[Bug 1567776] CVE-2018-6913 perl: heap buffer overflow in pp_pack.c [ fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567776 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-404.fc27, perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180414-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in

[Bug 1567778] CVE-2018-6797 perl: heap write overflow in regcomp.c [ fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567778 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-404.fc27, perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180414-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in

[Bug 1567777] CVE-2018-6798 perl: heap read overflow in regexec.c [ fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=156 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-404.fc27, perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180414-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in

[Bug 1567564] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567564 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.54-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1567777] CVE-2018-6798 perl: heap read overflow in regexec.c [ fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=156 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1567778] CVE-2018-6797 perl: heap write overflow in regcomp.c [ fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567778 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1567776] CVE-2018-6913 perl: heap buffer overflow in pp_pack.c [ fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567776 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1567564] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567564 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.54-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: starting services in fedora

On 17 April 2018 at 19:42, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: >>> On 04/17/2018 12:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>>

[Bug 1562410] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562410 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1568642] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.057 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568642 Bug ID: 1568642 Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.057 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1568634] New: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999812 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568634 Bug ID: 1568634 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999812 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-BigInt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1568637] New: perl-Math-BigRat-0.2614 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568637 Bug ID: 1568637 Summary: perl-Math-BigRat-0.2614 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-BigRat Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1568636] New: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568636 Bug ID: 1568636 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6005 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1568635] New: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568635 Bug ID: 1568635 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1567450] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567450 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1568631] New: perl-bignum-0.50 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568631 Bug ID: 1568631 Summary: perl-bignum-0.50 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-bignum Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Fedora Rawhide-20180417.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 38/137 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180416.n.0): ID: 224543 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/224543 ID: 224665 Test:

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> On 04/17/2018 12:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> >tl;dr: the proposal is to start services immediately during >> >installation (in

Fedora 28 Final blocker status mail #1

Hi folks! As we're now frozen for Final, here's an update on blocker bug status. tl;dr action summary Accepted blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566621 ACTION: anaconda team to submit build/update with fix, QA to test 2.

Fedora 28-20180417.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/137 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 28-20180416.n.0): ID: 224802 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/224802 ID: 224844 Test: i386

Re: starting services in fedora

On 04/17/2018 01:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Samuel Sieb wrote: I would assume that services that require configuration before being useful would not be enabled by default. I thing this is a mistaken assumption, and that we are moving into matters of sysadmin taste The

Re: non responsive maintainer - package python-flask-login

On 04/17/2018 07:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 16:16 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Is there some reason that you couldn't mention who the package maintainer is? Both Richard Marko (rmarko) and Jan Kaluža (jkaluza) are listed as maintainers that package. Also, I

Re: non responsive maintainer - package python-flask-login

On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 16:16 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Is there some reason that you couldn't mention who the package > maintainer is? > > Both Richard Marko (rmarko) and Jan Kaluža (jkaluza) are listed as > maintainers that package. Also, I don't think you (Itamar) have fully followed

Re: non responsive maintainer - package python-flask-login

Is there some reason that you couldn't mention who the package maintainer is? Both Richard Marko (rmarko) and Jan Kaluža (jkaluza) are listed as maintainers that package. - J< ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

non responsive maintainer - package python-flask-login

I filled a bug report and then a pull request I have been waiting for 2 months, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-login/pull-requests I am sending this mail and then filling a non-responsive ticket against the package owner. ___ devel

Re: Fedora 28-20180416.n.0 compose check report

On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 14:18 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 05:06:20PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > That's a vital dependency for GNOME - gnome-settings-daemon, gnome- > > session, mutter, nautilus, control-center etc. all depend on it. > > [...] > > So thanks to good

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > The use case is that for simple packages, it's simpler for the user > if the service is available immediately. My initial example with gpm > is actually good here: do "sudo dnf install -y gpm", move mouse, voilà. > Also the case from

How do I run the standard test interface tests with docker?

I'm trying to follow the following guide: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/Tests#Wrapping Let's say I've done the following: $ fedpkgclone gzip $ cd gzip/tests/ Now I want to run the tests in Docker. The guide says: > Try running this example test against an Atomic Host or Docker

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > i could puke everytime something is pulled as dependency and started > > without any use > > Can you give an example of such services? The first is a list of 'sbin' processes running from that machine being probed The second are

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:01:04PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:41:15PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > > > To make this work, we could either require that maintainers of A add > > Requires(post): B, or delay

starting services in fedora

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Services which are subject the guidelines allow to be enabled by > default should be such that starting them briefly should not cause > any permanent effects. Some 'real world' data, from a unit that was deployed this morning at

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Services which are subject the guidelines allow to be > enabled by default should be such that starting them briefly > should not cause any permanent effects. 'should not' is not true to fact in the real world I mentioned we inject a

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Samuel Sieb wrote: > I would assume that services that require configuration > before being useful would not be enabled by default. I thing this is a mistaken assumption, and that we are moving into matters of sysadmin taste The SSHD is enabled by default, and likely to

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 08:58:06PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 17.04.2018 um 20:53 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > >> On 04/17/2018 12:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>> tl;dr: the proposal is to start

[EPEL-devel] Re: Nagios "disabled" at startup, after recent update

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > We have been getting a couple of reports of this, but I have not been > able to duplicate it on my test systems. bug numbers? As I said in my earlier post, there was a new strictness in the nagios parser, and I needed to tighten things up in

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:41:15PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > To make this work, we could either require that maintainers of A add > Requires(post): B, or delay the starting of services until the end > of the transaction, using a

Re: starting services in fedora

On 04/17/2018 12:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: b) services that have assumed our current behavior and are not useful, or are even insecure when started by default. I would assume that services that require configuration before being useful would not be enabled by default.

Re: starting services in fedora

On 04/16/2018 10:41 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm a bit surprised that there's no reply to this fairly explosive > idea. Maybe Nikos' text is too long, so let me summarize: Well, I marked it to reply to, but just hadn't gotten to it yet. ;) Not everyone can immediately

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:41:15PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > That said, maybe Fedora's service preset files these days are > > > carefully enough written and already formalize such deliberation? > > > > Pfff. Yes they are. See >

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

So is someone else is going to do the checking if the reverse dependencies work with the new version or do I have to do that? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links:

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 04/17/2018 12:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >tl;dr: the proposal is to start services immediately during > >installation (in %post), iff they are enabled in presets and the > >system is live (not a chroot or such). > >

Re: Fedora 28-20180416.n.0 compose check report

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 05:06:20PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > That's a vital dependency for GNOME - gnome-settings-daemon, gnome- > session, mutter, nautilus, control-center etc. all depend on it. [...] > So thanks to good old: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427365 > we get

[Bug 1560908] perl-Git-Repository-1.321-2.fc29 FTBFS: Failed test ' ... expected error message': doesn't match '(?^:^fatal: Not a git repository)'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560908 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Re: Nagios "disabled" at startup, after recent update

On 17 April 2018 at 11:32, Neil MacGregor wrote: > Hi folks, we are giant fans of your work! Here's an idea on how to make it > better. > > We received an update to Nagios on Friday, last week: > [root@albion ~]# rpm -q --last nagios > nagios-4.3.4-5.el7.x86_64

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-04-18 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks and problems needed to keep EPEL

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180417.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180416.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180417.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 235 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 29.01 MiB Size of dropped packages:11.53 MiB

Re: updates in stable branches introducing new dependencies

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 07:36:34AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > I filed a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564699 > but the maintainer refused to even comment on the merits and closed > it without any reasonable explanation. I find his response not >

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > That said, maybe Fedora's service preset files these days are > > carefully enough written and already formalize such deliberation? > > Pfff. Yes they are. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices. Is packager

Re: starting services in fedora

On 04/17/2018 12:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: tl;dr: the proposal is to start services immediately during installation (in %post), iff they are enabled in presets and the system is live (not a chroot or such). This would mean that e.g. after 'dnf install gpm' gpm would be running

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: java-openjdk 10 - rolling release for Short Term Support releases of OpenJDK

On 04/17/2018 05:38 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 04/15/2018 11:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Note - page was updated for what you asked. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/java-openjdk-10 Dont hesitate toask for more :) TY! J. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:58:56PM +0200, Jan

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: java-openjdk 10 - rolling release for Short Term Support releases of OpenJDK

On 04/15/2018 11:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:58:56PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: This is a late proposal for F28 release, mostly to spread awareness of the availability of java-openjdk 10 in Fedora. It is not closely tied to the F28 release however it would

[EPEL-devel] Nagios "disabled" at startup, after recent update

Hi folks, we are giant fans of your work! Here's an idea on how to make it better. We received an update to Nagios on Friday, last week: [root@albion ~]# rpm -q --last nagios nagios-4.3.4-5.el7.x86_64 Fri 13 Apr 2018 04:21:00 AM MDT After a reboot, Nagios didn't

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Issue 49109 - nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo should accept StartTLS as an option

The LDAP+StartTLS was changed back to StartTLS by Mark suggestions and I support his commentary. https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49613#comment-50699 Please, check once again if everything is okay. Thanks! Simon On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:38:51AM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote: > On Wed,

[Modularity] Working Group IRC meeting minutes (2018-04-17)

= #fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two weeks) = Meeting started by nils at 14:00:00 UTC.

[Bug 1560908] perl-Git-Repository-1.321-2.fc29 FTBFS: Failed test ' ... expected error message': doesn't match '(?^:^fatal: Not a git repository)'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560908 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Git-Repository-1.321-3.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-63db4756a6 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1560908] perl-Git-Repository-1.321-2.fc29 FTBFS: Failed test ' ... expected error message': doesn't match '(?^:^fatal: Not a git repository)'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560908 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1568433] perl-Config-Model-2.120-1.fc29 FTBFS: tests fail with Config-Model-Tester-3.006

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568433 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This has been fixed by upstream in 2.121 release with commit. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1568433] New: perl-Config-Model-2.120-1.fc29 FTBFS: tests fail with Config-Model-Tester-3.006

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568433 Bug ID: 1568433 Summary: perl-Config-Model-2.120-1.fc29 FTBFS: tests fail with Config-Model-Tester-3.006 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-Model

Re: starting services in fedora

Dne 17.4.2018 v 09:23 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > Actually we do. If systemd is running and dnf is installing packages > into the same root from which it is running, it's a live system. Hmm, this will work for Mock. Thou I am not sure about others environments. Miroslav

Re: git clone ... Permission denied

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Normand wrote: > Since today, I have a problem accessing the openqa git tree from pagure. > I do not understand what I am doing wrong. > > any suggestion ? > > === > $git clone -v

OpenIPMI in rawhide now use Python3

Hi folks, upstream authors has released new version of OpenIPMI (2.0.25) with incomplete Python3 support. I have decided to finish their work and replace python2-openipmi package by python3-openipmi package. python2-openipmi will be marked as obsolete. This change will be applied in Fedora

[Bug 1568409] perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-2.02-3.fc29 FTBFS: Can' t locate MooseX/Attribute/FormFuChained.pm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568409 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 125102 -- You

[Bug 1568409] New: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-2.02-3.fc29 FTBFS: Can't locate MooseX/Attribute/FormFuChained.pm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568409 Bug ID: 1568409 Summary: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-2.02-3.fc29 FTBFS: Can't locate MooseX/Attribute/FormFuChained.pm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

git clone ... Permission denied

Since today, I have a problem accessing the openqa git tree from pagure. I do not understand what I am doing wrong. any suggestion ? === $git clone -v https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora.git Cloning into 'os-autoinst-distri-fedora'... fatal: unable to access

[Bug 1562274] perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2018.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562274 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1568391] New: perl-Config-AutoConf-0.316 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568391 Bug ID: 1568391 Summary: perl-Config-AutoConf-0.316 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-AutoConf Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

SuperLU update

Hello everyone. SuperLU update to 5.2.1 release is expected within next days (7 at least) on rawhide; dependent packages shouldn't have problems when rebuilt against SuperLU-5.2.1. Please, test your own software before and point out potential issue. Rebuilds tested on Copr:

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > You mean systemctl can talk to a systemd via > /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket. Ok. IIRC, systemctl detects that it is running in chrooted environment (i.e. system isn't "live") by looking at inode number of /. If the

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:44:45AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 17.04.18 05:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm a bit surprised that there's no reply to this fairly explosive > > idea. Maybe Nikos' text is too long, so let me

Re: starting services in fedora

On 2018-04-17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 08:30:59AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 17.4.2018 v 07:46 Petr Pisar napsal(a): >> > Maybe nobody knows how to determine a system is live. >> >> +1 > > Actually we do. If systemd is running You

[Bug 1547772] CVE-2018-6913 perl: heap buffer overflow in pp_pack.c

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547772 --- Comment #18 from Cedric Buissart --- Acknowledgments: Name: Sawyer X (Perl 5 Porters) Upstream: GwanYeong Kim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1547783] CVE-2018-6797 perl: heap write overflow in regcomp.c

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547783 --- Comment #13 from Cedric Buissart --- Acknowledgments: Name: Sawyer X (Perl 5 Porters) Upstream: Brian Carpenter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1547779] CVE-2018-6798 perl: heap read overflow in regexec.c

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547779 --- Comment #17 from Cedric Buissart --- Acknowledgments: Name: Sawyer X (Perl 5 Porters) Upstream: Nguyen Duc Manh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: starting services in fedora

On Di, 17.04.18 05:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm a bit surprised that there's no reply to this fairly explosive > idea. Maybe Nikos' text is too long, so let me summarize: > > tl;dr: the proposal is to start services immediately during >

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180417.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 05:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On 2018-04-17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > I'm a bit surprised that there's no reply to this fairly explosive > > > idea. Maybe Nikos' text is

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 05:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-04-17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I'm a bit surprised that there's no reply to this fairly explosive > > idea. Maybe Nikos' text is too long, so let me summarize: > > > > tl;dr: the proposal is to start

Re: starting services in fedora

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 08:30:59AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 17.4.2018 v 07:46 Petr Pisar napsal(a): > > Maybe nobody knows how to determine a system is live. > > +1 Actually we do. If systemd is running and dnf is installing packages into the same root from which it is running, it's a

Re: starting services in fedora

Dne 17.4.2018 v 07:46 Petr Pisar napsal(a): > Maybe nobody knows how to determine a system is live. +1 Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org