Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 10:24 -0500, James Simmons a écrit :
2). Downloading a document is very slow. I distribute View Slides
files on an Apache server, using the Browse activity to copy same to the
Journal. This takes under a minute even for a large file (over 15mb).
Then I share the
Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 10:55 +0200, Bernie Innocenti a écrit :
- how could they make kids from Ankara and Istanbul chat together
- how could a kid talk with his parents or teachers who are using
a normal computer
We use XMPP/Jabber when the laptop is connected to a schoolserver. So
Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 11:54 -0400, Chris Ball a écrit :
Hi,
- They asked if video chat is possible. I recall someone was
working on it months ago. What is the current status?
We need two things: a codec that we can encode and decode in real-time
(the demo from 2006 used
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 10:24 -0500, James Simmons a écrit :
2). Downloading a document is very slow. I distribute View Slides
files on an Apache server, using the Browse activity to copy same to the
Journal. This takes under a minute even for a large file
Le mardi 22 avril 2008 à 04:26 -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos a
écrit :
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 10:24 -0500, James Simmons a écrit :
2). Downloading a document is very slow. I distribute View Slides
files on an Apache server, using the Browse activity
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 05:54:13PM -0500, Joe Barr wrote:
It really sucks to see OLPC shriveling up and dying.
Joe,
It's good for people who have been unable to reconcile their differences
with one another to
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So with all these tours, my planned xs-0.3 is a bit delayed. Being in
NZ, and with a proper private office, it won't take long.
Any news about
2008/4/21 Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess I'd like to err on the side that people believe by default that 'no
activities are supported'. That way anything that works is a plus!
In reality there are going to be some important things that we want to
ensure are really working with every
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OLPC's focus is on development, funding and delivery of laptops to the least
developed countries. The expectations for features, testing, support,
logistics, delivery, IT and RF infrastructure (to name a few things) are
widely
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:20:49AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
I've had these symptoms often over the course of the last two
months, with various update.1 / joyride builds.
This is http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6590. I'll put more effort into
reproducing it here.
Thanks -- the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:45:21AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
* provide root access on some Linux host(s) (or take great care with
fakeroot / qemu configuration) to allow others to work on the
filesystem without screwing up file ownership and permissions
Virtual machines would help
Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 10:05 +0200, Guillaume Desmottes a écrit :
Le samedi 19 avril 2008 à 22:18 +0300, Giannis Galanis a écrit :
In the testbed in peabody, the list of peers seen from the server is
usually a superset of what we see from each individual mesh view.
Could be related
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
thanks for looking into this - I had the wikipage in my sight, but not
the bugs you listed. Excellent, reading up to fill the gaps.
Based on feedback from Peru, Mexico, and Nepal, the restoration from
On Apr 22, 2008, at 12:46 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Wad's too simple, I am hoping to use a slightly simplified version of
Ivan's. For the restore part, I think I will drastically simplify
things from Ivan's approach.
My solution is the simplest design I could create that allows both
Edward Cherlin wrote:
Basically, the impression that outsiders get is of imperial rule
by Nicholas Negroponte, with no sense that the workers or the public
deserve to be informed of anything until after the decisions have all
been made, and made wrongly.
What's so imperial about the United
here is what i have I tried this afternoon
bunzip xo-1tar.bz2
mkdir os703
tar xvf xo-1..tar -C os703/
then
mkfs.jffs2 -n -e128KiB -r os703 -o testpre.img
sumtool -n -p -e 128KiB -i testpre.img -o testpost.img
../pilgrim/crcimg/crcimg testpost.img
copyied testpost.img and testpost.crc to
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
We use XMPP/Jabber when the laptop is connected to a schoolserver. So
basically all we need to do to allow this is:
- Enable communications between jabber server
- Add a way in Sugar to add not OLPC contact as Friend, initiate chats
with them, etc.
- Modify Chat
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Right. As said we need a good free encoder as H263 has legal issues.
So, if we want to have full audio/video support on XO's we have to:
a) Solve this legal codec issue and make farsight work with the chosen
free codec
The download codecs yourself (aka [EMAIL
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 13:13 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
The download codecs yourself (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is an
I don't think you can call it piracy when all you are doing is using the
free implementation of a codec. This is completely legal in some
countries, you are not stealing
Kim Quirk wrote:
Collaboration is really important to any release... so we need to include
some activities that collaborate as part of formal testing. Similarly,
Journal is much more than just an activity... so that will have to be part
of systematic testing.
Browse has to work as it is
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:19:33PM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
here is what i have I tried this afternoon
bunzip xo-1tar.bz2
mkdir os703
tar xvf xo-1..tar -C os703/
then
mkfs.jffs2 -n -e128KiB -r os703 -o testpre.img
sumtool -n -p -e 128KiB -i testpre.img -o testpost.img
Walter Bender wrote:
Actually, I don't recall ever approving a Turkish keyboard... The rest
of the table seems up to date as far as I know. I had been in close
contact with several groups in Turkey about 12 months ago and at the
time, they were advocating the F layout. It would certainly be
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:45:21AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
* provide root access on some Linux host(s) (or take great care with
fakeroot / qemu configuration) to allow others to work on the
filesystem without screwing up file ownership and permissions
If you use GIT, you need to
Guillaume,
I was using gabble every time. The Collabora jabber server was up each
time I did a test, so I assume that by default I was using gabble. I
have not yet tried a test with Salut because that seems to be broken on
the computer I have sugar-jhbuild on. (I do have it working on
joshua n pritikin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:45:21AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
* provide root access on some Linux host(s) (or take great care with
fakeroot / qemu configuration) to allow others to work on the
filesystem without screwing up file ownership and
Urko Fernandez wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 13:13 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
The download codecs yourself (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is an
I don't think you can call it piracy when all you are doing is using the
free implementation of a codec. This is completely legal in some
countries,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Bender wrote:
Actually, I don't recall ever approving a Turkish keyboard... The rest
of the table seems up to date as far as I know. I had been in close
contact with several groups in Turkey about 12 months
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 16:31 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
And even if they _do_ ask you, patent law only allows patent holders
a compensation proportional to the market opportunity involved in
the specific breach. So, if I download an mp3 codec, I can be
asked to refund the market value of
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Urko Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 13:13 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
The download codecs yourself (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is an
I don't think you can call it piracy when all you are doing is using the
free implementation of a
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Urko Fernandez wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 13:13 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
The download codecs yourself (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is an
I don't think you can call it piracy when all you are doing is using
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OLPC's focus is on development, funding and delivery of laptops to the
least
developed countries. The expectations for features, testing, support,
Congratulations !
I have not looked at the latest stuff yet, but it looked impressive a
few weeks back :-)
Karl
Ties Stuij wrote:
Well, it took us at OLE Nepal a whole lot of sweat and especially
tears, but finally, after half a year of hard work, we finished the
first build that is
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Chris Preimesberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter, you have been a shining light of good information for all this
time, and it's sad to see you pull away from the project. Sad to see
the project melting away, too -- at least that's my impression.
One
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build1893
Changes in build 1893 from build: 1890
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar 0.79.3-1.olpc2
+sugar 0.79.4-1.olpc2
-sugar-base 0.2.3-1.olpc2
+sugar-base 0.79.1-1.olpc2
-sugar-toolkit 0.79.3-1.olpc2
+sugar-toolkit 0.79.4-1.olpc2
-telepathy-glib
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My solution is the simplest design I could create that allows both
emergency restore (laptop FS has been trashed, get everything back) and
individual file restore and sharing via a web interface running on the XS,
Indeed,
2008/4/22 Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My solution is the simplest design I could create that allows both
emergency restore (laptop FS has been trashed, get everything back) and
individual file restore and
2008/4/22 Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My solution is the simplest design I could create that allows both
emergency restore (laptop FS has been trashed, get everything back) and
individual file restore and
2008/4/22 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/22 Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My solution is the simplest design I could create that allows both
emergency restore (laptop FS has been trashed, get
2008/4/22 Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/22 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/22 Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My solution is the simplest design I could create that allows both
2008/4/22 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/22 Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/22 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/22 Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My solution is
I'm not seeing the use case that I *think* is the primary one:
1) Backup and restore from a disaster recovery perspective.
and the secondary that goes with that is:
2) Ability to restore to a new laptop (as in the child lost the laptop or it
died and they need to restore their work to a new
I always forget that when I reply the message does not go to the list.
On the support-gang list there is quite a bit of discouragement over
Walter leaving because Negroponte has decided to go the XP route with
the XO. And he is in talks with MS$ to get a version of XP to run on the
XO.
How may
2008/4/22 Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not seeing the use case that I *think* is the primary one:
That's still listed as the main one, at least in Ivan's email, and
definitely from my perspective. This discussion of how to deal with
the secondary one with minimal fuss and with a good fit
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Drew Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OLPC has increased funding and resources in 2008 toward a continued
commitment to helping kids in the least developed countries through
deployment of
On Apr 22, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote:
Who says Negroponte is shifting? Certainly not Walter in any of his
public posts. Can't happen. We would all be out of here like a shot
to fork Sugar. Nicholas is weird, but not utterly stupid.
Eventually, Negroponte added, Windows might be
Ar 22/04/2008 am 09:59, ysgrifennodd Guillaume Desmottes:
Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 11:54 -0400, Chris Ball a écrit :
Hi,
- They asked if video chat is possible. I recall someone was
working on it months ago. What is the current status?
We need two things: a codec that we
The OLPC Association has done amazing things with limited resources and
deserves to take great pride in this. However, this Negroponte quotation
from the article seems correct to me:
He lamented that an overriding insistence on open-source had hampered the
XOs, saying Sugar grew amorphously and
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1894
Changes in build 1894 from build: 1890
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar 0.79.3-1.olpc2
+sugar 0.79.4-1.olpc2
-sugar-base 0.2.3-1.olpc2
+sugar-base 0.79.1-1.olpc2
-sugar-toolkit 0.79.3-1.olpc2
+sugar-toolkit 0.79.5-1.olpc2
-telepathy-glib
On 22.04.2008 23:25, Edward Cherlin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Aaron Konstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always forget that when I reply the message does not go to the list.
On the support-gang list there is quite a bit of discouragement over
Walter leaving because Negroponte
In brief,
As Peruvian collaborator and open source developer, the issue of the
departure of Walter and rumors about Windows XP really worry me. In Peru
there are those who have worked with politicians and authorities speaks
about the freedoms that the OLPC / XO means, may lose that?
We need
On 22.04.2008 23:29, Ivan Krstić wrote:
On Apr 22, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote:
Who says Negroponte is shifting? Certainly not Walter in any of his
public posts. Can't happen. We would all be out of here like a shot
to fork Sugar. Nicholas is weird, but not utterly stupid.
Eventually, Negroponte added, Windows might be the sole operating
system ... Negroponte said he was mainly concerned with putting as
many laptops as possible in children's hands.
..and credit cards with huge overdrafts for all. so this project IS
about the colonization of minds and expanding
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 03:52:35PM -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
I always forget that when I reply the message does not go to the list.
On the support-gang list there is quite a bit of discouragement over
Walter leaving because Negroponte has decided to go the XP route with
the XO. And he is in
On Apr 22, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
It confirms that this has become a
pure laptop project and not an education project as the official
mission
states (stated?). Giving laptops to children is not an education
project, it's giving laptops to children.
Which is why I
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build1894
Changes in build 1894 from build: 1893
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar-toolkit 0.79.4-1.olpc2
+sugar-toolkit 0.79.5-1.olpc2
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/faster-pkgs.html for
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:29:58PM -0400, Ivan Krstić wrote:
Eventually, Negroponte added, Windows might be the sole operating
system ... Negroponte said he was mainly concerned with putting as
many laptops as possible in children's hands.
-- via Associated Press
On Apr 22, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
The laptop might run Windows or Linux or both, but not Sugar on
Windows.
That's not accurate.
--
Ivan Krstić [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://radian.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 07:29:22PM -0400, Ivan Krstić wrote:
On Apr 22, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
The laptop might run Windows or Linux or both, but not Sugar on
Windows.
That's not accurate.
Care to elaborate? Suppose Sugar was running on Windows. What's the
benefit? Why
First of all, just to clear, Flash does run on the laptop: there is a
choice of both the Adobe Flash player and the FOSS Flash player,
Gnash. We opted to install the Gnash player by default. Many of the
problems people have with Flash are actually related to codecs rather
than the player itself.
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:25:12 -0700
Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:29:58PM -0400, Ivan Krstić wrote:
Eventually, Negroponte added, Windows might be the sole operating
system ... Negroponte said he was mainly concerned with putting as
many laptops
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:00:06PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:25:12 -0700
Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least Ivan quoted this part properly: Negroponte said he was mainly
concerned with putting as many laptops as possible in children's hands.
I
I know quite a few children in the US who benefit from laptops running a
proprietary stack.
Web access is the core capability that transforms the computer from a
convenience to a near necessity.
Before the web, most people in developed countries had computers at work
for doing Office
stuff,
thanx,
thats exactly what i needed
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Guillaume Desmottes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 10:05 +0200, Guillaume Desmottes a écrit :
Le samedi 19 avril 2008 à 22:18 +0300, Giannis Galanis a écrit :
In the testbed in peabody, the list of
I am not sure what you are driving at Mitch: web browsers are
available to fundamentalists of both camps. Are you suggesting that a
proprietary browser will reach more children more quickly?
-walter
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Mitch Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know quite a few
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Mitch Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose, as a thought experiment, that someone were to propose giving
every child in the world
a device that could do nothing but access the web. Would you consider
that a positive
educational step?
It would be
Mitch Bradley wrote:
I know quite a few children in the US who benefit from laptops running a
proprietary stack.
Web access is the core capability that transforms the computer from a
convenience to a near necessity.
Before the web, most people in developed countries had computers at work
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:28:20 -1000
Mitch Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Suppose, as a thought experiment, that someone were to propose giving
every child in the world
a device that could do nothing but access the web. Would you consider
that a positive
educational step?
I
No, I'm saying that giving laptops to all the world's children is a Good
Thing,
and worthy of being called an education project, even if they don't
have the
world's friendliest UI or free software. And the reason for that is because
the web is so immensely valuable.
The laptops are even more
Mitch Bradley wrote:
No, I'm saying that giving laptops to all the world's children is a Good
Thing,
and worthy of being called an education project, even if they don't
have the
world's friendliest UI or free software. And the reason for that is because
the web is so immensely valuable.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Mitch Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The laptops are even more wonderful with a child-friendly UI, loads of fun
activities, and a non-proprietary software stack. But in the steady
state, the
web is the high-order bit, sufficient to qualify as education
2008/4/23 Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/22 Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My solution is the simplest design I could create that allows both
emergency restore (laptop FS has been trashed, get
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
Mitch Bradley wrote:
No, I'm saying that giving laptops to all the world's children is a
Good Thing,
and worthy of being called an education project, even if they don't
have the
world's friendliest UI or free software. And the reason for that is
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 22, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote:
Who says Negroponte is shifting? Certainly not Walter in any of his
public posts. Can't happen. We would all be out of here like a shot to
fork Sugar. Nicholas is
On 23.04.2008 03:09, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Mitch Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The laptops are even more wonderful with a child-friendly UI, loads of fun
activities, and a non-proprietary software stack. But in the steady
state, the
web is the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23.04.2008 03:09, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
In theory, mesh networking is a feature of the wireless firmware and
should work fine regardless of operating system choice.
In practice, this is manifestly not the
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:44:43AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
The big problem is that most people see this as a Linux+Sugar vs.
Windows decision.
Presently, I'm not very concerned by the role that Windows plays in
OLPC's aims -- there's plenty of stuff to learn from and through
Dear everyone,
We'll be having our weekly status meeting tomorrow at 2:00 PM EST in
#olpc-meeting on irc.freenode.org.
See you there!
Michael
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Chris Preimesberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter, you have been a shining light of good information for all this
time, and it's sad to see you pull away from the project.
I don't have wireless. My XO is connected through an USB-ethernet
adapter. Way back when, this wired interface was always being
assigned to eth0.
From time to time I install a newer Joyride build. More than a
week ago (1852 ?) the wired interface was being assigned to eth1
instead.
Then
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1895
Changes in build 1895 from build: 1894
Size delta: 0.00M
-Journal 86
+Journal 87
--- Changes for Journal 87 from 86 ---
+ First code for the journal redesign:
--
This mail was automatically generated
See
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build1895
Changes in build 1895 from build: 1894
Size delta: 0.00M
-Journal 86
+Journal 87
--- Changes for Journal 87 from 86 ---
+ First code for the journal redesign:
--
This mail was automatically generated
See
Hi,
I seemed to have caused a
XO power glitch reboot at;
storyjamunicef.googlepages.com
at which Henry suggested [after
examining /var/logs] that you may
wish to know how I did so.
Reaching across the table for
the charger plug in the XO
that was being charging I not
very smoothly
Hoi,
the most imporant thing is that we are left with a sense of gratitude of all
the great things the leaders that have left have done. In this way we know
the history of the project. We also remember that the people who left did
good.. and we cherish them for it. We still need to move on and
Edward Cherlin wrote:
I recently wrote to Nicholas about Illinois HB5000, the Children's
Low-Cost Laptop Act, and received no reply.
Yeah, I know the feeling. I recently wrote to the CEO of General Motors about
customizing my minivan for my work and
didn't hear back either...
OLPC now has
Walter,
As someone who only knows you recently I am sorry to hear that you will
be ‘redirecting’ your work with OLPC. I’ve appreciated your help in getting me
more involved with the program, and look forward to my current collaboration
with Tom Boonsiri. As a teacher who is not
I've stayed away from this discussion until now. But for my own part, if the
OLPC becomes just another laptop running standard educational software of the
kind that inhabits my daughters primary school, I'm no longer interested in the
project.
I really bought into the new paradigm of
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Wes Kussmaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward Cherlin wrote:
I recently wrote to Nicholas about Illinois HB5000, the Children's
Low-Cost Laptop Act, and received no reply.
Yeah, I know the feeling. I recently wrote to the CEO of General Motors
about
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Wes Kussmaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward Cherlin wrote:
I recently wrote to Nicholas about Illinois HB5000, the Children's
Low-Cost Laptop Act, and received no reply.
Yeah, I know the feeling. I recently wrote to the CEO of General Motors
about
2008/4/22 Martin Edmund Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've stayed away from this discussion until now. But for my own part, if the
OLPC becomes just another laptop running standard educational software of
the kind that inhabits my daughters primary school, I'm no longer interested
in the project.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:58:20PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
2008/4/22 Martin Edmund Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I really bought into the new paradigm of pervasive collaboration and
constructionist education. I'm not particularly interested in a cheap laptop
clone and in any case I guess
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's this hostility about? Does it accomplish something?
Not everyone knows everything about your project - though it's
interesting to hear.
Regardless of project size, getting hold of key people at a large
project is
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll be having our weekly status meeting tomorrow at 2:00 PM EST in
#olpc-meeting on irc.freenode.org.
Alright! That's a 6AM'er for me, but I'll be there ;-)
cheers,
martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:58:20PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
2008/4/22 Martin Edmund Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I really bought into the new paradigm of pervasive collaboration and
constructionist
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Edward Cherlin wrote:
2008/4/22 Martin Edmund Sevior [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've stayed away from this discussion until now. But for my own part, if the
OLPC becomes just another laptop running standard educational software of
the kind that inhabits my daughters primary
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's this hostility about? Does it accomplish something?
Not everyone knows everything about your project - though it's
interesting to
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's this hostility about? Does it accomplish something?
Hi all!
This is Spiky, Japanese volunteer.
Reading through whole the discussion on Suger v.s. Windows,
(or whatever)
what I'm so afraid of is there's no discussion from the aspect of
the very root principle of OLPC, that is,
Learning learning or constructionism theory with which OLPC is
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So with all these tours, my planned xs-0.3 is a bit delayed.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll be having our weekly status meeting tomorrow at 2:00 PM EST in
#olpc-meeting on irc.freenode.org.
Alright! That's a 6AM'er for me, but I'll be there ;-)
cheers,
martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
99 matches
Mail list logo
