Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \ >  --enablerepo=updates-testing \ >  $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo -- > enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ >  --assumeno distro-sync I got Error:

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 14:59 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: >   >  # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules >  # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again >  sudo dnf

Re: Request for assistance: zfs-fuse

On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 18:17 +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > > > gcc -o cmd/mount_zfs/mount_zfs.o -c "-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto- > > objects > > -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall > > -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > > -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

Re: FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for

One more update. On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 16:24 +, Nathanael Noblet wrote: > Hello, > >    I didn't think I needed i386 personally. In fact due to this > thread I removed many i386 packages left on my machine. Just today I > plugged in an 'IronKey' device. Its an encrypted USB drive. When >

F36 - Errors/Warnings with `dnf update`

Hello, Just wondering if this is a bug and what to report against. I upgraded from F35 to F36Beta last night. Today I ran `sudo dnf update` and saw some odd output. Not sure if its a bug with dnf or selinux or the packages being installed. Let me know if its a known issue or if I need to file a

Orphaning some packages (w3c-markup-validator fallout)

Hello, I recently gave ownership of w3c-markup-validator to Sérgio Basto which reminded me that there are a handful of perl packages that I probably created/took a hand in as part of that. I haven't touched them in as long as w3c-markup-validator so probably should also orphan them as well. 

Orphaning some packages (w3c-markup-validator fallout)

Hello, I recently gave ownership of w3c-markup-validator to Sérgio Basto which reminded me that there are a handful of perl packages that I probably created/took a hand in as part of that. I haven't touched them in as long as w3c-markup-validator so probably should also orphan them as well. 

Re: Intent to retire w3c-markup-validator, perl-HTML-Tidy, tidyp

Hello Sérgio, > > > perl(HTML::Tidy) is optional for w3c-markup-validator [1] I'd like > maintain w3c-markup-validator package in Fedora at least for sometime > , > I was looking for a tool like this for some time > > >

Re: F35 Potential Bugs - Where/What to file against

On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 15:40 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Try pressing ctrl-alt-f8 to switch to a text console. If the text > login > appears, then the issue was most likely in the graphics stack. If > still > blank, try pressing ctrl-alt-del. On a text console this should > result >

F35 Potential Bugs - Where/What to file against

Hello, I recently updated from F34 to F35 on an MSI laptop. I've noticed two 'regressions' and I'm not sure where to file bugs. #1 - The first one is if I close the lid and the device suspends (I assume as it used to do this fine), when I re-open the lid, the keyboard lights up, fans start,

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >  Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: >   >  # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules >  # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again >  sudo dnf

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: > >    # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules >    # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again >   

Re: Ars claims: Fedora 32 is sluggish

On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 13:25 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:33:37AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > > > I genuinely wonder if this is due to the launch animation. I know > > > that > > > subjectively for myself using the Impatience t

Re: Ars claims: Fedora 32 is sluggish

On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 14:48 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I genuinely wonder if this is due to the launch animation. I know > that > subjectively for myself using the Impatience to triple the speed > makes my > desktop feel more snappy. Sorry, what is 'the Impatience'? How does it improve the

Re: Ars claims: Fedora 32 is sluggish

On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 10:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > Has anybody investigated Jim Salter's claims that Fedora 32 is slow > to > launch applications? Recent article: > > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/02/ubuntu-core-20-adds-secure-boot-with-hardware-backed-encryption/ > >

Re: compat-openssl11 vs openssl1.1

On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 13:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:36 PM Nathanael D. Noblet > > My 2 cents would be consistency. If others disagree, perhaps > > compat- > > openssl10 should be renamed to compat-openssl1.0 and obsolete the > > old > &g

Re: compat-openssl11 vs openssl1.1

On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 19:26 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > I've submitted a new compat-openssl11 package for review but it was > pointed out to me that according to the new format of the naming for > compat packages it should be named openssl1.1. However there already > is > a compat-openssl10

Re: SELinux question

On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 12:12 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > Thanks, I got [1] and [2] more or less covered thanks to the output > of > the SELinux troubleshooter. The missing parts were how to get > policies > into a subpackage (and [3] explains this, thanks), and how to write a > rule just for my

Re: A few questions about a package update / policy questions / GCC 9 error

On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 16:13 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > I wish this was easier done than said :) Yeah, this isn't *my* project, I just packaged it. Thank you to everyone who added suggestions to dealing with the C code. I'll take a look and see what upstream thinks about it. I am wondering if

A few questions about a package update / policy questions / GCC 9 error

Hello, I maintain beanstalkd which is a message server of sorts. It recently released a new version however some changes I'm not 100% sure about. When compiling I got the following GCC error. usr/include/bits/string_fortified.h:106:10: error: '__builtin_strncpy' specified bound 201 equals

Re: Firewalld/nftable/libvirt...

On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 22:08 +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > > I would guess that some ip_forward or something like this is not set. > I'd report this against firewalld component on > https://bugzilla.redhat.com. > Thanks Igor, In attempting to file the bug I found that a bug has been filed

Firewalld/nftable/libvirt...

Hello, I upgraded to F32 Beta, and then final when it came out. In the last few days I've got an issue that I'm 99% sure I'm not the cause of but I don't know what component to report it on. I've had this workstation for years and it has a number of VMs that I manage with

Re: Compilation Error on F32

On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 13:47 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Thank you for looking into this for me. Just to be clear, the proper > place to fix this is in the php-cpp project because it is using > std::runtime_exception without including . Is that > correct? Aaaand

Re: Compilation Error on F32

On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 20:55 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > So, from the offlist posted preprocessed source, seems the TU > includes the > following libstdc++ headers > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > and then uses std::runtime_exception. That one

Re: Coronavirus: Fedora RTC solutions and YOU

On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 14:09 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Before jumping into jitsi, I think you should see what I got when I > tried it > using the web app. > > Why does it want access to my youtube?? I've used Jitsi without an account at all for over a year (at least

Re: Coronavirus: Fedora RTC solutions and YOU

On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 18:09 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno sab, 28/03/2020 alle 15.13 +, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: > > I will try packaging all Jitsi Meet suite [1] Me too, I've been watching that suite of tools and would love to be a little involved as potentially a co-maintainer but

Compilation Error on F32

Hello, I have a project that isn't part of Fedora yet - though really I should add it at this point. Its php-cpp. It allows me to write c++ extensions for PHP. Its worked well for a couple years. I upgraded to F32 beta and now when compiling anything that includes its headers compilation fails

F32 selinux denials

Hello, I upgraded to F32 yesterday and everything seems to have gone smoothly except I'm getting many selinux denials (I'm in permissive so functionality is ok at the moment). What should I report them against? I've done a relabel to try to resolve them. A sample of the most common: SELinux

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 32. Please check existing reports

Intent to Orphan/Retire dspam

Hello, Years ago I was managing mail servers and really liked dspam's accuracy and resource consumption so added it to fedora and maintained it. Sadly shortly after adding it upstream went through a number of ownership changes and nothing has been added to it in years. I no longer use it,

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 06:23 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:47:20PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > > Is this an error with gegl03? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703828 > The update there seems to have fixed the i

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

I've since run sudo dnf module reset eclipse Which results in the following error when trying a distro-sync. Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(eclipse) needed by module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 Error: Problem: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

Hello, I had a few problems. To clear some I had to run. sudo dnf module reset libgit2 This resulted in the rest of the errors. Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module

Re: Compiling with AddressSanitizer

On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 10:25 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Nathanael Noblet: > > >I have been using a library for awhile now and have been > > thinking > >of submitting it to Fedora. Part of what I have been doing with > > it > >was compiling it using -fsanitize=address and leak

Re: F29 Self-Contained Change: GnuTLS enables TLS 1.3 by default

On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 17:14 +0200, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet < > nathan...@gnat.ca> wrote: > > Ok, so should I be filing a bug and if so against which component? > > I > > wasn't sure if the google online acco

Re: F29 Self-Contained Change: GnuTLS enables TLS 1.3 by default

On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 21:33 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Yes. If Google hands out certificates for other secure services in > the > same way as it does on its IMAP servers, any other TLS based client > will > need to be developed further. Ok, so should I be filing a bug and if so against

Re: F29 Self-Contained Change: GnuTLS enables TLS 1.3 by default

On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 22:32 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:06 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > This change enables TLS 1.3 (draft28) support on the gnutls crypto > > library. > > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > > That change should have no impact on upgrade or

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 11:17 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 02:31 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. > > Just in case you weren't aware.. They release 0.68 yesterday w

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 02:31 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. Just in case you weren't aware.. They release 0.68 yesterday with some security fixes. Not sure if the API changed or anything like that as their changelog is pretty

Re: Release criteria proposal: installing / removing software

On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 17:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Basic: > > "The installed system must be able appropriately to install, remove, > and update software with the default console tool for the relevant > software type (e.g. default console package manager). This includes > downloading

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? > > ;) > > My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then. Hello, So I made a fix for clamsmtp, and

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 00:03 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > > nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview > >

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable TRIM pass down to encrypted disks

On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 17:32 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > So I've got multiple systems with encrypted partitions on SSD > > disks. > > Are there ways of enabling this for pre-existing partitions? > >   I believe putting “discard” at the the of each line in > /etc/crypttab > will do the trick.

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable TRIM pass down to encrypted disks

On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 09:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Jan Kurik > wrote: > > = System Wide Change: Enable TRIM pass down to encrypted disks = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableTrimOnDmCrypt > > > > Change owner(s): > > *

Re: Docker/Libvirt networking issue / bug?

On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 14:02 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > Try running 'iptables-save' before you start docker, and then running > 'iptables-save' after.  Diff the results.  Did docker remove > anything? Hello,   So this seems to be the source of the problem but I'm a little out of my depth to

Re: Docker/Libvirt networking issue / bug?

On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 14:28 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > I rarely mess with docker, but I expect that the docker0 bridge has > an ip > address on it which may conflict with the one on libvirt > bridge.  That is to > say, if they are on the same subnet, and the route for the docker0 > bridge takes >

Docker/Libvirt networking issue / bug?

Hello,   I have an issue that likely needs a bug or something to fix but I'm not sure which component is at fault. So I'm writing here in the hopes that someone will know where to point me.   I have a F24 Workstation where I've been using libvirt/qemu VMs for development for awhile now. It works

Re: On packager motivation

On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 08:44 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > I know a number of companies have experimented with "ownership-free" > models of code development, but they are able to offer incentives > that > Fedora cannot offer, such as money and kudos offered in front of > coworkers.  What motivates

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:34 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > beanstalkd (jjh, gnat) removed defattr. --  Nathanael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Unresponsive Maintainer Question

Hello,   I'm interested in taking over beanstalkd (at least for EPEL) but will take it for all of fedora as well if the maintainer is completely gone as opposed to not interested in EPEL. The maintainer in question is Jeremy Hinegardner, (jjh).   A bug report requesting the el7 branch be created

Re: Unresponsive Maintainer Question

On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 11:04 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Hello, > >   I'm interested in taking over beanstalkd (at least for EPEL) but > will > take it for all of fedora as well if the maintainer is completely > gone > as opposed to not interested in EPEL. The m

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:21:00PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > I just used dnf distro-sync as per: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_22 > > _-.3E_Fedora_23 > > > > This went fine, and I'm now typing

Re: bodhi 2 now live

On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Greetings. After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that bodhi2 is now live in production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates or https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ I see in the thread that people seem to

Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker

On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 11:12 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Here's my perspective as an i686 Fedora user... I have a box (2009-ish) that's in use as a file/backup server. As such, I don't spend a lot of time futzing with it - it doesn't run rawhide, it rarely runs the prereleases until

Re: f22 screensaver/lockout issue requiring reboot :/

On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 16:39 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: gdm still does not start properly on boot, and when using startx once the screen locks, despite disabling screensaver, all I can do is reboot. Can you access the machine via ssh? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GNOME 3 bug?

On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 09:42 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: So is this a bug? Is there a way to 'reset' gnome settings to defaults? Or detect differences between defaults and a user's settings that may have caused this? I ask because previously I had window focus set to follow

GNOME 3 bug?

Hello, I updated my F21 workstation to F22 beta. Everything has gone well except for some bug in GNOME. Window focus is messed up. When I click on a window in the background it gets focus, but doesn't come to the foreground. Only clicking a window title brings it forward. A side effect of

Re: Dependency chain issue...

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 05:49 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Nathanael d. Noblet wrote: I have F21 Workstation installed. I installed liveusb-creator and the following was the dependency chain installed. http://www.fpaste.org/180713/34735142/ The real odd parts are all the multi-media

Dependency chain issue...

Hello, I have F21 Workstation installed. I installed liveusb-creator and the following was the dependency chain installed. http://www.fpaste.org/180713/34735142/ The real odd parts are all the multi-media being installed. This seems to stem from phonon being included in the chain. I don't

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Vagrant

On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 11:09 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 10:21 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: == Scope == * Proposal Owners: Initial work has been done in for Vagrant on F20 in a Copr repository. I'm really really interested in vagrant on fedora. I am however

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Vagrant

On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 10:21 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: == Scope == * Proposal Owners: Initial work has been done in for Vagrant on F20 in a Copr repository. I'm really really interested in vagrant on fedora. I am however running F21. The copr is only for F20. Any chance one can be created

Re: Power consumption with Fedora

On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 21:47 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:30:57 +0100, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote: I don't know much about it but I hate how bad my battery life is on my laptop... My 3 years old Lenovo X220 lasts for 12 hours (powertop reports so) on Fedora 20

Re: Power consumption with Fedora

On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 15:23 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:44:59 -0700 Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 21:47 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:30:57 +0100, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote: I don't know much about

Re: Power consumption with Fedora

On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 17:57 -0700, john.tiger wrote: Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it stinks on Fedora 20. OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4 Chrome OS on Chromebook gets 9-10

Re: The Poodlebleed Bug

On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 17:00 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: this site http://poodlebleed.com/ says that my server with F19 is vulnerable any news about this ? Disable SSL3? Who needs IE6 on XP? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F21/F22: xorg-x11-drv: which for SiS?

On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 17:20 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Last cpu for 775 socket was released in 2010 not 2008. But yes, it can be seen as old and slow. So just to clarify. It should be possible to remove the part in xorg.conf specifying the sis driver, while still manually setting the

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 16:47 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: On 12 September 2014 16:16, Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: Yeah, I almost never use the reboot install method. 90% of the packages being installed/updated seem foolish to need a reboot to update. I've been called

Re: PkgDB, pending ACL requests

On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 19:13 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 15:28, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: From the version 1.16, the page listing all the pending ACLs now provides 'Approve all' and 'Deny all' buttons. So feel free to visit:

Re: Lockscreen / suspend / keyboard issue

On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:30 -0600, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote: After opening/closing the computer a few times sometimes I just hard reset the machine. Sometimes it comes to and lets me enter my password and unlocks. I'd like to debug and find the source of the problem. If I login via ssh

Lockscreen / suspend / keyboard issue

Hello, I'm writing here because I don't know what component to report a bug against. I have a Toshiba P50-A. When waking from suspend I have often but not always have issues. 1) Sometimes the keyboard and mouse are non-responsive. Except for what I presume are handled by APCI (screen

Re: GnuTLS issue (Mandos Server/Client)

On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:05 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: CentOS 6 = gnutls 2.8.5 F20 = gnutls 3.1.20 The server is a python app and sets the priority string as follows: priority=SECURE256:!CTYPE-X.509:+CTYPE

GnuTLS issue (Mandos Server/Client)

Hello, I'm working on getting a package (mandos) included in Fedora/EPEL. Currently its heavily focused on debian based distros so I'm not ready for a review. However I have it working in a few situations but have some issues in others. I'm hoping someone here may be able to shed light on what

Re: GnuTLS issue (Mandos Server/Client)

On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Well, have you tried the 'obvious' - building the newer gnutls on CentOS 6 (or the older on Fedora 20) and building mandos against that, to see if the issue is in gnutls or somewhere else in the 'base system'? That'd narrow it down at

qemu / VNC / vino

Hello, So I've found a 'bug'. I have a group of developers who use vagrant/libvirt to develop against. We use VNC since we are a distributed team to connect to each other's desktops/workstations for when we're at the 'huh this makes no sense'. If libvirt/qemu-system-x86_64 starts before

Re: qemu / VNC / vino

On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 18:24 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: In /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf you can set remote_display_port_{min,max} to control the port range used So that is awesome thank you. Given that by default virt-manager/libvirt/qemu listens to 127.0.0.0:PORT as opposed to 0.0.0.0:PORT.

Re: qemu / VNC / vino

On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 17:51 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: There was a bug about that in the past, but we rejected changing the default range. Libvirt and xen and qemu have all used the assumption of starting at port 5900 for too long, we didn't want to deal with any potential fallout for

Re: [perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP/epel7] exclude ppc64 for now as perl-class-accessor is unavailable

On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 16:36 +, Paul Howarth wrote: On 28/01/14 16:32, Paul Howarth wrote: On 28/01/14 16:14, Nathanael Noblet wrote: commit 09acd6327d876e6d1126ebed87ae9e1e1ec84c27 Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca Date: Tue Jan 28 09:14:44 2014 -0700 exclude

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 19:04 +0100, drago01 wrote: Second, give people what they *do* care about: choices of language stacks above the base level, and a layer of separation so that there isn't a big impact when the base layer changes. To quote someone I talked to: No distribution does that

Re: Discontinued Packing of NetBeans IDE

into the original package but the spec file is so complicated and I have no idea how java programs are packagaed so shied away. If someone else thinks collectively we could bring it back up to a recent version. I'd be delighted to co-maintain it. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel

Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page

if we can still do the $100,000,000 transfer with only my personal information and without my FAS credentials. :D Fingers crossed! -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: Rebuilding in dependency order

grouping so that it tells you what can be built in parallel. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-08-14)

is what accurately describes what the community does so surely there is a word in the English vocabulary that is a better match to that then support and we can try to use... tested? -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Fwd: Thursday is Spice Test Day!

... -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

looking for co-maintainer / new owner

it if no one steps up for a little. If no one takes it I'll likely drop it around F20 or so. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Smock successor?

: https://gitorious.org/smock/smock/ Hello, I still use smock with some modifications (patched to build different distro/arches in threads). I think I also modified it to sign the packages it builds (asks for the key when I kick off a build)... -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel

Re: Smock successor?

expect and all that for the password. It would be much better to just grab from the perl script itself the signing password than to do what I did. I also hardcoded the number of packages. Not my best work but included for completeness... :D -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 smock

Re: Feedback wanted: Fedora Formulas

in the packager group etc. Having a fedora account etc... -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: How do I find the maintainers of a package ?

, not the sub-packages it may produce. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: HEADUP for all PEAR packages

}/.??* Use rm -rf %{buildroot}%{pear_metadir}/.??* This can be applied on all branches (already used on some of my packages, see php-phpunit-PHPUnit p.e.) I presume php-pecl packages are un-affected by this? -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Taking over orphaned Func and Certmaster packages

of func but not certmaster. Oversight? -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Taking over orphaned Func and Certmaster packages

should I go about having him take them over? If you're willing to mentor him, it's probably easiest to do this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?

kickstart, but somehow merges only the pieces that are inputted?? This way there are the defaults, but a community of 'user preference' snippets could exist etc... Just a random thought. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?

On 09/26/2012 12:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:15 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: I wonder if this couldn't be a RFE for anaconda. Maybe not possible, however couldn't we allow the upload of a kickstart 'snippet' or something where users installing Fedora could

Re: Network configuration future

work together towards a common goal. I can't imagine how it wouldn't be possible to get NM to the point where it does do everything one needs it to do. Especially with the lead developers it has. My 2cents. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: building compose, selinux problems

. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_Fedora_install_ISO_for_testing I've used it with good success. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

in the install section etc. To try it out yourself try it against bug 841662 -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

On 08/02/2012 12:02 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:52 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Where would you like bug reports? I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of issues however almost all of them except one was wrong. For example it complained

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

? That would definitely be clearer to me. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Package review...

Hello, No rush on this I *just* posted it and sadly I don't have a lot of time to swap reviews. I thought I would point out that I had posted a review for php-pecl-cairo if anyone is interested in having it in fedora so they could review it. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel

Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

-0.2.0-1.fc16 Enjoy! Stanislav Pierre -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

  1   2   >