Re: [riot-devel] RIOT-OS Stammtisch in der c-base

Thanks Martine. Who is available to accompany Martine Saturday at 8PM at C-Base? (I will try to attend myself, but I cannot confirm yet, thus the above question ;) Cheers Emmanuel On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Martine Lenders mlend...@inf.fu-berlin.de wrote: Am 30. Oktober 2014 13:35 schrieb

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

Hi everyone, this is a gentle reminder to input your opinions on this thread before Wednesday night (i.e., tomorrow). Thanks, Emmanuel On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Carsten Bormann c...@tzi.org wrote: On 09 Dec 2014, at 00:09, Adam Hunt voxa...@gmail.com wrote: allow a potential license

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

Hi Johann, Le 12 déc. 2014 00:48, Johann Fischer johann_fisc...@posteo.de a écrit : Can you explain exactly what you expect of licence change? That more hardware will be supported? That RIOT will be more spread? The motivation for a more permissive license now is that the RIOT community has

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

Hi Olaf, if both LGPL and other considered licenses are OK for you, then switch to RIOT right now ;) What is holding you back, more precisely? I would be interesting to know about it, it might bring some arguments to this debate. Best, Emmanuel Le 11 déc. 2014 18:28, Olaf Bergmann

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

Hi Kaspar, On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Kaspar Schleiser kas...@schleiser.de wrote: As the man earning a shit load of money from one of these evil companies, using a proprietary smart phone, and buying Facebook goggles, working on RIOT for me is a very expensive hobby. I'm not sure I

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

be an awesome step, especially for small design companies like us. Thanks, Akshay On 4 December 2014 at 03:29, Emmanuel Baccelli emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr wrote: Dear RIOTers, we have been receiving an increasing amount of negative feedback from various companies concerning the practical

Re: [riot-devel] Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

May 2015 be inspiring for all RIOTers, as was 2014! Cheers, Emmanuel Le 31 déc. 2014 00:34, Thomas Eichinger thomas.eichin...@fu-berlin.de a écrit : Thank you all for an amazing year with RIOT! Looking forward to an exciting year 2015. Best wishes to you all. Thomas On 24 Dec 2014, at

Re: [riot-devel] LGPL compliance testing

Hi Kaspar, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Kaspar Schleiser kas...@schleiser.de wrote: Hey Matthias, On 02/19/15 23:47, Matthias Waehlisch wrote: As you pointed out in your email, there are scenarios where the approach will not help due to technical reasons (and using a weird

Re: [riot-devel] LGPL compliance testing

Hi Matthias, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Matthias Waehlisch m.waehli...@fu-berlin.de wrote: Hi Kaspar, sorry for the silence! As you pointed out in your email, there are scenarios where the approach will not help due to technical reasons (and using a weird compiler might have

Re: [riot-devel] [i...@meetup.com: Invitation: Internet of Things Meetup 12 – Intel Edison]

Hi all, I will probably join too. Cheers Emmanuel On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Frank Holtz frank-riot2...@holtznet.de wrote: Hi, i have joined this meeting. Frank Am 29.01.2015 11:48, schrieb Hauke Petersen: Hi, sounds interesting, I think I will go. Anyone joining in? Cheers,

Re: [riot-devel] Why RIOT is partner of Ubuntu? (technical cosequences?)

Hi Jan, As far as I understood it, Ubuntu contacted us because they were looking for expertise on how to communicate with embedded devices which cannot run Linux. A low-overhead solution that we suggested for their problem is: RIOT (and its network stack) runs simultaneously on IoT devices, and

Re: [riot-devel] Network refactoring

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Ludwig Ortmann ludwig.ortm...@fu-berlin.de wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 06:00:34PM +0100, Oleg Hahm wrote: Maybe we can discuss a tentative schedule and set some milestones for the refactoring during a (PlaceCam) conf call this week? What do you think?

Re: [riot-devel] Meeting 11/02/2015

Hi Baptiste, I don't think there is a meeting today. Last week was heavy with the network stack task force workshop, so if I understood correctly, this week's meeting is cancelled. Best, Emmanuel On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Baptiste Clenet bapcle...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there a

Re: [riot-devel] Radio duty cycling

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ken Bannister kb...@runbox.com wrote: Oleg, There's definitely a need for generic MAC layer solutions in RIOT, besides the specific solutions like CSMA in the cc110x driver or TiSCH for 802.15.4e as part of the OpenWSN stack. As far as I know, at least

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

Dear all, thanks for the input from everyone on this topic. It is a tough case to decide, based on our long and detailed exchanges on this subject. But it is probably time to conclude. At INRIA, we came up with the following observations: - there is no enthusiastic majority for a license change

Re: [riot-devel] Google Summer of Code 2015

wrote: We have been getting quite a lot of students introducing themselves on the mailing lists now. How many students can be accepted? Who decides on which students are accepted? Google or RIOT? Best regards, Joakim On Mar 4, 2015 4:41 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr wrote

Re: [riot-devel] Riot Software Update

Hi Thomas, there are some initial efforts on-going in the community, such as [1] [2] [3], and upcoming GSOC projects on implementing LWM2M amd dynamic linking. However, this is not sufficient to get the whole nine yards. To have the full picture, there lacks security/crypto aspects, software

[riot-devel] Wakaama LWM2M

Hi everyone, I was recently in contact with Wakaama [1] community (part of the Eclipse IoT foundation), and which maintains an open source implementation of LWM2M. More to the point, they told me that the code base [3] is deprecated (it was their repo prior to joining Eclipse), and that their

[riot-devel] Network stack task force meeting April 30th

Hi everyone! We now have a confirmed time and location for the next network stack task force meeting: we will meet Thursday April 30th in the morning, from 10:00 to 12:00 CEST, in room 049 of the computer science building of FU Berlin (Takustr. 9 | 14195 Berlin). The tentative agenda with a list

[riot-devel] Google Summer of Code 2015: Three Students for RIOT

Dear RIOTers, we are happy to announce that three students have been selected to work on RIOT in the context of Google Summer of Code (GSOC) 2015, which runs from now until end of August. Please welcome Alexandru Caciulescu, James Hollister and Kushal Singh. Kushal will work on dynamic linking

Re: [riot-devel] NTSF meeting

Hi Lotte, there was a slight delay due to technical issues. But the meeting is on now (and you are in it ;). Everyone else: feel free to join. Best Emmanuel On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Lotte Steenbrink lotte.steenbr...@fu-berlin.de wrote: Hi, afaik the meeting was supposed to start at

Re: [riot-devel] NSTF - Naming the stack

Hi everyone, concerning the name of the new network stack, and assuming it is not going to be the only network stack that RIOT hosts, here's a suggestion. The way I see it, the goal of this network stack was/is to be generic [1]: - one-size-fits-most - flexible/configurable/extendable In

Re: [riot-devel] broken archives?

Hi Julien does it still do that for you? On my end, it works perfectly well. Best, Emmanuel On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I tried to consult this mailing list archives, but the archive link on this page:

Re: [riot-devel] OpenTech Summit

2015, at 17:47, Emmanuel Baccelli emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr wrote: Hi Lucas, looks like a good opportunity. Do you know the organizers? To propose a talk on RIOT, should we just use the online form, or should we first contact someone in particular (one of the organizers you might happen

[riot-devel] Developers survey on IoT

it seems a lot of people still do not understand important aspects of IoT... http://www.zdnet.com/article/only-half-of-enterprise-developers-are-ready-for-the-internet-of-things-survey-finds/ ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org

[riot-devel] interesting new BLE hardware?

Seems Cortex M based, rather small and full of sensors http://www.silabs.com/products/sensors/Pages/environmental-biometric-sensor-puck.aspx ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[riot-devel] plans towards the next RIOT release (RIOT-2015.06)

Dear RIOTers, plans are shaping up towards a new RIOT release this month, driven by the upcoming availability of the refactored network stack some of us have been working on lately (code-named the gnrc stack, where gnrc stands for generic, shortened by eliding vowels) The envisioned schedule is

Re: [riot-devel] Open Processes Task Force

to the evolution of both the community and of the work to be done So this would be the place to talk about this and design this evolution together. Best, Emmanuel Cheers, Martine Am 28.05.2015 00:09 schrieb Kaspar Schleiser kas...@schleiser.de: Hey, On 05/28/15 00:02, Emmanuel Baccelli

Re: [riot-devel] Open Processes Task Force

soonish some input on the tentative definition of what a task force is (and what it is not). Best, Emmanuel On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Oleg Hahm oliver.h...@inria.fr wrote: Hi! - introducing

[riot-devel] Open Processes Task Force

Hi everyone, I propose to launch a task force focusing on open processes at work in the RIOT community. The goals are both (i) maintenance/improvements of these processes to adapt to the evolution of our community, and (ii) ensure an appropriate level of transparency concerning what the current

Re: [riot-devel] GSoC status

Hi Joakim, GSOC students will start this month and will work until August -- hopefully they will have so much fun that they will stick with the community afterwards too ;) During their work, GSOC students are supposed to interact with the community at various levels, so the plan is it will be

Re: [riot-devel] Pull request procedure

+1 On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:50 PM, rakendra thapa rakendrath...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Aug 24, 2015 9:13 PM, Oleg Hahm oliver.h...@inria.fr wrote: Hi again! So, are there any objections about putting the following into the Wiki? = ## Guidelines for creating a good Pull Request *

Re: [riot-devel] Pull request procedure

One argument for decently documented/explained code is that it is not only for the reviewer(s) before merging, but for ALL the people who will look at the code and try to understand/modify/extend it AFTER it's been merged... That's potentially a LOT of people... and a lot of problems down the

Re: [riot-devel] Disabled Strider (1 and 2)

+1 for disabling (unless Philipp yells very loud now ;) On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hi, > > since the results of both Strider CI systems are currently of very limited > use and confusing for many people, I decided to deactivate them for now. If >

Re: [riot-devel] Documentation How-To

Hi there, I don't know about 101 or no 101 (although maybe it's too american centric an expression, indeed, so I'd vote for another title). But I do support some explicit policy as to how to contribute documentation to RIOT. The hope is that it will diminish duplicate documentation, and thus

Re: [riot-devel] module documentation

Hi there, I agree that some text would be very helpful. Actually, the plan was to indeed provide some such text very soon, right Martine? Best, Emmanuel On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey Martine, > > On 11/17/15 09:18, Martine Lenders wrote: >

Re: [riot-devel] Release branch

Yay! On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Dear roaring IOTlers, > > we've finally merged all remaining PRs that were missing for our upcoming > release and are now in final testing phase. Therefore, I created a release > branch [1] as well as a tag for the

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2015.09

gt; wrote: > >> wohoooah! >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Emmanuel Baccelli <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr> >> To: RIOT OS kernel developers <devel@riot-os.org> >> Sent: Mo., 05 Okt. 2015 23:11 >> Subject: Re: [riot-d

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2015.09

YAY! On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Martine Lenders wrote: > \o/ finally! > > /goes to bed > Am 05.10.2015 22:17 schrieb "Oleg Hahm" : > >> Dear RIOT developers and users, >> >> it has been a long and rocky road, but thanks to the marvellous >>

Re: [riot-devel] The border router wi^H^H is ready!

+1 On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Ludwig Knüpfer < ludwig.knuep...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I bow my head to everyone who contributed :) > > Cheers, > Ludwig > > Am 17. September 2015 18:31:21 MESZ, schrieb Oleg Hahm < > oliver.h...@inria.fr>: > >Ladies and gentlemen! > > > >I'm more

[riot-devel] Low-power WAN

Hi everyone, while so far most of us here are interested in shorter range radios (as far as I know), there is this recent push towards low-power long-range technologies of various types. I stumbled over this blunt, high-level survey [1] of the current state of affairs in that domain, I thought it

[riot-devel] Wind in our sails?

Hi everyone, here's what some people say looking back at 2015 [1]. If what is stated there is true, it may be one more hint we're on good tracks at all levels, even license-wise? Cheers, Emmanuel [1] http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-and-open-source-have-won-get-over-it/

Re: [riot-devel] Task Forces

kas...@schleiser.de> wrote: > Hey, > > On 11/19/15 16:50, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > - would Kaspar agree he was the shepherd of the timers task force? > > yes. > > Kaspar > ___ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org &g

Re: [riot-devel] Task Forces

! > > Sounds like a sensible proposal to me. > > Cheers, > Oleg > > Am Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:51:36PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli: > > +1 here too. > > I think it is also important to describe to malloc and free :) > > I mean how to: > > > > 1 - c

Re: [riot-devel] Task Forces

+1 here too. I think it is also important to describe to malloc and free :) I mean how to: 1 - create a new task force (hopefully we have a lot more to come!) 2 - join/ping/revive an existing task force (e.g. OTA is somewhat dormant) 3 - dissolve an existing task force For creating: how about,

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

in good condition and send it as a pull request. > > > 2016-06-07 12:58 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr > >: > > > > > Hi Gustavo, Hi Ivan, > > > ok I see. thanks for your answers. > > > That's too bad. It would have been gr

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

2016-05-31 17:30 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com > >: > > > > > > > Hello Baptiste, Emmanuel > > > > > > > > I'll let the people more familiar (in cc) with it reply. > > > > > > > > On terça-feira, 31 de maio

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

2016-05-30 21:07 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr>: > >> Hi Baptiste, >> >> Thanks for the clarification. >> >> Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago? >> >> It may be interesting if they attend and/or pr

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT, Windows, and Code Composer Studio

Hi there I don't know how complete and up to date that is but there is also: https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Using-the-Eclipse-IDE-for-C-and-CPP-Developers,- Howto Cheers Emmanuel On Jun 20, 2016 4:39 PM, "Francisco Javier Acosta Padilla" < francisco.aco...@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi Clark! > >

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT, Windows, and Code Composer Studio

Caeveat: coma at the end url may mess up your automatic URL detection thingie: https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Using-the-Eclipse-IDE-for-C-and-CPP-Developers,- Howto On Jun 20, 2016 4:49 PM, "Emmanuel Baccelli" <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi there > >

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2015.12

Yay! On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Cenk Gündogan wrote: > Dear RIOT developers and users, > > I am glad to announce the sixth official release of the RIOT operating > system: > > --- * RIOT 2015.12 * > --- >

Re: [riot-devel] Contiki as a RIOT thread

Hey there, +1 for the idea on my side too. cheers Emmanuel On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey, > > On 01/19/2016 11:58 AM, Joakim Nohlgård wrote: > >> I would like to hear any ideas and opinions on this list on how to >> effectively implement

Re: [riot-devel] Contribution to RIOT OS as GSOC 2016 student

Hi there, thanks for your interest! Please have a look at https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/GSOC16 Thanks, Emmanuel On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Aditya Manglik wrote: > Hello developers > I would like to contribute to RIOT OS as a Google Summer of Code >

Re: [riot-devel] Newcomer to the community

Hi Satyaki, thanks for your interest. Please have a look at https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/GSOC16 Thanks, Emmanuel On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Satyaki Upadhyay wrote: > Hi > > > My name is Satyaki and I'm a newcomer to the RIOT community. I want to > contribute

Re: [riot-devel] Happy 10k!

Fantastic! Let's keep rocking! On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Ludwig Knüpfer < ludwig.knuep...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hoorah! > > BTW: > what's the current SLoC count? > > Cheers, > Ludwig > > Am 22. Februar 2016 00:56:13 MEZ, schrieb Kaspar Schleiser < > kas...@schleiser.de>: > >Hey fellow

Re: [riot-devel] Sample applications

Hi there, I think it would be great to have a RIOT tutorial space somewhere. Two comments: - Cenk also had some input on that at https://github.com/cgundogan/RIOT-Tutorial - maybe some stuff from Alex (e.g. his upcoming Bluetooth+802.15.4 border router) could belong into applications or even

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT: Production ready?

Hi Baptiste, I think you need to specify for what type of use/product. Else it's difficult to judge... I mean: if RIOT is supposed to "make coffee and donuts out of the box", it's maybe not production ready. For some other types of use, it may be production-ready. Cheers, Emmanuel On Wed, Mar

[riot-devel] IoT technology survey

Hi everyone, our friends from Eclipse Foundation are conducting a survey about IoT technologies currently in use or aimed at in various contexts. Maybe you can consider filling it in (and maybe the results will be of some interest). https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/AGILEIoT Best, Emmanuel

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-users] Certificates on RIOT pages

Thanks Oleg! Now we're super legit ;) On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Dear requesting IOTlers, > > good things come to those who wait: we finally got our letsencrypt [1] > sponsored certificates for the self-hosted RIOT related pages. > For

Re: [riot-devel] GSOC inquiry.

Hi Om RIOT is not participating in GSOC this year. Best, Emmanuel On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Om Shivom Nagpal wrote: > Hi, I am Om Shivom pursuing CSE from PEC University of Technology, > Chandigarh and I have previously worked on C++ and Python. I am interested >

Re: [riot-devel] Port to STM32F7

this branch might give > you a head start? Feel free to copy what you need! > > Cheers, > Hauke > > [1] https://github.com/haukepetersen/RIOT/tree/add_board_stm32f7discovery > > On 03.03.2016 18:31, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > Hi Antoine, > > As far as I know, no

Re: [riot-devel] Port to STM32F7

Hi Antoine, As far as I know, no one has started porting to this board, or to any other Cortex M7-based board yet. However, it would be great to have support for this Discovery board (and initial M7 support). Are you interested/willing to start porting? The community usually turns out to be

Re: [riot-devel] PowerProfiler

<mich...@steelcode.com> wrote: > I would be more than happy to start it up again and maintain it if it > would be of use to the community. I'll do so as soon as I finish my > post-IPSN Vienna tour :) > On Apr 21, 2016 3:46 PM, "Emmanuel Baccelli" <emmanuel.bacce..

Re: [riot-devel] Unifying the interfaces of the digest functions

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hi Matthias! > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:12:42PM +0200, Mathias Tausig wrote: > > The interafces used by the cryptographic digest functions sha256, sha1 > and md5 > > (xx_init, xx_update, xx_final) are very

Re: [riot-devel] IoT technology survey

at 2:43 PM, Michael Frey <f...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Di, 15.03.2016, 11:15, schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli: > > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/AGILEIoT > > so, here are (if I see this correctly) are the results > > > https://ianskerrett.wor

Re: [riot-devel] Web and IoT discussion

Hi Ken Let me enquire. It would be great if you could participate indeed. Cheers Emmanuel On Jul 14, 2016 7:12 PM, "Ken Bannister" wrote: > I read that Ari Keränen and Carsten Bormann plan to lead a discussion on > Saturday at the RIOT Summit on the Web and IoT, including

Re: [riot-devel] Web and IoT discussion

Hi again, for the CoAP session on Saturday, there may be a remote participation organized based on Google Hangouts or some other WebRTC scheme. Stay tuned... Carsten will make the announcement will be on #riot-os Cheers Emmanuel On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli < emmanuel.ba

Re: [riot-devel] Web and IoT discussion

Hi Carsten, Great. Thanks, Emmanuel On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: > Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > The CoAP discussion is going to be a break-out session on Saturday, with > > a relatively small number of participants, so remot

Re: [riot-devel] Web and IoT discussion

Hi Joakim, unfortunately, there is no such plan concerning the whole event... The CoAP discussion is going to be a break-out session on Saturday, with a relatively small number of participants, so remote participation would be easier to organize. Best, Emmanuel On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:08

Re: [riot-devel] Skimpy make-do streaming of RIoT summit plenary

Jul 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Oleg Hahm <oliver.h...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:35:06AM +0200, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: >> > Thanks Carsten! >> > >> > On Jul 15, 2016 9:30 AM, "Carsten Bormann&q

Re: [riot-devel] C.H.I.P

Hi Arash, at first sight Linux can run on C.H.I.P. So why not use Linux? RIOT targets devices which cannot run Linux (or derivatives/equivalents). Hence: there are no plans to support CHIP best, Emmanuel On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Arash Shafiei wrote: > Hi, I was

Re: [riot-devel] Skimpy make-do streaming of RIoT summit plenary

Thanks Carsten! On Jul 15, 2016 9:30 AM, "Carsten Bormann" wrote: > > https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/bomthsflordmhfhplund2imm64e > > You cannot see the slides there; copies of the slides are slowly > gathering at http://www.tzi.de/~cabo/riot-summit/ > > If you join the

Re: [riot-devel] about RIOT-os porting

Hi Chen, RIOT targets primarily low-end IoT devices, e.g. see devices defined in RFC 7228 [1]. At first sight, it seems to me your hardware is rather high-end in comparison: what are the RAM/ROM specs? What architecture? If it can run Linux, why don't you want to use Linux? This does not mean

[riot-devel] Next from Arduino

Hi everyone, I just stumbled across this. Seems Arduino is going for easier hardware modularity and cloudification. https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/29/arduino-unleashes-a-serious-internet-of-things-system-for-hardware-hackers/ Emmanuel ___ devel

Re: [riot-devel] Hacktoberfest

OK, I just created the label. So feel free to use it this month! We'll delete the label after our next release. Cheers, Emmanuel On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Kaspar Schleiser <kas...@schleiser.de> wrote: > Hey, > > On 10/07/2016 02:50 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > A

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Core Development Project

Hi Srivignessh, improving x86 support in RIOT is a not such a bad idea, in my opinion. If you are interested in this however, instead of the Galileo board, I would suggest working on support for Arduino 101 [1]. The first step would be to provide initial support i.e. to have the bare minimum for

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

Hi there, Any news on this? Is there a branch available somewhere? Best, Emmanuel On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Anon Anonymous wrote: > Hi, RIOTers! > > After a couple of months I've finished a Semtech's SX1276 LoRa transceiver > driver (physical level, RX and TX)

Re: [riot-devel] LoRaWAN implementation under RIOT

Hello again Cr0s, Great. I was asking this because some RIOTers in Chile are about to start to port LoRaWAN to RIOT, hence your SX1276 driver would be great for them, I guess. Looking forward to your PR! One last question: are you using your SX1276 on a STM32L1 of some sort? Cheers Emmanuel

Re: [riot-devel] IoTivity pkg for RIOT

Hi Mattia, I would say: make the PR and we will feedback then. Two comments at first sight, though: - to remain clean, Apache licensed files should not be PRed directly to be located in the RIOT/example/ Instead, can't you pull them (+ whatever you need) along with your pkg? - the files you

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2016.10

Yay! Thanks a bunch Martine for taking on the role of manager for this release. Congrats to everyone for all the work! Emmanuel On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey, > > congratulations to everyone and thanks for all the hard work! > > On

Re: [riot-devel] SiLabs Gecko

Hi Akshay It seems that SiLabs uses the terms of a zlib license [1] for its code (see [2]). If this is correct indeed, zlib is recognized by FSF and compatible with LGPL, so no issues there, I guess. Cheers Emmanuel [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zlib_License [2]

Re: [riot-devel] wolfSSL port to RIOT OS

rts. The only real change required on Mac > OS X was to include instead of when > building with RIOT_OS. > > > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Kaleb Himes > > Software Engineer > > www.wolfssl.com > > > >> On Dec 8, 2016, at 09:13, Emman

Re: [riot-devel] wolfSSL port to RIOT OS

+1 here! This would be a great addition to RIOT. Cheers, Emmanuel On Dec 1, 2016 12:38 AM, "Matthias Waehlisch" wrote: > Hi Kaleb, > > > +1 -- in particular, if you plan to continue the maintenance of the > port! > > > > Cheers > matthias > > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016,

Re: [riot-devel] [RFC 6719] MRHOF - Objective Function for RPL

Hi Rafał On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Rafał Rzatkiewicz < rafal.rzatkiew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/issues/2493 > > Of course this checklist is related to the previous implementation of RIOT > OS and long before the gnrc network stack which is included in

Re: [riot-devel] waspmote + xbee + shell

Hi François, you could first try the below, assuming you have some other board with 802.15.4 lying around (e.g. a SAMR21): - use gnrc_minimal on your waspmote - compile/flash/term the gnrc_networking example on the other board - ping6 on the board running the gnrc_networking example to check that

[riot-devel] IoT Software Update IETF mailing list

Hi everyone, those concerned with software updates in RIOT should probably consider registering to this new mailing list to follow and/or participate in related discussions: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fud Cheers, Emmanuel ___ devel mailing

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Summit?

Hi Ken, yes there is. It is planned in September, in Berlin. The dates are not 100% set in stone, but very probably it will be Sept. 29th and 30th, in conjunction with ACM ICN conference [1]. We will announce it soon. Would you be able to come by? Would be great. Cheers, Emmanuel [1]

[riot-devel] RIOT Research Seminar: a short report

Hi everyone, there was a seminar organized earlier this month in Paris. The goal of that seminar was to gather various research teams working (or considering to work) around RIOT at Inria. The agenda + slides are available at http://riot-os.org/seminar-2017.html Some synopsis/highlights below:

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-maintainer] Release 2017.04

Yay! Thanks Kaspar for being the Release Manager this time around! Best, Emmanuel On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > we are happy to announce the 11th official release of RIOT: > > --- * RIOT 2017.04 *

Re: [riot-devel] Help testing Kinetis dev boards

Hi Joakim, FYI I just got hold of some kw41z boards. gnrc_networking compiles on both OS X and Ubuntu (Vagrant). Now I am trying to debug some trouble with jlink (can't flash the board yet). Cheers Emmanuel On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli < emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr>

Re: [riot-devel] Help testing Kinetis dev boards

Hi Joakim just the other day, we ordered a couple frdm-kw41z at Inria, so we should be able to test here soon. Cheers, Emmanuel On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Joakim Nohlgård wrote: > Dear developers, > Eistec have begun adding support for more Kinetis Freedom

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Research Seminar: a short report

SCH implementation > in RIOT. Are there any more details available on this project? > > Thanks, > Ken > > http://riot-os.org/files/RIOT-Seminar-2017/RIOT-Spring- > Seminar-Watteyne.pdf > > On 04/28/2017 06:26 AM, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > Hi everyone, > >

Re: [riot-devel] Commercial products based of RIOT

Hi Samir, for this, I suggest you take a look at the companies that have given a talk at the last RIOT Summit. See: http://summit.riot-os.org/2017/#speakers and http://summit.riot-os.org/2017/blog/2017/10/06/slides/ Some examples of products and deployments using RIOT that I have seen recently

Re: [riot-devel] Ahoi SANE

Hi Thomas, thanks for letting us know! Is there any pointer/URL or preliminary documentation that is available already concerning this project? Cheers, Emmanuel On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Thomas C. Schmidt wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > this is to announce SANE,

[riot-devel] RIOT Summit 2017: slides & recap

Dear RIOTers, The RIOT Summit 2017 was a success, with talks, break-sessions and lively interactions for 2 days, with over 100 participants from Europe, North- and South-America, as well as Asia. The slides for the presentations of day 1 of the Summit are now available online at

Re: [riot-devel] Whether RIOT can achieve wireless ICN communication

Hi there, RIOT supports CCN-lite and NDN stacks, which are both offering ICN capabilities over low-power wireless networks as demonstrated in [1][2][3] among others. For preliminary instructions/tutorial on how to use these stacks see [4] [5]. The boards supported by RIOT are listed there [6].

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-users] Release 2018.04

Yeehah! Thanks to everyone involved and to Kaspar for managing this release! Cheers Emmanuel On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > we are happy to announce the 15th official release of RIOT: > > --- * RIOT 2018.0 *

Re: [riot-devel] Low power options for STM32 (L432) boards

Hi Patrick, welcome to RIOT! I'm not the best specialist of the topic, maybe others will have complementary advice (or may correct me). Can you scan through the wikipage on this topic [1] ? For the L4, pm is not there yet. What you could do is look at [2] an consider extending for L4. Then if

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-users] Release 2017.10

Yay!! Congrats to all involved parties and thanks Hauke for managing this release. Cheers! Emmanuel On Oct 27, 2017 12:38 PM, "Hauke Petersen" wrote: > Dear RIOTers, > > we are happy to announce the 13th official release of RIOT: > > --- * RIOT

Re: [riot-devel] [riot-maintainer] Release 2018.01

Indeed, thanks to Sebastian for managing this release, and congrats to all involved parties! On Jan 31, 2018 23:55, "Cenk Gündoğan" wrote: > congratulations to everyone involved! > > ... and kudos to Sebastian for managing this release so elegantly (: > > Cheers, > Cenk

  1   2   >