Hello,
Anybody knows how to contact Avesh Agarwal (fas:avesh) ?
I have a bug filed in Bugzilla that has not seen any action for 6+ months now.
BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748553
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list --
Hello,
Anybody knows how to contact Trond?
I have sent him an email last week, but no response (neither in bugzilla).
BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827995
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 23. 04. 20 16:28, Kamil Dudka wrote:
It really looks like my requests
were ignored until maintainer status was called into question.
Because you did not use an appropriate channel to discuss your concerns.
Bugzilla is a tool to report bugs, most frequently when something does
not work as
Kamil Dudka writes:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 4:08:24 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> That's not how this works.
>
> Yes and I am trying to suggest you how to make it work.
>
>> Even if your assertion were true (which it isn't), we have a closure
>> status for that. Michal (the maintainer,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806619
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 4:08:24 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> That's not how this works.
Yes and I am trying to suggest you how to make it work.
> Even if your assertion were true (which it isn't), we have a closure
> status for that. Michal (the maintainer, who isn't you) even used it -
Kamil Dudka writes:
> On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 7:28:36 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> To make this as clear as I can, let's look at
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
>
> The above mentioned ticket is not a bug report in the first place.
That's not how this works.
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 7:28:36 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> To make this as clear as I can, let's look at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
The above mentioned ticket is not a bug report in the first place. You just
expressed your personal opinion about a package
Hi Xavier,
Since this thread has your attention, I'd like to take over
rubygem-json, if you don't mind.
Vít
Dne 22. 04. 20 v 21:03 Xavier Lamien napsal(a):
> Oh hi,
>
> Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried to reach me
> personally or my bugzilla's filter is too efficient
Thanks for answering Xavier.
I am checking with Vascom why I can't see the libgdiplus-devel in EPEL 8.
- Breno
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 15:04, Xavier Lamien
wrote:
> Oh hi,
>
> Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried to reach me
> personally or my bugzilla's filter is too
Hi Vascom,
I don't see the -devel package available. Why is that?
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 15:07, Vascom wrote:
> I already built it.
>
> But you can update to 6.0.5 :)
>
> ср, 22 апр. 2020 г. в 22:04, Xavier Lamien :
> >
> > Oh hi,
> >
> > Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried
Thanks Vasiliy, much appreciated.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 9:07 PM Vascom wrote:
> I already built it.
>
> But you can update to 6.0.5 :)
>
> ср, 22 апр. 2020 г. в 22:04, Xavier Lamien :
> >
> > Oh hi,
> >
> > Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried to reach me
> personally or my
I already built it.
But you can update to 6.0.5 :)
ср, 22 апр. 2020 г. в 22:04, Xavier Lamien :
>
> Oh hi,
>
> Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried to reach me
> personally or my bugzilla's filter is too efficient I'd say.
>
> Any way, I'll have a look at your ticket asap.
>
Oh hi,
Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried to reach me
personally or my bugzilla's filter is too efficient I'd say.
Any way, I'll have a look at your ticket asap.
Also, I'm more than welcome to get co-maintainer on this package so feel
free to request access since you're
Hi,
I've been trying to get in contact with Xavier Lamien since Sep 2019 [1].
The package libgdiplus is particularly important to have mono built in EPEL
8.
I am following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [2].
In 7 days if I don't get any answers I will be filling a ticket to
Martin Sehnoutka writes:
> Hi Robbie,
>
> I'm pretty sure Michal would respond if you contacted him via email.
Hi Martin, you've dropped Michal from CC in your reply, but I did
include Michal on my original email. In other words: this *is*
contacting by email :)
> Also Michal is far from
Good point, thanks!
On 22/04/2020 10:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 04. 20 10:21, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
Regarding the abrt reports: I can see a lot of them are for Wireshark,
but given the size of Wireshark codebase and speed of its development
it would require a huge effort to fix all of
On 22. 04. 20 10:21, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
Regarding the abrt reports: I can see a lot of them are for Wireshark, but given
the size of Wireshark codebase and speed of its development it
would require a huge effort to fix all of them.
Not related to Michal at all, more general thought:
If
of Wireshark codebase and speed of its development it
would require a huge effort to fix all of them.
So please contact him via email, I'm pretty sure you will find solutions
for your bugs.
Regards,
Martin
On 21/04/2020 23:32, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Hi, in accordance with non-responsive maintainer
Hi, in accordance with non-responsive maintainer policy [1], does anyone
know how to contact Michal Ruprich (mruprich)?
Michal, if you're still interested in maintaining your packages, please
respond here and also in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
https
Hi,
following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact elyscape (Eli Young).
Eli, if you're still interested in maintaining your packages, please respond.
Open bugs:
- python-digitalocean-1.15.0 is available
8.
> >
> > I've opened a bug asking for either an EPEL 8 branch for squashfuse,
> > or to be added as an admin or committer, on March 2nd:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809433
> >
> > emailed him via the squashfuse
=1806773
emailed him via the terminus-fonts-owner alias on March 27, and just
opened a non-responsive maintainer bug today:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820751
There are open bugs dating to January for terminus-fonts, and one bug
from 2015 asking for an EPEL7 branch for avrdude
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809433
emailed him via the squashfuse-owner alias on March 27, and just opened
a non-responsive maintainer bug today:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820749
He seems to only maintain squashfuse, and it has bugs dating back to
April 4 2018
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818461
CC: gilb...@gmail.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:29:36AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 11:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 07:00, Ján ONDREJ wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am maintainer of TurboGears packages in Fedora. After release of RHEL8,
>
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 11:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 07:00, Ján ONDREJ wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am maintainer of TurboGears packages in Fedora. After release of RHEL8,
>> I am trying to build it for EPEL. But there are some dependencies, which
>> are not
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 07:00, Ján ONDREJ wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am maintainer of TurboGears packages in Fedora. After release of RHEL8,
> I am trying to build it for EPEL. But there are some dependencies, which
> are not satisfied yet. What complicates my work is, that the unresponsible
>
Hello,
I am maintainer of TurboGears packages in Fedora. After release of RHEL8, I am
trying to build it for EPEL. But there are some dependencies, which are not
satisfied yet. What complicates my work is, that the unresponsible maintainer
is a SIG, currently infra-sig. I have filled some
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 8:10 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> As mentioned in the RTC thread, here is the review request:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936
>
I've started the review, but I'm running into some issues in compiling the
software, as shown in the bug referenced above.
On 20/03/2020 00:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 6:42 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I had added Dakota as developer (commit?) and when I looked tonight, I
>> notice he had vanished. I've added him now as admin. Is there any way
>> to see how he vanished? Does he need to
- Original Message -
> From: "Pete Walter"
> To: "Neal Gompa"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Pete Walter"
>
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 4:44:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwal
On 21. 03. 20 16:41, Pete Walter wrote:
Thanks for asking nicely (instead of demanding like Neal Gompa did ...).
Neal actually asked you nicely several times, including the original Buzgilla.
It seemed like you were not there, so he rightfully initiated the non-responsive
policy.
Please
21.03.2020, 10:15, "Neal Gompa" :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>> For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I
>> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
>
> In that case, I'd be happy to take on co-maintainership (admin)
Sure, I've bumped the access level and please go ahead. Thanks for asking
nicely (instead of demanding like Neal Gompa did ...).
Pete
21.03.2020, 15:20, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:02:18AM +, Pete Walter wrote:
>> For months!? This is the first email I get from
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:02:18AM +, Pete Walter wrote:
> For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I
> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
Hi Pete,
The infra-sig group has already commit access to pygit2, however, to request a
new
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> For months!? This is the first email I get from you.
>
That's really surprising. I had CC'd you on each email requesting for
assistance on getting pagure's dependencies into EPEL 8 from December
through now, and I filed the bug asking for an
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I
> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
>
In that case, I'd be happy to take on co-maintainership (admin) or
even take over the package
w.r.t. python-pygit2[0]. Unfortunately, he hasn't been responding to
> my emails[1][2][3] (he was CC'd to all of those) or the bug I filed
> requesting pygit2 for EPEL 8[4].
>
> I've also filed the requisite non-responsive maintainer check bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18
] (he was CC'd to all of those) or the bug I filed
> > requesting pygit2 for EPEL 8[4].
> >
> > I've also filed the requisite non-responsive maintainer check bug:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815734
> >
> > Does anyone know how to get in touch
gt; requesting pygit2 for EPEL 8[4].
>
> I've also filed the requisite non-responsive maintainer check bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815734
>
> Does anyone know how to get in touch with him?
You could try to resubmit Igor's libgit2-0.99 update to f31+f32,
Hello all,
I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now
w.r.t. python-pygit2[0]. Unfortunately, he hasn't been responding to
my emails[1][2][3] (he was CC'd to all of those) or the bug I filed
requesting pygit2 for EPEL 8[4].
I've also filed the requisite non-responsive
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 6:42 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15/03/2020 13:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >>>
> I would
On 15/03/2020 13:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>>
I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
prepared
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806619
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|fedora...@rule.lv |s...@techie.net
---
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
wrote:
>
> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
> >> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
> >>
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:47 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 07/03/2020 10:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> > In any case, Fedora is a more bleeding edge distro than Debian/Ubuntu
> > (First one of the foundations), so I am not sure how realistic it is to
> > be waiting for Debian/Ubuntu to include
On 07/03/2020 10:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 06.03.2020 o 19:21, Daniel Pocock pisze:
>>
>>
>> On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
>>> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
>>>
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 9:02 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> W dniu 07.03.2020 o 13:53, Neal Gompa pisze:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
> >> from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of
W dniu 07.03.2020 o 13:53, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0. Even
if you patch for the issue, it may be completely
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
> from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0. Even
> if you patch for the issue, it may be completely untested upstream.
> That is why it is so
W dniu 06.03.2020 o 19:21, Daniel Pocock pisze:
On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
I have rebuilt all asio's
On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies
On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
> I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies and only encountered issues with
>
W dniu 05.03.2020 o 21:01, Daniel Pocock pisze:
>
>
> On 03/03/2020 23:23, Dakota Williams wrote:
>> On 3/3/20 4:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>>>
>>> But based on what you say, I'm happy to give access to Dakota and I'd
>>> also like to know if anybody else can help with the reSIProcate
>>>
On 03/03/2020 23:23, Dakota Williams wrote:
> On 3/3/20 4:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>> But based on what you say, I'm happy to give access to Dakota and I'd
>> also like to know if anybody else can help with the reSIProcate
>> packages. There is a new release in the pipeline and if
n the thread AND putting some prefix on the subject. Here
is what I see:
From: devel-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock
>>
>> - the last message sent from the pocock.pro address was on 19 August, it
>> was delivered to
On 3/3/20 4:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 28/02/2020 10:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer to make the
branch.
Yes, I would
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:39 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 28/02/2020 11:21, Radka Janekova wrote:
> > Please excuse me going completely offtopic here - for some reason I'm
> > getting this thread addressed directly to me. If someone's adding me as
> > bcc please don't, I have nothing to do
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 05:52:10PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing that
>
> Here are some observations:
>
> - the original email was sent to my pocock.com.au address and so my mail
> client replied to all mails using that address, I didn't notice until
> now. That address is
On 03/03/2020 17:35, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:10 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28/02/2020 10:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>> Would you
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:10 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28/02/2020 10:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
> >> On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>
>
> Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer
ontribute.
Unfortunately sometimes maintainers "disappear" but the FESCo process is a
good one to ensure new maintainers can help out.
In general I feel as long as you are working in good faith no one will blame
you even if there was a premature "non-responsive maintainer" bug.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:23 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I would like to add to Ankur's point: while I understand that many of us are
> doing Fedora work voluntarily and the expectations should be set accordingly,
> I believe we should be open to accept help when we realise
Hello all,
I have had zero success in contacting Brendan Jones per the non-responsive
maintainer checks I filed in Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806161
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806162
Additionally, I attempted a pull request on fedora-jam
Hi Daniel,
I would like to add to Ankur's point: while I understand that many of us are
doing Fedora work voluntarily and the expectations should be set accordingly, I
believe we should be open to accept help when we realise that we cannot
realistically commit enough time to the project. In
Please excuse me going completely offtopic here - for some reason I'm
getting this thread addressed directly to me. If someone's adding me as bcc
please don't, I have nothing to do with this.
Thanks,
Radka
--
*Radka Janeková (she/her)*
.NET Core QE Lead, Red Hat
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
> On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer to make the
> > > branch.
> >
> > Yes, I would welcome help with these packages
> >
> > But there is also an
On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 26/02/2020 22:56, Dakota Williams wrote:
On 2/24/20 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 24/02/2020 20:47, Dakota Williams wrote:
Does anyone know how to contact maintainer pocock?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806708
On 2/24/20 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 24/02/2020 20:47, Dakota Williams wrote:
Does anyone know how to contact maintainer pocock?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806708
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790674
Like most developers, I have a backlog of things
On FSF Europe's mailing lists, DP's using the "daniel at pocock dot pro"
address. I guess you could try messaging him using that address.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Does anyone know how to contact maintainer pocock?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806708
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790674
Thanks,
Dakota
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Does anyone know how to contact maintainer normunds?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806619
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797039
Thanks,
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806619
Bug ID: 1806619
Summary: Non-responsive maintainer check for normunds
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 13:02 +, devel-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:10:49 +0100
> From: Miro Hrončok
> Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for libffi maintainer
> To: Anthony Green
> Cc: Development discussions
On 2/24/2020 1:46 AM, Anthony Green wrote:
>I would be very happy if somebody could pick up the libffi packaging
> responsibility from me.
I'd be happy to adopt libffi, but given that I am a VERY new packager
and this is a pretty core package, I think it would be best if someone
with a bit
On 24. 02. 20 1:46, Anthony Green wrote:
I would be very happy if somebody could pick up the libffi packaging
responsibility from me.
Suggestion: Try announcing on devel list that you are seeking co-maintainers
(from a separate thread). If that doesn't help, orphan the package and see who
On 12.02.20 10:23, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi Devrim
Please keep me as co-maintainer. I'm already maintaining these
packages in the
upstream repository (https://yum.PostgreSQL.org) with more options
there, and
I'd like to keep things in sync as much as possible.
Thanks for your reply. I read
Miro,
I would be very happy if somebody could pick up the libffi packaging
responsibility from me. For what it's worth, I'm about to make
_another_ ABI-changing upstream release (to .so.8). An opaque object
type (trampoline) is changing size in order to support Intel's
Control-Flow
Hello Anthony,
I am trying to determine if you are still interested in maintaining your Fedora
packages, namely libffi.
I cannot see any activity in Koji since 2017, but there were some commits in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libffi/commits/master cca 8 months ago, which
is confusing.
I have filed the following non-responsive maintainer checks for bsjones
regarding packages fedora-jam-kde-theme and fedoar-jam-backgrounds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806161
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806162
Here is the fedora-active-user output:
Last login
Thanks! Non-responsive maintainer check canceled from my perspective.
- Original Message -
> From: "Jared Smith"
> To: "Alex Scheel"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:14:11 AM
&
Hi Devrim
Please keep me as co-maintainer. I'm already maintaining these packages in the
upstream repository (https://yum.PostgreSQL.org) with more options there, and
I'd like to keep things in sync as much as possible.
Thanks for your reply. I read this as you being ok if I proceed with the
On 12/02/2020 07:29, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
Hi Sandro (and Tom),
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 00:01 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
I've attempted to contact devrim directly 2019-11-27 offering to take
care of updating these packages, but received no reply. My recent PR to
update gdal [2] also received no
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:01 PM Alex Scheel wrote:
> I'm initiating the non-responsive maintainer policy for jsmith.
>
Sorry for the slow reply -- I've been busy lately finishing up graduate
school, and I was on vacation last week. I will attempt to respond to your
bugzilla request as q
On 11/02/2020 23:49, Sandro Mani wrote:
The gdal, proj and geos packages in Fedora are outdated (plus, recent
QGIS refuses to build against proj 6.2.0).
The latest activity by devrim related to these packages are:
- 2019-11-06: EL8 only gdal-3.0.2 update, which failed to build
- 2019-09-02:
Hi
I'm following the non-responsive maintainer process to ask whether
anyone knows how to contact devrim. Per policy, I've filed a bug for
gdal at [1].
The gdal, proj and geos packages in Fedora are outdated (plus, recent
QGIS refuses to build against proj 6.2.0).
The latest activity
I'm initiating the non-responsive maintainer policy for jsmith.
Per:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
Week -1:
Mail to jsmith (cc: devel@). Sent 7 February 2020. Subject:
nodejs-babel-runtime - orphan?
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795179
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dd...@cpan.org |xav...@bachelot.org
---
2016-03-03.
He seems to be still active on CPAN though:
https://metacpan.org/author/DDICK
Anyone knows how to contact him ?
Here's the non-responsive maintainer bug :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795179
The following bugs are assigned to him:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795179
Bug ID: 1795179
Summary: Non-responsive maintainer check for ddick
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl
James Paul Turner writes:
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785011
>
> This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for
> btashton, following
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785011
This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for
btashton, following
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
.
Both of your packages are FTBFS in rawhide, including
On 18.12.2019 09:07, kefu chai wrote:
> Vitaly, sorry for the latency. thanks for your help. already added you
> as an admin of fmt project.
Thanks. Build completed:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1423531
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:38 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18.12.2019 01:43, Brad Hubbard wrote:
> > I spoke to the maintainer. He said he'll take a look this weekend. His
> > workload is truly enormous and mind boggling so please be patient.
>
> Please ask him to add me as
On 18.12.2019 01:43, Brad Hubbard wrote:
> I spoke to the maintainer. He said he'll take a look this weekend. His
> workload is truly enormous and mind boggling so please be patient.
Please ask him to add me as co-maintainer to fmt package. I can help him
with packaging.
My FAS username: xvitaly
On 17.12.2019 20:18, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Is there a particular Fedora bug that you need Kefu to address?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747062
Package fmt need to be updated to version 6.x at least in Rawhide.
Currently it locked 3 of my packages.
If he has no free time, he can
I spoke to the maintainer. He said he'll take a look this weekend. His
workload is truly enormous and mind boggling so please be patient.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:26 AM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Ken Dreyer writes:
>
> > I work on a team at Red Hat with Kefu. He is very active with upstream
> >
Ken Dreyer writes:
> I work on a team at Red Hat with Kefu. He is very active with upstream
> Ceph, though I have not watched his Fedora activity or lack thereof.
>
> Is there a particular Fedora bug that you need Kefu to address?
This is probably about
I only see one day of activity on src.fedoraproject.org...
https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/tchaikov
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
301 - 400 of 879 matches
Mail list logo
