Re: How to get a new gilab.com/fedora sub-project?

/issues?search_pattern=Gitlab=all -- Best, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

> on the bug reports we've gotten. > > Interesting. I opened an issue for us to discuss: > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1291 Thank you! I left to a comment to add more context. -- Best, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Descri

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

there based on the bug reports we've gotten. -- Best, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL2RHEL - New Wording? - New Workflow?

. 3. The maintainers won't have to remember to do it. 4. If we find out that a package is buildroot only, then we'll close the bug and exclude it from the automatic retiring. -- Best, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His ___ epel

Re: F38 proposal: Minizip renaming (Self-Contained Change proposal)

ame is "wrong". > Thus, I think it's better to skip this last step and tell minizip > upstream that the we'll keep the "-compat" name for compatiblity > reasons. Maybe add a sentence of explanation to the package name. I agree. While it's possible to overcome the technical hurdl

Re: problem creating a kernel module rpm package

t; Failed to get ns from Git url or pushurl > Could not execute mockbuild: > /home/jerry/Workspace/Research/RPM/Modules/hid-ite8291r3-kmod is not a > valid repo > Try `spectool -g NAME_HERE.spec` and then rerun the rfpkg command. You have to download the sources to build the pac

[EPEL-devel] Re: Fwd: [Fedora-packaging] Need help: Building a package requiring python >= 3.7 on epel8

e probably not available for python38. If you want to support lutris on EPEL 8, you'd have to package up the dependencies. However, I'd recommend targeting python39 instead of python38. If you're interested in doing that, I'd be happy to provide some more pointers. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax

[EPEL-devel] Fwd: [Fedora-packaging] Need help: Building a package requiring python >= 3.7 on epel8

ure/new_issue - -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding Package to side-tag

multiple ways to build against packages that have not yet reached stable. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

ansible-collection-community-mysql License Change

532ce?branch=rawhide. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Cod

Re: CPE Weekly Update - Week 34 2022

appreciate getting the updates as a clean, plain text email that doesn't require clicking external links to read. Also,  I'd venture that not every CentOS person is interested in the Fedora blog or forums. -- Best, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP

More Ansible license changes

L-2.0 AND PSF-2.0". I cannot claim this to be 100% accurate, but I have done my best to determine the overall license. Note that ansible is a curated bundle of 103 Ansible collections, so this task is a bit difficult. See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible/pull-request/32. -- Thanks,

Re: sqlcipher soname change in rawhide

like this. If you keep the regular repository enabled and filter out the src packages after, the Provides are queried, as well. $ sudo dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} -q --whatrequires sqlcipher-devel | grep '\.src$' | pkgname | sort -u kmymoney libgda python-peewee rust-libsqlite3-sys skr

Re: GNOME's Icon Development Kit icons potentially causing implicit conflicts

On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > The CC0 has been banned for new packages in Fedora. > > Banned for code, not content. Icons are not code. Good point! Thanks for the correction. -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc

Re: GNOME's Icon Development Kit icons potentially causing implicit conflicts

On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 Lyes Saadi wrote: > Fortunately, Icon Development Kit is under CC0, so we're kinda saved > from a Licensing apocalypse (although, I have to admit that this is not > ideal). The CC0 has been banned for new packages in Fedora. -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronoun

Re: F37 side tag after branching point

u should be able to merge the sidetag normally through the Bodhi interface, though it will be for f37 and not rawhide. You'll have to rebuild everything in rawhide. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digi

[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning EPEL Branches

s://pagure.io/api/0/#issues-tab According to the documentation, the only valid inputs to "Update issue information" are "title" and "issue_content". https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/ 4761 was opened for this and never closed. Is there some undocumented parame

[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning EPEL Branches

On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 4:07:29 PM CDT Troy Dawson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 12:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:05:40PM +0200, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: > > > We could create an issue tracker for this. Packagers would have to >

python-ntlm-auth License Correction

I've corrected the license of python-ntlm-auth from LGPLv3+ to MIT. It was relicensed upstream 5 years ago, but the previous maintainer never updated the License field. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Intent to retire: novacom-client, novacom-server

packages. This way, anyone can pick up the packages themself through the src.fp.o web interface. The packages will get automatically retired in six weeks if nobody claims them. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mes

[EPEL-devel] Orphaning EPEL Branches

rvice manner, but I don't think that's a huge deal for our case. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_orphan_and_retired_packages/#_orphaning_and_retiring_packages -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His si

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Updating several packages to SPDX

Do Callway > SPDX license changes where there's a clear mapping and no other additions or removals still have to be announced? That wasn't my understanding. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signat

Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)

to package tries to package scancode. There are quite a few unpackaged dependencies... [3]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/spdx-license-diff/ [4]: https://tools.spdx.org/app/check_license/ -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His sign

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)

On 22/07/31 12:57PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > I can go into why I don't think it's worthwhile, if there's interest. Feel free to go into more details if you'd like :). -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signat

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)

eems to have been removed. Other projects were relying on this (e.g. [1]). Are there any plans to add it back? [1]: https://github.com/ansible-collections/overview/blob/main/collection_requirements.rst#id5 -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: HTTP 500 - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/

report issues like this. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedor

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring - bug report

nd notifications for new commits) despite working on pagure.io. I believe the FMN brokenness has something to do with my account not existing in the old FAS2 instance, but I'm not sure about the src.fp.o issue. Is it some deliberate configuration difference or a bug? -- Thanks, Maxwell G

Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

do this later if nobody beats me to it. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

niq This is quite a bit faster. I only just recently learned this, so I thought I'd pass it on :). -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

repoquery-fu (was Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora)

learned this, so I thought I'd pass it on :). -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedora

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

oject.org room on Matrix, or by dropping an email to > our list[2] or filing an issue in pagure[3]. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8: All Python 3.8 and 3.9 packages provide python3dist(...)

es/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5e2dae8961 [1]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-781937ed73 Out of all of the packages, only python38-itsdangerous-epel FTBFS, and I filed [2] for that one. [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109363 -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pro

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

at don't follow the packaging guidelines and are missing ExclusiveArch: %{golang_arches}`). [1]: sudo dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --recursive --whatrequires | grep '\.src$' | pkgname | sort | uniq -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His __

[EPEL-devel] EPEL Steering Committee Meeting

Hi everyone, The weekly EPEL Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for today at 20:00 UTC (4:00 p.m. EDT for those in the U.S.). It will take place in #fedora-meeting on Libera.chat and bridged to #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. Hope to see you all there! -- Thanks, Maxwell G

Re: Golang Mass Rebuild

On 22/07/17 09:57PM, Maxwell G wrote: > golang 1.18.4 was released a couple days ago. This release has fixes for > 9 medium (rated by Red Hat Product Security) CVEs, so I will preform a > rebuild in `rawhide` and `f36` to mitigate them[^0]. See > https://groups.google.com/g/

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8: All Python 3.8 and 3.9 packages provide python3dist(...)

n testing that needs to be synced with some upcoming updates in c8s in order to avoid an FTI, and I don't want the karma to be reset. I'm already handling the go rebuild, but I wouldn't mind handling this one as well. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Descrip

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

to not FTBFS. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Con

Re: Golang Mass Rebuild

If you all couldn't already tell, I really don't like dealing with changelog/release related merge conflicts, so I try to avoid them when making mass changes :). -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature __

Golang Mass Rebuild

, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Non-responsive maintainer-like policy for approved packages that aren't imported?

ct.org/en-US/fesco/Package_review_policy/#stalled -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to de

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

ery --repo=rawhide-source -q --requires bear | grep fmt cmake(fmt) ``` -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe s

Re: Shall we add a limit to number of packages in a Bodhi update?

ng about ABI/API changes. This about the recent rebuilds we've done to fix CVEs in golang/the surrounding libraries. golang/the libraries are only needed at buildtime and the binaries are statically linked, so it doesn't matter if everything is pushed at exactly the same time. -- Thanks, Maxwell

Re: Shall we add a limit to number of packages in a Bodhi update?

has fixes for 9 CVEs, so I will probably have to do another rebuild in F36 and Rawhide. It would be helpful if we could come to a conclusion about how to handle this properly sooner rather than later. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc

Re: Script to get all deps of a package (for soname bumps etc.)

ols) $ sudo dnf repoquery -q --repo=rawhide --whatrequires python3-setuptools | grep reuse reuse-0:1.0.0-2.fc37.noarch ``` -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailin

Re: Shall we add a limit to number of packages in a Bodhi update?

abilizing, and they don't have breaking changes. The packages are simply getting rebuilt against the new go minor version with fixes for the CVE(s). I've already had to waive the tests, as they timed out when trying to download the 300+ packages in the update. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: H

Re: Shall we add a limit to number of packages in a Bodhi update?

ed like this. However, they have thousands of packages instead of hundreds. Would those still have to wait 7 days, though? The nice thing about submitting through Bodhi is that the updates can get karma and proceed to stable sooner, which is desirable for security updates. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23)

Re: Script to get all deps of a package (for soname bumps etc.)

orthwhile to include this repo definition in fedora-packager. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-l

Re: Golang F35 Mini Mass Rebuild

On 22/07/04 03:00PM, Maxwell G wrote: > Later this week, I will be a doing a mass rebuild in F35 for all packages > that > require `golang` and provide binaries to mitigate the following CVEs I completed the rebuild this weekend, but I realized that I probably should provide an upda

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On 22/07/12 01:03PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > golang-github-apparentlymart- textseg-12 eclipseo, go-sig I have successfully rebuilt this: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-07d3083c35 -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description:

Re: Python package review

ut it seems he has not yet built it for f35 and f36. Ben, can you please handle this? -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc

Re: Python package review

ut it seems he has not yet built it for f35 and f36. Ben, can you please handle this? -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc

Golang F35 Mini Mass Rebuild

/BiFivroxQdqEZsW_tach8A -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Bugzilla: You can't ask Lennart Poettering because that account is disabled.

On Saturday, July 2, 2022 3:11:44 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 11:54:17AM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > On Saturday, July 2, 2022 10:01:18 AM CDT Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > This is an extremely common problem in Fedora: the d

Re: Bugzilla: You can't ask Lennart Poettering because that account is disabled.

tream in three years. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed

Re: Stalled EPEL Request Policy (was Unresponsive maintainer: Alex Chernyakhovsky)

On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 1:24:07 PM CDT Maxwell G via devel wrote: > On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 1:09:07 PM CDT Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > Newly added EPEL maintainers can make any changes to Fedora branches. I > > don't like that. > > I'm a bit confused. You

Re: F37 proposal: Deprecate openssl1.1 package (System-Wide Change)

ing so if it's not a leaf package. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/ -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ d

Stalled EPEL Request Policy (was Unresponsive maintainer: Alex Chernyakhovsky)

> > Newly added EPEL maintainers can make any changes to Fedora branches. I > don't like that. I'm a bit confused. You say this sounds like a "package hijack attempt," but then you also say you don't like that it only allows access to epel* branches. -- Thanks, Ma

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: Alex Chernyakhovsky

hed for EPEL. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy/ #stalled_epel_requests -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mai

Re: F37 proposal: Golang 1.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

ly linked, if we wanted the go binaries that we provide to have the code of the final release, we'd have to rebuild all of them again. The change owners would be able to answer your second question better than me. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc De

Re: List active versions for a package from CLI

get that info > by calling the API endpoint. The API endpoint that src.fp.o uses is https://src.fedoraproject.org/_dg/bodhi_updates/rpms/[packagename] . -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: F37 proposal: Deprecate openssl1.1 package (System-Wide Change)

ually checks this; it's not particularly common to > deprecate packages. FedoraReview checks for deprecated dependencies. I don't think there's any process to make sure that existing packages don't start depending on deprecated packages. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His

Re: ansible-core license change and update (Re: `ansible` Package License Change)

ermissions for EPEL and Fedora Linux. EPEL packagers are Fedora packagers. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

On Thursday, June 16, 2022 6:40:04 AM CDT Miro Hrončok wrote: > python-ntlm-auth orphan 0 weeks > ago I have picked this up, as it's a transitive dependency of ansible-core. I would welcome co-maintainers :). -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pr

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

out any need to maintain sources for in the dedicated dist git. However, it doesn't sound to me like Github Actions is related to this proposal; that's just how the Python SIG happens to publish their container images to quay.io. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His s

Re: F37 proposal: Deprecate openssl1.1 package (System-Wide Change)

python3.6-0:3.6.15-9.fc37.src > python3.7-0:3.7.13-2.fc37.src Perhaps it makes sense to query recursively to get a fuller picture? All the recursive dependents would also break if their dependencies FTBFS and get retired. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns:

ansible-core license change and update (Re: `ansible` Package License Change)

On Monday, May 9, 2022 10:20:25 PM CDT Maxwell G via devel wrote: > The license of `ansible` 2.9.x has been corrected from `GPLv3+` to `GPLv3+ > and BSD and Python and MIT and ASL 2.0`. The previous `License:` tag did > not properly account for the multi-licensing. > > Please note

Re: side-tag including other side-tag ?

rit builds from another one would require releng, as Vit said. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: Spring Cleaning go-sig/June 2022

be available to handle the rebuilds, which delays the process. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe sen

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

ck if CRB is actually enabled would allow us to create a scriptlet for epel-release to print a warning instructing users to run `crb enable` if necessary. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a

[EPEL-devel] Re: Stalled EPEL package: glances

On Tuesday, June 14, 2022 5:26:11 PM CDT Richard Shaw wrote: > I think the non-response maintainer process should be started. It seems that someone has already done just that: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2808 -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Descript

[EPEL-devel] Re: Intent to retire containerd in EPEL 7 and co-maintainer request

cfiles using the %include macro. This way, you can easily create a script to update virtual provides for bundled go packages without having to copy/paste text into the specfile. This also keeps your specfile cleaner. If anyone is interested, feel free to look at moby-engine for an

Re: Intent to retire containerd in EPEL 7 and co-maintainer request

cfiles using the %include macro. This way, you can easily create a script to update virtual provides for bundled go packages without having to copy/paste text into the specfile. This also keeps your specfile cleaner. If anyone is interested, feel free to look at moby-engine for an

[EPEL-devel] Intent to retire containerd in EPEL 7 and co-maintainer request

of containerd, its unbundled go dependencies, and moby-engine (bundled go package). Long term, I'm not sure I'll have the time or the interest to maintain these packages. Note that on EPEL 7, containerd bundles its dependencies; moby-engine is not packaged there. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23

Intent to retire containerd in EPEL 7 and co-maintainer request

of containerd, its unbundled go dependencies, and moby-engine (bundled go package). Long term, I'm not sure I'll have the time or the interest to maintain these packages. Note that on EPEL 7, containerd bundles its dependencies; moby-engine is not packaged there. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

modify it all. Am I missing something or are we talking about different things? -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 8:59:21 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote: > The problem is that RPM Fusion only targets Fedora. It also targets RHEL, CentOS Stream, and the various RHEL rebuilds. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

Re: Installing ffmeg-free degrades firefox video support

rsh, but I'm frustrated by how this has played out. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe se

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8: New Ansible and (native) python modules

CLJH3QPXWNZGNTG3KIQHFZB4WFVOAN/ #S57EJSNCP6YOY7QXGGI4NATDR2FKQZWO -- Maxwell G Pronouns: He/Him/His gotmax@e.email signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

pel-release/pull-request/21 [2]: With my ansible hat on, it also doesn't help that the two most popular epel roles on Ansible Galaxy don't enable CRB/Powertools, but I disgress. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc De

Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

On Thursday, May 26, 2022 2:58:54 PM CDT Neal Gompa wrote: > There's only one MIT license carve-out I know of: X11. The rest are > classified the same. I don't exactly follow. Are you referring to the fact that the X11 license also falls under Fedora's "MIT" identifier? -- Th

Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

quot;or", those won't need to be converted at all (besides by prepending "SPDX:" if we decide to go that route). -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. _

Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

. SPDX already has a couple distinct MIT license variant identifiers that we don't have. [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___

Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

verted to use SPDX identifiers. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an emai

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 12:53:36 PM CDT Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: > I think it's better to add `Requires: > python%{python3_pkgversion}-rpm-macros`. > To be fair, they both do effectively the same thing: set %__python3 to the > correct value. In any case, I submit

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

Let's see what the RHEL Python maintainers have to say... As far as I know, `% {py38_dist}` doesn't exist at all. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ epel-deve

[EPEL-devel] Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

; are you referring to? > And the goal for some of us is to have one spec file > work across all currently supported releases. I agree; divergent dist-git branches are a nuisance. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digi

Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

; are you referring to? > And the goal for some of us is to have one spec file > work across all currently supported releases. I agree; divergent dist-git branches are a nuisance. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digi

[EPEL-devel] Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

(also X11))', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SMLNJ', > 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-feh', 'mpich2'] > > mpich2 or GPL-1.0-only -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ epel

Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

(also X11))', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SMLNJ', > 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-feh', 'mpich2'] > > mpich2 or GPL-1.0-only -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. __

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

eck > %{__python3} setup.py test I was going to suggest using `%pytest`, but then I remembered that https:// pagure.io/releng/issue/10679 is still outstanding :(. > %files -n python38-%{srcname} [...] > %{python3_sitelib}/* Globs like this are against the Python Packaging Guidelines. -

[EPEL-devel] Fwd: Re: retirement of ansible-2.9.x

May 16, 2022 8:32:58 PM Maxwell G : On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 3:14:56 PM CDT  Kevin Fenzi wrote: > In epel8 I will be converting the 'ansible' epel8 package into the > upstream ansible-5 meta collections package (which also pulls in > ansible-core). > Hi everyone, I have reb

Re: ansible-collection-community-docker License Change

On Monday, May 16, 2022 11:00:06 AM CDT you wrote: > With the release of ansible-collection-community-docker 2.5.1, the license > has changed from `GPLv3+` > `GPLv3+ and Python`. This same change applies to the new release of ansible-collection-community-rabbitmq. -- Thanks,

Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Cod

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

ay around? > Well, in this case, the issue is that ansible-core bumped its minimal Python version requirement for the controller to 3.8. They had no choice but to build it for a non-default Python version. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

the tests/nose > dep). Unless you are planning to remove python3-passlib (the python36 version) or make it a modular package, I think it is better to just create a new SRPM named python38-passlib with no subpackages. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His s

Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

interpret MIT. Possible options: > ['Adobe-Glyph', 'MIT-CMU', 'MIT-CMU', 'HPND', 'HPND', 'no-spdx-yet > (MIT license (also X11))', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SMLNJ', > 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-feh', 'mpich2'] > > mpich2 or GPL-1.0-only -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: H

Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 10:21:39 AM CDT Miro Hrončok wrote: > That includes both MIT and BSD, right? > Yes. I believe LGPLv2(+) is also ambiguous, because SPDX differentiates between 2.0 and 2.1. There may be others. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signatu

Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

d for new packages? Will this be integrated into fedora-review? -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

ps the EPEL SIG can create some policy or provide some docs about this process? -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@list

[EPEL-devel] Re: retirement of ansible-2.9.x

lection-* RPM packages or from Ansible Galaxy. If you would like to do this, you can switch to ansible-core with `dnf swap ansible ansible-core`. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. __

<    1   2   3   4   >