2.23 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC223
Change owner(s):
* Carlos O'Donell
Switch glibc in Fedora 24 to glibc version 2.23.
== Detailed Description ==
The GNU C Library version 2.23 will be released at the end of February
= Proposed System Wide Change: Removal of librtkaio from glibc =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC223_librtkaio_removal
Change owner(s):
* Carlos O'Donell
Remove librtkaio support from glibc in Fedora 24.
== Detailed Description ==
On July 2003 the rtkaio add-on was added to Fedora
On 3 February 2016 at 14:35, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-02-02, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> May packages assume that /usr/sbin is on PATH when they are built?
>>
>> If you need a program which is currently only in /usr/sbin, should a
>> package use an absolute
77743950ce9f8f312194d4b34eed56b9 Verilog-Perl-3.418.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Verilog-Perl/Verilog-Perl-3.418.tar.gz/md5/77743950ce9f8f312194d4b34eed56b9/Verilog-Perl-3.418.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304362
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:57:37PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> attempt on settle this one down: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6761
rfc6761 is a useful reference, but it doesn't really solve this
discussion one way or another.
It's concerned with names to be "carved off a sub-tree of the DNS
= Proposed System Wide Change: Removal of librtkaio from glibc =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC223_librtkaio_removal
Change owner(s):
* Carlos O'Donell
Remove librtkaio support from glibc in Fedora 24.
== Detailed Description ==
On July 2003 the rtkaio add-on was added to Fedora
= Proposed System Wide Change: The GNU C Library version 2.23 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC223
Change owner(s):
* Carlos O'Donell
Switch glibc in Fedora 24 to glibc version 2.23.
== Detailed Description ==
The GNU C Library version 2.23 will be released at the end of February
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304359
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304359
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.02-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=715721
--
You are receiving this
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> We'll implement a graphical user interface for system upgrades. The
> implementation will use PackageKit and the libhif stack as a backend
> and GNOME Software as a frontend. First supported version is going to
> be Fedora 23->24
On 2016-02-02, Florian Weimer wrote:
> May packages assume that /usr/sbin is on PATH when they are built?
>
> If you need a program which is currently only in /usr/sbin, should a
> package use an absolute path, or reset PATH to include /usr/sbin?
>
When I was small, I was
From b5648aa101810dc13ddd6aed7181fef46cf2507c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:56:57 +0100
Subject: Package cleanup
---
perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff.spec | 36 ++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304359
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.02-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, at 05:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > NAICT, DNF, like Yum before it, offers no option I can recognize from its
> > man
> > page to download less than all the to-be-updated/installed packages before
> > proceeding to install any packages. Thus it downloads (typically
I'll be updating these in rawhide only. The big change is that
courier-unicode has changed the library name to libcourier-unicode and
includes a couple extra header files. As far as I can tell the only
package that cares is maildrop, so this shouldn't be an issue.
--
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda
On Qua, 2016-02-03 at 15:10 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 02:28 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Problem #3:
> > When running from say the /boot directory the same dnf command
> > above:
> >
> > # dnf update kd*, kf*, q*, per*, pyt*, u*, v*, x* y*, z*
> >
> > dnf reports cannot install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304359
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Hello /all,
I've been using GNU/Linux since 1998. That year I joined to GPUL, the Coruña
(North Spain) Linux Users Group. In these years I organised with my LUG a lot
of free software hackmeetings, the greatest one, the GUADEC 2012.
I was a Debian zealot more than 10 years, but because my
Do we have zypper in Fedora?
Perhaps we should give that a try?
On Feb 3, 2016 23:28, "Felix Miata" wrote:
> I have lots of test installations using identical partition sizes for EXT3
> or
> EXT4 / filesystems. the filesystem space these provided is adequate on all
> if
>
On 3 February 2016 at 23:00, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Really, it is not realistic to expect people who need to urgently fix
> something to write up a polite e-mail and wait possibly days for you to
> reply (especially if you then answer that you don't want the change and
On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 23:27:30 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > This is the hazard of using %{_libdir}/*.so.* in %files. Is there
> > any reason why such a syntax should NOT be formally discouraged in
> > the packaging guidelines?
>
> There is: I
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 02:28 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>
>> Problem #3:
>> When running from say the /boot directory the same dnf command above:
>>
>> # dnf update kd*, kf*, q*, per*, pyt*, u*, v*, x* y*, z*
>>
>> dnf reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304553
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1120943
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1120943=edit
[patch] Update to 0.4.4 (#1304553)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304552
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1120942
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1120942=edit
[patch] Update to 0.4.4 (#1304552)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304553
Bug ID: 1304553
Summary: perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.4.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Clownfish-CFC
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304558
Bug ID: 1304558
Summary: perl-Log-Report-1.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Log-Report
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Chris Murphy composed on 2016-02-03 15:54 (UTC-0700):
> Felix Miata wrote:
...
>> Does anyone here agree that each of the three would represent legitimate
>> wishlist bugs, unlikely to be summarily dismissed as wontfix?
> My expectation is that's a lot more work than for dnf to do a better
>
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> A workaround would be to make it too hard for the compiler to see the
> problem:
>
> void* ptr = page->data;
> _root = new (ptr) impl::xml_document_struct(page);
>
> This way GCC doesn't see that the address refers to a 1-byte array.
Why not simply:
char data[
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304552
Bug ID: 1304552
Summary: perl-Clownfish-0.4.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Clownfish
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304558
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1120949
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1120949=edit
[patch] Update to 1.13 (#1304558)
--
You are
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:26:23 +
Ian Malone wrote:
> If this is a requirement then it rules out a lot of potential
> packagers who are not full time employed to work on OSS. I could not
> sit at my desk and respond to IRCs about Fedora all day.
As with so much in life,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304564
Bug ID: 1304564
Summary: perl-XML-XPath-1.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-XPath
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
From dd05da2f8b65384292dbf4e273222997b7b0f90b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:43:09 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
fpdns.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:44:32 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> Several people have said something similar lately, and it worries me.
> I understand that we're trying to combat the hostility some packagers
> show when somebody does something to "their" packages, but I'm
> concerned
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Why would it be a pointless edit? Surely you are editing it to update
> to the new version, why wouldn't you also just edit it to adjust the
> so files? or do you not test your version upgrade specs before firing
> off official builds?
Of course not. The rule of thumb is
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 08:44 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>
> I think we need to ask ourselves, as a project, what behaviors we want
> to motivate and what behaviors we want to demotivate in our packagers.
> I think we need to take human nature, flawed as it is, into account
> when doing so. I fear
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo