updates in stable branches introducing new dependencies

Hello, does anyone else beside me think it's not OK to introduce new dependencies without any explanation in package updates released to stable Fedora branches? Arguably, the current stable updates policy is against this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases : [...]

Re: Unacceptable size increase to ALL live images in F28: Noto CJK Fonts

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:11:40AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > Failing all this should we drop the Serif fonts for Japanese and Korean - > > but it seems unfair to single them out? > > So just drop ALL the CJK Serif fonts, and also the monospace ones (CJK Sans >

Re: Unacceptable size increase to ALL live images in F28: Noto CJK Fonts

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > And IMHO the KDE and LXQt Spins should revert to shipping only > wqy-microhei-fonts and no other CJK fonts. They never promised CJK support > beyond "we can bring up SOME rendering for every character of the typical >

[Bug 1565384] New: perl-HTML-FormFu-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565384 Bug ID: 1565384 Summary: perl-HTML-FormFu-2.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-HTML-FormFu Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1565385] New: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-2.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565385 Bug ID: 1565385 Summary: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-2.03 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Unacceptable size increase to ALL live images in F28: Noto CJK Fonts

Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Failing all this should we drop the Serif fonts for Japanese and Korean - > but it seems unfair to single them out? So just drop ALL the CJK Serif fonts, and also the monospace ones (CJK Sans is essentially monospaced anyway), bringing us back to where we were in F26

[Bug 1564711] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564711 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1564711] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564711 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 139 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e64eeb6ece nagios-4.3.4-5.el7 17 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1fbdf7f103 chromium-65.0.3325.181-1.el7 11

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2018-04-10 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us on

[Bug 1564935] perl-version-0.9920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564935 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1564711] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564711 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1564929] perl-IO-Compress-2.081 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564929 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1564927] perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.081 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564927 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Fedora Rawhide-20180409.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 46/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 219058 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/219058 ID: 219062 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL:

[Bug 1564928] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.081 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1564476] perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564476 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180408.n.0 compose check report

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 18:05 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 46/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) A large chunk of the failures are down to a bug in the new qemu that showed up in Rawhide recently:

Fedora 28-20180409.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 219305 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/219305 ID: 219306 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e4e96fbf3f drupal7-7.58-1.el6 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b5d9f8f571 wordpress-4.9.5-1.el6 5

Re: Fedora28 / autofs

Ian here are 2 bugs autofs : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565293 nfs-utils : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565310 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Upcoming gdouros-*-fonts license change and subsequent complications

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-04-08 10:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit : >>> >>> Nothing is set in stone yet, but some >>> time soon he is going to upload a whole new license text (hopefully in >>> English), probably

Re: Sliming down kernel and provide more as modules

On 09/04/18 13:38 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On 09/04/18 13:01 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >> 8) If someone is using Linux working in VM or headless HW .. > > Actually a lot of VMs have mice mapped by default. > >> -CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y >> +CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=m >> >>

Re: DNSSEC, DoH, dnscrypt-proxy 1 vs 2

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:01:21AM +0200, Martin Sehnoutka wrote: > > > Restarted Firefox and then also the whole laptop. Doesn't work. But > > > then I'm in Fedora 28 so it may be a bug. Anyway, getting this to work > > > for me

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180409.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180407.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 120 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.36 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: Recommended way to pass CFLAGS/LDFLAGS through libtool

On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 11:15 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > True, if you need to preserve order you need to use -Wl, for each such > argument, e.g.: > > libdemo_la_LDFLAGS = -Xlinker --as-needed -Xlinker -lm -Xlinker > --no-as-needed -lvirt > > or: > > libdemo_la_LDFLAGS =

Re: Server SIG Weekly Meeting Minutes (2018-04-03)

> * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh, > 20:08:36) TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise server" that the Server SIG has targetted. >>> >>> But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server >>>

Re: Recommended way to pass CFLAGS/LDFLAGS through libtool

On 2018-04-09 05:21, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:21:54AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags >>> specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC

[Bug 1563208] perl-IO-Async-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563208 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- This makes the test to pass: diff --git a/t/50resolver.t b/t/50resolver.t index 7047b9d..587eb21 100644 --- a/t/50resolver.t +++ b/t/50resolver.t @@ -326,11 +326,13 @@ my $missinghost =

Re: Recommended way to pass CFLAGS/LDFLAGS through libtool

On 2018-04-09 04:40, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 04/09/2018 11:21 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags >>> specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler >>> driver sort

Re: Server SIG Weekly Meeting Minutes (2018-04-03)

On 8 April 2018 at 07:08, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> >>> > * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh, >>>

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180409.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 140 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

[Bug 1563208] perl-IO-Async-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563208 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar --- Running in local mock: # perl -Ilib t/50resolver.t ok 1 - '$loop->resolver' isa 'IO::Async::Resolver' ok 2 - '$future' isa 'Future' ok 3 - getpwuid from future ok 4 - getpwuid ok 5 -

[Bug 1563208] perl-IO-Async-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563208 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- The test tries to resolve TCP/localhost:www. Maybe the mock Koji is older and the newer local mock has broken /etc/hosts. Or it tries to resolve using /etc/resolv.conf that is properly

[Bug 1563430] perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563430 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.080-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1563431] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563431 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.080-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1563022] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563022 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.52-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1563208] perl-IO-Async-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563208 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Interesting. This builds in koji but not in mock. Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26265832 Mock: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/result/ -- You

Re: Sliming down kernel and provide more as modules (Was: Re: Fedora28 / autofs)

Have you actually tested any of these proposed changes before you come barging in, or even looked for history as to why they're like that? In reality you should send this, with them all separate, with reasons/justification why you believe they should be changed to the kernel list. > Just

Sliming down kernel and provide more as modules (Was: Re: Fedora28 / autofs)

On 9 April 2018 at 07:24, Peter Robinson wrote: [..] > It's also unrelated to this topic, it's (and I use it's, not they're, > as it's one driver) built in because it makes booting faster in the > general use case, it also makes debug and recovery easier when one of > the

[Bug 1563208] perl-IO-Async-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563208 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 04/08/18 17:49, Kevin Kofler wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: And we've circled back to the original post starting this thread. Note: intent to *orphan*, not intent to *retire*. If it is not going to be retired, then why would we want to kill python2-* subpackages throughout the distribution for

[Bug 1564801] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564801 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1565097 --- Comment

Re: Fw: fedmsg notification

On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 13:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: [...] > Finally the reason this has not been correctly announced is that we are still > investigating the capacity of the system and the pipeline to check if it can > handle the load of all the package in Fedora, but as said, the

Interviews on the Fedora Infrastructure Hackathon 2018

Hi all! This week, the Fedora Infrastructure team is convening for a Hackathon from April 9-13 at Fredericksburg, VA. The hackathon is intended to help the team leap ahead for several critical Fedora and CentOS initiatives. Dennis Otugo, a member of the CommOps team, interviewed members of the

Re: Fw: fedmsg notification

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:13:11AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > The body is not exactly meaningful either, and if you follow the > link you just get a mostly blank page. > > As best I can tell they are triggered by doing builds, but I seemed > to get three from two builds yesterday so it's not

Re: Unacceptable size increase to ALL live images in F28: Noto CJK Fonts

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Nicolas Mailhot < nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote: > Le vendredi 30 mars 2018 à 16:45 +0900, Akira TAGOH a écrit : > > The problem on this workaround is that we need an exception for > > packaging because the packaging guidelines mentions we must package > >

Re: Recommended way to pass CFLAGS/LDFLAGS through libtool

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:21:54AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags > > specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler > > driver sort out which flags to pass to

Re: Fw: fedmsg notification

The body is not exactly meaningful either, and if you follow the link you just get a mostly blank page. As best I can tell they are triggered by doing builds, but I seemed to get three from two builds yesterday so it's not exactly one-to-one but I still have no idea what they're about. Tom On

Re: Fw: fedmsg notification

I don't mind to receive such notification, but I would welcome if the subject was meaningful. V. Dne 8.4.2018 v 13:47 Michael Schwendt napsal(a): > Please make such a message flood opt-in by default instead of opt-out. > The communication about such new services and their purpose is extremely >

[Bug 1564935] perl-version-0.9920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564935 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-version-0.99.20-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-26891429de -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Recommended way to pass CFLAGS/LDFLAGS through libtool

On 04/09/2018 11:21 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote: Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler driver sort out which flags to pass to the compiler/assembler/linker?

Re: Recommended way to pass CFLAGS/LDFLAGS through libtool

On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote: > Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags > specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler > driver sort out which flags to pass to the compiler/assembler/linker? $ libtool --mode=compile --help [snip] This

[Bug 1564711] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564711 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4dfd3db01a -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1564711] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564711 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f6e5121860 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1564711] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564711 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f786087e06 -- You are receiving this

Re: Recommended way to pass CFLAGS/LDFLAGS through libtool

On 04/09/2018 10:59 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler driver sort out which flags to pass to the compiler/assembler/linker? Never mind, I found the old thread again:

Re: DNSSEC, DoH, dnscrypt-proxy 1 vs 2

On 09/04/18 09:54, Matthias Runge wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:01:21AM +0200, Martin Sehnoutka wrote: Restarted Firefox and then also the whole laptop. Doesn't work. But then I'm in Fedora 28 so it may be a bug. Anyway, getting this to work for me isn't really the point of the thread. I'm

[Bug 1564711] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564711 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1564929] perl-IO-Compress-2.081 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564929 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IO-Compress-2.081-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-191ce06280 -- You are receiving this

Recommended way to pass CFLAGS/LDFLAGS through libtool

Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler driver sort out which flags to pass to the compiler/assembler/linker? Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list --

Re: DNSSEC, DoH, dnscrypt-proxy 1 vs 2

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:01:21AM +0200, Martin Sehnoutka wrote: > > Restarted Firefox and then also the whole laptop. Doesn't work. But > > then I'm in Fedora 28 so it may be a bug. Anyway, getting this to work > > for me isn't really the point of the thread. I'm wondering about > > something

[Bug 1564306] perl-App-Cme-1.027 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564306 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1564929] perl-IO-Compress-2.081 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564929 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

Re: Upcoming gdouros-*-fonts license change and subsequent complications

Le 2018-04-08 10:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit : Nothing is set in stone yet, but some time soon he is going to upload a whole new license text (hopefully in English), probably something custom-made. Try to point it to the OFL and its FAQ, it has been created exactly for this

[Bug 1564935] perl-version-0.9920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564935 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Re: Upcoming gdouros-*-fonts license change and subsequent complications

Le 2018-04-08 14:55, Alexander Ploumistos a écrit : My concern is if he can retroactively apply the new license to the older versions of the fonts. Is this a valid concern or is it not how licensing works? Legally, he can’t. We can ship existing fonts forever, however having an hostile

Re: DNSSEC, DoH, dnscrypt-proxy 1 vs 2

On 04/09/2018 02:07 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: >> On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 00:52, Chris Murphy wrote: >> [...] >>> [chris@f28h ~]$ dnssec-trigger-control status >>> at 2018-04-08 16:46:45 >>> cache

Re: release-monitoring is telling me it has noticed (new) ceph-13.0.x

Le 2018-04-05 17:00, Tom Hughes a écrit : On 05/04/18 15:50, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: according to https://release-monitoring.org/project/267/ But the Homepage: in the above and the Source: in the .spec would seem to be saying that http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ is where the-new-hotness

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180409.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1564476] perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564476 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.47-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0706575899 -- You are receiving this

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 12:55:04AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > ZJ> Please don't. This is a repeat of the original idea of having > ZJ> separate python3 packages back when python3 was being > ZJ> introduced. > > It

[Bug 1564476] perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564476 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED ---

[Bug 1564927] perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.081 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564927 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.081-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1d529d -- You are receiving

[Bug 1564928] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.081 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564928 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

[Bug 1564927] perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.081 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564927 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

Re: Upcoming gdouros-*-fonts license change and subsequent complications

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 11:58:29PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > >> My concern is if he can retroactively apply the new

Re: Fedora28 / autofs

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 6 April 2018 at 22:58, Pierre-Francois RENARD wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs. > > BTW autofs: is it any particular reason why in Fedora kernels autofs >