On 02/02/2013 07:33 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:06:12AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:03 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:08:00AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
When I meet a maintainer in the project that stated to me I
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:24:39AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
If you can't handle that, then Fedora development might not be
On 02/02/2013 07:57 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:24:39AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
If you can't handle
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:43:48AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:33 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:06:12AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:03 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:08:00AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:19:29AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:57 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:24:39AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
Le samedi 02 février 2013 à 06:29 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a
écrit :
On 02/02/2013 02:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.02.2013 03:08, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
When I meet a maintainer in the project that stated to me I have to talk
to my manager first before upgrading his
On 02/02/2013 08:31 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:43:48AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:33 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:06:12AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:03 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02,
On 02/02/2013 08:41 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le samedi 02 février 2013 à 06:29 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a
écrit :
On 02/02/2013 02:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.02.2013 03:08, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
When I meet a maintainer in the project that stated to me I have to talk to
On 02/02/2013 08:38 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:19:29AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:57 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:24:39AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02,
Hi
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Then Rahul how about a wiki page about all the RH employees that are
maintaining components in the distribution that have to vs those that want
to.
If you want to, go ahead. Noone is stopping you.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
This thread is over.
I'd like to ask everyone to take a few minutes to re-read:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
and get some away time from the discussion and think about things and
how to approach discussions more constructively.
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 02/01/2013 04:21 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:46:33PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
And in the midst of me doing this research I have to have Bill
Notting butting into my work ( and I know what that means ), trying
to come up with his own list instead of simply
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 08:44 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/01/2013 04:21 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:46:33PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
And in the midst of me doing this research I have to have Bill
Notting butting into my work ( and I know what
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
And Bills behavior towards me has been so civilized through out the
years.
If he leaves me and my work alone and general stays away from me maybe I
will...
You are just proving David Tardon's point here. You have no monopoly on
On 02/01/2013 07:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
And Bills behavior towards me has been so civilized through out the
years.
If he leaves me and my work alone and general stays away from me
maybe I will...
You are just proving David
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:28:56PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I personally would have preferred people waiting and giving me the
chance to go through all the cron jobs and make my presentation and
findings to fesco then afterwards discuss the merits of making the
switch for the cron
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I dont mind everyone else opinions and criticism or help staying in and
out of my works and what not except Bill's after the treatment he has given
me over the years.
I have no idea what treatment you are talking about.
On 02/01/2013 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 08:44 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/01/2013 04:21 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:46:33PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
And in the midst of me doing this research I have to have Bill
On 02/01/2013 07:35 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:28:56PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I personally would have preferred people waiting and giving me the
chance to go through all the cron jobs and make my presentation and
findings to fesco then afterwards discuss
On 02/01/2013 07:41 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I dont mind everyone else opinions and criticism or help staying
in and out of my works and what not except Bill's after the
treatment he has given me over the years.
I
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 08:44 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/01/2013 04:21 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:46:33PM +, Jóhann B.
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:39:48PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I really don't understand how it hurts to have multiple people look at the
information.
The plan was to gather that information and give people something to
actually look at.
So... more information is good, right?
--
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I dont know if that group actually is active and on one of the group when
it got formed it was proposed that Red Hat employees would get *special*
treatment within the project and the CWG would speak with their *managers*
so much
On 02/01/2013 08:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Again, your complaint here seems very vague. Please provide
references. If there is a complaint about someone working in a
company that itself is involved in the project, it is not unexpected
it will get escalated to their manager to help
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
You can go yourself through the community working log meetings to find my
reference.
I would expect RH employee ( and other corporation's employee ) sitting at
the same table as their community brethren's and not having to worries
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) said:
On 01/31/2013 03:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I would be tempted to say:
Anything running at a core system level where a dependence on a separate
cron daemon may be unwanted (or a bad idea) should be migrated, and nothing
else for now
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
In any case, to look at 'we have this functionality... now what':
For the sake of completeness, the default is 0) Avoid all the
arguments and work, and continue using existing files.
Is there actually a noticeable
On 1 February 2013 15:57, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
In any case, to look at 'we have this functionality... now what':
For the sake of completeness, the default is 0) Avoid all the
arguments and work, and
On 02/01/2013 08:32 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
You can go yourself through the community working log meetings to
find my reference.
I would expect RH employee ( and other corporation's employee )
sitting at the same
On 02/01/2013 11:14 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 1 February 2013 15:57, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
In any case, to look at 'we have this functionality... now what':
For the sake of completeness, the
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 19:38 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 08:44 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/01/2013 04:21 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:46:33PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 01:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 19:38 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 08:44 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/01/2013 04:21 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 01:25:09 +,
\Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\ johan...@gmail.com wrote:
community. Do you really want to head down this road with me? Go
ahead big man make my day!
This is not appropriate behavior for a Fedora contributor.
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:36:20PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
3) introduce compatibility
The cron and at interfaces aren't complex at all. It shouldn't be
too hard to have a generator that reads crontab and cron.*, and
the at queue, and creates the approprate timer files for systemd,
in
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.comwrote:
I know few RH employees who would beg the differ, many of which go above
and beyond their corporate duties but I'll remember your remarks.
It's good to know there exist that corporate line...
You don't seem
On 02/02/2013 01:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com mailto:johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I know few RH employees who would beg the differ, many of which go
above and beyond their corporate duties but I'll remember
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Either RH employees are participating in the project by their own free
will or not. I have personally meet both sides which has gotten me confused
and conflicted.
Employees can have assigned duties as well as projects of
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 01:25 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Feeling happy in the Red Hat position they invented for you in QA.
Feeling a big man now? Challenged accepted big man you have in your rein
of error effectively killed 2 thriving process in the QA community. Do
you really want
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
Feeling happy in the Red Hat position they invented for you in QA.
Feeling a big man now? Challenged accepted big man you have in your rein
of error effectively killed 2 thriving process in the QA community. Do
you really want
On 02/02/2013 02:28 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 01:25 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Feeling happy in the Red Hat position they invented for you in QA.
Feeling a big man now? Challenged accepted big man you have in your rein
of error effectively killed 2 thriving
On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
Feeling happy in the Red Hat position they invented for you in QA.
Feeling a big man now? Challenged accepted big man you have in your rein
of error effectively killed 2 thriving process
On 02/02/2013 02:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.02.2013 03:08, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
When I meet a maintainer in the project that stated to me I have to talk to my
manager first before upgrading his
component that rings alarm bells to me, That gives me the feel that they are
On 02/02/2013 02:28 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Either RH employees are participating in the project by their own
free will or not. I have personally meet both sides which has
gotten me confused and conflicted.
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:08:00AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
When I meet a maintainer in the project that stated to me I have to
talk to my manager first before upgrading his component that
rings alarm bells to me, That gives me the feel that they are
maintaining their components as
On 02/02/2013 07:03 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:08:00AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
When I meet a maintainer in the project that stated to me I have to
talk to my manager first before upgrading his component that
rings alarm bells to me, That gives me the feel
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
If you can't handle that, then Fedora development might not be the right
place for you.
Get the fuck out before you get in my business. If you want to test
me here I am deal
On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
If you can't handle that, then Fedora development might not be the right
place for you.
Get the fuck out before you get in my
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:06:12AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:03 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:08:00AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
When I meet a maintainer in the project that stated to me I have to
talk to my manager first before
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 07:24 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
If you can't handle that, then Fedora development might not be the
Le Mer 30 janvier 2013 19:07, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
it's wasteful in terms of builds and updates for users to be
updating all of systemd just to add a new French keymap conversion,
esp. since users want their keyboard to work the same in gui and the
console, so putting the keymaps in
Marcela Mašláňová (mmasl...@redhat.com) said:
I would say that work even before. If I should say according to
number of bugs, not many users were using specific SElinux contexts
for cronjob tasks.
No objection to this feature, it might be very powerful for some
use-cases. I'm afraid of
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 14:30 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
This is interesting, in that it's a feature that's occasionally requested
by various users and administrators. However, this is rather limited in
that only systemd stuff is using it now,
On 01/31/2013 03:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I would be tempted to say:
Anything running at a core system level where a dependence on a separate
cron daemon may be unwanted (or a bad idea) should be migrated, and nothing
else for now until we have a clearer perspective on the future.
Given
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:51:45 -0500,
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
I would be tempted to say:
Anything running at a core system level where a dependence on a separate
cron daemon may be unwanted (or a bad idea) should be migrated, and nothing
else for now until we have a
On 01/31/2013 04:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:51:45 -0500,
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
I would be tempted to say:
Anything running at a core system level where a dependence on a
separate
cron daemon may be unwanted (or a bad idea) should be
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm the one that has been looking into the benefit from which component
and of which cron job it would be useful for migrating to systemd timer
units and that's totally irrelevant to that feature as I mentioned to FESCO
but
On 01/31/2013 05:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm the one that has been looking into the benefit from which
component and of which cron job it would be useful for migrating to
systemd timer units and that's totally
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:32 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/31/2013 05:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm the one that has been looking into the benefit from which
component and of which cron job it would
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 16:03 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 30 janvier 2013 19:07, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
it's wasteful in terms of builds and updates for users to be
updating all of systemd just to add a new French keymap conversion,
esp. since users want their keyboard to work
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Have fun with your proposals and implementing them just dont mix the cron
migration up with the timer units ( which has been there from the get go
)...
You seem confused. I don't have any proposals
Rahul
--
devel mailing
On 01/31/2013 07:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:32 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/31/2013 05:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm the one that has been looking into the benefit from which
On 01/31/2013 07:27 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Have fun with your proposals and implementing them just dont mix
the cron migration up with the timer units ( which has been there
from the get go )...
You seem
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Then stay out of this.
I don't think that is a reasonable request. This is a public mailing
list after all.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 02/01/2013 12:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Then stay out of this.
I don't think that is a reasonable request. This is a public
mailing list after all.
I'm not seeing asking you to stay out of this is an
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm not seeing asking you to stay out of this is an unreasonable request
nor this being a public mailinglist has anything to do with that request
after you stated you had no proposal.
I guess I must still be confused...
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:46:33PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
And in the midst of me doing this research I have to have Bill
Notting butting into my work ( and I know what that means ), trying
to come up with his own list instead of simply asking me for the one
I was looking at [¹]
On 01/30/13 01:08, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) said:
Realistically, it's new textual files, replacing old textual files, which
are then compiled into a binary file. I'm not sure why there's the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/30/13 01:08, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) said:
Realistically, it's new textual files, replacing old textual files, which
On 01/30/13 11:55, Kay Sievers wrote:
Hi,
Still looks pointless.
You convert the old-format into new-format, then compile new-format into
the database. It's not obvious why you don't go straight from
old-format to the database. hwdata package updates would directly show
up in the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/30/13 11:55, Kay Sievers wrote:
Hi,
Still looks pointless.
You convert the old-format into new-format, then compile new-format into
the database. It's not obvious why you don't go straight from
old-format to
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
And because a major part of the data the hwdb will carry in the future
will be the equivalent of udev rules, and should not be shipped by a
different package, because it it might carry specifics needed for a
certain
Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) said:
Either you're intending for the lifetime of your OS to be shipping systemd
updates that update the base data set,
I don't intend to ship update packages in the context of systemd, we
can just update the data in the package like we add patches for other
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 13:07 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) said:
Either you're intending for the lifetime of your OS to be shipping systemd
updates that update the base data set,
I don't intend to ship update packages in the context of systemd, we
can
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:18:40 +0100
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
+1 million - another data point - ca-certificates package - it was
much cleaner to split it out of openssl.
+1 a lot from me too. Adding to churn of a core system component to
simply update data files is bad.
kevin
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 07:18:40PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
The point is, we've done this in the past where we shipped the data with
the tools, and we very quickly moved to shipping the data separate - it's
cleaner, allows for just updating the data when necessary, and it forces
people to
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Features/SystemdHardwareDatabase =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdHardwareDatabase
Feature owner(s): Kay Sievers kay at redhat dot com
The udevd service has a long history of managing kernel devices.
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
Some years ago all hardware data was moved out of various separate
packages into the hwdata package (even if it meant moving it out of
the original upstream source). The feature page doesn't even mention
the hwdata package. AFAICS this
1) Duplicates
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Features/SystemdMessageCatalog =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdMessageCatalog
Feature owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering dot net
Logging is essential for finding and tracking down system problems. Just
finding
On Tue, 29.01.13 20:07, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Features/SystemdHardwareDatabase =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdHardwareDatabase
Feature owner(s): Kay Sievers kay at redhat dot
On Tue, 29.01.13 14:30, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Features/SystemdMessageCatalog =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdMessageCatalog
Feature owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering dot net
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 14:30 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
This is interesting, in that it's a feature that's occasionally requested
by various users and administrators. However, this is rather limited in
that only systemd stuff is using it now, and it's tied to the journal API.
Actually,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Features/SystemdHardwareDatabase =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdHardwareDatabase
Feature owner(s): Kay Sievers kay at redhat dot
Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) said:
The hwdb is drop-in directory based, which means:
- additionally installed data overwrites shipped data
- stuff with the same file name in /etc/ disables stuff in /usr/lib/
Users can just install update packages, or add their own files, which
will not
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) said:
The hwdb is drop-in directory based, which means:
- additionally installed data overwrites shipped data
- stuff with the same file name in /etc/ disables stuff in /usr/lib/
Users
Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) said:
Realistically, it's new textual files, replacing old textual files, which
are then compiled into a binary file. I'm not sure why there's the
intermediate step of a second textual format, but there is.
Because the original text file is a hack and a format
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) said:
Realistically, it's new textual files, replacing old textual files, which
are then compiled into a binary file. I'm not sure why there's the
intermediate step of a second textual
On 01/27/2013 04:36 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013 à 09:49 -0500, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
Jaroslav Reznik writes:
Announcing various systemd features in one announcement, see bellow:
= Features/SystemdCalendarTimers =
On 01/28/2013 02:56 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/27/2013 04:36 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013 à 09:49 -0500, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
Jaroslav Reznik writes:
Announcing various systemd features in one announcement, see bellow:
= Features/SystemdCalendarTimers
. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 4:01:40 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: systemd features
On 01/28/2013 02:56 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/27/2013 04:36 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013 à 09:49
Jaroslav Reznik writes:
Announcing various systemd features in one announcement, see bellow:
= Features/SystemdCalendarTimers =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdCalendarTimers
Feature owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering dot net
systemd has supported timer units
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013 à 09:49 -0500, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
Jaroslav Reznik writes:
Announcing various systemd features in one announcement, see bellow:
= Features/SystemdCalendarTimers =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdCalendarTimers
Feature owner(s):
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik writes:
Announcing various systemd features in one announcement, see bellow:
= Features/SystemdCalendarTimers =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdCalendarTimers
Feature owner(s):
92 matches
Mail list logo
