On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 20:47 Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 10:36 AM Igor Raits
> wrote:
> >
> > Seems rust-srpm-macros and rust-packaging are in the RHEL9 which means
> it is not possible to get them in EPEL9. That also means, they are already
> outdated and do not support our
Hi,
I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries.
There is still time to submit fixes for the final 13.0.1. I'll give more
details about timelines and how to do this once the bugzilla migration is
complete. Currently, bugzilla is read-only, so we can't submit any
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:16 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Thank you very much for your help, there are 107 failures, and 270 java
> packagers, but only 2 active members of java sig. Without your help, the JDK
> bump will be very hard.
All of the packages listed under jjames should now be fixed.
--
On Monday, November 29, 2021 5:12:22 PM CST Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:52 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:16 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > Fedora 33 will go end of life for updates and support on 30th of
> > > November 2021.
Hello,
This issue [1] is open for an epel8 build of fedora-review. I would like to
help out and co-maintain if possible.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868827
--
Robby Callicotte
He/Him/His
Timezone: America/Chicago
IRC: c4t3l | Twitter: @robbycl2v
signature.asc
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> 5 - Use internal RHEL mirrors.
This is inherently not an acceptable solution for the default mock
configuration shipped to end users, because they will not have access to
those internal mirrors (and I doubt Red Hat will allow making them public,
as it would bypass
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> You're correct. With the current setup, it's also relatively simple to
> revert to the "frozen" release, which handles most of the regression
> situations. And Fedora releases are nowhere near so long-lived as RHEL
> and EPEL, so it tends to be less of a long-lived
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:52 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:16 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Fedora 33 will go end of life for updates and support on 30th of
> > November 2021. No further updates, including security updates, will be
> > available for
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:22:42PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Well that would be what I was missing. I guess this should be much
> less controversial, then, if it's OK for people to just continue
> using dist-git forever and completely ignore src-git? Nobody is ever
> required to use
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:16 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Fedora 33 will go end of life for updates and support on 30th of
> November 2021. No further updates, including security updates, will be
> available for Fedora 33 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora
> 33 being
I echo your views and agree with you completely. FOSS implementations
should be used whenever available. - Ahmed Almeleh (Candidate for FESCo,
the youngest of them.)
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:59, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:06 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 08:04, Tomáš Orsava wrote:
>
> The downside is that we will have a few thousand (est. 3624 [1])
> additional Obsoletes tags in the Fedora repos that are mostly useless.
> Does anyone see a problem with this? Given the amount of tags already
> present (e.g. 336 thousand
On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 04:42:18 PM -0500, Matthew Miller
wrote:
Nope! The Packit Service bot works just like a human packager and
syncs
back changes other packagers have made.
Well that would be what I was missing. I guess this should be much less
controversial, then, if it's OK for people
Hello all,
Fedora 33 will go end of life for updates and support on 30th of
November 2021. No further updates, including security updates, will be
available for Fedora 33 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora
33 being pushed to stable will be stopped as well.
Fedora 34 will continue to
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 16:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> > Could we set up open-source Gitlab and run that? Well, history has
> shown that the answer is "probably not, actually".
>
> I don't believe it. If GNOME and KDE and freedesktop.org and Debian and
> Purism can all do it, I'm pretty
Hello all,
Fedora 33 will go end of life for updates and support on 30th of
November 2021. No further updates, including security updates, will be
available for Fedora 33 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora
33 being pushed to stable will be stopped as well.
Fedora 34 will continue to
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:25:29PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> src-git is exclusively used for downstream Fedora packaging, so I
> don't expect upstreams to be interested at all, unless upstream
> developers are also the Fedora packagers, right? I'm also assuming
So, we do have a lot of
On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 03:15:24 PM -0500, Matthew Miller
wrote:
source-git is intended to be
distributed and close to upstreams.
Interesting. Why? What you and David are both saying seems so weird to
me, I suddenly wonder if I am seriously misunderstanding something,
because I know you're
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:53:54PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> coordinate their work. Even if you spend your time working solely
> upstream, src-git still ultimately goes through dist-git via PackIt as
> would existing package maintenance. dist-git therefore is the
> authoritative source of
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:58:58PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> interview, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
> I actually briefly mentioned this topic in my last interview for
> FESCo, one year ago (last paragraph, the "open question"):
>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge?
Fedora Council has already effectively stated
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:06 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
> > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
> > gitlab.com, which a proprietary
RHEL 8.5 updated qt5 from 5.12 to 5.15. This allowed us to update the KDE
Plasma Desktop in epel 8 to the latest version, per the update schedule[1].
That update is complete, tested and pushed to epel stable.
** New Versions
qt5 - 5.15 (5.15.2 mainly)
plasma - 5.23.3
kf5 - 5.88
** Known Bugs
-
On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 10:42:13 AM EST Rob Crittenden wrote:
> What's strange is that /etc/ipa is owned by freeipa-client-common and
> freeipa-server-common so I'm not sure how it became orphaned. Is it
> possible some of these are leftovers after package install/uninstall?
I thought
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
> support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
> gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge?
I am not one of these candidates, but I
On 11/29/21 1:33 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda
= Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI =
== Summary ==
The Anaconda installer GUI will have the administrative rights
checkbox on the User screen ticked by
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:06 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
> support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
> gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge?
>
> Fedora Council has already effectively stated
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:05 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> I mean... that would have been a good way to make sure everyone at least
> provided some answer, but I don't think we have (or should have) any rule
> against asking FESCo or Council people questions at other times.
I think asking FESCo or
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 10:36 AM Igor Raits
wrote:
>
> Seems rust-srpm-macros and rust-packaging are in the RHEL9 which means it is
> not possible to get them in EPEL9. That also means, they are already outdated
> and do not support our latest greatest consistent packaging across Fedora
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda
= Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI =
== Summary ==
The Anaconda installer GUI will have the administrative rights
checkbox on the User screen ticked by default.
== Owner ==
* Name:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_1.0
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 1.0.0 in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt 1.0.0 released with a bunch of bugfixes and new features. It's
always good to keep
> It's too late for the questionnaire, yes, but... too late to ask???
>
> I mean... that would have been a good way to make sure everyone at
> least
> provided some answer, but I don't think we have (or should have) any
> rule
> against asking FESCo or Council people questions at other times.
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda
= Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI =
== Summary ==
The Anaconda installer GUI will have the administrative rights
checkbox on the User screen ticked by default.
== Owner ==
* Name:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_1.0
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 1.0.0 in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt 1.0.0 released with a bunch of bugfixes and new features. It's
always good to keep
On 11/27/21 6:40 AM, Igor Raits wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 2:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> The macros and tools that power the rust packaging stuff (aside from
> rust-srpm-macros) are not shipped in CentOS/RHEL 9, so we can ship it
> in EPEL 9 if we want.
>
>
> Hmm, so why does
>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:19:53AM -0800, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> One should have proposed such a question during the period when such
> questions were being vetted. It is too late now that the questions asked
> were the decided, the responses made, and the election has begun. Perhaps
> you
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:11:48AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> > > dedicated CDN endpoint for
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:11:48AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> > > dedicated CDN endpoint for
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 10:06 Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
> support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
> gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge?
>
One should have proposed such a question
during the
Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you
support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on
gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge?
Fedora Council has already effectively stated that dist-git
infrastructure must remain open source, but has no
Short background: a little while ago, I proposed that we move CommonBugs
from the wiki to a special section of Ask Fedora. Details here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NE6IKJMLKUK2BB4HGBQTALXKJFKVKTR7/
Over the Thanksgiving holiday, I hacked up
Just want to say that this was discussed at the EPEL Steering Committee
Meeting.
Passed: epel9 will have 7 day and epel9-next will have 3 day waiting period
in bodhi. 6 votes for, 0 votes against, 1 abstain
This is valid until RHEL 9 GA.
At that time the epel9-next will become the same as
On 11/23/21 22:13, Steve Grubb wrote:
```
$ rpm -qf /var/cache
filesystem-3.14-7.fc35.x86_64
```
Top level ownership is not good enough because we have to be able to
determine what is in use now vs what I can delete.
For this particular one, I always assumed that I can delete anything in
Hi Otto
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:17 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> The first link is about other docs than the Package Maintainer Docs,
>
with some critical comments from you about the use of Antora in
> docs.fp.o. The latter two are about Pagure. So if I understand
> correctly, when you say that
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:38:26PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:02:23 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > anyone had a successful experience with Fedora 35 Cloud images, and
>
On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:02:23 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > anyone had a successful experience with Fedora 35 Cloud images, and
> > guestfish/virt-sysprep?
> >
> > Seems like we switched from ext4 or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027039
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Pcap-0.19-1.fc36
> I use %bcond , with %bcond we can manipulate mock builds with --with ou
> --without .
> In my opinion the most confuse of %bcond is not have %without tag . I
> think that is address here :
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1520
As a reference, you can also manipulate the
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 3/208 (x86_64), 11/142 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0):
ID: 1073177 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:23:26PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 15:07, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >Oh, wow, we need to get them to replace that logo they've made up for us.:)
>
> They use Simple icons library: https://github.com/simple-icons/simple-icons
>
> Also they
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello,
>
> anyone had a successful experience with Fedora 35 Cloud images, and
> guestfish/virt-sysprep?
>
> Seems like we switched from ext4 or xfs to 'btrfs', and guestfish
> doesn't work with the images, am I right? At least I
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 15:23:26 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 15:07, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Oh, wow, we need to get them to replace that logo they've made up for us.:)
>
> They use Simple icons library: https://github.com/simple-icons/simple-icons
>
> Also they removed
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 13:57:52 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:55:11PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > What I think Artur meant was to use the badge from repology, see
> > https://repology.org/project/python:libneuroml/badges
>
> Or maybe even
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 15:08 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 14:57, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > Did you find a better alternative syntax?
>
> Now I'm using the following:
>
> %global enable_foo 1
>
> %if %{enable_foo}
> ...
> %endif
I use %bcond , with %bcond we can manipulate
yes it works for me thank you
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 13:25 +, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Not sure if there's a way to test a conditional by itself, but if
> it's somewhere in a spec file,
> you can use "rpmspec --parse $FILE" to see what the spec looks like
> after it's parsed
> and all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027399
Bug ID: 2027399
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.082 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:24 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> anyone had a successful experience with Fedora 35 Cloud images, and
> guestfish/virt-sysprep?
>
> Seems like we switched from ext4 or xfs to 'btrfs', and guestfish
> doesn't work with the images, am I right? At least I had
Sorry , I want to test RPM Conditionals generally like
%if !0%{?fedora} < 22
echo yes
%endif
%if ! 0%{?rhel} < 8
echo yes
%endif
%if !0%{?fedora}%{?rhel} || 0%{?fedora} >= 15 || 0%{?rhel} >= 7
echo yes
%endif
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 14:22 +0100, Jun Aruga wrote:
> You can use `%bcond_with
Hello,
anyone had a successful experience with Fedora 35 Cloud images, and
guestfish/virt-sysprep?
Seems like we switched from ext4 or xfs to 'btrfs', and guestfish
doesn't work with the images, am I right? At least I had problems
on EL8 hypervisors so far.
Pavel
On 29/11/2021 15:07, Matthew Miller wrote:
Oh, wow, we need to get them to replace that logo they've made up for us.:)
They use Simple icons library: https://github.com/simple-icons/simple-icons
Also they removed the Fedora logo as it is not free:
-
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> > dedicated CDN endpoint for them, because mirrors would seriously have
> > trouble taking it.
>
> How
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> > dedicated CDN endpoint for them, because mirrors would seriously have
> > trouble taking it.
>
> How
On 29/11/2021 14:57, Jun Aruga wrote:
Did you find a better alternative syntax?
Now I'm using the following:
%global enable_foo 1
%if %{enable_foo}
...
%endif
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:02:58AM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> https://github.com/nest/nest-simulator/blob/master/README.md
Oh, wow, we need to get them to replace that logo they've made up for us. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:01 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:36:30AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > This seems to be happening on a semi-regular basis now. I run scratch
> > builds and they invariably work, but I have seen at least one of my
> scratch
> > builds fail
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> dedicated CDN endpoint for them, because mirrors would seriously have
> trouble taking it.
How often would such packages be used? If we had a non-default repo
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> dedicated CDN endpoint for them, because mirrors would seriously have
> trouble taking it.
How often would such packages be used? If we had a non-default repo
Hi,
I need https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024094 reviewed.
I'm willing to do reviews in return.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:16, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> I would kindly ask you to search yourself in this list:
> https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/fillCopr/exemplarResults/maintainers.jbump
This list contains dead/retired packages. Any chance to regenerate it
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:55:11PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:40:29PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 11:23:13 -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > > > Would anyone have an idea of how this works and
> > > > where issues should be
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:51 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2021 14:22, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > You can use `%bcond_with foo` (foo is not set as "false") or
> > `%bcond_without foo` (foo is set as "true") syntax.
>
> %bcond_with{,out} has very ugly reverse syntax. I recently got rid
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:40:29PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 11:23:13 -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > > Would anyone have an idea of how this works and
> > > where issues should be filed? On our infra or on shields.io?
> > Fedora badges are listed on shields.io under
On 29/11/2021 01:31, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
What would it take to get Fedora, or at least EPEL, to preserve old
releases in the default published repos?
Mirror owners won't be happy.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel
> The idea here [...] is for our target audience to quickly be made aware
> that something is available in Fedora when they go to a GitHub repository.
> They're really not going to go to repology to search
Repology also offers badges. What I meant is that a single Repology badge
listing all known
On 29/11/2021 14:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
How I can check RPM Conditionals [1], for example How I can check what
is the result of:
rpmspec --parse foo-bar.spec
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
On 29/11/2021 14:22, Jun Aruga wrote:
You can use `%bcond_with foo` (foo is not set as "false") or
`%bcond_without foo` (foo is set as "true") syntax.
%bcond_with{,out} has very ugly reverse syntax. I recently got rid of
them in all my packages.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 11:23:13 -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > Would anyone have an idea of how this works and
> > where issues should be filed? On our infra or on shields.io?
> Fedora badges are listed on shields.io under the "Version" category:
> https://shields.io/category/version
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027039
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026984
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
+1
as in upvoting on stack exhcanges.
On 11/29/21 14:25, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
rpmspec --parse $FILE
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Yah, I usually ends in writing super simple no-build package like:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001567#c12
and in MC or via rpm scriplet listing, check the outputs...
J:(
On 11/29/21 14:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
How I can check RPM Conditionals [1], for example How I can
Not sure if there's a way to test a conditional by itself, but if it's
somewhere in a spec file,
you can use "rpmspec --parse $FILE" to see what the spec looks like after it's
parsed
and all the conditionals have been evaluated.
A.FI.
___
devel
You can use `%bcond_with foo` (foo is not set as "false") or
`%bcond_without foo` (foo is set as "true") syntax.
```
%bcond_without foo # foo is set as true
%if %{with foo}
echo 1
%else
echo 0
%endif
```
Then run `mock --with foo *.rpm` or `mock --without foo *.rpm` for the
SRPM file.
Jun
Hello fellow java package maintainers!
We are planning to bump the JDK from java-11-openjdk to java-17-openjdk for
f36. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17
Short Story:
* if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide
* Ensure your package
Thanks to everyone that answered the survey. I shared a short summary of
the results
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-coreos-survey/34408/2
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 12:52, Clement Verna
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Fedora CoreOS Working Group [1] is looking to get feedback on how we
> share
Hi,
I'm working on a way to automatically generate Obsoletes tags for Python
packages. I.e. for each `python3-foo` package, the automatic generator
would create a tag `Obsoletes: python3.10-foo < X-Y` (assuming python3
version is 3.10).
Currently we automatically generate only Provides tags,
Hi,
How I can check RPM Conditionals [1], for example How I can check what
is the result of:
%if 1
echo 1;
%else
echo 0;
%endif
Best regards,
[1]
https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/#rpm-conditionals
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:36:30AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> This seems to be happening on a semi-regular basis now. I run scratch
> builds and they invariably work, but I have seen at least one of my scratch
> builds fail with the same error on f36/rawhide.
>
> This makes no sense that gcc
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211129.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 107
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.94 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
This seems to be happening on a semi-regular basis now. I run scratch
builds and they invariably work, but I have seen at least one of my scratch
builds fail with the same error on f36/rawhide.
This makes no sense that gcc gets an internal error on random occastions.
Is it the machine (or vm)
Hi folks,
we have nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling today's meeting.
See you next week.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:42 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:42 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026984
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico
> Would anyone have an idea of how this works and
> where issues should be filed? On our infra or on shields.io?
Fedora badges are listed on shields.io under the "Version" category:
https://shields.io/category/version
Clicking on the "Fedora" badge brings up a pop-up that allows to specify the
Hi folks,
I've only recently realised that there's a shields.io badge for
Fedora packages. For example:
https://github.com/nest/nest-simulator/blob/master/README.md
A few questions:
- Did we get this setup? Are there other services we can use too?
- What do people think of opening PRs to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211128.0):
ID: 1072937 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211128.0):
ID: 1072921 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
