On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:28:53PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4091/4384091/build.log
The problem is that Fedora 18 currently ships with python-
docutils-0.10-0.2.20120730svn7490.fc18. It works when downgrading to python-
docutils-0.8.1-3.fc17.
Hi,
On 08/21/2012 12:00 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Hello, all.
Hans, the ode maintainer, has asked me to implement and coordinate the
upgrade of ode to the current release, 0.12.
The affected packages, so far as we've determined, are delelict,
machineball, ompl, stormbaancoureur, xmoto and
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 08/21/2012 12:00 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Hello, all.
Hans, the ode maintainer, has asked me to implement and coordinate the
upgrade of ode to the current release, 0.12.
The affected packages, so far as we've
Hello,
I'd like to ask for assistance getting package gscan2pdf updated. I
reported a bug two months ago (835685) but it didn't get attention.
One month ago gscan2pdf upstream was updated to 1.0.6, but fedora still
uses the four months old version 1.0.4.
I've built the newer 1.0.6 locally, no
From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
the other probable cause of sluggish performance in F18 is the old debug
kernel issue. Remember, prior to Beta, most kernel builds have debugging
enabled, which ever since 2.39 or so has been _very_ slow compared to
non-debug modes (much more so
I'm going to wrangle the GNOME 3.5.90 bodhi update again for packages
that have not opted out. If you either fix up a mclazy build for a
package you own or do your own build, please add the build ID to
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
and
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package speed-dreams,but
the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/418027-autotest/virt04.qa/depcheck/results/speed-dreams-2.1.0-1.html
the problem was already discussed on
commit e44e218c9cbf9c8d9341f41de8f2a7e6026bd851
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 21 15:54:59 2012 +0200
Run-require Exporter
perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/418027-autotest/virt04.qa/depcheck/results/speed-dreams-2.1.0-1.html
the problem was already discussed on
On Mon, 20.08.12 13:49, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Daniel Drake (d...@laptop.org) said:
Hi,
I'm porting olpc-dm to F18 /
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework
Thanks for the good documentation.
The only detail that I'm unclear about is
RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
RWMJ I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
Yep, someone has taken it upon themselves to mass-file a bunch of
unnecessary tickets.
When FPC makes guidelines changes, they aren't generally accompanied by
some mandate that existing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:16:42PM +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850364
[...]
Summary: Introduce new systemd-rpm macros in watchdog spec file
[...]
On 08/21/2012 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I'd like to see these macros back-ported into F17 and F16 RPM to remove
this objection. If that doesn't happen, I'm going to resist using them
in my spec files until they are in all active Fedora branches.
regards, tom lane
+1
commit 15024cdb3b80667d59e182fda6bbb91ee987be2c
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 17 22:29:01 2012 +0100
Add BR: perl(Digest::MD5) (Fix mass rebuild FTBS).
perl-CGI-Session.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 4a685233201ef56286fa6ec61575d926944b6f97
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 12 14:06:42 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-CGI-Session.spec | 22 --
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 1be3cb9dec8b06db5a17518a9d98fc9cef475049
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 21 17:08:46 2012 +0200
Fix deprecated use of qw//
CGI-Session-4.35-qw.patch | 41 +
perl-CGI-Session.spec |6 +-
2 files changed, 46
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-Session-4.35-14.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Session-4.35-14.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-Session-4.35-12.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Session-4.35-12.fc17
--
You are receiving this
I see you are already in packagers group, so if you want to take
co-maintainership of gscan2pdf package you should apply your request in
packagedb:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gscan2pdf
And you can also try to contact user rakesh, who is already a
co-maintainer accordingly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-Session-4.35-10.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Session-4.35-10.fc16
--
You are receiving this
Jason L Tibbitts III (ti...@math.uh.edu) said:
RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
RWMJ I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
Yep, someone has taken it upon themselves to mass-file a bunch of
unnecessary tickets.
When FPC makes guidelines changes, they aren't
On 08/21/2012 10:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:16:42PM +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850364
[...]
Summary: Introduce new systemd-rpm
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:59:29 -0400,
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Presets are a valuable new feature for both distribution constructors
and administrators - rather than having a single hardcoded policy *in
the packages* about what starts and doesn't start (and requires
From d8822be083b6ffd4c21004ede8cd14a8246c079c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:00:21 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] coverity - mbo dead code - winsync leaks, deadcode, null
check, test code
This fixes the following issues:
13060 Logically
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:59:29 -0400,
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Presets are a valuable new feature for both distribution constructors
and administrators - rather than having a single hardcoded policy *in
the packages* about what
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:25:32 -0400,
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:59:29 -0400,
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Presets are a valuable new feature for both distribution constructors
and administrators -
Le 21/08/2012 17:04, Tom Lane a écrit :
I'd like to see these macros back-ported into F17 and F16 RPM to remove
this objection. If that doesn't happen, I'm going to resist using them
in my spec files until they are in all active Fedora branches.
+1
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
On 08/21/2012 04:22 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/418027-autotest/virt04.qa/depcheck/results/speed-dreams-2.1.0-1.html
the
I've noticed that immediately after installing the kernel-devel package, the
mtimes on many of its files fail verification, for example
[root@compaq-pc ~]# rpm -V kernel-devel-3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64
...T./usr/src/kernels/3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64/Kconfig
...T.
On 08/21/2012 02:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is
(a) in a much better position to change the packages because they
understand the problem and the solution, and (b) ought to take on this
work because that's part of whatever
On 08/21/2012 07:49 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
I've noticed that immediately after installing the kernel-devel package, the
mtimes on many of its files fail verification, for example
[root@compaq-pc ~]# rpm -V kernel-devel-3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64
...T.
Aloas,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:22:10AM -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Tue, 21.08.12 16:52, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 08/21/2012 02:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is
(a) in a much better position to change the packages because they
understand the problem and the solution, and
On 2012-08-21 9:36, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 08/21/2012 04:22 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
On 08/21/2012 05:08 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 21.08.12 16:52, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 08/21/2012 02:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is
(a) in a much better position to change the packages because
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2012-08-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note: This is the new time for regular blocker review meetings
We'll be running through the beta blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list
ack
On 08/21/2012 12:09 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
Mark Reynolds
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
Yeah, it gets old pretty quick when every time some packages get updated,
one needs to enable or disable them again.
Huh? That doesn't happen given the current (F16/F17) scriptlets
Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
- Original Message -
From: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 5:59:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mass changes to packaging
Jason L Tibbitts III (ti...@math.uh.edu) said:
RWMJ == Richard W
A version of the new blocker tracking app has been up for a little
while but the code is finally public and the app has a new home!
The blocker app now lives at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/
A quick link to the current release blockers is at:
On 08/21/2012 07:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-08-21 9:36, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 08/21/2012 04:22 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
On 08/21/2012 05:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
which should not do anything on an update. It would auto-enable if
you were installing the package when it was previously not present,
but that isn't what you're describing. File a bug maybe?
regards, tom lane
It's a know ( and
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:23:41PM -0400, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
Sorry for this mess. After a discussion, we have decided, that the
best way would be to create bugs for every packages and then helping
creating patches for specfiles.
Just to be clear, I had no problem at all with the bugs being
For some reason when I tried to build my package in the master branch
with fedpkg build, it failed with the error message:
Could not initiate build: Unknown build target: dist-rawhide
It has always worked OK in the past, as recently as July 1st.
Here's the output:
$ fedpkg -v build
On 08/21/2012 12:24 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
Is there something I need to change so that a simple fedpkg build
will work again?
I believe you need a new version of fedpkg and pyrpkg. It should just
be using rawhide instead of dist-rawhide.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON:
b84866b99e142d63e75bb08a55e3ad26 Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 10c7e3fe61851cb0db8c108479ec5114bb2ca491
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Aug 21 20:27:32 2012 +0100
Update to 0.14
- New upstream release 0.14
- Added minimum perl version (5.006)
- Reworked Makefile.PL for clarity
- Implemented
- Original Message -
Is there something I need to change so that a simple fedpkg build
will work again?
I believe you need a new version of fedpkg and pyrpkg. It should just
be using rawhide instead of dist-rawhide.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom is a feature!
I
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Dave Anderson ander...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Is there something I need to change so that a simple fedpkg build
will work again?
I believe you need a new version of fedpkg and pyrpkg. It should just
be using rawhide instead of
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.14-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
10c7e3f... Update to 0.14
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.14-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
10c7e3f... Update to 0.14
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
For your information.
I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project for f18 because for me
it is imposssible to to work together with Dan Mashal.
One of the reason for my decision is this last talk with Dan Mashal
today.
Unterhaltung mit Dan Mashal am Di 21 Aug 2012 10:03:44 CEST:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ExtractUse:
5ad0c19fa47fe9c338e7dac76b0ad18f Module-ExtractUse-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 13:24:53 -0400,
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
which should not do anything on an update. It would auto-enable if
you were installing the package when it was previously not present,
but that isn't what you're describing. File a bug maybe?
I'll need to keep better
Ri == Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de writes:
Ri For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project
Ri for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with
Ri Dan Mashal. One of the reason for my decision is this last talk with
Ri Dan Mashal today.
I've watched a
commit fc781692d330bb3a2c2465967ebcd0b25390aa9d
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Aug 21 21:00:23 2012 +0100
Update to 0.28
- New upstream release 0.28
- Whitespace in use base is valid
perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec |8 ++--
sources
Summary of changes:
f4b79ce... Update to 0.21 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 21.08.12 13:24, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
Yeah, it gets old pretty quick when every time some packages get updated,
one needs to enable or disable them again.
As a reminder, everyone working within the Fedora project is expected to
abide by the code of conduct (http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct).
If there's an interpersonal conflict that can't be resolved by the
individuals or the specific subset of the project involved, please feel
free to
On 08/21/2012 01:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:23:41PM -0400, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
Sorry for this mess. After a discussion, we have decided, that the
best way would be to create bugs for every packages and then helping
creating patches for specfiles.
Just to be
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:23:41PM -0400, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
Sorry for this mess. After a discussion, we have decided, that the
best way would be to create bugs for every packages and then helping
creating patches
GH == Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org writes:
GH I am pleased that I got a bug report and not an involuntary patch,
GH as it gives me a chance to take care of special cases and schedule
GH things appropriately.
I would much have preferred to receive an announcement about what should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
--- Comment #81 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 3.32
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.30
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/
Please consult the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849893
Bug ID: 849893
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
commit f42e36c7c690e0edf3b08fe044fef9e4bcde0f86
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 21 10:33:07 2012 +0200
Correct dependencies
perl-Template-Toolkit.spec | 40 +---
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs:
924ac5417f52474e03e12ef91a2d4738 Perl-Critic-Bangs-1.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Since Nov 2011 there has been a bug open against the perl-CGI-Session package
which started emitting a warning about:
Use of qw(...) as parentheses is deprecated at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/CGI/Session.pm line 882.
when this was added as a standard check in perl. The original bug was:
commit 02ce1b8f8831b9ebd80e344dcd96ce3497c6b05a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 21 10:51:16 2012 +0200
1.10 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint|2 ++
perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs.spec |9 ++---
sources |2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #4 from Simon Andrews simon.andr...@bbsrc.ac.uk ---
I've sent a mail to the perl-sig group to see if anyone there is able to apply
the patch to fix this since there has been no response from the package
maintainer.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782599
Simon Andrews simon.andr...@bbsrc.ac.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-AnyEvent:
4eaf54ed326578ae5e3be39dadd13c5f AnyEvent-7.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849893
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
commit eae35cb72ed117276f99918bc2be393f29360191
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Aug 21 10:08:33 2012 +0100
Update to 7.02
- New upstream release 7.02:
- AnyEvent::Util::run_cmd could block indefinitely
- Verified that AnyEvent::Socket follows RFC5952
Summary of changes:
eae35cb... Update to 7.02 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-AnyEvent-7.02-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
eae35cb... Update to 7.02
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-AnyEvent-7.02-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
eae35cb... Update to 7.02
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837746
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839751
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837746
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-1.7-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839751
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DB-0.769-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Metadata:
f2ac2da66f269b32f73dfc6b87e622b1 Module-Metadata-1.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
commit ad2b00058889c38ef2eac80ed6acb316c0bb493b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Aug 21 12:23:33 2012 +0100
Update to 1.11
- New upstream release 1.11
- Fix various warning messages
- This release by APEIRON - update source URL
Summary of changes:
ad2b000... Update to 1.11 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 540ffcd04968e471e07190ca21b30f50bb93bb69
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 21 13:37:34 2012 +0200
Modernize spec file
perl-TermReadKey.spec | 35 ---
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.11-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
ad2b000... Update to 1.11
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849703
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
commit 9886354d541f06b1eed92aa17c661e4da98a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 21 17:08:46 2012 +0200
Fix deprecated use of qw//
CGI-Session-4.35-qw.patch | 41 +
perl-CGI-Session.spec |8 +++-
2 files changed, 48
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 605963
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=605963action=edit
Fix
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras
Summary of changes:
98863ee... Fix deprecated use of qw// (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e557f675061329059dc7d25985fc4719c4f02b19
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 12 14:06:42 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-CGI-Session.spec | 24 ++--
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 2bbdc9e535c1fa8cfa0abc7893eeaec478e4ca8e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 21 17:08:46 2012 +0200
Fix deprecated use of qw//
CGI-Session-4.35-qw.patch | 41 +
perl-CGI-Session.spec |6 +-
2 files changed, 46
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
