Excerpts from Dan Callaghan's message of 2022-03-06 20:13:26 +11:00:
> python-phonenumbers
I took python-phonenumbers back. I forgot that it's in the dependency
chain of matrix-synapse which I very much still use.
--
Dan Callaghan
___
devel mail
-aiohttp-negotiate
python-blessings
python-fastimport
python-lrparsing
python-nose-progressive
python-ofxparse
python-phonenumbers
python-plyvel
python-pystalk
python-unidiff
qcommandline
--
Dan Callaghan
___
devel mailing list -- devel
Starting from version 3.5.0 the python-pytest-randomly package has
changed license from BSD to MIT. I will build this update for rawhide
shortly.
--
Dan Callaghan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Excerpts from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek's message of 2018-08-28 08:38 +00:00:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:56:58PM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote:
> > What does it mean for a package to be owned by orphan while it still
> > has other admins who are real people?
> >
> >
are still other maintainers? Is there any record where
we can see when or why these changes were made?
And is the solution here that one of the existing co-maintainers should
just go into the Pagure settings and click... some button to become the
"main admin" so that it's no longer or
n for all their
packages because it makes it quite easy to find problems like this.
(Sadly, you do get a bit more noise when pushes something that breaks
the entire distro, but it's still worth it.)
--
Dan Callaghan
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies DevOps
Red Hat
signature.asc
Des
away in two more
weeks when its rebuilt dependencies go stable. But there are likely
others in this list caused by the same issue.
--
Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations
Red Hat
reminds me, one thing we never did set up properly is a Conserver
instance so that Beaker can scrape the serial console logs. That would
certainly make it easier to see why the Dell machines aren't netbooting
successfully.
I should try and see about writing a playbook to deploy Conserver...
--
This is a much nicer solution because
it means you can install a machine using only Fedora packages (or
a freshly built disk image) and it already has the data it needs,
without then going back to some random server on the internet.
So maybe the ClamAV definitions should be treated similarly? In
a separate pa
in gevent 1.2.x, I filed bug 1459389.
For all other callers of gevent, please check if your package might be
affected. Note that the first upstream alpha of 1.2.x was first released
more than 9 months ago, so callers should have adjusted to the changes
upstream by now.
--
Dan Callaghan <dc
Excerpts from Tim Flink's message of 2017-05-09 10:53 -04:00:
> I've added and sponsored mjia to sysadmin-qa.
Thanks!
> Dan, I assume that you'll be helping him figure out the bastion hosts
> etc.?
Yep will do.
--
Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.com>
Senior Software Eng
ker list hosted on there. It is nice because Fedora
infra still does all the hard work of hosting it :-) but the domain
implies a slightly looser relationship to the Fedora project.
AFAIK the lists on fedorahosted.org are not affected by any of the Trac
decomissioning work.
--
Dan Callaghan <d
s of RPM packages with metadata in the format originated by
yum").
In that case, yum.repos.d still seems reasonable to me, but if you
*really* want to avoid the word "yum" in there then maybe
package-repos.d or package.repos.d or packagerepos.d?
--
Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.co
instead of en_US.UTF-8? Or fixed by ensuring that
en_US.UTF-8 is available in the build environment (by adding it to the
Koji build group I guess)? Or some other fix?
--
Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
I will update any packages I have commit access to (which is just
TurboGears I think).
--
Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
be easier to request the RHEL packages to add a virtual
Provides for the python2-* name? That is, python-setuptools in RHEL
could provide python2-setuptools.
--
Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
would be to make it x86-only?
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Senior Software Engineer, Products Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
subpackage on only one arch?
%ifarch x86_64
%package doc
BuildArch: noarch
...
%endif
I think Koji still counts this a regular noarch subpackage and it should
therefore be included in the Fedora trees for all arches.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Senior Software Engineer, Products Technologies
don't have at home, like
ppc64 and aarch64, on beaker.fedoraproject.org too.
The only big unresolved issue with beaker.fedoraproject.org right now is
how to hook up FAS authentication. I haven't had a chance to figure that
out yet.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Senior Software Engineer
this output is run and developed by Fedora
Release Engineering. Please report issues at its trac instance:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/
The sources of this script can be found at:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py
--
Dan Callaghan dcall
This was intended for erlang@ not devel@, I will resend it there. My
apologies for the noise.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Products Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
. Where is the preferred place to iterate on that? Is there an open
Phab issue, or should I just mail this list, or something else?
I'm sure it will take me quite a few attempts to get right :-) since
I haven't done anything with Fedora infra ansible before.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
rather than just /usr/bin/python3
though, so that the scripts are always invoked with the same Python
stack they are built for. Currently on Fedora they have
/usr/bin/python3. This might need a patch to
setuptools/distutils/whatever it is?
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer
shouldn't just upgrade applications to the
python35-* stack straight away, by providing python3-*?
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel
they are ready.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
release monitoring on all my packages but I've lost
track of which ones were correctly configured on the old wiki page.
Also, will Anitya warn me somehow if a configuration becomes invalid
later (because upstream changed their hosting or similar)?
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software
in the idea of package integration
tests, which may include running jobs in Beaker. I'll let him elaborate
further.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
+, right? Or
is something else needed?
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
these packages
from Johan?
I can join as comaintainer too if you need help. I run Prosody at home
so I'm keen to see it maintained.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel
Is the EPIC proposal totally dead? It seems like that would be a nicer
and more general solution to this problem (not wanting to ship a Python
3.x stack for 10 years).
Personally I am not looking forward to maintaining more branches and/or
(sub-)packages for every python3X-*.
--
Dan
it,
please get in touch with me.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
?
I'm a little confused now though... I would have also expected these
other TG1 pieces to be on the list:
* python-TurboMail
* python-tgmochikit
* TurboGears
but it looks like they are not retired... Toshio, is there some reason
you left them out?
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software
the exact list here.
Zhiwei, if you would like to co-maintain that would be a great help. I'm
not able to sponsor you into the packager group, but I think you can be
a co-maintainer without a sponsor (actually I'm not sure about that...)
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer
permissive license, I don't see any
problems.
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
that matters given that the Beaker instance is currently not usable :-)
(Tim, when you can spare a few minutes please ping me and we can sort
out the remaining issues with those Beaker VMs.)
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc
-3.12.1-122.fc20.noarch
openssh-server-6.4p1-3.fc20.x86_64
(among many others). Any hints on how I can figure out what went wrong
with the labelling of /usr/sbin/sshd?
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
upgrade on 24 Feb was actually from F19-F20,
just like Philip who originally started this thread.
I suppose that means we just write it off as upgrading between releases
is not supported then...
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
Software Engineer, Hosted Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc
Excerpts from Jason L Tibbitts III's message of Mon Jul 02 07:38:40 +1000 2012:
DC == Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com writes:
DC I will take all three (they look straightforward :-) in exchange for
DC saslwrapper:
Since you appear to be familiar with sugar, is there any possibility
sugar-locosugar: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836708
I will take all three (they look straightforward :-) in exchange for
saslwrapper:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828626
--
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing
39 matches
Mail list logo