On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Michael Lorenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On Mar 6, 2008, at 15:58, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Michael Lorenz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Michael Lorenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On Mar 6, 2008, at 16:40, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Michael Lorenz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 2008, at 15:58, Alex
On 4/11/07, SciFi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri 06 Apr 2007 14:01:59 -0400,
Alex Deucher wrote:
On 4/6/07, SciFi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yves' changes did not help getting stuck several times during
the build here. I'll be documenting as best I can and send
'em thru bugzilla. I bet
/VDR) * (1/(1 + PS))
VNR being SR6C and VDR and SR6D. PS is bit 7 of SR6D.
I hope this helps.
Alex
bruno
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote:
On 3/10/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at that diff and it looks like what I added, except that I also
set bits 7:6
On 3/13/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote:
On 3/12/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used your vclk setting code as in smi_driver.c, and changed the shift
in SMI_CommonCalcClock() but it seems to still have some
issue.
12220
On 3/10/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at that diff and it looks like what I added, except that I also
set bits 7:6 of CCR68 to 01 because the doc I have says that will select
VCLK from the programmable VCLK regs, CCR6C and CCR6D.
I fixed the vclk problem. The
On 3/10/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at that diff and it looks like what I added, except that I also
set bits 7:6 of CCR68 to 01 because the doc I have says that will select
VCLK from the programmable VCLK regs, CCR6C and CCR6D.
Right, I should probably do that
On 3/10/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in SMI_Save(), SR6C and SR6D (and SR68) are saved only if pSmi-Dualhead,
why ? seems it should always be done ?
It should. Like I said this is still my untested local working tree.
I'm aiming to add xrandr 1.2 support as well.
in
a similar patch in my xorg
smi tree.
Alex
bruno
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, bruno schwander wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote:
The siliconmotion driver doesn't explicitly set the vclk pll. It uses
the bios (if UseBIOS is set or does nothing if not).
that is what I was wondering
On 3/9/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote:
On 3/9/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so I gather now that actually I should leave the xf86SetCrtcForModes()
alone, and just add setting the clock with CCR6C, CCR6D (and enabling
On 3/9/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote:
The latest version of the siliconmotion driver in xorg git head should
have the lockup fix you need. The problem is the engine doesn't need
to be synced until it has been started. I've also added
On 3/8/07, bruno schwander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah never mind. since this is interlaced, the pixel clock needs to be half
that to get the right frame refresh rate (60Hz) with a pixel clock of
12.22MHz, it passes.
Now, I am not sure if the pixel clock is effectively set to that, and my
lcd
On 10/5/06, jf simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use the x86emu code to emulate a PCI ATI Radeon
VGA bios on a powerpc platform (IBM 970 Maple).
The emulation starts OK, but after some time I can see that it is
making a call to a location that is outside of the VGA bios.
Which
On 6/14/06, Barry Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
The i810 driver is limited to the modes the bios knows how to set. If
the bios doesn't have the specific mode you are lookign for, then you
are out of luck. There is native modesetting support in the xorg
intel driver
On 6/13/06, Barry Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Roberts wrote:
Barry Scott wrote:
Using the Xfree86 4.6.0 i810 driver I'm seeing a problem with sync
polarity setting.
This modeline is required for 1280x768 mode:
Modeline 1280x768 79.30 1280 1335 1473 1665 768 769 772 793
On 2/6/06, Kaliraj Kalaichelvan - CTD, Chennai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using XFree86 Version 4.3.0. I understand from driver folder
(\xc\programs\Xserver\hw\xfree86\drivers\siliconmotion)that silicon motion
driver supports for SM720, SM910, SM810, SM820, SM710, SM712. Does this same
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Alex Deucher
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:55 AM
To: devel@xfree86.org
Subject: Re: SM501 driver support in XFree86
On 2/6/06, Kaliraj Kalaichelvan - CTD, Chennai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using XFree86 Version 4.3.0. I understand
If you have a monitor that is natively portrait or will support a
portrait mode, then you can just define a 768x1024 modeline and
assuming the driver doesn't rely on the bios (since I doubt any bios
will have a mode like that defined) it will set the mode. However, if
the monitor you are trying
On 11/28/05, Barry Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing this error when I attempt to play a HD 720p (1280x720) movie
in Xine:
X Error of failed request: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 143 (XVideo)
Minor opcode of failed request: 19
On 11/16/05, Smoof . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am writing an application that will display up to 9 independent video
streams (each stream is 320 x 240). I'm new to Xv and may not be using the
correct terminology so please bear with me. I have tried two approaches:
The first
On 11/16/05, Smoof . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smoof . wrote:
My plan was to do all the rendering with the same client and I know that
my overlay adaptor only has a single port for the YUV420 format that I am
using. Can someone say if the following would be possible:
Suppose I create a
On 10/19/05, Rick Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done some more testing and the problem seems to actually be with
KDE. If I start Xorg in failsafe mode and scan in the Xterm window, I
can see the Cuecat's output. Also, if I open an xterm in KDE, not a KDE
term, I can still scan. It seems
On 10/16/05, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
since the sunffb driver doesn't support the XRender extension but
the graphics processor supports alpha blending and a few other nice
tricks I've been poking around a bit to add this sort of
functionality. The problem seems to be
On 6/1/05, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Stuart Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the similar work
that has been underway for several months. Details can be found at
On 5/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:18:28PM -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
devel@XFree86.Org
Hi I am trying to get XFree running on this configuration butno success
so
far. It looks likevsomething to do with the on
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:12:01 -0800, Bukie Mabayoje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read my comments in blue. And I am still looking into this.
Nqnsome wrote:
Hi,
Can someone help me, please!?
I have a Compal CY27 laptop. The graphics chipset is (as reported by lspci):
:00:02.0
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:03:33 -0300, SLCB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for replying, really!
The 82852GM supports two independent display. You have one at 00:02:.0
and the other at 00:02.1. You are configured to use BusID
PCI:0:2:0. I am not sure which video port 0:2:0
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:13:17 -0300, SLCB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I forgot to comment one answer.
Bukie Mabayoje wrote:
I suspect the reason it works is that your system have two graphics
controller. And one of it is the 350Mhz 24-bit RAMDAC that support a
regular scan
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:15:16 -0300, Nqnsome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks again.
Alex Deucher wrote:
Alex is correct. Let focus on the primary display controller on PCI:0:2:0
with Display Pipe A and Display Pipe B.
In your case you can only have PipeA=CRT and PipeB=LCD (LFP
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:32:44 +0100, Grand Apeiron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i've just noted that the XFree86 radeon driver does not support DRI
(at least not for 9500/9700 series and i have a 9550).
I've also tried the ATI proprietary driver but giving up after it didn't
work right away
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:33:41 +0100, Grand Apeiron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 10:58 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
there is experimental r300/r400 support going on here:
http://r300.sf.net
Note, at the moment there is no support with any X server for DRI with
xinerama
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:05:13 +0100, Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Where I can find the documentation about developing video driver
for XFree?? I'll need to develop one to a new card we working
on. Where can I find
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:12:31 +0100 (BST), Andrew C Aitchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Klaus Dittrich wrote:
I put all noDDC options in the server flags and in both
monitor options as well.
But nothing helped, the hangs still happen.
According to the log file
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:45:17 -0500 (CDT), Huver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:12:31 +0100 (BST), Andrew C Aitchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still can't get dual head on G550 to work without HAL, so DDC support
is moot
At long last I've gotten duoview (dualhead) working with my savage IX!
It should also work on MX and Supersavage chips, but I don't have the
hardware to test. My current code is a bit of a hack, basically just 2
viewports into a big framebuffer. There are no safeguards in the code
at the
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:25:24 +0200, Stefan Lucke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2004 05:32, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:40:49 +0200, Stefan Lucke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
based upon Michael Deucher's radeon_xvalpha.diff found at
It's
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:40:49 +0200, Stefan Lucke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
based upon Michael Deucher's radeon_xvalpha.diff found at
It's actually Alex Deucher.
http://www.botchco.com/alex/radeon/Xv/xv_alpha/
I enabled pixel based alpha blending by attached diff.
The only
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 05:06:25 -0500, Ryan Underwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two bugs open on the mga driver that I'd like some feedback on:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098
This one implements I2C support for G-series cards with single-chip
dualhead support. (i.e.
--- Helmar Spangenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am using a tablet pc of Fujitsu Siemens, it contains an i830
chipset. Is
there a possibility to rotate the screen by 90°?
I know that there is an i810fb driver at sourceforge which claims to
be able
to do that. Does it make sense
too hard. Take a look at another driver that implements it in SW
(shadowfb), like savage for instance. Then port the required changes
to the i810 driver.
Alex
Sebastian
Alex Deucher wrote:
As I recall, the only driver that supports HW accelerated rotation
is
the smi driver. several
As I recall, the only driver that supports HW accelerated rotation is
the smi driver.
Alex
--- Lucas Correia Villa Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 16:19, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Lucas Correia Villa Real wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2004 08:56, Sebastian
--- James Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
I have a notebook with ATI IGP340 and I would use linux. But on this
operative system my video card support only 2D, but I need 3D. :(
So I would known if 3D will supported on my video card, or this is a
dream
:)
3d support for IGP
--- Rafa³_Rzepecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 21 of May 2004 16:58, Barry Scott wrote:
The application is to mount a Plasma screen on its side.
Which means the software simulation. We have tested on
Windows and the i810 driver costs about 20% extra on a
2.4GHz P4 CPU to run
--- John Belmonte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Can you try XFree86 4.4, to see whether this has been fixed since
4.3 ?
Fortunately, I found a usable Debian package of XFree86 4.4
(http://ftp.fifi.org/debian-local/stable/unofficial/), which probably
saved me
--- John Belmonte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm the author of the toshiba_acpi Linux driver, which allows control
of
LCD brightness on some Toshiba laptops.
After upgrading from XFree86 4.2.1 to 4.3.0.1 on my laptop (Toshiba
Libretto L5 with Radeon M6), a bizarre problem has
--- John Belmonte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
It probably is the radeon driver. Unfortunately, xfree86 and it's
drivers have no knowledge of acpi at the moment. probably some
acpi
related regs do not get properly saved by the server.
Can you suggest how I might get
Whoops, patch attached this time.
Alex
---
Angelus sent me this patch for the problems he was having with the
colorkey on the savage driver. I've been pretty busy so I was just now
taking a look at it. I haven't tested it yet, but then again, I
haven't had any problem with Xv on
--- Thomas Winischhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
harry wrote:
Hi,all
I met a problem while porting xfree86 to mips, it seems that I
can't unlock the sis6326 registers. SR5 is used as password register
in sis6326, if 86h is written into this register, then A1h will be
read from this
Matt,
Is there any chance Intel will release the source to the IEGD
driver? many of the features like native mode setting and dualhead
would be nice to have in the open driver. I'm sure if the source were
available the features could be merged in pretty easily.
Thanks,
Alex
--- Sottek,
--- Jeff Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Have you tried adding
Option VBERestore false
Tried, but still doesn't work.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Alex Deucher wrote:
Can you narrow down the exact change that caused the problem?
I looked
--- Jeff Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting black screen after power resume on version 4.4.99.2.
I can see the mouse, all window frames, but black contents.
No such problem with 4.3.0.
Tested on linux 2.4.26-rc2 and 2.6.5
I'm using apm to resume, and with 4.3.0, it works fine.
--- Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i saw your web site was encouraging people to suggest ideas for
xfree86, and i figured, what the heck :)
i have an XDA-2 phone and have just recently managed to get the
touchscreen driver working (sort-of) and also managed to
--- root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there's a bug in the acceleration code of the s3 driver. When
scrolling (with acceleration enabled), only parts of the screen that
become newly visible really get visible, the screen doesn't scroll
up. XaaNoScreenToScreenCopy option solves it.
For
--- Thomas Hellstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Code for bringing the VIA 2d driver up to date with the drm module
currently in dri.sourceforge.net cvs has been submitted under
bugzilla 1327
/Thomas
Thomas,
If you'd like to keep an up-to-date 2D driver in DRI cvs that's in
--- Suresh Chandra Mannava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Roberts wrote:
Andrew E. Mileski wrote:
Andrew E. Mileski wrote:
Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote:
Dear Friends, We are porting Xfree86 on to a new 32bit RISC
processor. We have test FPGA system running at 2.6 Mega Hertz
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember that a couple of extra tests failed with Xinerama enabled.
Weren't there also some fixes for xtest and xinerama that came from the
dmx project? Were those ever integrated?
The ones I'm seeing are XCopyArea and XCopyPlane. Are these the
--- Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi XFree86 dev team,
how good does ATI support you in comparison to nVidia ?
Is it only a manpower problem, that the new ATI cards
based on R3xx chips are missing 3D support (I noticed that
in the 4.4 release notes) ?
Or is it just because you
--- Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:06:46PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
I think in general
though
ATI is more open to xfree86 and open soruce
--- Mike Imhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THE PROBLEM: When running a dual head configuration, the primary head
is
not drawn,
while the secondary head works
correctly.
Failing system notes and observations:
1. The video hardware does not have a BIOS or VGA
--- Mike Imhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply...
I'm curious why you would suggest using different PCI
slots, seeing that both heads work in their respective slots under a
single
head
configuration in item #2.
I don't know why... resource allocation variations? I've had
Please create a bug on xfree86 bugzilla and add this patch to it.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/
Alex
--- John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have two old Diamond Stealth 64 VRAM cards that use the IBM 526
RAMDAC.
This patch makes XFree86 work on it again. The relevant pieces of the
log
open source drivers support mergedfb yet: Matrox, SiS
and
radeon (in the DRI trunk). Radeon's code is nearly if not entirely
identical with the SiS code as Alex Deucher took my SiS code and
inserted it into the radeon driver.
As regards pseudo-xinerama, I think the SiS driver is the only one
--- Sottek, Matthew J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will there be open discussion of what makes up Xaa? I know
you have already have a working design but rather than accept
major changes wholesale can we discuss the finer points before
they become defacto-accepted.
-Matt
It depends
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking to enhance the parser in XFree86 so that a lot of
redundant
code in the current drivers that implement the 'mergedfb' mode can
be eliminated such that they don't have to do all the monitor munging
in the driver.
So here's two variants
--- dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am writing a driver and need to now what copyright GPL stuff
I need to put in my source files
most XFree86 device drivers has a X11/BSD style license. take a look
at the other drivers in xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers
However, how you want to
--- Rob Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The one thing I missed from my Windows days was the ability to assign
one of the mouse buttons to perform a left button double-click. It's
pretty much a universal feature on Windows mouse drivers these days
(with buttons being in ample
--- Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know (or have some contacts at ATI that knows) what the
current status of XvMc hardware support for radeon cards is?
I'm using a fanless EPIA 5000 with fanless Radeon 9200SE PCI and
really
need this for smooth dvd playback.
Ati hasn't
--- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 07:40 -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
--- Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know (or have some contacts at ATI that knows) what
the
current status of XvMc hardware support for radeon cards is?
I'm
--- Kean Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Is there any reason why the SiS driver isnt the one Thomas
Winischofer
provides on his site? I recently had very negative experiences with
the
stock SiS driver on a 661FX that his driver solved immediately. Now I
realized it may have
--- Zhang Weiwu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I'm zhangweiwu from the minichinput project. This is the first
time I post to this list, so please forgive me if I posted to the
wrong list.
To be brief: minichinput is a Chinese input method server. Can
XFree86
accept minichinput as its
--- mel kravitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a patch to ../bsd/alpha_video.c
for NetBSD alpha 21164 boxes, where can i send this?
Post the patch and a description of what it does on
http://bugs.xfree86.org
from there it will be reviewed and potentially committed.
Alex
-Mel
--
mel
--- Cyril Duveau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am running linux on a Compaq Presario with an ATI video card,
reporting the
following via lspci
VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility U1
PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc U1/A3 AGP Bridge [IGP 320M] (rev 01)
I
--- Karl Oberjohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a Mitsubishi AMiTY CN2 notebook with a NeoMagic NM2097
(MagicGraph
128ZV+) video chipset. I was excited to see that XVideo support was
added
for NeoMagic chipsets in XFree86 version 4.3, but for the life of me,
I could
not get
--- Jan Dittmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I recently aquired a second video card, so that I now have a triple
display. I'm using a Nvidia card (with the binary drivers) in
TwinView
Mode to drive the first two displays and a Ati card for the third
display. What really annoys me is,
--- Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:31:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:41:07AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
That's not entirely true... Some people do
--- Yukun Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi , All
After I start my machine in graphic mode as default in X-window
(Redhat9) I found my linux os hang when I execute the following
script:
while true
do
init 3
sleep 10
--- Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 04:43:17PM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
Excluding Nvidia and ATI, for which I believe I know the answer,
what
manufacturers I am likely to see on ebay that:
1) Usually fully and freely publish the specifications of their
--- Brad Arant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am a Linux developer and have actively been involved with the XFree
X
Windowing System. Would like to be a part of the developer's list and
was
wondering where the newsgroups and other conversations are actively
taking
place.
devel (this
--- Nicolas Pascoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Now, I'm using XFree 4.3.x but this release don't support
ati radeon 9200 with DRI (no hardware acceleration). This is a
problem : I can't play to game which need this acceleration under
Linux. Then, when XFree 4.4.x will be distibuted as
--- Shrei Rin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I'm using XFree 4.3.x but this release don't support
ati radeon 9200 with DRI (no hardware acceleration). This is a
problem : I
can't play to game which need this acceleration under Linux. Then,
when
XFree 4.4.x will be distibuted as a rpm
--- Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:53:06PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Someone needs to track down the bug that causes a server crash and
subsequent lockup if a dualhead config is used but mga_hal is not
available (either not around or wasn't compiled
--- Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:35:00AM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
Only the G400 needs it for dualhead and tv-out. the g450/550 need
hal
to use the DVI port and the g200 MMS cards need it for multi-head.
it's also needed for mergedfb on all
--- Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
No code was copied, only some defines. I need other people to check
the
code and tell me if it will break on other video cards. I only have
a
G400 DH, but there is G450, G550, G200 DH, G200 non-maven DH, etc
which
need to be tested, and
--- William M. Quarles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
try disabling fastwrites or pageflipping.
Option AGPFastWrite false
Option EnablePageFlip false
Also make sure agpgart is loaded (kernel 2.4) or agpgart and the
agp
chipset specific driver (kernel 2.6).
Hi
--- Mark Cuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I'm wondering if its possible to set up a dual headed system with two
keyboards and two mice? Essentially what I'm after is being able to
have
two users with two X consoles independently using the same computer.
I've found some hints on the
What does the future hold for XvMC? I've been playing around with the
open source savageXvMC lib that S3/VIA released. As I understand it
now, you have to explicitly link you application with the particular
XvMC lib you want to use. Are there any plans to make this more like
Xv? That way apps
2004, Alex Deucher wrote:
What does the future hold for XvMC? I've been playing around with
the
open source savageXvMC lib that S3/VIA released. As I understand
it
now, you have to explicitly link you application with the
particular
XvMC lib you want to use. Are there any plans to make
PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 15.01.2004 05:18:52, Alex Deucher a écrit :
The i810 driver in xfree86 supports XvMC and the savage driver from
S3/VIA supports it although that code has not yet been integrated
into
an xfree86 release.
Is there any patches floating around that I could try (I have
Intel has not provided docs on how to program the modes directly, just
how to pull a mode from the bios. if the mode you want is not in the
bios, then you are out of luck. they only possible way to get it to
work at this point is to try and reverse engineer the windows
driver...or beg intel for
The i810 driver in xfree86 supports XvMC and the savage driver from
S3/VIA supports it although that code has not yet been integrated into
an xfree86 release.
Alex
--- Yukun Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Until now, we support Xv but not XvMC. Then , any idea for support
it?
Thanx
Thank you for producing an opensource driver! Any possibility of a
open source 3D driver down the road? even a lite version?
Welcome to the Community!
Alex
--- Yukun Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I am a developer from XGI Technology which is a new company
stem from graphic
Take a look at the chips driver in xfree86. it has support for just
about all features of the 69030 including the video overlay. it might
be a good starting point.
Alex
--- Tim Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:37:42 +0530, Karthikeyan Somanathan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
3D is only supported on radeon cards up to the 9200. 3D support for
r300 based cards (9500 and above) is only available from ati's binary
driver.
Alex
--- toxicfeet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I just installed Mandrake 9.2 but was unable to get XFree86 4.3.0 to
support my Radeon 9600se
be updated when 4.4.0 is released.
For info on 3D support see the DRI pages:
http://dri.sf.net
Alex
--- Martin_MOKREJ© [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Alex Deucher wrote:
How about updating http://www.xfree86.org/current/Status6.html#6 ?
And about adding a section about upcoming
Unfortunately these databooks lack register level information on the
graphics part of the chipset. Without that adding dualhead support is
not really possible. As far as I know intel has not released register
level documentation for anything newer than the i810/15 graphics chips.
Alex
---
contains my monitor model and serial
number :)
Mario
Alex Deucher wrote:
Unfortunately these databooks lack register level information on the
graphics part of the chipset. Without that adding dualhead support
is
not really possible. As far as I know intel has not released
register
level
Based on suggestions raised by my previous release, I've created a new
patch that uses device independant values for gamma. the XV_GAMMA
attribute now takes a value between 0 and 5000 representing gamma
values from 0.0 to 5.0 (gamma x 1000). so a value of 850 would be
equal to a gamma of 0.85,
I think you can run xfree86 on solaris 9 now. you may have to build
from source. I'm not sure if there are binaries available or not.
Alex
--- Ðîìàí [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'd like to ask one question about your future plans. Are you
going to develop XFree86 for Solaris 9, and how soon
I'd recommend submitting you fixes as a bug report on the xfree86
bugzilla website:
http://bugs.xfree86.org
that way they will not be lost and can be reviewed and commented on by
other developers.
Alex
--- Eric Wittry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be honest, I am rather green to this, but I
try it with a sw cursor.
try:
option hwcursor false
in your config.
--- Jozef Riha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
i am trying to write a small script that would do a screenshot of an
X window together with the mouse cursor. since import from
ImageMagick (and any other utility i know) is
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
