On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 2:17 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> We could if somebody will commit on maintaining those packages in stable
> releases, keep them always updated, insert proper Obsoletes and create compat
> packages all the time.
I volunteered to work on stable-release rust packages, and
No. All dependencies and such are in Fedora Build System and kept there as
any other package.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, 14:10 Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:58 PM Randy Barlow
> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/9/20 11:53 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Source-only rust packages (those
We could if somebody will commit on maintaining those packages in stable
releases, keep them always updated, insert proper Obsoletes and create
compat packages all the time.
The good news are that Koji maintainers implemented necessary configuration
and when new version will be released and
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:58 PM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> On 3/9/20 11:53 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Source-only rust packages (those only shipping noarch -devel
> > subpackages) have been untagged from f32 on purpose by Igor. For
> > reasons I disagree with:)
>
> I too wish that we kept the
On 3/9/20 11:53 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Source-only rust packages (those only shipping noarch -devel
subpackages) have been untagged from f32 on purpose by Igor. For
reasons I disagree with:)
I too wish that we kept the Rust devel packages in stable releases. I am
unable to build updates
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, 16:08 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Report without testing repos enabled:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> >
> > Report with testing repos enabled:
> >
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Report without testing repos enabled:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
>
> Report with testing repos enabled:
>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:54 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> > > Report with
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 18:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 21:35:52 +0100,
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> > > check if
Le lundi 09 mars 2020 à 12:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 18:11:32 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm also not sure how you would detect that from the package
> > metadata
> > ... query all
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 12:11:42PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 18:11:32 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> >I'm also not sure how you would detect that from the package metadata
> >... query all packages for
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 04:53:25PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> > >
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 18:11:32 +0100,
Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm also not sure how you would detect that from the package metadata
... query all packages for their file contents, and then show
conflicts when two packages own the same
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 21:35:52 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> >check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
> >fedora 32
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:40 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 21:35:52 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> > check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
> >
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 21:35:52 +0100,
Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi all,
With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing
you need:
Is
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> > Report with testing repos enabled:
> >
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> Report with testing repos enabled:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32-testing.md
I see a lot of rust packages on this
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:14 AM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:06 PM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> >> check if any of
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:06 PM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
>> check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
>> fedora 32 (+testing)
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
> fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing
> you need:
>
>
Dokuwiki has broken dependencies because one of them got retired recently due
to no upstream activity. There is an open Review Request for a still-maintained
fork of the original package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809097
If anyone has a moment to review it (it's a PHP
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 4:42 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 15:05 Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> Are the broken source dependencies real?
>>
>> python-pyside2 (src):
>>
>> qt5-qtwebengine-devel > 5.13
>>
>> I just checked koji and qt5-qtwebengine 5.13.2 is in f32 which should meet
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 15:05 Richard Shaw wrote:
> Are the broken source dependencies real?
>
>
>- python-pyside2 (src):
> - qt5-qtwebengine-devel > 5.13
>
> I just checked koji and qt5-qtwebengine 5.13.2 is in f32 which should meet
> the requirement.
>
This looks like a case of either
Are the broken source dependencies real?
- python-pyside2 (src):
- qt5-qtwebengine-devel > 5.13
I just checked koji and qt5-qtwebengine 5.13.2 is in f32 which should meet
the requirement.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list --
On 06. 03. 20 21:35, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Report without testing repos enabled:
https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
Report with testing repos enabled:
https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32-testing.md
The second most common
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:18 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 21:35 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> > check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
> > fedora 32
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 21:35 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
> fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing
> you need:
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
