Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 20:14 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Strange error with camotics: > > Error: > Problem: package cairo-devel-1.15.10-2.fc28.x86_64 requires > pkgconfig(gobject-2.0), but none of the providers can be installed > -

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 10:36 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:18:05AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > My build of american-fuzzy-lop fails because clang doesn't > > understand the ‘-mcet -fcf-protection’ flags

[Bug 1544065] perl-Net-DNS-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544065 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-DNS-1.15-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2697615f0c -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1544065] perl-Net-DNS-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544065 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-DNS-1.15-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-344ecfd015 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1315525] perl-Net-DNS-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315525 Paul Wouters changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED

Orphaning scram

Hi, I orphaned scram. My hard drive w/ Fedora died a while ago. Lost all my packaging setup and never caught up w/ the new packaging changes :( There's an open "upgrade-request" [bug 1544524] that I cannot fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544524 I'm an upstream developer and

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 12:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 11:59 -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better > > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like > > tell > > me what things changed in

Removal of BuildRoot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Just a small heads up, BuildRoot tag is not needed since RHEL6 (which is oldest supported one nowadays, it's been year or so after EL5 retirement). And we don't support EL5 anymore, so... I wanted to send this heads up before I actually did that,

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 09:37 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > About 5K packages is very high for the average mass rebuild failures > (around 25% of the total source packages), there was a dist-git outage > during the mass rebuild and I wonder if a bunch of these were affected > by that issue,

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Michael Šimáček > wrote: > >> On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. >>> >>> Pavel >>>

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

El mar, 13-02-2018 a las 20:14 +, Samuel Rakitničan escribió: > Strange error with camotics: > > Error: > Problem: package cairo-devel-1.15.10-2.fc28.x86_64 requires > pkgconfig(gobject-2.0), but none of the providers can be installed > - conflicting requests > - nothing provides

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

Hello, On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Michael Šimáček wrote: > On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. >> >> Pavel >> >> On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >>> Because we are

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:07:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better >> > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like tell

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:07:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better > > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like tell > > me what things changed in the new glibc package, not that the glibc RPM > > has

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

Strange error with camotics: Error: Problem: package cairo-devel-1.15.10-2.fc28.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(gobject-2.0), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides /usr/bin//usr/bin/python3 needed by glib2-devel-2.55.2-1.fc28.x86_64

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 11:59 -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like tell > me what things changed in the new glibc package, not that the glibc RPM > has been upgraded to

Gating test in bodhi failing on dependency check, can't tell why

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-55ac90e798 is the update I'm trying to push. The dist.rpmdeplint test is failing, for example with https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/7207b7c8-10ed-11e8-9d8f-525400fc9f92/task_output/ghc-listsafe-0.1.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.log The

Re: Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable

De: "Jason L Tibbitts III" > The initial set of stub python2-* packages I created have now made their > way to EPEL6 and EPEL7 stable, so packages can now depend on > python2-setuptools, python2-six, python2-pytest and python2-sphinx > in all releases without having to add conditionals for

Re: Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > [For those who don't read epel-devel, this is a duplicate of a message > also posted there.] > > The initial set of stub python2-* packages I created have now made their > way to EPEL6 and EPEL7 stable, so packages

[Bug 1542731] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542731 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-02-14 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks and problems needed to keep EPEL

[Bug 1541674] perl-Email-Address-XS-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541674 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Email-Address-XS-1.02-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Qt 5.10.1 coming to rawhide

Sorry for the late notice... kde sig is working to import Qt 5.10.1 into rawhide starting today, so there will be some related rawhide buildroot broken dependencies until this task is complete -- Rex ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On 02/12/2018 11:16 PM, Vascom wrote: > I am see that my package libzen in need rebuild list. but I can't find > failed koji build for it to see logs. > Where I can find failed build? Or I must run it manually? There were some packages missed because pkgs01 had a short outage. I suspect yours is

[Bug 1544753] perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544753 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <upda...@fedoraproject.org> --- perl-RDF-NS-20180213-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

On 02/13/2018 01:02 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-02-13, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> What does it mean? >> > I opened . A config change was pushed that was missing a , in it so the config was invalid. This was fixed last

Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working

On 13 February 2018 at 02:01, Terry Barnaby wrote: >> Yes: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#faq_a8 >> >> --b. > > > Quite right, it was network limited (disk vs network speed is about the > same). Using a slower USB stick disk shows that fsync() is not working with > a NFSv4

Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable

[For those who don't read epel-devel, this is a duplicate of a message also posted there.] The initial set of stub python2-* packages I created have now made their way to EPEL6 and EPEL7 stable, so packages can now depend on python2-setuptools, python2-six, python2-pytest and python2-sphinx in

Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable

[For those who don't read epel-devel, this is a duplicate of a message also posted there.] The initial set of stub python2-* packages I created have now made their way to EPEL6 and EPEL7 stable, so packages can now depend on python2-setuptools, python2-six, python2-pytest and python2-sphinx in

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On February 13, 2018 8:24:12 AM CST, "Tomasz Torcz ️" wrote: >On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:16:01AM +, Vascom wrote: >> I am see that my package libzen in need rebuild list. but I can't >find >> failed koji build for it to see logs. >> Where I can find failed build? Or I

[EPEL-devel] Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable

The initial set of stub python2-* packages I created have now made their way to EPEL6 and EPEL7 stable, so packages can now depend on python2-setuptools, python2-six, python2-pytest and python2-sphinx in all releases without having to add conditionals for EPEL. Feel free to suggest additional

[Bug 1544753] perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available

|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <upda...@fedoraproject.org> --- perl-RDF-NS-20180213-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for

[Bug 1389064] EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389064 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: HEADS UP: upcoming giflib-5.1.4 update in rawhide

The giflib-5.1.4 update is mostly done now, three packages failed to build hitting unrelated issues: * java-9-openjdk (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25000111) error: cannot access module-info   bad class file:

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:16:01AM +, Vascom wrote: > I am see that my package libzen in need rebuild list. but I can't find > failed koji build for it to see logs. > Where I can find failed build? Or I must run it manually? I see the same with my "maradns". GIT shows version bump in spec,

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 14:27, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/13/2018 11:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > redhat-rpm-config flags have usually been compatible with both gcc and > > clang, so if there's no newer clang that supports this, it feels like > > we've a few options > > > >

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On 02/13/2018 11:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: redhat-rpm-config flags have usually been compatible with both gcc and clang, so if there's no newer clang that supports this, it feels like we've a few options 1. Have the RPM spec for apps using clang filter these flags out of the RPM

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On 02/13/2018 11:46 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: Given that -mcet seems to turn on extra instructions is this not an issue for compatibility with older processors? or are they sequences which decode as no-ops on older processors? They are NOPs on all current CPUs. They trap on some older CPUs, but

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 08:18:20AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Randy Barlow > wrote: > > On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote: > >> The changelogs are long ass hell. > >> What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote: >> The changelogs are long ass hell. >> What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest? >> (It will be still kept in GIT history) >> 2 releases

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote: > The changelogs are long ass hell. > What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest? > (It will be still kept in GIT history) > 2 releases could be 2- I usually trim my changelogs to the last year of entries. It's kinda

[Bug 1544753] perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544753 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <upda...@fedoraproject.org> --- perl-RDF-NS-20180213-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cf99034a15 -- You are receiving thi

[Bug 1544753] perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544753 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System <upda...@fedoraproject.org> --- perl-RDF-NS-20180213-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6254482e1a -- You are receiving thi

[Bug 1544753] perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available

Fixed In Version||perl-RDF-NS-20180213-1.fc28 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1542721] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #9) > I agree -- Ralf, this is by no means an acceptable way to act towards new > people in Fedora, and your comments about "noobs" are way

[Bug 1544753] New: perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544753 Bug ID: 1544753 Summary: perl-RDF-NS-20180213 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-RDF-NS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi

[Bug 1542721] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #12) > This probably is not the proper forum for hashing out whatever "general > tendency" you're talking about, Agreed, this is not the

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. Pavel On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: Because we are unable to find a consensus on implementation details, it's likely we'll drop this feature from copr API and

[Bug 1544588] perl-SVG-2.83 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544588 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:25:48PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > I personally find it abusing shared resources throwing builds at it which has > not been tested first. So I prefer to do local mockbuilds first, simply to > lessen the load on shared resources. I'm not saying I haven't tossed

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:46:37AM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > Given that -mcet seems to turn on extra instructions is this not an > issue for compatibility with older processors? or are they sequences > which decode as no-ops on older processors?

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. Pavel On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Because we are unable to find a consensus on implementation details, it's > likely we'll drop this feature from copr API and it will be probably a bit > more

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On 13/02/18 10:36, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:18:05AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: My build of american-fuzzy-lop fails because clang doesn't understand the ‘-mcet -fcf-protection’ flags which seem to be added by RPM. clang -O2 -g -pipe -Wall

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:18:05AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > My build of american-fuzzy-lop fails because clang doesn't > understand the ‘-mcet -fcf-protection’ flags which seem to be > added by RPM. > > clang -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 >

clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)

My build of american-fuzzy-lop fails because clang doesn't understand the ‘-mcet -fcf-protection’ flags which seem to be added by RPM. clang -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong

[Bug 1542731] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542731 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sys-Statistics-Linux-0.66-14.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d861e58814 -- You are

[Bug 1544581] perl-DBD-Pg-3.7.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544581 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1544581] perl-DBD-Pg-3.7.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544581 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

>> We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild, >> The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found >> here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the >> full list of packages that are needing rebuilding can be found here[4].

Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

On 2018-02-13, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > What does it mean? > I opened . -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Monday, February 12, 2018 5:59:57 PM CET David Cantrell wrote: > On 02/09/2018 08:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >>> It seems that a lot of

"Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

What does it mean? Rich. - Forwarded message from upda...@fedoraproject.org - The following comment has been added to the libguestfs-1.36.13-1.fc26 update: bodhi - 2018-02-13 03:01:37.555909 (karma: 0) Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py,

Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

On 13.2.2018 09:00, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: What does it mean? Rich. - Forwarded message from upda...@fedoraproject.org - The following comment has been added to the libguestfs-1.36.13-1.fc26 update: bodhi - 2018-02-13 03:01:37.555909 (karma: 0) Bodhi is unable to request this

[Bug 1544277] perl-Dist-Zilla-6.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544277 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-6.011-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1544287] perl-System-Info-0.057 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544287 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1544162] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.28-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See