Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Di, 09.04.19 10:11, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > Basically, anything that's part of the install environment is going to > be present after a live install. That accounts for both of the above: > the installer supports multipath and dmraid storage devices, so the >

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/9/2019 11:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Di, 09.04.19 12:54, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote: This is more about socializing and teaching the systemd replacements... because most of the systemd advocates and heavy users I have asked aren't sure about how systemd

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 19:27, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Hmm? Can you elaborate? Why does fwupd's runtime have something to do > with display flickers? Not grokking the connection? More information in https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/commit/75b965d01d80d70ae51816acd4d4cafdaf792e99 -- in the case

Re: Sphinx and xindy

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 08:57:22AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:36 PM Jerry James wrote: > > That was, in fact, an s390x-specific gcc bug, now fixed in Rawhide. > > Sadly, the clisp build is still failing in Rawhide, with failures in > > the socket tests: > > The failing

Fedora Rawhide-20190409.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 17 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Di, 09.04.19 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:07:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > multipathd [...] And beyond that, this daemon is really ugly too: it logs > >at high log levels during boot that it found no configuration

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 20:20 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 09.04.19 10:11, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > > > Basically, anything that's part of the install environment is going to > > be present after a live install. That accounts for both of the above: > > the

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/9/19 2:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 09.04.19 10:11, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > >> Basically, anything that's part of the install environment is going to >> be present after a live install. That accounts for both of the above: >> the installer supports

Re: Could not execute import_srpm

Antonio Trande wrote: > On 09/04/19 22:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Can any of you folks seeing this: >> >> Run this script: >> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/tWt5LBT13-~d22wBpo38uQ/raw >> >> and send me the output? > > Sorry, > > how this script works? You can download the script (using

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:11 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 12:54 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 12:07, Lennart Poettering > > wrote: > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > > > laptop. It

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Di, 09.04.19 19:24, Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 19:21, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Very similar is actually "fwupd", why does that need to run all the > > time? Seems like something that should be bus activatable, and > > exit-on-idle, but why run it

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Di, 09.04.19 20:12, Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 19:27, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Hmm? Can you elaborate? Why does fwupd's runtime have something to do > > with display flickers? Not grokking the connection? > > More information in >

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/9/19 2:14 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 09.04.19 12:54, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> I think these two are here because of the blivet you mentioned earlier. >> Advanced partitioning requires them to be there... and there do seem to be >> people who actually do

Fedora 30-20190408.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 12/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 2/24 (i386) ID: 379607 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/379607 ID: 379619 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Di, 09.04.19 12:54, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote: > I think these two are here because of the blivet you mentioned earlier. > Advanced partitioning requires them to be there... and there do seem to be > people who actually do expect both of those to work on their workstations

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Di, 09.04.19 14:16, Cole Robinson (crobi...@redhat.com) wrote: > On 4/9/19 1:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:07:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> multipathd [...] And beyond that, this daemon is really ugly too: it logs > >>at high log

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 19:21, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Very similar is actually "fwupd", why does that need to run all the > time? Seems like something that should be bus activatable, and > exit-on-idle, but why run it all the time? It does exit on idle, if you don't have hardware that is

Re: Could not execute import_srpm

On 4/9/19 9:27 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 08/04/19 19:45, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 10:09, Antonio Trande >> escreveu: >>> >>> Hi all. >> >> Hi, >> >> Just a guess that it was the same issue as for me a few days ago. But it >> might >> be

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/9/19 1:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:07:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> multipathd [...] And beyond that, this daemon is really ugly too: it logs >>at high log levels during boot that it found no configuration and >>hence nothing to

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: To be specific here, 'at' is part of the @standard group. 'chrony' is pulled in several ways. It's part of @standard *if gnome-control-center is being installed*, so effectively it'll be installed with Workstation but not other

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/9/19 2:24 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 09.04.19 14:16, Cole Robinson (crobi...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> On 4/9/19 1:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:07:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: multipathd [...] And beyond that, this daemon is

Re: Could not execute import_srpm

On 09/04/19 22:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 4/9/19 9:27 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 08/04/19 19:45, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >>> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 10:09, Antonio Trande >>> escreveu: Hi all. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Just a guess that it was the same issue as for

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:07 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Heya, > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) > crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda > again, just because

Re: auto-starting libvirtd on Workstation

On 4/9/19 1:00 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: On 4/9/19 2:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Di, 09.04.19 10:11, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: Basically, anything that's part of the install environment is going to be present after a live install. That accounts for both of the

Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 01:26:47PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Ok, I have reverted change: > > * https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-42ea21c6e4 > * https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-660ccd306c > *

dlib update

Hello team, dlib needs an update but the maintainer has not responded for month to verify and merge the change. Can a proven test push the merge and update that package matching upstream release. See https://release-monitoring.org/project/18600/ Reference: ---

Re: Could not execute import_srpm

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We have had at least 3 reports of this today... > (upload causing 408 error). > > Can any of you folks seeing this: > > Run this script: > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/tWt5LBT13-~d22wBpo38uQ/raw > > and send me the output? I just had a

Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 4:21 AM Antonio Trande wrote: > We can complete the coin-or-Bonmin, coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip, > coin-or-OS reviews before, of course. > > Let me check them. I had hoped to get a COPR set up tonight, but alas! I ran out of time. So I just uploaded a tarball here:

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:35 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:07 AM Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > > > Heya, > > > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) > > crashed five

Re: Sphinx and xindy

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:58 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:36 PM Jerry James wrote: > > That was, in fact, an s390x-specific gcc bug, now fixed in Rawhide. > > Sadly, the clisp build is still failing in Rawhide, with failures in > > the socket tests: > > The failing test

Re: vanishing abrt logs

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:21:47PM +0200, jfi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > I agree, but the file /proc/meminfo is not present, right? > And yes, the abrt thing just reads the data from journal and > > stores them on filesystem to be able to upload them to Bugzilla. > > > > > > Regarding the

Re: vanishing abrt logs

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 08:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > If you need some information that is relevant only to your packages, > > we can work together to create a new abrt configuration which will > > gather that information for your packages > > (for example, dnf ships its own abrt

Re: vanishing abrt logs

Dne 09. 04. 19 v 8:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > Can you point me to it? rpm -ql $(rpm -qa|grep dnf)|grep abrt doesn't > yield anything. What and how it is collected is determined by libreport with configs in /etc/libreport Some of those configs even have man page. You can start

Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining

Hi Andi, welcome to the pack! You can try to review some packages or submit your own package, whatever you feel like doing (if you submit a package, you'll need to get sponsored though and reviewing packages is a good way how to get sponsored). In case you want to package some games, there's a

Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true

Awesome, thanks Igor! All of this sounds good to me. Kalev On 4/9/19 14:47, Igor Gnatenko wrote: At this moment, * %meson doesn't pass -Db_ndebug at all, we use project-specific options * If project doesn't specify it, b_ndebug=false is default in meson * In case of mesa, it specifies

Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true

At this moment, * %meson doesn't pass -Db_ndebug at all, we use project-specific options * If project doesn't specify it, b_ndebug=false is default in meson * In case of mesa, it specifies b_ndebug=if-release which works correctly now with backported patch On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:29 PM Kalev

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

> Sorry, but I'm afraid I don't quite get this. Could you please rephrase? > The script uses source repos to fetch build-dependencies. Thanks. That answers my question. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 13:54, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > At this moment, > > * %meson doesn't pass -Db_ndebug at all, we use project-specific options > * If project doesn't specify it, b_ndebug=false is default in meson > * In case of mesa, it specifies b_ndebug=if-release which works correctly > now

Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 7:54 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: Awesome, thanks Igor! All of this sounds good to me. Yeah, sounds like everything is fine now after the if-release fix. Thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining

Hi Dan,  thx for welcoming me to the pack!  I’ve skimmed through the games. I have different games in favor: Raildroad Tycoon, Pizza Tycoon and escape from Monkey Island.  What are the first steps to start?  Thx in forward Cheers  Andi  Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, April 9,

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190409.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 30 Dropped packages:12 Upgraded packages: 94 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 58.74 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages

On 09/04/19 06:31, Jerry James wrote: > Hi Antonio, Hi Jerry. > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:26 PM Antonio Trande > wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Updates of coin-or-Sample/CoinUtils/Ipopt packages are coming on >> Rawhide; involved packages: > > I didn't know you were

Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

Heya, today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda again, just because I wanted to undo something). But I don't really want to discuss that.

Fedora Rawhide-20190409.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 17 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could

Re: Could not execute import_srpm

On 08/04/19 19:45, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 10:09, Antonio Trande > escreveu: >> >> Hi all. > > Hi, > > Just a guess that it was the same issue as for me a few days ago. But it > might > be something else, like an offline server for some reason. >

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 12:07, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) > crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda > again, just because I

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:07:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > multipathd [...] And beyond that, this daemon is really ugly too: it logs >at high log levels during boot that it found no configuration and >hence nothing to do. Yes, obviously, but that's a reason to shut up >and

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 12:54 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 12:07, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > > Heya, > > > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) > > crashed

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 10:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > To be specific here, 'at' is part of the @standard group. 'chrony' is > pulled in several ways. It's part of @standard *if gnome-control-center > is being installed*, so effectively it'll be installed with Workstation > but not other

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2019-04-10 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the

[Bug 1698174] New: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698174 Bug ID: 1698174 Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sereal-Encoder Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1698173] New: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698173 Bug ID: 1698173 Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sereal-Decoder Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1698172] New: perl-Sereal-4.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172 Bug ID: 1698172 Summary: perl-Sereal-4.007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sereal Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1697635] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1697634] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1698315] New: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.462 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698315 Bug ID: 1698315 Summary: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.462 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Verilog-Perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[389-devel] please review: PR 50323 - Add monitor tab functionality to UI/CLI

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50323 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-04-10 - 88% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/04/10/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190409git51eb5b2.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 238 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 46 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2 tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7 40

[Bug 1697630] perl-App-a2p-1.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697630 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1697630] perl-App-a2p-1.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697630 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-App-a2p-1.011-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d7bb240e1b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1697634] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2363e01b3b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1697634] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d5b3e2cb13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1697633] perl-Sereal-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697633 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Github |

[Bug 1697635] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d5ce92c1b9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1697635] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-cf812a3fd3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1697634] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1697635] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1697634] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e03735d10d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1697633] perl-Sereal-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697633 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This release fixes a bug but at the same time Serial module stops exporting write_sereal and read_sereal symbols. This a breaking change and thus this release is suitable for Rawhide only. -- You are

[Bug 1697635] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4965667f10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1697633] perl-Sereal-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697633 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1697633] perl-Sereal-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697633 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1697634, 1697635 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1697635] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1697633 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1697634] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1697633 Referenced Bugs: