On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I also wonder what happened to rubygem-slop [1], because it says it is
> retired, while it should be only orphaned [2].
>
> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-slop
Looks like some debugging slipped it way to the release
There is very likely more packages like this:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-tern-cordovajs
Vít
Dne 05. 05. 20 v 8:53 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> I also wonder what happened to rubygem-slop [1], because it says it is
> retired, while it should be only orphaned [2].
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>
I also wonder what happened to rubygem-slop [1], because it says it is
retired, while it should be only orphaned [2].
Vít
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-slop
[2]
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> It seems that only the main admin can edit the owners (they have
> displayed the "edit" button), is that expected? E.g. checking
> rubygem-puma [1], where I have admin bit, I cannot edit the BZ assignee,
> while for rubygem-tilt [2] as
On 04. 05. 20 19:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And since I am asking questions like this, how does it work for group
owned packages (if there are any, can't find any example ATM, but there
used to be, right?)?
There aren't any.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
And since I am asking questions like this, how does it work for group
owned packages (if there are any, can't find any example ATM, but there
used to be, right?)?
Vít
Dne 04. 05. 20 v 19:02 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> It seems that only the main admin can edit the owners (they have
> displayed
It seems that only the main admin can edit the owners (they have
displayed the "edit" button), is that expected? E.g. checking
rubygem-puma [1], where I have admin bit, I cannot edit the BZ assignee,
while for rubygem-tilt [2] as a main admin, I can.
Vít
[1]
Good Morning Everyone,
You may remember the email below from a little while ago.
Well, we just wanted to let you know that this is now running in production and
the data present in the fedora-scm-requests repo has been migrated and that git
repo has been cleared of a large number of files.
Let
Good Morning Everyone,
You may remember the email below from a little while ago.
Well, we just wanted to let you know that this is now running in production and
the data present in the fedora-scm-requests repo has been migrated and that git
repo has been cleared of a large number of files.
Let
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 03. 20 14:45, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights,
> > > > there should
> > > > be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal)
> > > >
On 17. 03. 20 14:45, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, there should
be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) appear,
in which you can update the settings.
It appears you need to be main admin to do this. Is
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:26:18PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 03. 20 14:14, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this
Dne 17. 03. 20 v 14:24 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:25:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 17. 03. 20 v 11:58 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>>> Good Morning Everyone,
>>>
>>> A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to
>>> stop using
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:26:18PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 03. 20 14:14, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:14:46PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, there
> should
> be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) appear,
> in which you can update the settings.
>
> > > The overrides
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:17:13PM +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to
> > stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git
On 17. 03. 20 14:14, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on
pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:25:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 17. 03. 20 v 11:58 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to
> > stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on
> > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository
> > at
> >
Dne 17. 03. 20 v 11:58 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to
> stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information.
>
> However, this git repository is still being used to
On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on
pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository at
fedora-scm-request[2].
Thank You both \o/
This work has been deployed in staging today. We
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to
> stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information.
>
> However, this git repository is still
22 matches
Mail list logo
