From f989c36a523740f3ce7fe2dfee38e6e423f9ac8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:56:54 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] make sure the DBVERSION file ends in a newline
---
ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/dbversion.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.9.6. This release has fixes for bugs found in 1.2.9
testing and bugs from earlier releases.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.1, the 389-ds-base package is included in the base
OS. It is the same as the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733103
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519695action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519695action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/31/2011 12:19 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Description: If any string is set to an environment variable USE_VALGRIND,
when running a memory leak checking tool (e.g., valgrind),
it reduces the noise generated by the entry cache and dn cache.
Sample valgrind outputs from the same operations.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703990
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520886action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520886action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735121
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=521072action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 09/07/2011 11:12 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Genes MailLists wrote:
Would a git-shortlog suffice for %changelog ?
It would need to be git-short-shortlog (hypothetically) as filling a
rpm changelog with hundreds of lines of commits is not very helpful.
I've always considered the rpm
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/patches/0001-Add-support-for-pre-post-db-transaction-plugins.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/patches/0001-Make-all-backend-operations-transaction-aware.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 10/06/2011 12:04 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Rich Megginson wrote:
There are 3 patches. 0001 fixes a problem with betxn and modrdn to
make the ENTRY_POST_OP available to betxnpostop plugins. 0002 allows
us to pass the plugin config entry to plugin_init functions (yay!
finally!). 0003
From d39d500dadf640ac47f04370e9bb7b18e9bab9aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:46:34 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Change referential integrity to be a betxnpostoperation plugin
This changes referential integrity to be a betxnpostoperation
Ogun Heper wrote:
Hi all,
I don't know if this is the right place to ask but i want to learn if
support will be available for Solaris 10 SPARC in the upcoming
releases of 389 Directory Server?
What do you mean by support?
FAQ
Nathan Kinder wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Nathan Kinder wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release
Candidate 6 of version 1.2.6. This release has several bug fixes.
Note: RC4 and RC5 were never released.
***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a
release candidate, so it may have a few glitches, but it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610281
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=438753action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=438753action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Andrey Ivanov wrote:
2010/8/25 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com
Andrey Ivanov wrote:
2010/8/25 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631862
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447020action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447020action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634561
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=449061action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=449061action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
.
No, it should be 1.2.6.1-1, not 1.2.6-1, not 1.2.6-2.
Looks like 1.2.6.1-1 is not yet in the mirrors, so if you want to try it
in the meantime, you'll have to install it directly from koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=196612
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Rich Megginson
389-ds-base-1.2.6.1-2 is now in Testing. This release fixes the
crashing problems seen with Windows Sync, and fixes some other crashing
problems usually seen with deletion operations. Please help us test.
The sooner we can get this release tested, the sooner we can push it to
Stable and make it
Gary Morris wrote:
Hi guys.. so far since the fix things have been mostly stable.
However, sometimes in the evening things when things are very quiet,
i'm getting a crash, and i come in the next morning and ds is down.
This is just an heads up. Unless there is a known issue and
Michele Baldessari wrote:
Hi all,
some time ago the sources for jss could be found here:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/jss/releases/
Now they seem to have disappeared. Anyone know if they're in some
branch over at hg.mozilla.org?
The NSS team has been reluctant to move
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability for testing of
Alpha 3 of version 1.2.7. This release contains some new features as
well as many bug fixes. On those platforms which have OpenLDAP built
with Mozilla NSS crypto support (Fedora 14 and later), the packages are
built with
Nathan Kinder wrote:
Please review these design notes for implementing one way AD sync. In
particular, I'm concerned about the possible inconsistencies that can
arise from directly modifying a synced entry on the DS side. Does using
access control seem sufficient for avoiding these
On 12/07/2012 09:56 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Ludwig,
In Ticket 507, that change did not help after all, and will probably
be removed.
It's hard to tell. I'm having some problems getting reliable reports.
We are working on that.
As far as I can tell, this is the only option we have
Michele Baldessari wrote:
Hi all,
a couple of one liners to fix spelling typos. (Against 1.2.5)
Thanks - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558518
regards,
Michele
diff -urNad trunk~/ldap/servers/plugins/chainingdb/cb_conn_stateless.c
specifically, -lpthread - some programs have references to symbols in
-lpthread but were not linking against them directly, but were finding
the symbols resolved indirectly through another library. This cause the
build to fail on Fedora 13 and other platforms with strict linkers.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460168
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396645action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396645action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
From 59a11fbc168b52036ebadb8c0df017cc5b09fe67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:55:53 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] cleanup build warnings
This patch cleans up various build warnings found by compiling the code
with -Wall on RHEL5.
---
ldap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571514
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398603action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398603action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570905
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398636action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398636action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576074
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=402627action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=402627action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578229
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404763action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404763action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572162
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=405023action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=405023action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/09/2013 02:27 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 09/07/2013 05:02 AM, David Boreham wrote:
On 9/6/2013 8:49 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
This is a good idea, and it is something that we discussed briefly
off-list. The only downside is that we need to change the index
format to keep a count of
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47516/0001-Ticket-47516-replication-stops-with-excessive-clock-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47415/0001-Ticket-47415-Manage-certificates-crashes-admin-serve.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47551/0001-Ticket-47551-logconv-V-does-not-produce-unindexed-se.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/434/0001-Ticket-434-admin-serv-logs-filling-with-admserv_host.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 10/23/2013 08:25 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 09:09 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Should systemctl stop foo.service stop all parent and child service processes?
Example: GlusterFS starts a service daemon (glusterd) and a brick daemon
(glusterfsd). When a user issues
On 10/25/2013 01:36 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote:
Hello Roberto and Thierry,
as I promised, I am sending you a proof-of-concept code that demonstrates, how
we can mock DS in unit tests for library function (see attachment). You can run
tests just by executing py.test in tests directory.
Only 3 files
On 10/30/2013 10:47 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
This tickets implement a test case and propose a layout of the CI
tests in the 389-ds.
The basic idea is to put CI tests under:
head/dirsrvtests/
tickets/
standalone_test.py
m1c1_test.py
On 10/30/2013 02:09 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 10/30/2013 07:56 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote:
Hello Thierry,
layout OK.
As for tests - instead of reinventing the wheel by defing class Test_standAlone
to set up instance, use py.test fixture.
Also, you should not force setup, test, teardown
On 10/31/2013 09:58 AM, Roberto Polli wrote:
Hi @all,
I started investigating in mocking with fakeldap, and it seems an easy and
viable way of adding unittests.
A main issue is the DSAdmin.__init__ complexity.
I thought - a long time ago actually - to remove from DSAdmin all cached
references
On 10/31/2013 10:35 AM, Roberto Polli wrote:
Hi Rich,
On Thursday 31 October 2013 10:32:13 Rich Megginson wrote:
I thought - a long time ago actually - to remove from DSAdmin all cached
references to backends, suffixes and configuration.
Part of the complexity is due to trying to keep data
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47585/0001-Ticket-47585-Replication-Failures-related-to-skipped.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/19/2013 09:44 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I was recently adding a couple of changes to slapi-nis, and when I went
to run its self-tests, some of the tests that modify the plugin entry
started failing with LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM. I tracked the denial
down to validation
On 11/19/2013 11:06 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:05:13AM -0700, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/19/2013 09:44 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
The language in the ticket description's pretty firm that this isn't
going to be changed, and while I can _probably_ work around
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/434/0001-Ticket-434-admin-serv-logs-filling-with-admserv_host.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47478/0001-Ticket-47478-No-groups-file-error-restarting-Admin-s.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/21/2013 08:36 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 11/21/2013 04:22 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/21/2013 01:58 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hi,
The changes look very good.
I have a question regarding start/stop in Replica class. Why do not
you use the function self.agreement.schedule(agmdn
as a python
keyword/built-in?)
Regards
thierry
On 11/21/2013 03:21 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 11/21/2013 09:38 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 11/21/2013 05:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/21/2013 08:36 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 11/21/2013 04:22 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/21/2013 01:58 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hi,
The changes look very good.
I have a question regarding
On 12/09/2013 03:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing printf(%s, string) is just
silly.
My apologies for being repetitive, but the original point is that
printf(string) is insecure unless you can guarantee
389-ds-base-1.2.7 is now in Testing. This release adds some new
features and fixes many bugs. Please help us test. The sooner we can
get this release tested, the sooner we can push it to Stable and make it
generally available.
Installation
yum install 389-ds --enablerepo=updates-testing
389-ds-base-1.2.7.1 is now in Testing. This release has some key fixes
for bugs in 1.2.7. Please help us test. The sooner we can get this
release tested, the sooner we can push it to Stable and make it
generally available. There is also a new 389-admin-1.1.13 package.
Installation
yum
389-ds-base-1.2.7.2 is now in Testing. This release has some key fixes
for bugs in 1.2.7 and 1.2.7.1. Please help us test. The sooner we can
get this release tested, the sooner we can push it to Stable and make it
generally available. There is also a new 389-admin-1.1.13 package.
On 01/24/2011 12:02 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rich Megginson (rmegg...@redhat.com) said:
Ok. Do I need any Requires at all for this? Or should I just
remove that line from the spec?
I believe folding any requirements for %posttrans scripts into
'Requires(post)' should be sufficient.
Ok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576534
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=475042action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=475042action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667935
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=476412action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=476412action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8 Alpha 2. This release has fixes for bugs found in
1.2.8 alpha 1 testing and earlier releases.
Installation
yum install 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install 389-ds
setup-ds-admin.pl
Upgrade
yum upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677440
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=478698action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=478698action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677705
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480865action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480865action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8 Alpha 3. This release has fixes for bugs found in
1.2.8 alpha testing and bugs from earlier releases.
Installation
yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8 Release Candidate 1. This release has fixes for bugs
found in 1.2.8 alpha testing and bugs from earlier releases.
Installation
yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8 Release Candidate 2. This release has fixes for bugs
found in 1.2.8 testing and bugs from earlier releases.
Installation
yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691422
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668385
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488552action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488552action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692937
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=489440action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=489440action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692331
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693451
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693503
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693455
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693466
--
389-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693962
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=490849action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=490849action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8.1. This release has fixes for bugs found in 1.2.8
testing and bugs from earlier releases.
Installation
yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing 389-ds
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8.2. This release has fixes for bugs found in 1.2.8
testing and bugs from earlier releases.
Installation
yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing 389-ds
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8.2. This is the first Stable release from the 1.2.8
branch. Since the last Stable release (1.2.7.5) there have been many
bug fixes and a couple of new features.
Installation
yum install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703990
There is a ds patch and an admin server patch.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8.3. This release fixes a few bugs found in 1.2.8.2.
Installation
yum install 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install 389-ds
setup-ds-admin.pl
Upgrade
yum upgrade 389-ds-base idm-console-framework 389-admin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707384
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=503765action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=503765action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706472
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=504157action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=504159
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=504157action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703703
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=505674action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=505674action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697694
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=506109action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=506109action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710372
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=510505action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=510505action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ticket #347 - IPA dirsvr seg-fault during system longevity test
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/347/0001-Ticket-347-IPA-dirsvr-seg-fault-during-system-longev.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ticket #347 - IPA dirsvr seg-fault during system longevity test
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/347/0001-Ticket-347-IPA-dirsvr-seg-fault-during-system-longev.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/355
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/355/0001-Ticket-355-winsync-should-not-delete-entry-that-appe.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From a2dec53772cc1f5f72e701dddf16430229851485 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:39:09 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] fix coverity issues with uninit vals, no return checking
12766 Uninitialized pointer read
In _entryrdn_replace_suffix_id
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.10 and 1.2.11.5 for Testing. 1.2.10.10 contains a
fix for a crashing issue:
#390 [abrt] 389-ds-base-1.2.10.6-1.fc16: slapi_attr_value_cmp: Process
/usr/sbin/ns-slapd was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.11 and 1.2.11.6 for Testing. 1.2.10.11 and 1.2.11.6
contain a fix for a password security issue:
#378unhashed#user#password field https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/378
NEW: Platform Support
Pre-built RPMs of
...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
[rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 8:09 PM
To: 389 Directory server developer discussion.
Subject: Re: [389-devel] Setting up 389 DS without DNS
On 07/23/2012 05:13 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
On Jul 23, 2012 5:15 PM, Rich
Megginsonrmegg
From d8822be083b6ffd4c21004ede8cd14a8246c079c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:00:21 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] coverity - mbo dead code - winsync leaks, deadcode, null
check, test code
This fixes the following issues:
13060 Logically
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.12 for Testing. This release includes support for
POSIX attributes in Windows Sync, several bug fixes, and cleanup of
various issues found by valgrind and Coverity. The 389 team would like
to thank Carsten Grzemba
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.13 for Testing. This release fixes a bug found
during upgrade with the POSIX Windows Sync plugin.
The new packages and versions are:
389-ds-base 1.2.11.13
NOTE: 1.2.11 will not be available for Fedora 16 or
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.14 for Testing. This release fixes a bug with
CLEANALLRUV and winsync, and a race condition in the replication
consumer extop code.
The new packages and versions are:
389-ds-base 1.2.11.14
NOTE: 1.2.11 will
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15 for Testing. This release fixes another issue
with CLEANALLRUV, some schema and userpassword related fixes, and other
fixes.
The new packages and versions are:
389-ds-base 1.2.11.15
NOTE: 1.2.11 will not
When you commit and push a patch to the git repo, and you add the git
commit message to the ticket comment, you can easily make the commit a
link to the changeset in the trac source browser - just change
commit 20ab029c0f0309838
to
commit changeset:20ab029c0f0309838/389-ds-base
the
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/167
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/167/0001-Ticket-167-Mixing-transaction-and-non-transaction-pl.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/12
patch to fix the problem
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/12/0001-Ticket-12-389-DS-DNA-Plugin-Replication-failing-on-G.patch
patch to allow disabling of the SASL canonical hostname lookup for
running on localhost
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/15
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/15/diffs-without-autoconf.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 1ddcc951eec9ede74ae6650de04a921198aec493 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:52:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Remove redundant code - make a global into a static
Remove redundant code - make a global into a static
---
ldap/servers
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/264
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/264/0001-Ticket-264-upgrade-needs-better-check-for-server-is-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
1 - 100 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
