Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 3:37 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > Unfortunately, this doesn't apply to decoders in the ffmpeg > architecture. Worse, some decoders that _could_ be enabled are > basically broken when hardware support is missing. FFmpeg does not > correctly invalidate them as choices and the

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:10 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 8:33 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 05/06/2022 10:02, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > > We should really start thinking about this. > > > > Yes. Patents for algorithms hinder the development of

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 9:32 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > On 2022-06-09 10:27, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > On 2022-06-09 01:33, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > Building Blender

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 8:33 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 05/06/2022 10:02, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > We should really start thinking about this. > > Yes. Patents for algorithms hinder the development of humankind. > > But there is nothing we can do about it, because Red Hat

[Bug 2091186] Please build perl-PAR-Packer for epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091186 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2095607] New: perl-Log-ger-0.040 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095607 Bug ID: 2095607 Summary: perl-Log-ger-0.040 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-ger Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On 2022-06-09 10:27, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On 2022-06-09 01:33, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Building Blender 3.2.0 with ffmpeg support failed on the following lines: -Wno-unused-function

Re: Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

Big +1 from me... I think this would be great to enable. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Who checks the exception at fedora-scm-requests?

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 09:09:30PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently seen a package that was imported into Fedora without a package > review. I've noticed this because the packages doesn't even install and I > wanted to check if this could have been caught in the package

Re: Intent to retire containerd in EPEL 7 and co-maintainer request

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:55 PM Stewart Smith via devel wrote: > > Maxwell G via devel writes: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have been de-facto maintaining containerd in Fedora as a member of the go- > > sig for a little while now, as the previous maintainer no longer has time to > > do. In addition

[EPEL-devel] BTW Thanks

Not sure it was already said. With the release of RHEL9, EPEL9 (repo) was in such a good state that the first steps with EL9 felt super pleasant (compared to the EL8 start). So, thank you all for the great work you all are doing. Cheers! -- Leon ___

Re: Intent to retire containerd in EPEL 7 and co-maintainer request

Maxwell G via devel writes: > Hi everyone, > > I have been de-facto maintaining containerd in Fedora as a member of the go- > sig for a little while now, as the previous maintainer no longer has time to > do. In addition to the Fedora branches, this package also exists on EPEL 7. > That branch

Re: F37 proposal: RPM Macros for Build Flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 6/7/22 02:18, Florian Weimer wrote: * Ben Cotton: This change will add new macros which will make it easier for packages to add and remove their own compiler flags. This strategy is already used to some extent with feature macros like %{_lto_cflags}, %{_hardening_cflags}, etc, but these

[Bug 2095533] New: perl-Sys-Virt-8.4.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095533 Bug ID: 2095533 Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-8.4.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-Virt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: py3status orphaned

Thanks Ben, you are completely right: Basically, the generated doc is the website. And besides the weird feeling of packaging a website, it comes with all the problems that you pointed me to (bundling jquery, licenses). So, even though I had gotten `mkdocs-simple-hooks` to build meanwhile,

Re: Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 22:01 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 06. 22 21:48, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > ... > > > > So, I'd like to propose that we enable Rawhide update testing on the > > production openQA instance also. This would cause results to appear on > > the Automated

Re: Combine two Bodhi requests?

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 05:20:20PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 09/06/22 11:37, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto: > > Pairs of Bodhi updates which probably should be combined so the > > packages go out together: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f775872c9 & > >

[Bug 2095515] New: Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RandPasswd in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095515 Bug ID: 2095515 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RandPasswd in epel9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Crypt-RandPasswd Assignee:

Re: Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

On 09. 06. 22 21:48, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! ... So, I'd like to propose that we enable Rawhide update testing on the production openQA instance also. This would cause results to appear on the Automated Tests tab in Bodhi, but they would be only informational (and unless the update

Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

Hi folks! We've had openQA testing of updates for stable and branched releases, and gating based on those tests, enabled for a while now. I believe this is going quite well, and I think we addressed the issues reported when we first enabled gating - Bodhi's gating status updates work more

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On 09/06/2022 20:31, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: The linking happens on the user machine, no? For Fedora only akmods are available, which generate kernel-specific kmod RPMs on the user machine. Which causes its own issues since that means you can't boot with Secure Boot anymore... Akmods can

Re: Fedora Copr - EPEL-9 buildroot

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:32 PM David Sommerseth wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've been trying to complete the OpenVPN 3 Linux v18_beta release in my > Fedora Copr repository for EPEL-9. But there seems to be something odd > going on here. I tried to reach out on IRC earlier today but didn't get > much

Re: Who checks the exception at fedora-scm-requests?

On 09. 06. 22 21:11, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:09 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, I've recently seen a package that was imported into Fedora without a package review. I've noticed this because the packages doesn't even install and I wanted to check if this could have been

Re: Who checks the exception at fedora-scm-requests?

On 09. 06. 22 21:26, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 21:09 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, I've recently seen a package that was imported into Fedora without a package review. I've noticed this because the packages doesn't even install and I wanted to check if this could have

Fedora Copr - EPEL-9 buildroot

Hi, I've been trying to complete the OpenVPN 3 Linux v18_beta release in my Fedora Copr repository for EPEL-9. But there seems to be something odd going on here. I tried to reach out on IRC earlier today but didn't get much further. The issue, how I see it, is that the buildroot for EPEL-9

Re: Who checks the exception at fedora-scm-requests?

On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 21:09 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently seen a package that was imported into Fedora without a package > review. I've noticed this because the packages doesn't even install and I > wanted to check if this could have been caught in the package review but

Fedora-IoT-36-20220609.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220607.0): ID: 1292931 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1292931 ID: 1292944 Test: aarch64

Re: Who checks the exception at fedora-scm-requests?

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:09 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, > > I've recently seen a package that was imported into Fedora without a package > review. I've noticed this because the packages doesn't even install and I > wanted to check if this could have been caught in the package review but I >

Who checks the exception at fedora-scm-requests?

Hello, I've recently seen a package that was imported into Fedora without a package review. I've noticed this because the packages doesn't even install and I wanted to check if this could have been caught in the package review but I couldn't find it, so I've checked the fedora-scm-requests

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

> On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 03:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > The linking happens on the user machine, no? For Fedora only akmods are > available, which generate kernel-specific kmod RPMs on the user > machine. Which causes its own issues since that means you can't boot > with Secure

[Bug 2094515] CVE-2022-23712 elasticsearch: DoS via a specifically formatted network request

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094515 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ali.erdinc.koro...@intel.co |

Re: Request to change default /etc/resolv.conf symlink

On 09. 06. 22 19:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I reviewed your pull request https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/21317. I know you are trying to move things forward, but at the same time, you're not really responding to feedback. Despite two versions being pushed in the meantime, my

Re: Updated criteria proposal: networking requirements

On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 19:50 +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > I would propose also ability keep DNSSEC validation passthru. If > infrastructure provides cryptographic records, they should be available > also on the installed host. Without extra modifications. > > Ie. if delv @$NS is validated for all

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 03:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > In addition, that download offer actively promotes proprietary > software, > which used to be a no go in Fedora, but now (very sadly) even Fedora > itself > has started doing that by shipping pointers to all sorts of >

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 2:03 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 09/06/2022 19:27, Neal Gompa wrote: > > In your spec, I see you have this: "-D_ffmpeg_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include" > > It should be: "-D_ffmpeg_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include/ffmpeg" > > I think it will be better to patch Blender's >

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On 09/06/2022 19:27, Neal Gompa wrote: In your spec, I see you have this: "-D_ffmpeg_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include" It should be: "-D_ffmpeg_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include/ffmpeg" I think it will be better to patch Blender's cmake/Modules/FindFFmpeg.cmake to use pkg-config for searching ffmpeg paths.

Re: Updated criteria proposal: networking requirements

I would propose also ability keep DNSSEC validation passthru. If infrastructure provides cryptographic records, they should be available also on the installed host. Without extra modifications. Ie. if delv @$NS is validated for all network DNS servers, then delv should validate too. But that

Re: Python installation paths, pip, F36

On 26. 05. 22 17:13, Owen Taylor wrote: >   - Why is Python itself not installed in the /app prefix? >  - Where and how is pip install invoked? The way that Flatpaks work is that there are *two* filesystem images, one mounted on /usr and one mounted on /app. The image mounted on /usr is

Re: Combine two Bodhi requests?

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 06:47:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Pairs of Bodhi updates which probably should be combined so the > > packages go out together: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f775872c9

Re: Request to change default /etc/resolv.conf symlink

I reviewed your pull request https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/21317. I know you are trying to move things forward, but at the same time, you're not really responding to feedback. Despite two versions being pushed in the meantime, my re-review was to a large part a repeat of what I posted in

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > On 2022-06-09 01:33, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > Building Blender 3.2.0 with ffmpeg support failed on the following lines: > > -Wno-unused-function -Wno-type-limits

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:44 AM Andreas Schneider wrote: > > On Sunday, June 5, 2022 10:36:19 AM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > > H.264 is supported through OpenH264, and H.265 is not a popular codec. > > Aside from Apple services (which are not available to Linux users > > anyway), nobody uses H.265

Re: Combine two Bodhi requests?

Il 09/06/22 11:37, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto: > Pairs of Bodhi updates which probably should be combined so the > packages go out together: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f775872c9 & > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-13bc8c91b0 > >

Re: Python installation paths, pip, F36

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022, 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Unfortunately, I need to take time off from work for personal reasons > for a > > while, so if you could go ahead and make whatever changes are needed and > merge > > them, that would be greatly appreciated. Stephan Bergmann can help you >

Re: Combine two Bodhi requests?

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 12:48 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Pairs of Bodhi updates which probably should be combined so the > > packages go out together: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f775872c9 & > >

Re: Fedora elections voting now open

Reminder that voting is open for the Fedora Linux 36 elections. Go to the Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on Thursday 16 June. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when you cast your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the Elections app and on the

Re: Fedora elections voting now open

Reminder that voting is open for the Fedora Linux 36 elections. Go to the Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on Thursday 16 June. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when you cast your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the Elections app and on the

Re: Combine two Bodhi requests?

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Pairs of Bodhi updates which probably should be combined so the > packages go out together: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f775872c9 & > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-13bc8c91b0 > >

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 03:52:06PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > > Did you run the command

[Bug 2091635] perl-Net-DNS-1.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091635 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: py3status orphaned

HTML documentation generated with mkdocs will unfortunately suffer from the same kinds of issues around bundled and pre-minified JavaScript and CSS identified for Sphinx and Doxygen in [1] and in the “packaging” mailing list thread linked from that bug. (Yes, I know there are a lot of packages

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Sunday, June 5, 2022 10:36:19 AM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > H.264 is supported through OpenH264, and H.265 is not a popular codec. > Aside from Apple services (which are not available to Linux users > anyway), nobody uses H.265 because of the patent situation with HEVC. Sadly HEVC patent holders

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Sunday, June 5, 2022 10:02:21 AM CEST Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > **Rant mode on** > so, the whole purpose of Fedora is to have a fully free software linux > distribution... but we can't accomplish that in a working way, then we > came out with all sort of workarounds to get things working

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On 2022-06-09 01:33, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Building Blender 3.2.0 with ffmpeg support failed on the following lines: -Wno-unused-function -Wno-type-limits -Wno-int-in-bool-context -Wno-switch -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-uninitialized

[Bug 2094836] perl-Graphics-TIFF-19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094836 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-465b629fa6 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[EPEL-devel] Uninstallable due to missing CRB

On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 3:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > Let me start with examples that I get *regularly*: Pagure fails to > install from EPEL on RHEL/CentOS/Alma/etc. because python3-markdown is > not available. KDE Plasma fails to install because of a mass of > missing dependencies. > > I get

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

Once upon a time, Andrew C Aitchison said: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: > >On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 2:54:51 PM CDT Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > >>without messing with config files (which I > >>hate, because that means newer crb.repo changes won't be picked up). > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 2:54:51 PM CDT Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: without messing with config files (which I hate, because that means newer crb.repo changes won't be picked up). I thought files marked `%config(noreplace)` don't get

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ce8d5824ad halibut-1.3-3.el7 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aaaeae50ce rubygem-jmespath-1.3.1-1.el7 The following builds have

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-287b3b64f6 halibut-1.3-3.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing distgen-1.13-1.el8 python-bottle-0.12.21-1.el8

Re: py3status orphaned

py3status looks like a nice i3status provider, which is why I have looked into taking the orphaned package. Alas, the package needs an update from 3.34 (as packaged) to 3.44 (as current). In between these versions, the doc build chain changed from sphinx to mkdocs. Upstream uses the plugin

Re: Updated criteria proposal: networking requirements

Once upon a time, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden said: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 04:35:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections > >using both typical router-provided addressing systems (e.g. DHCP on > >IPv4 or SLAAC or IPv6) and

Re: Updated criteria proposal: networking requirements

On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 04:35:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections using both typical router-provided addressing systems (e.g. DHCP on IPv4 or SLAAC or IPv6) and static addressing. I'd like to see clarification whether this

[Bug 2095035] perl-Chart-2.402.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095035 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Updated criteria proposal: networking requirements

On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 1:36 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Any more thoughts, comments, adjustments etc? Thanks! > Which milestone is this supposed to block? It sounds fine (to my networking layman ears). ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 2091256] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220527 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091256 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022

[Bug 2091242] perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029-1. |perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029-1.

[Bug 2091432] perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709- |perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709-

[Bug 2088880] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220528 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

Re: Python installation paths, pip, F36

On 07. 06. 22 20:20, Owen Taylor wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 26. 05. 22 22:08, Owen Taylor wrote: > OK, I'll work on coming up with some patches. Do you have an opinion about > whether it makes sense to make the

[Bug 2095035] perl-Chart-2.402.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095035 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

perl-Chart license change

Upstream corrected a license in perl-Chart-2.402.0 from ((GPL+ or Artistic) and Artistic 2.0) to (GPL+ or Artistic). -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

[Bug 2095262] New: perl-Test-Time-0.092 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095262 Bug ID: 2095262 Summary: perl-Test-Time-0.092 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Time Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: fedpkg clone not working

Hey, On Thu, Jun 9, 2022, at 2:02 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > I am unable to clone repos from src.fpo since this morning. > > $ fedpkg co xfce4-power-manager > Cloning into 'xfce4-power-manager'... > nonamed...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: Could not read from

[Bug 2095035] perl-Chart-2.402.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095035 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Chart-2.402.0 is |perl-Chart-2.402.1 is

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:43 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 09/06/2022 10:33, Neal Gompa wrote: > > It also seems to fail to find libavdevice, which means you need > > libavdevice-free-devel too. > > That's why splitting ffmpeg into multiple subpackages was a very bad idea. > It is

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On 09/06/2022 10:33, Neal Gompa wrote: It also seems to fail to find libavdevice, which means you need libavdevice-free-devel too. That's why splitting ffmpeg into multiple subpackages was a very bad idea. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

[Bug 2095035] perl-Chart-2.402.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095035 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Chart::Color::Named removed. Suitable for Rawhide only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095035

[Bug 2095035] perl-Chart-2.402.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095035 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Status|NEW

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 15:59 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:31:34AM -0400, Matthew Miller napsal(a): > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:35:15PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > wrote: > > > On 07/06/2022 17:31, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > >

[Bug 2094515] CVE-2022-23712 elasticsearch: DoS via a specifically formatted network request

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094515 Sandipan Roy changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(agerstmayr@redhat

[Bug 2094515] CVE-2022-23712 elasticsearch: DoS via a specifically formatted network request

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094515 Sandipan Roy changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2095202, 2095203 -- You are

Combine two Bodhi requests?

Pairs of Bodhi updates which probably should be combined so the packages go out together: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f775872c9 & https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-13bc8c91b0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8fa7e5aeaf &

[Test-Announce] Kernel 5.18 Test Week is underway

Hey All, Kernel 5.18 Test week is happening now. It's fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your results. As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-...@libera.chat for question and

Re: Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > Building Blender 3.2.0 with ffmpeg support failed on the following lines: > > -Wno-unused-function -Wno-type-limits -Wno-int-in-bool-context -Wno-switch > -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-implicit-fallthrough >

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220609.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220607.0): ID: 1291351 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Enabling ffmpeg on Blender June edition

Building Blender 3.2.0 with ffmpeg support failed on the following lines: -Wno-unused-function -Wno-type-limits -Wno-int-in-bool-context -Wno-switch -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-implicit-fallthrough -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -Wno-class-memaccess -Wno-comment

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski writes: > I guess it could be fixed with a clean-room reimplementation of the > stripped parts of FDK-AAC. Clean-room reimplementation negates the very applicability of any pre-existing *copyright* to your work. It does not affect applicability of pre-existing