Re: Orphaning some Java packages

* Mikolaj Izdebski [24/09/2018 21:39] : > > Java SIG is dying slowly, this package set recently lost another > co-maintainer and I don't have time to maintain all these packages by > myself. Is there anyway to recruit new members? I've been told that Mageia's Java stack is a recompilation of

Re: [HEADS UP] Meson 0.48.0

Il giorno mer 26 set 2018 alle 9:54, Kalev Lember ha scritto: On 09/25/2018 08:43 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hello folks, new meson release is out (release notes ) which removes tools which are deprecated for quite long time: *

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Modules with their API specifications at least make it more clear what > are expectations about packages. Something user may consider essential > is only a build dependency for a packager and the packages won't receive > enough attention from the maintainer. As I wrote

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:34:33 -0400, you wrote: >On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:39 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> >> Java SIG is dying slowly, this package set recently lost another >> co-maintainer and I don't have time to maintain all these packages by >> myself. Switching to module-only content is

Re: Running a test from dist-git

On 27.9.2018 23:30, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: As directed by: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/Tests I tried to add a test to libguestfs dist-git: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libguestfs/blob/master/f/tests/tests.yml It's very simple initially. It just needs to run

Running a test from dist-git

As directed by: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/Tests I tried to add a test to libguestfs dist-git: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libguestfs/blob/master/f/tests/tests.yml It's very simple initially. It just needs to run ‘libguestfs-test-tool’ (a program installed by the libguestfs

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 13:40 +, Máirín Duffy wrote: > So this destroy and re-create philosophy is very counter to my past > development practices :( Does Vagrant have anything built in to set > it up with an Ansible playbook? It does have a hook to call into Ansible. Here's how I do that in my

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

On 09/26/2018 08:01 AM, Raphael Groner wrote: >>> Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >>> >>> This is exactly what I feared when the modules were first proposed: >>> essential packages moving to modules only. >>> >>> I think this is absolutely a step in the wrong direction. Things like "ant" >>> are

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

* Adam Williamson: > I don't think we ship anything that is exactly a *disk image* for this > kind of non-cloud, non-Atomic, minimal, probably-virtual deployment, > aside from the ones intended for vagrant use. At least not for x86_64. > I suppose I'd tend to use virt-install or just install from

fedora-tagger and statscache sunset

Dear all, As previously announced [0][1] fedora-tagger and statscache will be retired next Tuesday Oct 02 2018 at 21.00 UTC. Thanks [0] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RY23KIVRXFVXMTGMXNDV4D7NXM2V2NUJ/ [1] -

fedora-tagger and statscache sunset

Dear all, As previously announced [0][1] fedora-tagger and statscache will be retired next Tuesday Oct 02 2018 at 21.00 UTC. Thanks [0] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RY23KIVRXFVXMTGMXNDV4D7NXM2V2NUJ/ [1] -

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

On 09/26/2018 04:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> I'm in the process of transitioning maintenance of all software to >> modules only. The reason is that module maintenance is much easier >> compared to maintenance of non-modular, "ursine" packages. Starting from >> Fedora 29

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

On 09/24/2018 11:25 PM, Ben Rosser wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> On 09/24/2018 08:52 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> On 24.9.2018 19:09, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: I'm in the process of transitioning maintenance of all software to modules only. The reason

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 13:29 +, Máirín Duffy wrote: > I'm willing to put some skin in the game but it's unclear to me how > we'd lay things out. > > Is anybody interested in meeting up about this and talking through > it? I think the website / positioning / docs type stuff is > addressable,

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

On 09/27/2018 04:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:39 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> >> Java SIG is dying slowly, this package set recently lost another >> co-maintainer and I don't have time to maintain all these packages by >> myself. Switching to module-only content is

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-4.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1630391] expose SSL_CTX_set_post_handshake_auth

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630391 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1629618] perl-perlfaq-5.20180915 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629618 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-perlfaq-5.20180915-1.f |perl-perlfaq-5.20180915-1.f

[Bug 1629618] perl-perlfaq-5.20180915 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629618 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-perlfaq-5.20180915-1.f |perl-perlfaq-5.20180915-1.f

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

On 09/24/2018 08:32 PM, Christopher wrote: > I have a question about this because I don't fully understand modularity. > If these packages are retired, how will maintainers get them installed from > their respective modules in order to build their own packages, and how will > users get the

[Bug 1629618] perl-perlfaq-5.20180915 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629618 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:29:59PM -, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Is anybody interested in meeting up about this and talking through it? I > think the website / positioning / docs type stuff is addressable, but the > big challenge here is figuring out the strategy we want. > > For example - who is

Re: 3 days vs 7 days

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22.9.2018 22:47, Jerry James wrote: > > Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it > > be requiring 3 days at this point? > > > I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7741 ~3 weeks ago, but I've > got no

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:35 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora > Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement went out a > little late and then only due to a drop-everything effort (thanks, > stickster!). We have a proposal to add

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:07:55AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > I'd rather not put it in place, but it's the best option I see for > addressing the symptoms. It would be better to fix the upstream > problem: Marketing not getting enough input on the talking points. I'm > not sure what the solution

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:09 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:52 AM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:17:18AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > rubygem-rails (which already exists and has its purpose no matter if > > > there are comps or not) via

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:29:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > The readiness meeting is only run *once* - if we slip at the first > go/no-go, we don't run another readiness meeting after the second one. > (I don't know why that is, though.) Huh. That seems like maybe the problem. Readiness

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:39 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > Java SIG is dying slowly, this package set recently lost another > co-maintainer and I don't have time to maintain all these packages by > myself. Switching to module-only content is probably the best move to > keep high-quality software

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:41 PM Máirín Duffy wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 11:04 +, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > Even though I do this, I find it helpful to be able to completely > > destroy the VM and re-create it, knowing that all the information to > > re-create it is in git (via the

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:38 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:35:09PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora > > Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement went out a > > little late and then only due to a

Re: [HEADS UP] Meson 0.48.0

On 09/25/2018 08:43 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hello folks, new meson release is out (release notes ) which removes tools which are deprecated for quite long time: * mesonconf * mesonintrospect * mesontest * wraptool I will push it now for

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:11 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > That used to be true, but with Recommends these days, it's considerably > > less so. > > Not really, because of: > https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/issues/168 > (which libsolv upstream sadly does not consider

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180926.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-29-20180923.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20180926.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 26 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 468.96 KiB Size of dropped packages:304.24 KiB

[Bug 1624942] perl-File-Path-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Path-2.16-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: F29 Self-Contained Change: GnuTLS enables TLS 1.3 by default

On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 22:32 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:06 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > This change enables TLS 1.3 (draft28) support on the gnutls crypto > > library. > > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > > That change should have no impact on upgrade or

Re: Plans for Matplotlib 3.0+

On 26.9.2018 00:52, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 05:11, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 29.8.2018 10:56, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29.8.2018 05:38, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 18:42, Miro Hrončok

[Bug 1632767] perl-Text-Bidi-2.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632767 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Bidi-2.15-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-89672e0f8a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 16:54 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 14:44, Brian (bex) Exelbierd > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:25 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > On 09/25/2018 01:35 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > With today's Beta release, the release announcement

[Bug 1628550] perl-BSON-v1.8.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628550 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-BSON-1.8.0-1.fc30 |perl-BSON-1.8.0-1.fc30

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

Dne 26.9.2018 v 18:35 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 08:17 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 24.9.2018 v 19:32 Adam Williamson napsal(a): >>> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 12:21 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Just FTR, some while ago, I proposed to drop comps entirely:

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 14:18 +, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Hi fedora-devel, > > This morning I set out to set up a VM for web development for a project I've > been working on so I could access my development environment from multiple > locations / workstations without having to set it up again

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 errata-xmlrpc changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Red Hat Product Errata

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

If you these two steps from documentation: https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tools/vagrant/vagrant-atlas.html the vagrant box appears in virt-manager as another machine. The name of the machine will be derived from the directory name where the Vagrant file is located. Of course it is not

[Bug 1628413] ctstream-29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628413 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-29-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-09-27 16:00 UTC)

  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-09-27 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.   Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-09-27 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 11:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 11:15 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Metapackages have other issues too. They make it difficult to consume > > part of a group. You either have to have everything or nothing. With > > comps groups you can install a

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180923.0

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:43 PM Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:49 PM wrote: > > > > > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > > > Version: 28.20180923.0 > > Commit(x86_64): > 8b82902a0ca203645e9e288b8a0bbf9fe525749ec67cd674e6715daa64e5b7dd >

Re: Python Classroom spin dep issue: scanning

On 26.9.2018 02:41, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, Miro! Hi Adam. CCing Python Devel, so others can hop in the discussion. The Python Classroom spin images no longer build in recent Rawhide, because of a dnf behaviour change that exposes dependency issues as failures rather than hiding them by

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 06:33:28PM -0300, Eduard Lucena wrote: > Basically, the issue on the announcement is that is tight to the Talking > Points, and almost any team is helping us with that. The Marketing task is > to collect the Talking Points, not to create them, because we aren't the > people

Re: [HEADS UP] Meson 0.48.0

On 26.9.2018 00:15, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:43 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hello folks, new meson release is out (release notes) which removes tools which are deprecated for quite long time: * mesonconf * mesonintrospect * mesontest * wraptool I will push it now for

[Bug 1632347] perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.74 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632347 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1632349] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632349 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:38 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > Isn't this supposed to be the point of the release-readiness meeting that > follows go/no-go? > Sort of. The Release Readiness meeting is more informative than decision-making. And historically, we've only held it once. Eduard did bring up

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 17:25 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > If we think Vagrant is better for this kind of work, we should be > actively looking at producing vagrant images instead. I recommended it because we do produce Vagrant images. From the example Vagrantfile I posted:

Re: python2-matplotlib needs a maintainer (was: matplotlib 3 (no Python 2 support) in rawhide)

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:15 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21.9.2018 12:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > We updated python-matplotlib to 3.0.0. It only supports Python 3. This > > was done in Rawhide only. > > > > The python2-matplotlib* subpackages were moved to a new SRPM, > > python2-matplotlib

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:52 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:17:18AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > rubygem-rails (which already exists and has its purpose no matter if > > there are comps or not) via Suggests for example. The only issue AFAIK > > is there is no real

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 23:38 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > We IMHO produce images for vagrant and we document vagrant at the > developer portal: > > https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tools/vagrant/about.html >

[EPEL-devel] New limited arch package "libssh"

Hello all, as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Limited_Arch_Packages I would like to notify you about my intention to add the libssh package to EPEL 7 to cover aarch64, ppc64 and ppc64le architectures, which are not covered with that package by RHEL 7 (RHEL 7 currently just

[Bug 1632660] TLSv1.3 - enable post-handshake auth

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632660 --- Comment #1 from Joe Orton --- Patch should be conditional on Net::SSLeay exposing Net::SSLeay::CTX_set_post_handshake_auth which is done in f29 per bug 1630391, not sure how best to do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: qpdf soname bump in rawhide to 21.2.1

Hi, On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 09:52, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi, > > qpdf got new version and I would like to rebase our rawhide version, but > two packages will need to be rebuilt, because they depends on libqpdf > library. > I'm confused; there does not appear to be a soname bump: $ rpm -q

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 16:28 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 06:05:16AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Some of the group stuff is also used during the compose and if things > > aren't in groups specified but needed by say a kickstart the packages > > won't be in certain

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2018-09-26 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 --- Comment #14 from errata-xmlrpc --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Via RHSA-2018:2737 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2737 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1624942] perl-File-Path-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Path-2.16-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1632763] New: perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator-1.117 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632763 Bug ID: 1632763 Summary: perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator-1.117 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 18:37 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:35:09PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora > > Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement went out a > > little late and then only due to a

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

I have a question about this because I don't fully understand modularity. If these packages are retired, how will maintainers get them installed from their respective modules in order to build their own packages, and how will users get the appropriate modules installed to satisfy dependencies? Or

[Bug 1632767] perl-Text-Bidi-2.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632767 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 Tomas Hoger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

On 24.9.2018 19:09, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: I'm in the process of transitioning maintenance of all software to modules only. The reason is that module maintenance is much easier compared to maintenance of non-modular, "ursine" packages. Ideally these packages should be retired instead of

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

> On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 11:04 +, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Even though I do this, I find it helpful to be able to completely > destroy the VM and re-create it, knowing that all the information to > re-create it is in git (via the Vagrantfile + Ansible playbook). Before > I used it, I would lose

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-3.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-108cafe155 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-4.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8217a06c3a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

Hi Alex, this is great. Thanks for pointing me at it! Cheers, ~m ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

I'm willing to put some skin in the game but it's unclear to me how we'd lay things out. Is anybody interested in meeting up about this and talking through it? I think the website / positioning / docs type stuff is addressable, but the big challenge here is figuring out the strategy we want.

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:36 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 08:17 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 24.9.2018 v 19:32 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > > On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 12:21 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Just FTR, some while ago, I proposed to drop comps

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 errata-xmlrpc changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Red Hat Product Errata

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 --- Comment #16 from errata-xmlrpc --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.7 EUS Red Hat

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 --- Comment #15 from errata-xmlrpc --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 EUS Red Hat

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 errata-xmlrpc changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Red Hat Product Errata