On 14.07.2017 19:36, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:27 PM Matthew Miller 05:05:23PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>
>>
>>> How about reliable online updates of running applications as a
>>> benefit?
>>
>> AND the ability to roll back, to choose beta or stable streams, etc.
>>
>
On 21.12.2015 08:23, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 21/12/15 01:36, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> I'm currently looking into using npm v3 with nodejs v4. The problem I've
>> run into is that npm is apparently part of the main nodejs package which
>> effectively joins them at
Hi,
I'm currently looking into using npm v3 with nodejs v4. The problem I've
run into is that npm is apparently part of the main nodejs package which
effectively joins them at the hip for no apparent good reason.
Upstream ships npm with nodejs because they need npm to bootstrap the
environment
Hi,
I'm currently looking into creating an RPM for influxdb 0.9 but have run
into a problem when it comes to the %install step in the spec file.
I created RPMs for all dependencies which are installed at
/usr/share/gocode/src and these are found and influxdb builds fine
however once the "go
On 12.06.2015 15:25, Radek Holy wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:09:50 PM
Subject: Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having
On 21.05.2015 20:08, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
A year ago, I started working on a new storage library for low-level
operations with various types of block devices -- *libblockdev*. Today,
I'm happy to announce that the library reached the **1.0** milestone
which means that it covers all the
On 28.03.2015 04:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:34:35AM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Following on from
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.kernel/5549
Has there been any more consideration for enabling this by default?
It's the default in F22+:
On 20.06.2014 14:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Tim Lauridsen:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
mailto:den...@ausil.us wrote:
In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do dnf clean metadata dnf
update purely because I found most
On 23.03.2014 03:45, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
One example is the policy that patches for packages should first be
submitted and accepted upstream before they make it into Fedora.
That policy is only a non-normative guideline (not part of any enforced
Fedora Guidelines
On 21.03.2014 13:24, Christian Schaller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 12:59:01 PM
Subject: Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate,
On 21.01.2014 08:30, Colin Walters wrote:
Hi Dennis,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:40 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting. I've downloaded the VM Image and tried to understand the
setup.
Some bits are documented here
https://people.gnome.org/~walters/ostree/doc/layout.html
On 21.01.2014 20:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:40:00AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting. I've downloaded the VM Image and tried to understand
the setup. Apparently there exist sort of two root trees / and
/sysroot in the system with some links targeting
On 20.01.2014 19:03, Colin Walters wrote:
Hello devel@,
I'm excited to announce the first public release (v2014.3) of the
fedostree/rpm-ostree project.
The web page is here:
http://rpm-ostree.cloud.fedoraproject.org/#/
rpm-ostree is a quite new, raw, and also quite unofficial project (the
On 27.09.2013 20:59, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:55:43AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
I still can't choose a Desired Capacity that's larger than free space
in the VG. Ergo, I can't create a virtual size LV. Is this expected?
At this stage, yes. It might change in
On 08.09.2013 01:42, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:45:03PM +0200, Łukasz Jagiełło wrote:
2013/9/5 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de
Working fine here.
#v+
[root@p0x ~]# uname -a
Linux p0x 3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 29 19:05:45 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64
Hi,
i seems something in Kernel 3.10 broke the intel display driver for the
Dell XPS 13 (a.k.a. Sputnik). I filed a bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995782
Sombody commented in the bug that since it's hard to find other reports
of this elsewhere this might be related to
On 05.09.2013 16:32, Łukasz Jagiełło wrote:
2013/9/5 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de
mailto:denni...@conversis.de
Hi,
i seems something in Kernel 3.10 broke the intel display driver for
the Dell XPS 13 (a.k.a. Sputnik). I filed a bug here:
https
On 27.07.2013 05:07, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jul 26, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com wrote:
On 07/26/2013 09:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello all,
with thin provisioning available, the total and free space values
reported by a filesystem do not necessarily mean that that
On 02/15/2013 04:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to get involved as downstream
maintainers in Fedora as well. They did offer to do that but don't seem
to have stepped up yet.
I really don't see what we have to gain from having 2
On 01/31/2013 05:30 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/31/2013 04:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I don't see how a distribution default would make any sense.
I guess that's as senseless to you as it is for me fesco decision of make
mariadb to be preferred default is to me...
Fedora doesn't
On 01/23/2013 04:25 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Features/Ryu =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ryu
Feature owner(s): Isaku Yamahata yamahata at private.email.ne.jp
Ryu Network Operating System http://www.osrg.net/ryu/
== Detailed description ==
Ryu is an Operating System for
On 11/13/2012 05:28 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 11/13/2012 03:46 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 02:28:17PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Here, I mostly don't see the reason for it to be running all the time.
Couldn't it be dbus activated, and then go away when it's not needed?
On 11/12/2012 06:03 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:37 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
I think ssh has to be in the mix. Of ths
On 10/08/2012 09:48 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18.
10gen has a very good track record for being backwards compatible.
According
On 08/30/2012 08:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Olaf Kirch (o...@suse.de) said:
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Your feedback is very much welcome!
The network
On 07/13/2012 09:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 07/12/2012 09:54 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Again.. tmpfs is restricted to half the RAM size by default. You can't
store 8-9GB of trash.. only 2GB, which might land on swap over time.
As I have already pointed out some time ago, isn't a bizarre
On 06/19/2012 08:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:12:06PM -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
F18 is already using grub2 for EFI. I think we can remove grub-legacy
now.
What about the Fedora images
On 04/02/2012 09:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2012/3/27 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I assume that that mod_access_compat module only requires a few bytes, so I
don't see why it should not be loaded by default forever (or at least as
On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
[..]
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other
modules that add support for the
On 03/26/2012 10:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2012/3/26 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
The following is going to kill pretty much every packaged webapp unless they
are changed now:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html#access
IMHO mod_access_compat should be
On 03/27/2012 03:54 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
I disagree. Since this is a major update that gets introduced together with
a new Fedora version this opportunity should be used to make switches like
On 12/21/2011 06:52 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/21/2011 05:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
Well, hold on. Both the proprietary JDK and OpenJDK meet the
specification, and we try
On 12/20/2011 05:48 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
Actually that's not entirely correct. They're removing the Sun Java
closed source variant due to changes in licensing from Oracle
preventing them from shipping security fixes. They also ship OpenJDK
which is the open source
On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to
On 06/21/2011 12:45 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.06.2011 07:23, schrieb Alexander Kurtakov:
I wonder how could someone would put a deadline on volunteers?
You can't :)
oh in the thread Packages that will be orphaned you can?
Yes, because if the deadline passes then the packages will be
On 06/17/2011 01:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:48:14PM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 12:20 +0200, Henrik Wejdmark wrote:
Since you recommend not using the application menu, in other words,
you agree that the application menu is useless?
It
On 03/24/2011 04:36 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:36:33 -0400
Genes MailListsli...@sapience.com wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository on
On 03/24/2011 07:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
On 02/27/2011 03:55 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Fonts or whatever don't seem to be as nice or full looking as other
releases (F14 or below).
Yes the font rendering makes applications look significantly more ugly then
under F14. That was the first thing I noticed after starting Firefox.
When in
On 02/27/2011 06:36 PM, drago01 wrote:
I used to be able to hover my mouse over the time and at least it would
tell me the date instead of having to click on it just to see it.
I think the general problem here is that with the advent of tablet and
other touchscreen driven devices the whole
On 02/23/2011 03:27 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:18 AM, John Reiserjrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
On 02/23/2011 05:07 AM, drago01 wrote:
Defaults should be chooses on the metric what provides the best
experience for the users not based on what we have been doing in the
past
On 02/12/2011 11:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 02/12/2011 05:31 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 12 lutego 2011 23:19 użytkownik Ric Wheeler
rwhee...@redhat.com napisał:
On 02/12/2011 05:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I added a disc to my box. I wanted to use ext4. I run
On 01/02/2011 04:57 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/02/2011 06:16 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 12/27/2010 08:42 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Can I ask a stupid question? Does dbus have the kind of performance
necessary to support this type of application?
What kind of performance do you think
On 12/06/2010 08:53 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Phil Knirsch (pknir...@redhat.com) said:
Basically it's a statefull firewall daemon now that allows us to support
and implement a lot of those features which have been so critically
missing in our old way of doing firewalls (aka static crap) and
On 12/06/2010 08:43 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
On 12/06/2010 08:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:15:37AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 12/06/2010 11:05 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The other benefit would be if the user only intended the
service to be accessible to
On 11/14/2010 05:44 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 11/14/2010 10:42 AM, drago01 wrote:
Yes unless something changed recently the filesystem's discard command
never reaches the drive.
Looks like I'm reformatting and dumping the LVM. Thanks.
You should also file a bug against the tool that
On 11/15/2010 12:00 AM, John Reiser wrote:
On 11/14/2010 01:13 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 13:07 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
When I created 14 partitions using a DOS partition label
(3 primaries, plus extended containing 10 logical partitions)
and gave 6 of the partitions to
On 11/09/2010 10:05 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 08:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:43AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote
On 11/09/2010 07:33 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
Then why are people already calling for the rejection of Wayland even
though Wayland is still far from being finished and hasn't even touched
Fedora yet.
raising
On 11/09/2010 08:04 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 11/09/2010 06:12 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I've mostly been watching here and I think people have been fairly
clearly about their concerns: Network
On 11/09/2010 10:33 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
No. I'm sorry but it's fundamentaly unfair to hold me responsible for the
behaviour of others. If you think this shouldn't have been brought up fine
but if others
On 11/06/2010 07:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
First I think you should probably head over to the Wayland mailing list and
get involved there. That's something I also recommend to Richard because if
you want certain
On 11/06/2010 04:16 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
Out of interest, do you use individual shells/terms or something that
provides a more remote desktop like experience?
I use ssh -Y. Anything that sits in a huge window showing an entire
desktop-in-a-desktop is so obviously the wrong way to do it,
On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/14/2010 06:32 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 15:56:02 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Now we are really talking semantics. The point is that users should not be
confronted with choices they don't really need to make or they don't
understand.
I disagree. How should
On 10/14/2010 07:05 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/12/2010 03:56 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 10/12/2010 02:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/12/2010 02:16 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Striving for usability
On 10/13/2010 05:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 10:16 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
And it probably shouldn't be labeled Advanced ... but say what kind of
advanced stuff is hidden there, i.e. the advanced storage button
should be labeled Add SAN storage ... because this is
On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users certainly
is
a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make things technically
inferior just to please those kind of users.
We don't have to make things
On 10/12/2010 02:57 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users
certainly is
a good thing
On 10/12/2010 05:13 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:06:59AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/10 7:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
The only way
On 10/06/2010 08:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Seems quite complex. What's wrong with a directory:
/etc/iptables.d/
where RPMs like libvirt just drop the required additional rules (in a
separate chain if you like) and restart the iptables service? It's
low-tech but simple and it's
On 10/04/2010 03:34 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Rahul Sundarammethe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/04/2010 06:53 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So according to you any free software with a trademark is non-free
63 matches
Mail list logo
