On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:40:39PM +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
Hi all, from the discussion here, I'm tempted to revert the
change. Any objections?
+1
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:19:19PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.07.11 17:40, Roman Rakus (rra...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hi all,
from the discussion here, I'm tempted to revert the change. Any objections?
Yes. I am for keeping it in, and have prepped a patch for XDG basedir
fedpkg build says ...
Could not initiate build: Unknown build target: dist-f16-updates-candidate
Is this just a taking-time-to-set-it-up issue, or am I doing something
wrong?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:39:56AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:36:00 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
fedpkg build says ...
Could not initiate build: Unknown build target:
dist-f16-updates-candidate
Is this just a taking-time-to-set-it-up
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:35:29AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:30:30PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 07/30/2011 06:49 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
What's unique about the method described there is that the Mac
configures the interface with the same IP address it
Below are two packages. The first one is installed, the second one is
built for Koji. Yum refuses to upgrade the installed package to the
second one, saying:
Examining qemu-0.15.0-0.2.2011072859fadcc.fc17.x86_64.rpm:
2:qemu-0.15.0-0.2.2011072859fadcc.fc17.x86_64
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 02:20:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
You can't bring a policy to FESCO, fail to turn up to any of the
meetings and then be surprised if the enacted proposal doesn't perfectly
match yours. The ticket was flagged meeting up until the point where
it was closed which
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:21:17AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Of course with this method SVG is not an option
If you _did_ have an SVG, then I can tell you that this is the only
format you need. GNOME and XFCE appear to be happy to generate all
the required icons and sizes needed from a
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:28:38AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hello,
You may have noticed a lot of packaging activity on the fedora-medical
front[1]. There are still quite a few packages in the review queue. Some
have been approved, and we'd like to get started with the comps group.
I've
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
I am orphaning the techtalk-pse package because the Gtk2::MozEmbed perl
module will no longer be maintained in Fedora because gtkmozembed
support has been removed from xulrunner.
If upstream (or anybody) has the time to work on
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 06:47:37PM -0500, David Lehman wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 23:13 -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
I have tried installing Fedora 16 alpha (i386 version) on VMWare player
and it dies starting up the installer.
It also dies trying to install on my CTL 2GO pad.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 08:08:20AM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com writes:
768 MB!!!
When I want to stuff as many VMs onto a virtual machine as possible,
RAM usage really matters. Particularly since RAM is currently cheap
up to about 8 GB
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:32:01AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
I'd like to remove:
ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/vpnc
vpnc is a VPN client compatible with Cisco EasyVPN.
Although I use vpnc daily, I only need/use the old version in RHEL 5,
and I don't have a machine on which I can conveniently study Fedora
bug reports. Therefore I have released ownership of
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:33:06 -0700,
Jeremiah Summers jmiah...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes Literally I did, but as Adam just pointed out running Live just
dumps the squashfs image to the drive and slaps grud on it. I'm not
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:43:15PM +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 08/31/2011 12:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Attached is the output of 'ps afx' on my Fedora 16(-ish) laptop.
Scroll down to the bottom and the subject line of this email will make
more sense.
I can't find anything
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:21:19PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 31.08.11 12:43, Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 08/31/2011 12:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Attached is the output of 'ps afx' on my Fedora 16(-ish) laptop.
Scroll down to the bottom
Yes, it was a joke and off-topic for this list. (Not on my blog though ..)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:17:44PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I was looking for stuff on your website and noticed that the Fedora
OCaml project link is down:
http://www.cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora
Yes, this has unfortunately been broken for a while. It
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:20:35PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
Is there a program or script installed/installable by Fedora that can be used
to compare dotted version strings (eg. 1.5.2) from a shell script?
For non-RPM version strings, try 'sort -V'.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:28:19PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:20:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Is there a specific reason glibc does this?
Yes.
Can it not have a set of patches, one per change, as is usual practice?
Fedora glibc sources are from git,
I get this error all the time, but I can't find a coherent explanation
for what it means.
What is the precise meaning of the protected multilib versions error?
# yum install /lib/ld-linux.so.2
[...]
Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 !=
glibc-2.14.90-1.x86_64
# yum
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:44:36PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
$ touch a $ env -i /usr/bin/install a b
zsh: segmentation fault env -i /usr/bin/install a b
[Exit 139 (SEGV)]
Rich Jones found that updating to libselinux-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64
made it so
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:27:15PM -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, yes, that parallel came up in my mind too, but really, the two
aren't particularly similar. I don't think there's any intent to
obfuscate in the
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:18:51PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 11/09/11 09:33, Jim Meyering wrote:
darrell pfeifer wrote:
Fails for me too, with the same error.
Thanks for confirming that.
I don't mean to be rude or inflammatory, but do have to wonder how such
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
Is not rawhide the sanity check,
Yes.
even if used productively by many?
That's the problem then. Rawhide is explicitly labeled as NOT being intended
nor suitable for any sort of production use.
This
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 01:02:26AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 08:56 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I thought AutoQA was going to do this, but it's been disappointing.
AutoQA is under active development, still. It's a complex project.
I hope I can make
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:57:34AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
In reading the long trash each other fest that accompanies pre-release
jitters, could we start on a cleaner plate? What do the people who are
using rawhide day-in/day-out expect out of the channel? What level of
pain does
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:03:04AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi
2011/9/13 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
(This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0
for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd
files.)
I used this service file on F15 and it
This is about:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737261
F16 TC2 DVD grub/grub2 conflict
The grub package in F16 has a Conflicts: grub2 line. There are no
actual file conflicts, but this was added in order to workaround some
bugs in grubby, including:
-
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:31:49PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:27:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So I propose that we drop this conflicts and fix grubby instead.
No. It is not sane to have multiple bootloaders installed on one
machine.
There's
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:46:34AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 09/15/2011 10:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So I propose that we drop this conflicts and fix grubby instead.
We certainly can't do that without at least first fixing other problems.
Could you explain (preferably with a full
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:59:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We're talking about guest creation, aren't we?
No, we're talking about fixing and resizing existing guests, where
grub-install needs to be run to fix the bootloader.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
I will simply say that this is not my view of what happened. In any
case I hope we can be more excellent about this now.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:46:34AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 09/15/2011 10:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
libguestfs, as I guess is well known, uses tools from the host in
order to manage guests.
Honestly I don't think this is that well known, and looking at it
I'm amazed this passed
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:25:41PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:21:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:59:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We're talking about guest creation, aren't we?
No, we're talking about fixing
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16:29AM +0200, Jan F. Chadima wrote:
It amazes me how much energy people spend on it to save 3 seconds a
day. Of course, if the computer being turned daily. In the case of a
server time saving is even more amazing.
Virtualization changes things.
The way _I_ use
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 07:29:09PM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The context for this question can be found here:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt-maint/2011-March/002289.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679179
So the summary is that openbios needs to be
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:14:23PM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
What Xen implementation is considered supported for FC16 DomU?
Any commonly available upstream Xen releases.
Fedora itself
(ie. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0).
Also Xen in RHEL 5, although that's more
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:43:53PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 19:31 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 September 2011 17:36, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Here is how yum does
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 03:01:06PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Of course, if you are doing all this, it does beg the question of why
libguestfs couldn't simply mount both the root and boot partitions of
the guest vm, chroot into the root fs, then issue all the above grub
commands using the
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:52:58AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
That you've implemented a depsolver for use with PK that does not match
yum nor anaconda is pretty bad. You've chosen intentional
incompatibility. That's neither helpful nor really embodying the goals I
like
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 08:08:24AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 17 September 2011 07:21, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
... and no way to access yum information from anything other than
Python, which makes it harder to use more professional programming
languages and yum data
I meant to add this link to the current Python-subprocess code:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=febootstrap.git;a=blob;f=src/febootstrap_yum_rpm.ml;h=028492a0d3c894e7cb2c85b446f6bff272217147;hb=HEAD#l35
Note the extra backslashes and double %%'s are because the Python code
is contained in a
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:54:35AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 17 September 2011 10:38, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah, it looks possible.
The very fact that you're exposing a C API and a library is a
promising start, even if it didn't yet do specifically what I needed
ocamlnet 2.x and 3.x are not compatible.
I stuck with ocamlnet 2.x for quite a long time because some other
packages dependended on the old API. However ocamlnet 3.x has now
been around for well over a year, so it's time to follow upstream.
There may be some breakage from this change, but I'll
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:05:47AM -0500, Matyas Selmeci wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:00:28PM +0100:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:51:26AM -0500, Matyas Selmeci wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:26PM +0200:
Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:43:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
cduce-0.5.3-8.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(Unixqueue) =
0:5f2882e466b57c733efe14816d08229e
All these ocaml broken deps are because of the update to ocamlnet
noted on this list a couple of days ago. I will attempt to push new
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:54:28PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
Yes, but this will hardly help the situation, which right now is that the
distro pulls in grub 2, because that's what we've collectively chosen to do,
and libguestfs pulls in grub on the host, even though it isn't really using
it
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:05:19PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Given the grub1/grub2 discussion that is going on, I could use some info
about the state of grubby's support for grub1. The virtual machine
images that the Cloud SIG publishes on Amazon EC2 do not require
bootloaders, but
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:58:53AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
(In short, pvgrub! I thought that was dead and buried a long time ago ..)
Of course I'm confusing this with PyGrub, that was the old horrible
thing. PvGrub is the shiny new thing.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:37:39PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:18:09PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 17:00 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
grub provides no mechanism for you to know that, which means you can't
reliably know that. Which
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:18:48PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 09/22/2011 02:02 PM, David Airlie wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:18:09PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 17:00 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
grub provides no mechanism for you to know that, which means
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:38:26AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 17:18 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
You described yourself how libguestfs could check it. And failing
libguestfs doing it, the user could be warned to check it.
'check' it? And what's the user expected
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:45:11AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 09/22/2011 02:02 PM, David Airlie wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:18:09PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 17:00 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
grub
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:51:40PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
Oh, my mistake. That being beside the point, it pretty much means
any VM created in a previous OS release won't work. In any case I
totally disagree with your idea of security, as I mentioned at the
time. It makes things worse, not
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 07:58:35PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:44:00PM -0400, David Airlie wrote:
Nicely editing out of the other use-case I supplied. grub and grub2
*packages* don't install into the same few bytes.
I thought you were good at backing up
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:54:35PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I'm upgrading GitPython from 0.2x to 0.3 in rawhide. There are some changes
that require consumers to do some minor porting, briefly outlined at
http://packages.python.org/GitPython/0.3.2/whatsnew.html#guided-upgrade
I don't
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
Hi,
Anyone want to review this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531
I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update.
Questions ...
Are we going to obsolete these packages:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:55:43AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 09/27/2011 07:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison227
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:10:32PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 10:20 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The problem here is that upstream has no desire to keep a common
protocol, so you need the exact version on both ends. (If I recall
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 02:51:33PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Another little heads up - a newer snapshot is built in rawhide now.
Anyone who wants to fiddle with large ext4 filesystems, have at
it please!
Is there any background information to this change that I can read?
I created a 2**60
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:32:18AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:22:28 +0200
Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de wrote:
Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of this
discussion?
No one has officially asked fesco...
Please file a ticket what you actually
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:10:43PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/3/11 1:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 02:51:33PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Another little heads up - a newer snapshot is built in rawhide now.
Anyone who wants to fiddle with large ext4
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
testing something more real-world (20T ... 500T?) might still be interesting.
Here's my test script:
qemu-img create -f qcow2 test1.img 500T \
guestfish -a test1.img \
memsize 4096 : run : \
part-disk /dev/vda gpt
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:33:47PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/3/11 5:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
At 100T it doesn't run out of memory, but the man behind the curtain
starts to show. The underlying qcow2 file grows to several gigs and I
had to kill it. I need to play
100T seems to work for light use.
I can create the filesystem, mount it, write files and directories and
read them back, and fsck doesn't report any problems.
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda199T 129M 94T 1% /sysroot
Linux (none)
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:58:59AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
right; for large ext4 fs use (or testing), try
# mkfs.ext4 -E lazy_itable_init=1 /dev/blah
this will cause it to skip inode table initialization, and speed up
mkfs a LOT. It'll also keep sparse test images smaller.
IMHO this
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:42:37AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/5/11 9:58 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/4/11 6:53 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
...
Note that ext4 has a new feature that allows inodes to be initialized in
the
background, so you will see much quicker mkfs.ext4 times as
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:02:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com writes:
On 2011-10-05, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
For example, cairo BuildRequires: librsvg2-devel, and librsvg2
BuildRequires: cairo-devel, so there is no order in which I can rebuild
them. How
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
If I remember correctly
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Sure. However, if you have multiple keys with multiple passphrases, then
it's extra work to compromise each key.
Not true at all. If I keep my key(s) in a single location (a secure
machine at my home), then either all keys in
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:59:31PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
2) We've found PRIVATE keys on our servers
By all means educate these users with a large clue-stick.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:18:20PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:13:11 +0200
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, but then you should not penalize also the people who keep their
SSH private keys only on safe private computers.
We're sorry if it's causing you
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
cryptsetup-luks name was old relict, so I decided to rename
it back to cryptsetup (as in upstream and all other distros).
With this change comes also update to 1.4.0 version which
removes old API (not used for years) and it requires
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
libguestfs (this should require only binaries, not cryptsetup library, seems
like a bug)
It really needs the library, so not a bug.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:57:20PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
libguestfs (this should require only binaries, not cryptsetup library,
seems like a bug)
It really needs the library, so not a bug.
Actually there is a bug here
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:36:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 17:19 +1100, Masood wrote:
Hi
On a fresh install of F16, I have added wheel as a secondary group
for a user using # usermod -a -G wheel masood.
I have verified that /etc/group has the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:56:40PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
cryptsetup-luks name was old relict, so I decided to rename
it back to cryptsetup (as in upstream and all other distros).
With this change comes also update
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:28:47PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
On 10/14/2011 01:57 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
libguestfs (this should require only binaries, not cryptsetup library,
seems like a bug)
It really needs
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 06:00:44PM +, JB wrote:
Hi,
this is what PackageKit does to shell:
$ dmesh --help
Usage:
pk-command-not-found [OPTION...]
PackageKit Command Not Found
Help Options:
-h, --help Show help options
$
# yum remove PackageKit-command-not-found
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:54:45AM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
On 10/18/2011 06:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
So I did discover a weird problem with this update. When running
the libguestfs test suite, cryptsetup sometimes hangs
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 05:04:48PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
So, any suggestions, if any, to prevent any similar series of events?
Do the development in Rawhide and cherry pick only well-tested bug fix
commits to the stable branch (F16 in this case).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46:31AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 18:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
We have lots of suggestions. As I've said at least fifty times, it's
pointless going too far with the slapping of band-aids on the current
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:34:46PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
... The only breakage
in one which was approved was to do with compiling things - which, sure,
is a pain in the ass, but it's not the kind of problem critpath was
introduced to deal
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:56:19AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
not doable before.
It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
you go and read these first:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184209
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747377#c22
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I created feature page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
I strongly object to this
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:39:25PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:17:54PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
you go and read these first:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36:57PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
[...] but /bin/mount won't mount it even if I own both the image and the
mount point.
You can mount things that the administrator has set up for you in
/etc/fstab.
Having said that, the split between /sbin and /bin is not a truly
I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files, but it's probably
easier to compile every package.
Is
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:30:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
package that was compiled against the -13 glibc
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 05:51:10PM +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Last three months I cannot reach Adam Miller (aka maxamillion), neither
by emails nor by bugzilla ticket (#733030), whereas it seems that during
this period he appears sometimes here.
Could anybody contact him?
I had a chat
I would like to put libguestfs 1.14 (the next stable branch) into
Fedora 16.
There should be no changes required in other packages at all, since
libguestfs is API and ABI compatible for all releases, forever. Nor
should users know the difference (except new features). But it's
software, and we
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:21:52PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:57:20PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
Hi,
GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
A quick scan says
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:36:36PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
1:libguestfs-1.15.3-3.fc17.i686 requires /usr/lib/libkdb5.so.5
1:libguestfs-1.15.3-3.fc17.x86_64 requires /usr/lib64/libkdb5.so.5
Should be fixed now.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
What's the story with this VirtualBox driver ... why can't it go upstream?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:20:50AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 11/23/2011 10:08 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/23/2011 07:57 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
I can build glusterfs fine on real RHEL6.1 using rpmbuild, both x86_64
and i686 with `rpmbuild -bb ...` and `rpmbuild -bb
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 03:01:03PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
http://marc.info/?l=pptpclient-develm=132102054518031
This is indeed rather unexpected behaviour of make!
BTW I think your patch is incomplete, since it will create an
incomplete config.h if the disk runs out of space. I think this
1 - 100 of 3244 matches
Mail list logo
