On 30 January 2014 23:02, Richard Fearn richardfe...@gmail.com wrote:
You may have used this kind
of thing - it tells you 'click this next' and waits until you do.
As you might expect, googling for anything along these lines without
having a very precise set of keywords only returns pages of
On 30 January 2014 23:07, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 01/29/2014 07:10 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 29 January 2014 23:58, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I consider myself
On 29 January 2014 22:44, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 January 2014 15:01, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29,
On 29 January 2014 23:58, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large
or small it might be. I also think they can be done by the people
wishing to
On 30 January 2014 00:01, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Two thoughts:
1. Is there scope for a spin to be a particular sub-focus of a product?
Desktop (all)
. desktop gnome
. desktop kde
. desktop twm (maybe not)
Server (all)
. server web
. server fileserver (or whatever might make
On 28 January 2014 06:48, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting package icecat[1
On 28 January 2014 07:05, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 22:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng
On 23 January 2014 21:57, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:54 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 13:48 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
To be honest my concerns are more with
On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free
version firefox.
I'd argue it's *less* free since it seeks to restrict what you can do:
Finally, we need to
On 27 January 2014 13:06, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:36 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
does this mean there will be things unavailable on some 'products'
that are not on others?
No.
The Products will be defining an environment and a standard install
set
I'm looking for something and not quite sure what it's called.
In thinking about what the music SIG can do to add value I've hit on
wondering whether it's possible to write desktop-based guided
tutorials without having to interfere in the application in question
itself (otherwise you have to
On 24 January 2014 20:13, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 24.01.2014 19:31, schrieb Reindl Harald:
and try the however named option, keep
in mind some people own only one machine and can't google for help
I doubt that. Most people do have multiple ways to access the internet
(multiple
On 9 January 2014 15:13, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014 6:26 AM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com said:
nod Just have yum drop a config file in there that protects the
kernel
rather than protecting the
On 6 January 2014 13:06, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't even remember I ever needed yum remove kernel. Does it mean that
yum remove kernel should not work at all no matter if it leaves running
kernel on the system or not? Or should it be completely prohibited? Why we
keep 3
On 13 November 2013 16:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
http://209.132.184.188/
That page says
On 17 November 2013 04:33, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:11PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Oh, hey, look. That place is rapidly becoming the 'crap, we don't know
where to put this' dumping ground for GNOME 3, isn't it?
It has been there since 3.0 AFAIK, so
On 10 November 2013 15:06, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:35:41 +, Ian Malone wrote:
Please don't let it install applications, which cannot be started via the
graphical desktop user interface (such as a menu system or a list of
installed Applications
On 10 November 2013 20:55, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 18:02:46 +, Ian Malone wrote:
You are arguing that system management should only be possible through
a GUI where the affected components are themselves graphical.
No, not at all.
Please take some
On 9 November 2013 21:47, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
Hi,
The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something is
On 8 November 2013 00:11, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
HI
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Honestly, I don't think Software is really aimed at your use case, and
you may as well just keep using yum. It's meant to be a cool way to find
On 12 September 2013 08:34, Martin Briza mbr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:17:48 +0200, Michael Catanzaro
mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 00:13 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
1. This is the case for the KDE live CD install too.
2. Where the custom session
On 11 September 2013 08:05, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/10/2013 08:25 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
I did a TC5 minimal install last night, which omitted mc, my most
used cmdline tool. So:
# yum install mc
... installing for dependencies:
gpm-libs (which I never ever use)
perl*
Hi,
Looking at the installed login session options from SDDM on F20 Alpha
TC5 for Fedora Jam x86_64 there is a session listed 'custom' alongside
failsafe, KDE and KDE failsafe. This option doesn't log in to anything
and kicks the user back to the login screen, it also seems to be the
default
On 10 September 2013 06:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2013 10:54 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
Thank you for the put down. However, firstly I'm not referring to the
fqdn issue, but the mention of dropping user name and secondly I'm not
the administrator of all
On 22 August 2013 15:50, Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 08:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
- The user@ is mostly useless; if you su/sudo to root, the character
at the end of the prompt changes from
On 9 September 2013 20:53, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2013 07:53 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
I'd like to add myself as another datapoint for 'uses different
users', and often via ssh. In any case, that bash prompt trick surely
only works if applied to all user profiles
On 29 August 2013 01:53, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to follow up, thanks, your instructions for building worked fine
(I'd worried it wouldn't be so straightforward). Thought I'd best
mention koji
On 29 August 2013 13:32, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Strange. The source is definitely still on that machine. I'll look
into why it's not showing up on the webpage.
Ok, you can clone it with:
git
On 28 August 2013 14:53, Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but
I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM
and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that will be build rpm w/o/
On 20 August 2013 13:50, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
That shouldn't really be an issue for the most part. It would only
impact you if you're hitting issues in an area where the config
options differ between releases, and those are fairly uncommon. You
can try using koji
On 24 August 2013 16:38, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013,
On 20 August 2013 19:29, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Each approved spin MUST have at least 1 person fill in a basic spin
test matrix for at least 1 TC or RC in order to be shipped with Alpha.
If the image fails or there are no test results maintainers can try
again at the next
Hi, I've got a kernel bug where a developer has asked me to try a git
bisect. Does anyone have tips for doing a kernel bisect with fedora
kernel packages? I found a koji bisect thing, but the last known good
kernel is prior to the fedora release the machine is currently
running, so not sure that
On 20 August 2013 13:50, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I've got a kernel bug where a developer has asked me to try a git
bisect. Does anyone have tips for doing a kernel bisect with fedora
kernel packages
On 29 July 2013 03:32, Subhendu Ghosh sghosh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
In the OS/App differentiation, you are expecting each is coming from a
different source.
Apps are either boxed, or coming from a project.
The
On 3 July 2013 08:47, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 à 09:44 +0200, Johannes Lips a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal
dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 3 July 2013 20:48, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2013-07-03 2:28, Ian Malone wrote:
Tooling issues aside (and it is undesireable that bugs should get
marked fixed if they haven't been) I think this rule is wrong under a
strict reading. If an update claims to fix two bugs
On 13 May 2013 11:21, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/18/2013 01:08 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
Yes, Ada has some nice features. At least there are real arrays, but
they are somewhat cumbersome to work with, compared to Java, Python or,
well, C pointers.
On 9 May 2013 05:44, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2013-05-09 00:02 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread
On 4 May 2013 23:42, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2013 15:22:01 -0700
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 4 May 2013 19:23, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Another opinion.
It is possible to study such things, and even give caveats and error
bounds to show uncertainty.
Yes and no. It's possible it a tightly defined setting with specified
outcomes. Since a crucial factors here
On 19 March 2013 08:04, G.Wolfe Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/19/2013 02:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, look, my point is that sometimes our commitment to 'fixing things
the right way' appears to verge on bloody masochism.
snip
If we have to compromise on just papering it
On 19 March 2013 11:03, Marc Deop i Argemí m...@marcdeop.com wrote:
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:27:16 Christof Damian wrote:
Fixing an apostrophe – no
Umlaut, not apostrophe.
Fixing our UTF-8 handling – definitely yes
The issue here is not only about the Fedora's release name rather
On 19 March 2013 11:24, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le Mar 19 mars 2013 11:38, Ian Malone a écrit :
and holding up the release for what is basically a triviality seems a
bit silly.
The perception correct UTF-8 handling is a triviality that should be
worked on at some
On 19 March 2013 11:41, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le Mar 19 mars 2013 12:27, Ian Malone a écrit :
On 19 March 2013 11:24, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
wrote:
Le Mar 19 mars 2013 11:38, Ian Malone a écrit :
and holding up the release for what
On 19 March 2013 12:20, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 19.3.2013 12:23, Ian Malone napsal(a):
On 19 March 2013 11:03, Marc Deop i Argemí m...@marcdeop.com wrote:
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:27:16 Christof Damian wrote:
Fixing an apostrophe – no
Umlaut, not apostrophe
On 12 March 2013 22:13, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Why should the default configuration be ugly, slow, and biased toward
handling the odd case when things break ?
I confess I've only been lightly skimming this entire deeply
interesting thread, on which more man hours have almost
On 13 March 2013 12:46, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 03/13/2013 12:26 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- (Nobody explicitly stated this, but) Displaying information geared
towards power users by default is intimidating / confusing to
less-knowledgeable users.
I'd call this to be
On 13 March 2013 15:07, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 13.3.2013 14:23, Ian Malone napsal(a):
Are teens and pre-teens fedora's main target audience now? I'm really not
sure what it is anymore.
Are you suggesting that we should exclude them?
Yes okay, that's what I'm suggesting
On 11 March 2013 20:43, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Lennart Poettering wrote:
If some text like Press Esc now to choose which operating system to
boot. would be displayed, then the pause would need to be
On 5 March 2013 17:52, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:44:39 -0500
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
This is local testing that has been done in concert with the feature
to add enterprise login support to Anaconda/firstboot. There's
currently no way to
On 21 February 2013 18:24, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:04 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 19 February 2013 12:13, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Question: does a python segfault from a broken script indicate a
python bug as well? The scripting
On 18 February 2013 10:37, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
I'm trying to collect feedback, I'd expect some respect instead of one
liners. Loads of people working in Fedora don't follow devel@ because of
the attitude displayed here. I often get questioned wtf I spend the time
to proceed
On 18 February 2013 12:57, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 02/18/2013 07:58 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 18 February 2013 10:37, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
I'm trying to collect feedback, I'd expect some respect instead of one
liners. Loads of people working
On 11 February 2013 22:24, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
On record? Is there going to be a trial?
What frustrates me is it's such an uphill battle.
Step 1: Everything changes.
Step 2: Users protest, some leave.
Step 3: Supporters respond there's nothing wrong
On 9 February 2013 12:52, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le samedi 09 février 2013 à 11:34 +, Ian Malone a écrit :
On 9 February 2013 00:37, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
wrote:
* Gnome 3's target
On 9 February 2013 12:25, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
* Gnome 3 is going the I-know-better-then-you-what's-good-for-you
way.
Sure by giving you an extension system that allows you to do whatever
you want
On 11 February 2013 07:15, Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:34:34AM +, Ian Malone wrote:
Gnome 2 slowly returned to the old behaviour in many ways. Gnome 3 is
starting to do this.
As someone who, I presume, does not like Gnome 3, and as someone who, I
On 9 February 2013 00:37, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
wrote:
* Gnome 3's target audience does not enclose majority of Gnome 2's
target audience, though it *does* have some intersection. Many of
those are
On 5 February 2013 20:10, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't say Fedora follows blindly but rather chooses an upstream from
some alternatives (their ability to handle feedback from us beeing one ot
the criterias).
Gnome has been the default, unless I'm misremebering since
On 31 January 2013 09:07, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:05:16AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
This makes it difficult to call system commands. The only workaround is
to set LC_ALL to a known-good locale, but then your users get no benefit
from the
On 31 January 2013 15:04, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 January 2013 09:07, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:05:16AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
This makes it difficult to call system commands. The only workaround is
to set LC_ALL to a known
On 18 January 2013 01:19, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/17/2013 07:00 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Yes, I'd veto btrfs as the default as well. I lost a huge chunk of
data on a btrfs partition a while back, with *no* diagnostics,
recovery tools, help from Google, etc.
On 18 January 2013 17:19, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/18/2013 10:50 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
I suggest sdfs as the new default filesystem, you cannot veto it, but
highlighting critical bugs will be beneficial. Please post bugzilla links
rather than descriptions of the issues
On 12 January 2013 19:07, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:01:03 +
Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
KDE favourites:
For a spin (or formula) it makes sense that the favourites should
reflect the spin (or formula) focus. The kickstart updates this
through
On 12 January 2013 17:02, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
KDE favourites:
For a spin (or formula) it makes sense that the favourites should
reflect the spin (or formula) focus. The kickstart updates this
through /etc/skel/.kde/share/config/kickoffrc and
/etc/rc.d
On 10 January 2013 23:51, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Brendan Jones wrote:
The main problem we have with kickstarts at the moment is that there is
no way (according to current packaging guidelines) to alter files owned
by other packages.
This is just plain impossible anyway
On 9 January 2013 04:10, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm
On 9 January 2013 12:23, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Down-sides, there'd no longer be a live-cd/dvd as a 'demo' system. You
could only try out the formula on an installed system. It looks though
like people are already suggesting overlaying a formula somehow to
create traditional
On 10 December 2012 15:25, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:20:55 -0500 (EST), Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve
On 10 December 2012 16:02, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:28:22 +, Ian Malone wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email
On 30 November 2012 10:58, Erwin Waterlander water...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi,
Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
I have an Nvidia GeForce GT220. When I upgraded from f14 to f16 and then to
f17 I had to go through a lot of trouble, because Anaconda gave me a black
screen every time
On 15 November 2012 23:20, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 November 2012 04:40, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
A few months ago earlier in the F-17 release cycle, we had a problem
with jackd turning verbose, flooding the stdout, even when its
verbosity
On 15 November 2012 04:40, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
A few months ago earlier in the F-17 release cycle, we had a problem
with jackd turning verbose, flooding the stdout, even when its
verbosity was turned off. This was a bug [1] in the compiler,
specifically in the
Hi,
I'm trying to sort out a pulseaudio issue. It's failing to acknowledge
a request (from Jack) to release a device. I've tried the pulseaudio
list but haven't had any answers. The full thread is here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2012-November/015210.html
This is
On 1 November 2012 17:33, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
I didn't want to throw this grenade into the debate, but now someone
else has, I'll just note that I was in favour of this before and I'm
still in favour of it now. :) Rolling release is a model that
On 25 October 2012 14:43, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:20:01PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Are there any particular drawbacks to lesstif at this point?
It's been a few years I looked at this, but the lesstif implementation
was incomlete/buggy and
On 27 September 2012 13:13, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
Bugzilla goes by .src.rpm name not binary rpm
name. rpm -qi can tell you the .src.rpm from which any binary package
was built.
I used to get tripped up on this too and I've been doing Linux
On 26 September 2012 01:04, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:25 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
All official Fedora composes are done using spin-kickstarts git, not the
packaged spin-kickstarts. The packaged spin-kickstarts tends to lag
behind git rather a lot
On 26 September 2012 22:42, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:42 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Okay, thanks. That seems to have fixed a number of issues for me. The
wodim/genisoimage problem I originally reported has stopped
complaining, though that seems
On 25 September 2012 01:25, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 September 2012 00:27, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 September 2012 23:17, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 09/24/2012 03:00 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
The command is this:
livecd-creator --config
On 4 September 2012 18:35, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/02/2012 02:26 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
There's also a:
Skipping missing group 'base'
at the start of the livecd-creator process.
What repository are you pointing the install at? The base group should
exist
On 24 September 2012 23:17, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 09/24/2012 03:00 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
The command is this:
livecd-creator --config=/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde-raw.ks
--fslabel=Fedora18-Jam --cache=/var/cache/live --releasever=18
$ grep id /var/cache/live
On 25 September 2012 00:27, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 September 2012 23:17, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 09/24/2012 03:00 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
The command is this:
livecd-creator --config=/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde-raw.ks
--fslabel=Fedora18-Jam
Hi, think this is a dependency bug, though thought I'd check here
before filing it. I'm building a F18 compose in a F18 mock root and
getting these two errors, I've added coreutils explicitly to the
kickstart, but it doesn't get installed till later in the process.
readlink:
Installing:
On 14 August 2012 15:13, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2012 14:33, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/14/2012 03:49 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the fedora-jam
spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/music
On 14 August 2012 15:10, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2012 15:02, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/14/2012 12:45 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 14 August 2012 08:49, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian, have you go the latest version
On 15 August 2012 17:44, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:49:15AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the
fedora-jam spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/music-creation
spin-kickstarts/fedora-jam/fedora-live
On 15 August 2012 17:52, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
On 08/15/2012 10:44 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:49:15AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the
fedora-jam spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git
Hi,
I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the
fedora-jam spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/music-creation
spin-kickstarts/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde.ks, with the
mono-bristol package removed).
I'm using the command:
# setenforce 0
# livecd-creator
On 14 August 2012 08:49, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the
fedora-jam spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/music-creation
spin-kickstarts/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde.ks, with the
mono-bristol package removed).
I'm
On 14 August 2012 15:02, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/14/2012 12:45 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 14 August 2012 08:49, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian, have you go the latest version? There was an missing EOF tag in one of
the cat statements which could
On 13 June 2012 13:31, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Roman Kennke rken...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:15:14 PM
Subject: Re: Important kernel
On 3 May 2012 00:16, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2012 10:16, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 12:00 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
However, one pre-upgrade bug that may prevent you installing and is
not on the blockers list:
The blocker list
On 2 May 2012 10:16, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 12:00 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
However, one pre-upgrade bug that may prevent you installing and is
not on the blockers list:
The blocker list is specifically intended to be open to nominations. We
still
On 1 May 2012 19:30, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the fedora 17 schedule
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/17/Schedule lists the final
change freeze as 2012-05-07 this means that you need to make sure that
any changes you
On 29 April 2012 01:05, Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-04-26 10:50 AM, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 9 kwietnia 2012 17:46 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Hi,
Is it possible to upgrade now from F16 to F17
On 23 April 2012 14:06, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not against release names because some people are supposed to have
been offended by the words 'Beefy Miracle'
I don't know about offended, it just sounds silly. Maybe it's a UK/US
thing, or that it started as a RedHat
On 4 April 2012 10:42, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
Is it acceptable to repackage the tarball too? The prep stage seems to
expect a particular structure within it.
%setup takes some arguments to deal with strange tarballs.
That looks like the thing, thanks
On 30 March 2012 00:25, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
IM == Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com writes:
IM So, what's the next step? If necessary I can volunteer to maintain
IM it myself (and would have to volunteer as a maintainer), but would
IM be more than happy for someone else
101 - 200 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
