On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 11:14 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 11/29/2012 05:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade
Try scripted version of yum-upgrade, where all possible hick-ups should
be addressed:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 12:06 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I posted about this a couple of days ago to the test list; but I've gotten no
response so I'm fishing here.
I'm not sure if this is a genuine freeze; but I have not managed to elicit a
response to keyboard/mouse input.
When
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 23:24 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi
wrote:
IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as
submitting a
koji build without noticing a soname bump in it, the
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 00:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 12:06 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I posted about this a couple of days ago to the test list; but I've gotten
no response so I'm fishing here.
I'm not sure if this is a genuine freeze; but I have not
Is it the meeting itself which you find helpful or the discussion and
information during the review meetings? Could you see asynchronous
conversation (exact method TBD) being as useful?
The discussion is very helpful. It can be asynchronous, of course. It won't be
as efficient, but that's a
On 12/04/2012 10:43 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
bah shell script !? , why don't you do it in python ?
Because in python it would be longer and more complicated. For example
'set -e' saved me lots of if-loop and exceptions handling.
And I wanted to have requirements very minimal.
While bash has
Hello all,
I was just wondering if anyone else is seeing the problems I have on my
laptop with system sounds being very delayed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882506
Note that F17 on an identical laptop doesn't have these issues, so it
definitely seems to be something F18-ish.
On 12/05/2012 10:56 AM, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
Hello all,
I was just wondering if anyone else is seeing the problems I have on my
laptop with system sounds being very delayed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882506
Note that F17 on an identical laptop doesn't have these issues,
Compose started at Wed Dec 5 09:16:09 UTC 2012
New package: php-Slim-2.1.0-5.fc18
PHP micro framework
New package: phpMemcachedAdmin-1.2.2-5.svn262.fc18
Graphic stand-alone administration for memcached to monitor and
debug purpose
New package:
Hi there,
I am looking for a way how to add new users to a certain group upon
creation. Do we have such a mechanism?
/etc/default/useradd only is for useradd and can set a default group,
but no additional default groups.
Background: The 'Fedora Jam' spin [1] requires users to be in the groups
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:55:17PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I am looking for a way how to add new users to a certain group upon
creation. Do we have such a mechanism?
[...]
/etc/default/useradd only is for useradd and can set a default group,
but no additional default groups.
I was
On 12/05/2012 04:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:55:17PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I am looking for a way how to add new users to a certain group upon
creation. Do we have such a mechanism?
[...]
/etc/default/useradd only is for useradd and can set a default
commit 29bbe2f1c5df37ebd01f08742eee93c901537365
Author: Richard M. Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Dec 5 09:40:55 2012 -0600
Update to latest upstream release.
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
commit 47f48ad6fde08dc7881ed15dbfff7a251a5f989b
Author: Richard M. Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Dec 5 09:42:02 2012 -0600
Commit spec file.
abi-compliance-checker.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/abi-compliance-checker.spec
Summary of changes:
29bbe2f... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
47f48ad... Commit spec file. (*)
ead66f4... Merge branch 'master' into el6 Update to 1.98.6
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit ead66f4c6f09476fec9386935549c34434d34264
Merge: c4ddc14 47f48ad
Author: Orion Poplawski or...@nwra.com
Date: Wed Dec 5 08:44:07 2012 -0700
Merge branch 'master' into el6
Update to 1.98.6
.gitignore |1 +
abi-compliance-checker.spec | 10 +-
On Dec 5, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 00:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 12:06 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I posted about this a couple of days ago to the test list; but I've gotten
no response so I'm fishing
Summary of changes:
29bbe2f... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
47f48ad... Commit spec file. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
There is a perpetual problem facing all Linux distributions around how fast
to move with software updates. In Fedora, of course, our default speed is
petal-to-the-metal. This is part of who we are and why we are awesome.
However, it also sometimes makes life difficult for us -- for example, our
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
To: Fedora Development List devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 6:17:56 PM
Subject: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
There is a perpetual problem facing all
commit 6ca03da37af6152985b7e292edb16ecd04ba89d0
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Dec 5 16:43:38 2012 +
Update to 0.12
- New upstream release 0.12:
- Complete pure-perl implementation in addition to the one based on
Variable::Magic; you can specify
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Dec 5th)
in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
1)
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:39:03PM -0500, John Dulaney wrote:
a feature, especially a crit path feature, is not ready for prime time.
Obviously, if a feature is not %100 by feature freeze, then it needs to be
dropped. I would even venture to suggest that we include in the SOP
something along
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:19:15PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
I like burndown charts. Low overhead, easily read, and generally more
concrete than guesses at percentage done. I wonder if there's a way we can
easily provide a widget in the wiki for keeping them up to date. This:
I can't make the meeting. It conflicts with the Board meeting.
Current items on the agenda:
1) Current Problem packages
2) F18 ARM VFAD - additional feedback, blockers?
3) Ownership of non-release blocking images (Beagleboard XM, etc)
Who decided this was a non blocker? It was my
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So, some Red Hat folks have developed an idea called Software Collections
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/Software_Collections_Guide/index.html
which is aimed at this
commit 49907b0a28b5206ef11f1cc3ec940bd9d610f922
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Dec 5 19:39:07 2012 +
Update to 0.24
- New upstream release 0.24
- Properly skip debugger test when optional deps not available
- Make sure pure-perl tests pass
Anyone interested in a package review swap?
python-logutils:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884041
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'll do it.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Bean
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 11:56 AM
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Solicitation: Review Swap
Anyone interested in a
The lightweight tag 'perl-namespace-clean-0.24-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
49907b0... Update to 0.24
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:19:15PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
I like burndown charts. Low overhead, easily read, and generally more
concrete than guesses at percentage done. I wonder if there's a way we can
easily provide a widget in the wiki for keeping them up to date. This:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-12-05)
===
Meeting started by notting at 18:07:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-12-05/fesco.2012-12-05-18.07.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Hi!
FESCo on today's meeting decided to move the final change deadline
by one week earlier (2012-12-11) to avoid Christmas holidays
break [1] but the final release date remains the same - 2013-01-08 [2].
After the Final Change Deadline only approved blocker and NTH bugs
will be included into the
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:40:15PM -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote:
Given the short shelf-life of a Fedora release and the complication
involved in Software Collections, I'm still not convinced that we
really need this in Fedora. Can you give me a concrete case where
Fedora really needs to be
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Three things:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as well)
is a fine example of something within the distro itself. And, as a
platform
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:06:38PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as well)
is a fine example of something within the distro itself. And, as a
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:04:16 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Three things:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one
size doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as
well) is a fine example of something within the distro
One approach: a convention where each feature gets a tracking bug, and then
various tasks can be marked as blocking that. *Then*, each release can have
a tracking bug for accepted features themselves, and the tool to produce
the
chart can simply be pointed at that and follow the tree
On 12/05/2012 04:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
2) On a long-lived platform, Software Collections can provide a way to move
faster than the base. On a fast-moving platform like Fedora, we could use
it in the other way: providing longer-lived versions of certain
components even as the
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I think this tells us more about puppet than Fedora actually. ;(
I couldn't have said it better than this myself.
The biggest reason people are really pushing for software collections
(at least from what little I've seen them
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-12-05/fedora-arm.2012-12-05-21.00.html
Minutes (text):
On 5 December 2012 14:50, Jared K. Smith jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I think this tells us more about puppet than Fedora actually. ;(
I couldn't have said it better than this myself.
The biggest reason people are really
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:06:38PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as well)
is a fine example
On 5 December 2012 15:07, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:06:38PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:14 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 5 December 2012 15:07, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:06:38PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have
On 5 December 2012 15:35, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:14 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 5 December 2012 15:07, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:06:38PM -0500, Bill
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/395
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/395/0001-Ticket-395-RFE-389-ds-shouldn-t-advertise-in-the-roo.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:47 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Would that not cause a combinatoric nightmare with having to make sure
you had a libX11 compiled against say X number of glibc's or other
libraries that changed in the past so that you had the correct path so
that SC KDE-4.9 had
On 5 December 2012 15:56, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:47 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Would that not cause a combinatoric nightmare with having to make sure
you had a libX11 compiled against say X number of glibc's or other
libraries that changed in the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883815
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Locale-Codes-3.24-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror
On 12/05/2012 02:39 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I can't make the meeting. It conflicts with the Board meeting.
Current items on the agenda:
1) Current Problem packages
2) F18 ARM VFAD - additional feedback, blockers?
3) Ownership of non-release blocking images (Beagleboard XM, etc)
Who
On 12/05/2012 04:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Three things:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as well)
is a fine example of something
* Rahul Sundaram [06/12/2012 00:39] :
Yeah. This makes sense. Wiki for tracking isn't a bright idea really.
And the time-tracking is already built in to bugzilla so most of the code
needed is already written.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:09 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 5 December 2012 15:56, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:47 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Would that not cause a combinatoric nightmare with having to make sure
you had a libX11 compiled against
Hi
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as well)
is a fine example of something within the distro itself. And, as a
platform for
On 12/05/2012 03:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Three things:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as well)
is a fine example of something
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:50 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Hi!
FESCo on today's meeting decided to move the final change deadline
by one week earlier (2012-12-11) to avoid Christmas holidays
break [1] but the final release date remains the same - 2013-01-08 [2].
After the Final Change
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 22:25 -0600, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
On 12/05/2012 03:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Three things:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17
On 5. 12. 2012 at 11:17:56, Matthew Miller wrote:
There is a perpetual problem facing all Linux distributions around how fast
to move with software updates. In Fedora, of course, our default speed is
petal-to-the-metal. This is part of who we are and why we are awesome.
However, it also
On 5. 12. 2012 at 16:50:03, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I think this tells us more about puppet than Fedora actually. ;(
I couldn't have said it better than this myself.
The biggest reason people are really pushing for software
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Jan Zelený wrote:
Hi,
I guess the main reason why SCL is not used in Fedora it requires a certain
(potentially non-trivial) amount of work from package maintainer.
However feel free to make your packages SCL enabled. You shouldn't have any
issues with that. Just make
- Original Message -
Hi
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one
size
doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as
well)
is a fine example of something within the distro
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883815
Bug ID: 883815
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Locale-Codes:
a49f770d424b634a0c9726a8202984a8 Locale-Codes-3.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4d6bd6e40b558c9e7ecd146d35a3e5917c4cfc81
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 5 13:37:18 2012 +0100
3.24 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXML:
a146e20c122b074dbb0d953fb8f65ca0 XML-LibXML-2.0014.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883815
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
New codes. Suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
b9b791c... 3.23 bump (*)
69d51eb... Add missing deps (*)
1935a0d... Bump release (*)
4d6bd6e... 3.24 bump (*)
c094414... Sort build-requires (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 4d9cd1c9b082be2329bb1c888b0f11c508840a38
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 4 10:06:54 2012 +0200
3.23 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
commit b0a6327a5e66b8dcab22b0fe446be2bbe8686ac8
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 20 17:16:20 2012 +0100
Add missing deps
perl-Locale-Codes.spec | 21 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
commit d79443c258eab3fc867b08c88985d62f5a5a0a93
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 20 17:37:48 2012 +0100
Bump release
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-Codes.spec b/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
commit ba73169f7bb6e3606edeca3b1d29edc08d57cb3a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 5 13:37:18 2012 +0100
3.24 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
commit c9becb2cfb03ac58bcfc4ed48e4031c318b77b91
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 5 13:39:17 2012 +0100
Sort build-requires
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-Codes.spec b/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
commit aa012c2809f036a742f2006d48670b9ac4eaa77f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 4 10:06:54 2012 +0200
3.23 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
commit 60b57d9d7c98cd43d23f54312c8ffb76880b4599
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 20 17:16:20 2012 +0100
Add missing deps
perl-Locale-Codes.spec | 21 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
commit 707b94cccda49a1b8ce1cc75333acd5419f2272f
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 20 17:37:48 2012 +0100
Bump release
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-Codes.spec b/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
commit ff436de3b76a03aab8696e4a9d7270a6872c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 5 13:37:18 2012 +0100
3.24 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
commit 2324a1d9730b2a0afae647b45f69a74c5b1d4985
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 5 13:39:17 2012 +0100
Sort build-requires
perl-Locale-Codes.spec |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-Codes.spec b/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883815
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.24-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-Codes-3.24-1.fc18
--
You are
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for abi-compliance-checker:
add05076986cfbc26b61f80e597cf81a abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope:
1a536388be36b658ff50a621e0ee03a5 B-Hooks-EndOfScope-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
29bbe2f... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
47f48ad... Commit spec file. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope-0.12-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
6ca03da... Update to 0.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MRO-Compat:
06d21a3baf3d578ff3d3e10621656530 MRO-Compat-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 45bb95b28e4f520336691e38a5a6c0aa6c228e03
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Dec 5 19:15:37 2012 +
Update to 0.12
- New upstream release 0.12
- Bump Class::C3 dependency on 5.8, which in turn will automatically
install
Class::C3::XS if
The lightweight tag 'perl-MRO-Compat-0.12-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
45bb95b... Update to 0.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-namespace-clean:
bb6f2e2bba5f028a0e939cc6f2639fba namespace-clean-0.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878005
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.6-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878005
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com ---
In perl 5.8.8 and 5.10.1, this affected code is in lib/Locale/Maketext/Guts.pm,
not lib/Locale/Maketext.pm (as implied in the git commit above).
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363
Bug ID: 884363
Summary: perl: possible arbitrary code execution via
Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Component: perl
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com ---
Please use the following update submission link to create the Bodhi
request for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well
as this tracking bug. This
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879963
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DB-0.770-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879964
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.801-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
Hi!
FESCo on today's meeting decided to move the final change deadline
by one week earlier (2012-12-11) to avoid Christmas holidays
break [1] but the final release date remains the same - 2013-01-08 [2].
After the Final Change Deadline only approved blocker and NTH bugs
will be included into the
98 matches
Mail list logo
