Hi,
My time to work on Fedora cloud-related things has diminished in
recent months, so I have not been able to give the cloud-init and
python-boto packages the care they deserve. They are free to a good
home.
Thanks,
--
Garrett Holmstrom
___
devel
Cloud-init has changed its license from "GPLv3" to "ASL 2.0 or GPLv3".
--
Garrett Holmstrom
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ral of the custom fields on the right side of show_bug pages have
placeholder tooltips such as, "A custom Drop Down field in this
installation of Bugzilla."
--
Garrett Holmstrom
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
.
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
-- For Fedora 26, we want to switch all applications to OpenSC and
leave Coolkey as a backup. We will unregister coolkey from NSS
database and register OpenSC instead.
Doesn't that still make this a systemwide change?
--
Garrett Holmstrom
; for this. I'm not completely sold on
"stream", partly because we talk about "upstream" and "downstream" so
much, and this is unrelated to that. How about "branch"? That fits with
the idea of "rebase" for switching betwee
lved.
Any thoughts?
Using hyphens in the package name keeps the package collection more
consistent, and adding a Provides entry that uses underscores will more
or less seamlessly take care of the case where people installing it
assume it uses those instead. It's a win-win to do it that way, IMO.
t a System Wide Change)
But this is a system-wide change. Is the intention to fill out this
list as people learn what needs to be changed?
--
Garrett Holmstrom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
dependency.
--
Garrett Holmstrom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2016-02-18 17:51, Laura Abbott wrote:
4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soon. As
usual, please test and give karma appropriately (negative karma for
new issues, not existing issues).
Forgive my ignorance, but version 4.4.2 of _what_?
--
Garrett Holmstrom
--
devel
. I'd rather use
pure git here (but fedpkg also does some message bus thing).
FWIW, using fedpkg for that isn't mandatory. I use git directly all the
time and all the usual fedmsg stuff still seems to fire.
--
Garrett Holmstrom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/705
--
Garrett Holmstrom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 2014-01-02 16:38, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
[Third try to send this email. The Gmail Android app has a lovely UI
to select the sender address, but it doesn't do anything :(.]
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Garrett Holmstrom
gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:32 PM
it while I was on
vacation out of town.
Sorry about the delay. :-\
--
Garrett Holmstrom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed Jul 3 02:44:42 UTC 2013, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:47:25PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Hi, folks,
Since a large number of people have requested new features in
python-boto I'd like to update it from version 2.5.2 to the current
version, 2.9.6. API-wise
. Will that break anybody? I can help
with patches if necessary.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-boto-2.9.6-2.el6
Thanks,
--
Garrett Holmstrom
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On 2012-11-05 12:22, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/05/2012 07:52 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
A crit path update that affects, say, two packages and nothing else,
could be approved by default as well. Many of the crit path
features however affect a large or extremely large package set (e.g.
On 2012-08-25 10:09, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Enrico Scholz wrote:
Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com writes:
Doing this would break current users that have already configured
their system to use __git_ps1().
What are current users? Those who installed your just released
rawhide changes?
No, it
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:23:41PM -0400, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
Sorry for this mess. After a discussion, we have decided, that the
best way would be to create bugs for every packages and then helping
creating patches
On 2012-08-07 10:35, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 07.08.12 13:31, Gary Gatling (gsgat...@ncsu.edu) wrote:
Question about new systemd policy,
If your package is under review, and it enables its service by default, do
you add it to the bugzilla of the systemd package or would that be one of
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Wed, 08.08.12 00:17, Garrett Holmstrom (gho...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
I maintain a package (cloud-init) with several services that meet
the runs once then goes away grant. Shall I file a bug against
The axis2c package doesn't build against httpd 2.4, and since it is
effectively subsumed by one of wso2-wsf-cpp's sub-packages, wso2-axis2,
I think it would be better to just retire it. Nothing appears to depend
on that package, but if someone wants to take it for some reason then
please let
On 2012-07-19 15:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
The fact that the same consequences can occur from
upgrades, or some other unspecified events, is irrelevant, because
appropriate measures /can/ be easily put in place, to take the
appropriate action when upgrading, and most likely for whatever those
On 2012-07-16 22:50, Clive Hills wrote:
Coincidentally I was looking at gtm this weekend.
One of the interesting points in re packaging it is that one must
bootstrap gtm from an existing gtm using the providing source.
I'm wondering a bit how that might be affected by the Fedora packaging
On 2012-07-15 15:00, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Benny Amorsen writes:
Perhaps it's just me, but why would the daemon stat /proc/self/exe? I
presume prelink writes a new file and renames into place as a proper
Unix program should, which still leaves the original program intact on
disk until the last
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
El Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:11:20 +0100
Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com escribió:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:54:59PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
pvgrub peeks into the guest disk so it needs to understand the
On 2012-06-16 21:08, Ben Rosser wrote:
It seems to me that we should make the boot menu more consistent
somehow. I feel like the simplest solution is just to run grub2-mkconfig
at every kernel update, and stop using grubby for this. Then everything
would look consistent- the Fedora Linux boot
On 2012-06-06 6:26, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 01:12 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
After having had some funny issues in the past due to there being two
systemds (x86_64, i686) installed for some reason, something tells me
that it's a bad idea to proceed with the update. Or am I
On 6/2/2012 7:03 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
am not following what u mean?
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:00:29 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
done I built it, check this out:
Spec URL:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
* it is a valid workload that a application creates a 10 GB tempfile
* ok, you say: use /var/tmp
* well, i say: my whole rootfs is only 4 GB
On May 30, 2012 5:41 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Please be aware that since the most recent systemd uploads /tmp is now
in tmpfs by default in Rawhide/F18.
For details please see this feature page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs
Thanks for the
On Mar 7, 2012 7:54 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Remove mention of maven2 in guidelines since all supported versions
have maven-3.x. Some other small cleanups as well perhaps
Is there already a separate set of java guidelines for EPEL? If there isn't
does this
:02 PM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 02/26/2012 07:37 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 2012-02-24 4:22, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
So I installed the official Fedora version of cloud-init but the
service startup ordering is broken there too:
[root@342 ~]# dmesg | grep
On 2012-02-24 4:22, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
So I installed the official Fedora version of cloud-init but the
service startup ordering is broken there too:
[root@342 ~]# dmesg | grep cloud | grep About
[ 91.668396] systemd[1]: About to execute: /usr/bin/cloud-init start-local
[ 91.993238]
On 2012-02-23 10:20, John5342 wrote:
It is possible that they don't match but they are more or less
required to though. Last i checked the bugzilla editbugs permissions
and the like are set from fas by email address so if the addresses
don't match up then the user won't be able to manage
On 2012-01-27 5:10, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Any files with conflicting names, which the conversion could not resolve, will
be backed up to files named *.usrmove~ residing in /usr/lib, /usr/lib64,
/usr/bin and /usr/sbin.
To which file does the conversion script append this suffix when it
resolves
On 2011-11-10 8:35, Tom Lane wrote:
(And why is glibc ignoring the convention to use %{?dist} in
Release:?)
There is a bug open for this. Note that dist tags are still optional.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676755
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2011-11-09 18:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
thanks both of you; I hadn't really thought about the consequences of
merging vs. cherry-picking, I think I'd just cargo-culted from somewhere
the idea of using git merge instead of manually re-doing changes without
considering cherry-picking
On 2011-10-25 15:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's not just the updates-testing list, though. When I go to the web
interface, search for updates to, say, grub2, get a list, and click on
one of the results, I get an ID-based URL, not a package name-based one.
I then paste that into an email, IRC
On 2011-10-10 12:05, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Do any of those cloud providers ever run the stock image or do they roll
their own with a custom built kernel anyways? I don't have a lot of
insight into this but was
On 2011-10-04 12:01, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
So my solyution:
foo-0-1.20110120git.fc16 vs
Your solution:
foo-20110120-1.20110120git.fc16
(Since it's a snapshot, the date has to go into the release string anyway)
Which is uglier?
Also, since these are snapshots, a date in the upstream
On 2011-09-28 14:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:00:40 +0100
Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I was thinking of something slightly simpler: a single 'unison'
package that contained several binaries, like /usr/bin/unison227,
/usr/bin/unison (symlink to latest).
That
Given the grub1/grub2 discussion that is going on, I could use some info
about the state of grubby's support for grub1. The virtual machine
images that the Cloud SIG publishes on Amazon EC2 do not require
bootloaders, but they do require valid grub1 *configuration files* to
start. So while
Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2011-08-19 20:41, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Updates can be pulled out of updates-testing at any moment, which makes a
lot of sense, but which means that users with updates-testing enabled will
end up with the EVR going backwards, something that's not even allowed in
Rawhide.
Enabling
On 2011-07-30 9:44, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
I tried using
%global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion)
%if %{gccver}= 4.6.0
foo here
%endif
to conditionalize usage of quadruple precision support in a spec file
that ships on multiple distros, but the comparison gives the error
On 2011-07-20 9:18, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benjamin Lewisben.le...@benl.co.uk wrote:
Out of curiosity, how does this affect existing systems which have human
UIDs of 500, 501, etc..?
Do they suddenly become system UIDs or is login.defs left alone then
(and
On 2011-06-26 12:33, Christoph Wickert wrote:
And I have no idea what part of our update policy should be violated by
this update. Please somebody enlighten me.
This part:
* Avoid changing the user experience if at all possible.
Specifically, the update breaks a number of user-installed
On 2011-06-11 12:11, Lucas wrote:
Actually it does relabel by it self after boot with option selinux=0
That sounds rather useful. How does it know whether or not it was
previously booted with selinux=0?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Customers ask us to make the changes they want -- for server use and
scalability -- and KVM is absolutely the best in that area as a
result. See many recent benchmarks.
Usability on single desktops is, well ... we
On 2011-06-06 11:17, Tom Callaway wrote:
As usual, I will swap reviews or favors (within limits) for reviews on
some new packages for me:
mono-reflection:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711181
pyrit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894
gambas3:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
reserved/system IDs are supposed to be once that has been done we can
start looking at what is the best approach to implement and or fix
things that might break
On 4/29/2011 9:12, Jesse Keating wrote:
It is somewhat difficult, and odd, to create a git repo that does not
have a master branch. It would be a little more odd to potentially at
some point in the future create the master branch for a package should
it find a home within Fedora.
As you say,
On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've got an
EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to file it there.
How is this any different, given that process-git-requests creates a
rawhide branch without regard to
On 4/6/2011 11:11, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages) which
does just that.
Keeping with the
On 3/25/2011 17:38, Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Fri Mar 25 13:15:31 UTC 2011
An empty list? Quick, ship it!
In all seriousness, did something go wrong with the compose or are there
actually no depsolving problems?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2/25/2011 7:19, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
I've got an interesting idea - why not to provide a git repository
with the sources of current Fedora kernel? This could simplify the
maintenance of patches, allows other to easily backport stuff from
kernel.org's master and greatly improves the
On 2/24/2011 8:14, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Some people have been asking us to extend the systemd unit file header
to include information about whether a service should be on or off by
default (Michal!), like chkconfig had it. But after thinking about this
we came to the conclusion that this
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:46:34 -0500
Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
rversion=2.1
subversion=400
Spec file extract:
Version: %{rversion}.%{subversion}
Release: 2%{?locmark}
Source:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon j...@safe.ca wrote:
Ok, this means having an uptodate sources file is not
mandatory. I pushed the tar file in
same time as spec to GIT, koji was smart enough to forgive
my error.
So I can work one way or the other...
right?
While it will
On 1/27/2011 23:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I have just run into an issue with gcc-4.6, namely RPM Fusion's mame
failed to compile [1]. I was told that #includestddef.h was missing.
So I have two questions: why did including this header directly became
necessary (code builds fine with 4.5) and
It seems that the core yum group pulls in X11 libraries, at the very
least on x86_64, via the following dependency chain:
policycoreutils
dbus-glib
gobject-introspection
cairo
libX11
Does that much seriously need to be in what we consider a bare minimum
Fedora install?
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
What sort of attack would this enable?
Wait... any unprivileged process can create sockets in the abstract
namespace? Uh-oh.
Any unprivileged process can prevent you from running X on a given
display by using up the
On 12/14/2010 21:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 14.12.10 12:08, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Thanks, Bill, for replying in so much detail.
Here are a few other points:
- systemd mounts API filesystems without them needing to be in
/etc/fstab. This is for a variety
On 12/13/2010 7:37, Karel Zak wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:49:27PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
How did /dev/shm get noexec in Fedora 15 rawhide?
$ grep /dev/shm /proc/mounts
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
$ grep -srl noexec /etc
Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
So, when a package
- contains some example scripts
- the packager thinks that such scripts are useful and many people actually
want to execute them
- but such scripts need additional dependencies
then the packager actually may want to add additional dependencies.
On 12/6/2010 23:01, Matt Domsch wrote:
I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose
point if they have not resolved their FTBFS from F14 or earlier. The
lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3
exceptions, these 110 bugs are all still in NEW state as
On 12/3/2010 18:34, Jesse Keating wrote:
The original thought was to have top level branches that are named after
distribution releases, eg f14, f15, el5. Then we would force
branches of those branches use a naming structure of f14/topic. The
reason was so that our tooling could look at the
On 11/21/2010 17:51, Björn Persson wrote:
Andre Robatino wrote:
My feeling is that it would be better for Bodhi to always require a login.
Even Bugzilla does that. I suspect that a lot of people who give anonymous
karma don't realize that it doesn't count, and would have created an
account if
On 11/18/2010 8:09, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 15 November 2010 at 12:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
[...]
This is a silly straw-man. No one[1] formats external HDs with
anything other than MS-DOS FAT. Fedora changing the default for the
main hard disk will not make any
On 11/13/2010 18:15, Christopher Stolzenberg wrote:
yum install mock
useradd mockbuild
usermod -G mock mockbuild
Unless you want to ``su'' to a dedicated mockbuild account every time
you want to build you should add your usual account to the mock group
instead.
mock rebuild -r
On 11/6/2010 11:28, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
As for the if all apps are ported to Wayland I will not be able to use
them remotely anymore I think this is bogus. Nowadays virtually all
application aren't X application but gtk/qt applications and the toolkits
tend to support different
On 11/1/2010 9:32, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
I just put my package review template on my wiki space at :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jfsaucier/Review_Template
[ ] SourceX is a working URL.
[ ] SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[ ] Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q
On 10/29/2010 14:37, David Cantrell wrote:
(1) For VGs= 50 GB, we will continue to make swap and / as normal.
(2) For VGs 50 GB, / will cap at 50 GB and /home will consume the
rest.
50 GB is fairly arbitrary, and was based on the fact that an Everything
install of
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com said:
Also, it is worth noting that the new website makes heavy use of
Javascript, so if you have NoScript (or equivalent) running, you'll not
get a good view of the site. :)
Yeah, apparently that was the problem I
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
But a combo x86-32/x86-64 install media OTOH would be very interesting
for magazines that want to ship Fedora on a enclosed DVD, as that's
cheaper than two and makes way more readers happy than a x86-32 only
DVD. Ohh, and a combo install media might be interesting as
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Unfortunately we
On 10/24/2010 9:45, Mark Bidewell wrote:
Sorry if this has been discussed, but has there every been discussion
of a dual 32/64-bit install media? I realize that the default package
selection would be reduced but with a high speed connection it
shouldn't be too big of an issue. Having a
On 10/24/2010 10:17, Branched Report wrote:
Broken deps for x86_64
--
qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit)
rakudo-0.0.2010.08_2.7.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires
libparrot.so.2.7.0()(64bit)
Any chance these
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Somewhere in the recesses of my memory I remember a UNIX where /bin, /lib,
and so on were just symlinks to /usr/bin, /usr/lib, and so on.
Tru64 (Yes, it's still supported!) does:
gho...@seraph ~ % uname -a
OSF1 seraph.tetraforge.com V5.1 2650 alpha
gho...@seraph ~ % ls
Paul Wouters wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
for each available branches something similar:
fedpkg switch-branch el5;
git pull
git merge origin/master
git push
fedpkg build
fedpkg
On 10/7/2010 12:04, Mike McGrath wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastruture/Yubikey
^^
Typo alert! ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 09/22/2010 08:08 AM, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
I know I can do the likes of
export CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -blah and it will pass whatever CFLAGS is plus
the argument -blah to the compiler.
How do I do this with LDFLAGS. I'm trying to pass --build-id using
export
On 9/20/2010 16:41, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Fedora Koji Build System
build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Package: Miro
NVR: Miro-3.0.3-2.fc13
User: bodhi
Status: failed
Tag Operation: untagged
From Tag: dist-f13-updates-testing-pending
On 9/19/2010 9:40, Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi all,
since I keep offlineimap the same version for the latest stable (that I
got my hands on) + devel versions, my fedpkg workflow looks like:
1. master build package
2. f14 git pull origin master fedpkg push fedpkg build ...
3. f13 git
Roman Rakus wrote:
On 09/16/2010 04:21 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Updating igraph to 0.5.4. Success for devel and f14. Then for f13 I get:
fedpkg switch-branch f13
Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
git merge master
CONFLICT (rename/delete): Rename
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net writes:
I propose that fedpkg should consider a --dist option, a branch
file, and the name of the current git branch in that order.
Or make it a branch config (eg. git config branch.$branch.dist f14).
This, please. Using magical
On 8/27/2010 2:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
In accordance with the normal process, the following packages have been
orphaned for Fedora 14 and rawhide.
Will packages with untouched FTBFS bugs also be removed like the normal
process dictates?
Kevin Kofler wrote:
We probably need to attack this trend more aggressively, like putting
expiration dates into the installer after which it'll just refuse to
install, stuffing fedora-release-n+1 into the Fedora n updates repository at
Fedora n's EOL date etc.
Not only is this
On Aug 26, 2010, at 13:50, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 20:30 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org writes:
What's the benefit of having no default MTA at all? Is it that Desktop
users don't care about MTAs being installed?
On 8/26/2010 11:53 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On Thursday 26 of August 2010 21:21:53 Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
We probably need to attack this trend more aggressively, like putting
expiration dates into the installer after which it'll just refuse to
install, stuffing fedora
Why are bluecurve-gdm-theme and fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme still in the
distribution? The other gdm theme packages were deprecated after F12
(!?!), and I was under the impression that none of them work with
new-style gdm at all.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Reading this - I'm not sure all Fedora notifications should go through system
notification system. Why? I understand it for urgent/priority notification
like
Close your desktop, nuclear war out there (or just a security update
combined
with some steps how to fix
Matthew Miller wrote:
The service command has a syntax like this:
service servicename action
where as systemctl has a syntax like this:
systemctl action servicename.service
This is inconvienient for the common case where more than one action is
performed in sequence on the same
Lennart Poettering wrote:
So, to turn this around. Do you think this behaviour is problematic? Can
you make a good case for dropping this automatism? If so I'd be willing
to do so.
That behavior might be fine, but don't add filesystems marked noauto
to the list of filesystems to be mounted
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Well, we took the liberty to interpret noauto a little bit differently
than you: everything marked auto will be mounted at boot, and boot
will not proceed until all devices listed as auto appeared and are fully
mounted (or things timed out). File systems marked as
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.08.10 10:52, Garrett Holmstrom (gho...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
* fstab(5) documents the noauto option
Well, what it says is that noauto results in the -a option will not
cause the filesystem to be mounted. And that's still the case. We
execute either
Paul Howarth wrote:
No changes: the heads of the f12, f13, f14 and master branches all
point to the dist-git conversion commit.
In case it matters, these branches point to two completely separate
commits; f12 has an entirely different history from f13, f14, and master
as far as git is
Joachim Backes wrote:
having the following question: What does the DVD/CD media check exactly
if booting a Fedora DVD/CD? Is it the sha256sum? If yes, why this media
check, because it could be done after having burned the DVD?
If not, is it possible to perform this media check immediately
Kevin Kofler wrote:
* This policy of sticking religiously to upstream means we are not shipping
KDE integration for Firefox, despite patches from openSUSE existing. This
makes Firefox suck under KDE. Our Firefox maintainers refuse to do anything
about it.
What reason does upstream give for
On 8/12/2010 9:16, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
I'm currently in process of automatic enlisting of all ~10K Fedora Git
repos at Ohloh.
Do you have some way of automatically adding new packages as they are
added to Fedora in the future?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
