Re: RPM package for gql

Why not look into the "pyprpm" tool to build a source RPM to start with, to see if it has the dependency stack of doom common to some other python modules? On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 12:19 AM Sreeraj wrote: > > gql from https://github.com/graphql-python/gql is very widely used python > client for gr

Re: F33 podman: unpacking of archive failed cpio: cap_set_file

On 10/5/20 2:32 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 05. 10. 20 14:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 05. 10. 20 14:08, Daniel Walsh wrote: Please try this out and set the karma if it fixes the problem. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-15e7ef1dcc Hi. The update is unpushed and there is no

RPM package for gql

gql from https://github.com/graphql-python/gql is very widely used python client for graphql (stars in the github repo would tell you that.) Can we have an RPM for the python package ? Current stable version is present in v2.x branch. Let me know if this is not the right place to put this. _

Fedora 33 Final Freeze

Hi all, Tomorrow, October 6th 2020, is an important day on the Fedora 33 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Tomorrow we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable'

Fedora-IoT-34-20201005.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200928.0): ID: 685497 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https:

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 12:59 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/5/20 11:21 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 04.10.20 um 21:01 schrieb Samuel Sieb: > >> On 10/4/20 9:36 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: > >>> And still,we do not know why the f33 livedisc does not boot at all when > >>> inserted early > >>> AN

Fedora-33-20201005.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 6/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201004.n.1): ID: 685236 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/685236 ID: 685269 Test: x86_64 Workstation

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On 9/28/20 6:44 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: Subject: Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved I was just hit by the first bug in systemd-resolved 4 days after I upgraded to fedora33. I will file a bug report for that, but I wanted to discuss something more fundamental. systemd

Re: What package provide qmake?

Robbi Nespu wrote: > Hello there, I want to get involve with KDE development. I have follow > the step from https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/development but > unable to proceed to next step to build dolphin (as root): dnf builddep dolphin will install everything the fedora's packaged dolph

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201005.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20201004.n.1 NEW: Fedora-33-20201005.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:62 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 105 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 5.68 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Self Indroduction: Rafael Jeffman

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:46:52PM -0300, Rafael Jeffman wrote: > I am involved in the development of ansible-freeipa ( > https://github.com/freeipa/ansible-freeipa) and plan to co-maintain it for > Fedora. Cool, welcome! > > Years ago I helped with the development and packages for an alternativ

Intel specs

Hello, Could someone buddy-buddy with Intel and who has patience can give feedback on their Review Requests: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771343 https://github.com/intel-secl/trustagent/blob/v1.5.1/packages/trustagent-linux/src/build/trustagent-linux.spec https://bugzilla.redhat

Self Indroduction: Rafael Jeffman

Hello, I am involved in the development of ansible-freeipa ( https://github.com/freeipa/ansible-freeipa) and plan to co-maintain it for Fedora. Years ago I helped with the development and packages for an alternative Linux distribution, GoboLinux (https://gobolinux.org), which I helped develop fro

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 12:55:49 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > ankursinha arbor python-petlink  I've fixed both of these now. Apologies for the delay. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signat

Fedora-Rawhide-20201004.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33

On 10/2/20 3:50 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: sudo dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync F

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201004.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201003.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201004.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 133 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 129.14 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

On 10/5/20 11:21 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: Am 04.10.20 um 21:01 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 10/4/20 9:36 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: And still,we do not know why the f33 livedisc does not boot at all when inserted early AND why grub-install /dev/USBDRIVE  (correct devicename ofcourse ) is overwriting

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

Am 04.10.20 um 21:01 schrieb Samuel Sieb: > On 10/4/20 9:36 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: >> And still,we do not know why the f33 livedisc does not boot at all when >> inserted early >> AND >> why grub-install /dev/USBDRIVE  (correct devicename ofcourse ) is >> overwriting the ssd boot setup, instead o

Re: interest in debuginfod as fedora service

On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 13:35 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Adam Williamson writes: > > > This seems like it sort of overlaps a bit with what the abrt retrace > > server does. It's not the same, but in order to do what it does, the > > retrace server *does* need to act as a remote provider of de

Re: interest in debuginfod as fedora service

Adam Williamson writes: > This seems like it sort of overlaps a bit with what the abrt retrace > server does. It's not the same, but in order to do what it does, the > retrace server *does* need to act as a remote provider of debuginfo. I > wonder if it's possible to combine these somehow? Anoth

Re: interest in debuginfod as fedora service

Adam Williamson writes: > This seems like it sort of overlaps a bit with what the abrt retrace > server does. It's not the same, but in order to do what it does, the > retrace server *does* need to act as a remote provider of debuginfo. I > wonder if it's possible to combine these somehow? As I

Re: What package provide qmake?

On 10/5/20 12:55 AM, Robbi Nespu wrote: Unable to find qmake. This program is absolutely essential for building Please ensure the development packages for Qt are installed by using your distribution's package manager. This is actually a tricky program to find, although this line provides a go

Re: interest in debuginfod as fedora service

I for one really support this idea. Having immediate access to all the debuginfo for all the installed software really useful. The practical benefit is not entirely obvious. For example a week or so ago I needed to track down a problem with libboost and where it was storing a variable. So I en

Re: interest in debuginfod as fedora service

On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 11:20 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > > If you never use debuggers, tracing tools, profilers, crash dump > analysis tools, go ahead and skip this note! > > If you're still reading, you know you sometimes need debuginfo for the > packages you're working with. And you

fio accidentally Provided a few libraries like librbd.so.1, libaio.so.1, librdma.so.1, etc

Ooops: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884954 It causes various packages like libvirt in Rawhide to be uninstallable or not startable because dnf may prefer fio over the proper dependency. Anyway it's fixed now so just make sure your Rawhide repo caches are up to date. Rich. -- R

Re: how to list contents of a side tag?

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:08:11PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 10. 20 11:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I'd like to introspect a side tag: > > 'koji list-pkgs --tag f34-build-side-31299' lists many many packages. > > 'koji list-pkgs --noinherit --tag f34-build-side-31299' lists

Re: how to list contents of a side tag?

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:59:06AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I'd like to introspect a side tag: > 'koji list-pkgs --tag f34-build-side-31299' lists many many packages. > 'koji list-pkgs --noinherit --tag f34-build-side-31299' lists nothing. > Is there some command which would list

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33

Hey! while upgrading I get this error : Problem: package nodejs-grunt-1.0.4-4.fc33.noarch requires (npm(rimraf) >= 2.0 with npm(rimraf) < 3), but none of the providers can be installed - package nodejs-grunt-cli-1.2.0-9.fc32.noarch requires npm(grunt), but none of the providers can be installe

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33

On Fr, 2020-10-02 at 09:50 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf m

Re: interest in debuginfod as fedora service

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:21 AM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Hi - > > If you never use debuggers, tracing tools, profilers, crash dump > analysis tools, go ahead and skip this note! > > If you're still reading, you know you sometimes need debuginfo for the > packages you're working with. And you p

interest in debuginfod as fedora service

Hi - If you never use debuggers, tracing tools, profilers, crash dump analysis tools, go ahead and skip this note! If you're still reading, you know you sometimes need debuginfo for the packages you're working with. And you probably know that % sudo debuginfo-install is still the official w

Orphaned poetry and some of its dependencies

Hi everybody, I've decided to orphan poetry and some of its python dependencies. I don't actually use those packages myself (I've seen the light and switched to Rust for my own projects), and maintaining them has become a major headache with the upstream projects being very "special". Some of th

Re: s390x: Fedora ELN switched to z13 baseline (in redhat-rpm-config)

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:09 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard Shaw: > > > Excellent! I'm pretty sure this brings in some intrinsics that weren't > > available in z11(?), so I had to excludearch s390x for one of my > > packages. Now I just have to remember which one it was! > > Note that Fedo

Re: s390x: Fedora ELN switched to z13 baseline (in redhat-rpm-config)

* Richard Shaw: > Excellent! I'm pretty sure this brings in some intrinsics that weren't > available in z11(?), so I had to excludearch s390x for one of my z196? > packages. Now I just have to remember which one it was! Note that Fedora rawhide is still at zEC12, so the impact on your packages

Re: new dnf mode of listing upgraded packages

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:17:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:15 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On rawhide: > > $ sudo dnf upgrade > > > > Package

Re: s390x: Fedora ELN switched to z13 baseline (in redhat-rpm-config)

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:14 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > We established a while back the the Fedora infrastructure is capable of > running z13 binaries for the IBM Z (s390x) architecture, so I do not > expect any issues. > > The rationale for this change is that this aligns with the toolchain > def

Re: new dnf mode of listing upgraded packages

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:15 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On rawhide: > $ sudo dnf upgrade > > PackageArch Version > Reposito

new dnf mode of listing upgraded packages

On rawhide: $ sudo dnf upgrade PackageArch Version Repository Size ==

s390x: Fedora ELN switched to z13 baseline (in redhat-rpm-config)

We established a while back the the Fedora infrastructure is capable of running z13 binaries for the IBM Z (s390x) architecture, so I do not expect any issues. The rationale for this change is that this aligns with the toolchain default in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. The default built into gcc wi

Re: F33 podman: unpacking of archive failed cpio: cap_set_file

On 05. 10. 20 14:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 05. 10. 20 14:08, Daniel Walsh wrote: Please try this out and set the karma if it fixes the problem. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-15e7ef1dcc Hi. The update is unpushed and there is no active update for Fedora 33 now. Lumír

Re: F33 podman: unpacking of archive failed cpio: cap_set_file

On 05. 10. 20 14:08, Daniel Walsh wrote: Please try this out and set the karma if it fixes the problem. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-15e7ef1dcc Hi. The update is unpushed and there is no active update for Fedora 33 now. Lumír Lokesh can you explain what is going on?

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Hi, I think fontforge is a false positive. It's just one line which imports setuptools and that is from third party sources in the pycontrib directory. That file (or directory) is not installed by the fontforge package. Regards, Parag ___ devel mailing

Re: F33 podman: unpacking of archive failed cpio: cap_set_file

On 10/5/20 02:13, Lumír Balhar wrote: On 10/2/20 9:52 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: On 10/2/20 06:09, Lumír Balhar wrote: Hello. I have fully upgraded Fedora 33 on my laptop and when I try to use podman and install httpd package into container, I get the following error message: Error unpacking

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

I updated fail2ban and gmsh and committed to master. I assume that is sufficient? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https:/

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I'm adopting `pstoedit` On 05/10/20 12:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https:/

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33

Error: Problem: package mbrowse-0.4.3-20.fc31.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-25.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mbrowse-0.4.3-20.fc31.x86_64 -- Tom

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: how to list contents of a side tag?

On 05. 10. 20 11:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I'd like to introspect a side tag: 'koji list-pkgs --tag f34-build-side-31299' lists many many packages. 'koji list-pkgs --noinherit --tag f34-build-side-31299' lists nothing. Is there some command which would list packages that are in the s

how to list contents of a side tag?

I'd like to introspect a side tag: 'koji list-pkgs --tag f34-build-side-31299' lists many many packages. 'koji list-pkgs --noinherit --tag f34-build-side-31299' lists nothing. Is there some command which would list packages that are in the side tag? Also, is there a nice way to lists builds (failed

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33

On 05. 10. 20 9:30, Petr Pisar wrote: Problem 3: package irssi-1.2.2-6.fc33.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.32.0-462.fc33.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.30.3-455.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed packa

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

On Sunday, 04 October 2020 at 19:41, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 18:29, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > On Sunday, 04 October 2020 at 15:06, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > > > > > - tbb provides libtbb.so.2 > > > > That

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On 10/1/20 5:44 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 01.10.2020 16:54, Petr Menšík wrote: >> But DNS over TLS does not bring you more privacy usually. > > It does. DoT and DoH encrypt all DNS traffic. Your ISP can no longer spy > on you and sell the collected data to third parties. > No, it

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal:?? systemd-resolved

On 10/2/20 2:16 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 12:34 am, Marius Schwarz > wrote: >> If you send a DNS REQUEST to a US DNS server from within a company >> network, and with ipv6 the internal ip is sent out i learned lately, you >> have sent personal data which is protected

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On 4/16/20 5:43 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:41:07AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: >> >> Really, it may be best to go about this in the same way as Ubuntu, with nss- >> dns instead of nss-resolve.. Editing /etc/resolv.conf is still commonly done >> on Fedora, especially

Re: Fwd: Orphaned packages of skisela

Dne 03. 10. 20 v 17:41 Andy Mender napsal(a): > On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 11:53, Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > Hi, > > I was in contact with Sebastian, who used to work for RH and > maintained several Fedora packages. However, due to chances in his > live, he de

Re: What package provide qmake?

On 5/10/2020 4:00 pm, Tom Hughes wrote: Nothing provides qtmake. There is qmake-qt5 though, in qt5-qtbase-devel. There's also qmake-qt4 in qt-devel but I assume that it's the qt5 one you want. Yes you are right, qmake-qt5 is what i looking for. Thank you ___

Re: What package provide qmake?

Nothing provides qtmake. There is qmake-qt5 though, in qt5-qtbase-devel. There's also qmake-qt4 in qt-devel but I assume that it's the qt5 one you want. Tom On 05/10/2020 08:55, Robbi Nespu wrote: Hello there, I want to get involve with KDE development. I have follow the step from https://com

Re: What package provide qmake?

Try this dnf provides '*/bin/qmake' пн, 5 окт. 2020 г. в 12:55, Robbi Nespu : > Hello there, I want to get involve with KDE development. I have follow > the step from https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/development but > unable to proceed to next step to build dolphin > > > $ kdesrc-build dolp

Re: What package provide qmake?

Hello, I think you should look after qmake-qt5 instead of qmake ... qmake-qt5 is shipped by qt5-qtbase-devel Best regards, Yann - Mail original - De: "Robbi Nespu" À: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Envoyé: Lundi 5 Octobre 2020 09:55:01 Objet: What package provide qmake? Hello there, I

What package provide qmake?

Hello there, I want to get involve with KDE development. I have follow the step from https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/development but unable to proceed to next step to build dolphin $ kdesrc-build dolphin Cloning sysadmin-repo-metadata Unable to find qmake. This program is absolutely e

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 07:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Sunday, October 4, 2020 7:44:49 PM CEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Jerry James wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:07 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > > > > > > > - tbb pr

Re: %set_build_flags problem in rpm spec file

On 10/3/20 3:06 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 2:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 03. 10. 20 5:04, Ruki Wang wrote: Hi, every one. I am making rpm spec and doing tests on copr. But on opensuse-leap-15.1-*, %set_build_flags still causes some problems. + %set_build_flags /var/tmp/

Re: build rpm from spec file fails on fedora-eln-armhfp

On Monday, October 5, 2020 9:23:14 AM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: > * Ruki Wang: > > > Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'eln': > > - Status code: 404 for > > https://odcs.fedoraproject.org/composes/production/latest-Fedora-ELN/compose/Everything/armhfp/os/repodata/repomd.xml > >

Re: F34 Change proposal: Debug Info Standardization (from DWZ to -fdebug-types-section) (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:20:53 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Fedora Server still defaults to LVM and XFS, as far as I know. I expect > that downstream will continue to use XFS as well. > > I don't think you can assume that debugging information will be stored > on btrfs file systems. OK. Then DWA

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33

On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 08:01:16AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > Problem 2: package python2-libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 requires > libxml2(x86-64) = 2.9.10-4.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed > - libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - pro

Re: build rpm from spec file fails on fedora-eln-armhfp

* Ruki Wang: > Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'eln': > - Status code: 404 for > https://odcs.fedoraproject.org/composes/production/latest-Fedora-ELN/compose/Everything/armhfp/os/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 67.219.144.68) Looks like COPR is still trying to build ELN on armhfp

Re: F34 Change proposal: Debug Info Standardization (from DWZ to -fdebug-types-section) (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Jan Kratochvil: > On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:28:03 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Why do you think that? Using debuginfo for perf and the like seems to >> be much more common than actual debugging, based on what I see >> downstream. > > OK, interesting, thanks for the info. Still that does not cha

Re: F34 Change proposal: Debug Info Standardization (from DWZ to -fdebug-types-section) (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:28:03 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Why do you think that? Using debuginfo for perf and the like seems to > be much more common than actual debugging, based on what I see > downstream. OK, interesting, thanks for the info. Still that does not change anything with btrfs zst